This article examines 24 teachers’ perceptions of their curriculum and curricular choices over their first 11 years of teaching. Adaptive expertise and teacher visioning were used as a conceptual frameworks. A theme of diversity runs through the alternate route elementary teachers. Some of these teachers from diverse backgrounds promoted a social justice curriculum, but their teaching skills often lagged behind their goals for societal change. Eventually, on both the alternate route elementary and secondary levels, some of these teachers valued and implemented an integrated and interdisciplinary curriculum. The college-prepared teachers focused more on the creation of integrated learning environments on the elementary level and the adaptation of content to learning on the secondary level. Some of the college-prepared secondary teachers used more learning-centered approaches in all their classes from the start of their careers. Others were more influenced by the classroom context (the level of the class or the subject matter) and initially were more innovative in their beginning or “basic skills” classes than in their advanced classes. Most of the teachers in both preparation groups who remained in the classroom began to develop a sense of adaptive expertise.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bang-JensenV. (1995). Hands-on and first-hand experiences in the context of reading and language arts. Language Arts, 72, 352–358).
2.
BolinF. (1987). The teacher as curriculum decision maker. In BolinF.S., & FalkJ.M. (Eds.), Teacher renewal: Professional issues, personal choices (pp. 92–108)). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
3.
BradbeerJ. (1998). Imagining curriculum: Practical intelligence in teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
4.
BransfordJ., Darling-HammondL., & LePageP. (2005). Introduction. In Darling-HammondL., & BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world. What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1–39)). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BrooksJ. G., & BrooksM. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
6.
CalderheadJ. (1987). Developing a framework for the elicitation and analysis of teachers’ verbal reports. Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), 183–189).
7.
ClandininJ. D., & ConnellyF. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In JacksonP.W. (Ed.), Handbook of research in curriculum (pp. 402–435)). New York, NY: Macmillan.
8.
ConnellyF. M., & ClandininD. J. (1988). The idea of curriculum. Teachers as curriculum planners. Narratives of experience. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
9.
CornoL. (2008). On teaching adaptively. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 161–173).
10.
DuffyG. G. (2002). Visioning and the development of outstanding teachers. Reading Research & Instruction, 41(4), 331–343).
11.
GrossmanP. L. (1990). The making of a teacher. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
12.
GrossmanP. L., & StodolskyS. S. (1994). Considerations of content and the circumstances of secondary school teaching. In Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 20, pp. 179–221)). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
13.
GrumetM. R. (1988). Bitter milk: Women and teaching. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
14.
HammernessK. (2006). Seeing through teachers’ eyes: Professional ideals and classroom practices. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
15.
HubermanM. (1993). The model of the independent artisan in teachers’ professional relations. In LittleJ.W., & McLaughlinM. (Eds.), Teachers’ work. Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp. 11–50)). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
16.
LangerS. (1942). Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite and art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
OylerC. (1996). Making room for students: sharing teacher authority in room 104. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
19.
ParisC. (1993). Teacher agency and curriculum making in classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
20.
PeckC. (1999). Art and the reconstruction of practice in teacher education. Unpublished paper presented for the first annual Thomas G. Haring Memorial Lecture, University of Washington, Seattle.
21.
RandiJ., & CornoL. (2005). Teaching and learner variation. Pedagogy-learning from teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Monograph Series II, 3, 47–79).
22.
RutterA. (2017). Teacher choices: Teacher development. Teachers College Record, 119(14).
23.
SawyerR. D. (2004). Situating teacher development: The view from two teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Educational Research37, 733–753).
24.
SawyerR. D., & LaguardiaA. (2010). Reimagining the past/changing the present: Teachers adapting history curriculum for cultural encounters. Teachers College Record, 112(8), 1993–2020).
25.
SchwabJ. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. The School Review, 91(4), 501–522).
26.
ShiroM. (1992). Educators’ perceptions of the changes in their curriculum belief systems over time. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(3), 250–286).
27.
ShulmanL. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in the teacher. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 1–22).
28.
SnyderJ., BolinF., & ZumwaltK. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In JacksonP.W. (Ed.), Handbook of research in curriculum (pp. 402–435)). New York, NY: Macmillan.
29.
SowellE. J. (2000). Curriculum. An integrative introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
30.
StodolskyS. S. (1993). A framework for subject matter comparisons in high school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 333–346).
31.
VaughnM., & FairclothB. (2013). Teaching with a purpose in mind: Cultivating a vision. The Professional Educator, 37(2), 1–12).
32.
WallaceJ., & LoudenW. (1994). Collaboration and the growth of teachers’ knowledge: Qualitative Studies in Education, 7(4), 323–334).
33.
WellsG. (1999). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. Unpublished manuscript.
34.
ZeichnerK. M., & ListonD. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
ZumwaltK. (1988). Are we improving or undermining teaching? In TannerL. (Ed.), Eighty-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 148–174)). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36.
ZumwaltK. (1989). Beginning professional teachers: The need for a curricular vision of teaching. In ReynoldsM.C. (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 173–184)). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
