Metacognitive skills refers to individual abilities for regulating and controlling learning behavior. Orientation, goal setting, planning, monitoring, and evaluation are manifestations of those skills. Given that metacognitive skills directly affect learning behavior, they are a strong predictor of learning performance. Students display a huge variation in metacognitive skillfulness, dependent on age and experience. In this article, metacognitive skills are considered to be an acquired program of self-instructions, that is, an orderly series of condition-action rules that contain conditional knowledge about when to apply which skill, and operational instructions for how to implement a particular skill. This notion has implications for effective metacognitive instruction in deficient students. Prior to instruction, on-line assessments of metacognitive skillfulness during actual task performance are indispensable for the identification of deficient students and for tailoring metacognitive instruction to the individual needs of students. Instruction should subsequently address what skill to perform when, why, and how (WWW&H), embedded within the context of a given task. Moreover, instruction should explicitly inform students about the benefits of applying metacognitive skills to make them exert the required effort. Finally, teachers may act as role model to students by including explicit metacognitive instruction in their lessons.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderJ. M., CarrM., & SchwanenflugelP. J. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15, 1–37.
2.
AndersonJ. R., & SchunnC. D. (2000). Implications of the ACT-R learning theory: No magic bullets. In GlaserR. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1–33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
ArtztA. F., & Armour-ThomasE. (1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 137–175.
4.
BannertM., & MengelkampC. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalization method affect learning?Metacognition and Learning, 3, 39–58.
BrownA. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In GlaserR. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol 1., pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
BrownA. L., & DeLoacheJ. S. (1978). Skills, plans, and self-regulation. In SiegelR.S. (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 3–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
CampioneJ. C., BrownA. L., & FerraraR. A. (1982). Mental retardation and intelligence. In SternbergR.J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 392–490). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ConnorL. N. (2007). Cueing metacognition to improve researching and essay writing in a final year high school biology class. Research in Science Education, 37, 1–16.
10.
CromleyJ. G., & AzevedoR. (2006). Self-report of reading comprehension strategies: What are we measuring?Metacognition and Learning, 1, 229–247.
11.
DesoeteA. (2008). Multi-method assessments of metacognitive skills in elementary school children: How you test is what you get. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 189–206.
12.
DinsmoreD. L., AlexanderP. A., & LoughlinS. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391–409.
13.
EricssonK. A., & SimonH. A. (1993). Protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
FlavellJ. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In ResnickL.B. (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
FlavellJ. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
16.
GreeneJ. A., & AzevedoR. (2010). The measurement of learners’ self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 45, 203–209.
17.
HadwinA. F., NesbitJ. C., Jamieson-NoelD., CodeJ., & WinneP. H. (2007). Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 107–124.
18.
KluweR. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behavior. In WeinertF.E., & KluweR.H. (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 31–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
KramarskiB., & MevarechZ. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 281–310.
20.
LiJ., ZhangB., DuH., ZhuZ., & LiY. M. (2015). Metacognitive planning: Development and validation of an online measure. Psychological Assessment, 27, 260–271.
21.
LocklK., & SchneiderW. (2006). Precursors of metamemory in young children: The role of theory of mind and metacognitive vocabulary. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 15–31.
22.
ManloveS., LazonderA. W., & De JongT. (2007). Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 141–155.
23.
MettesC. T. C. W., PilotA., & RoossinkH. J. (1981). Linking factual and procedural knowledge in solving science problems: A case study in a thermodynamics course. Instructional Science, 10, 333–361.
24.
MevarechZ., & FridkinS. (2006). The effects of IMPROVE on mathematical knowledge, mathematical reasoning and metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 85–97.
25.
MolenaarI., SleegersP., & Van BoxtelC. (2014). Metacognitive scaffolding during collaborative learning: A promising combination. Metacognition and Learning, 9, 309–332.
26.
NelsonT. O., & NarensL. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125–173.
27.
NisbettR. E., & WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
28.
PintrichP. R., & De GrootE. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated leaning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
29.
PressleyM., & GaskinsI. (2006). Metacognitive competent reading is constructively responsive reading: How can such reading be developed in students?Metacognition and Learning, 1, 99–113.
30.
RollI., AlevenV., McLarenB. M., & KoedingerK. R. (2011). Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system. Learning and Instruction, 21, 267–1280.
SternbergR. J. (1990). Metaphors of the mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34.
StoutjesdijkE., & BeishuizenJ. J. (1992). Cognitie en metacognitie bij het bestuderen van informatieve tekst [Cognition and metacognition during the study of informative texts]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 17, 313–326.
35.
Van der StelM., & VeenmanM. V. J. (2014). Metacognitive skills and intellectual ability of young adolescents: A longitudinal study from a developmental perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29, 117–137.
36.
VeenmanM. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multi-method designs? In ArteltC., & MoschnerB. (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 75–97). Berlin, Germany: Waxmann.
37.
VeenmanM. V. J. (2007). The assessment and instruction of self-regulation in computer-based environments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 177–183.
38.
VeenmanM. V. J. (2008). Giftedness: Predicting the speed of expertise acquisition by intellectual ability and metacognitive skillfulness of novices. In ShaughnessyM.F., VeenmanM.V.J., & Kleyn-KennedyC. (Eds.), Meta-cognition: A recent review of research, theory, and perspectives (pp. 207–220). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
39.
VeenmanM. V. J. (2011). Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 6, 205–211.
40.
VeenmanM. V. J. (2013a). Training metacognitive skills in students with availability and production deficiencies. In BembenuttyH., ClearyT., & KitsantasA. (Eds.), Applications of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines: A tribute to Barry J. Zimmerman (pp. 299–324). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
41.
VeenmanM. V. J. (2013b). Assessing metacognitive skills in computerized learning environments. In AzevedoR., & AlevenV. (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 157–168). New York, NY: Springer.
42.
VeenmanM. V. J. (2015). Het onderkennen en herkennen van metacognitieve vaardigheden en metacognitieve deficiënties. Werkboek workshop voor docenten VO [The recognition and identification of metacognitive skills and metacognitive deficiencies. Workbook workshop for secondary-school teachers] (3rd ed.). Hillegom, The Netherlands: Institute for Metacognition Research.
43.
VeenmanM. V. J. (2017). Learning to self-monitor and self-regulate. In MayerR., & AlexanderP. (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (2nd rev. ed., pp. 233–257). New York, NY: Routledge.
44.
VeenmanM. V. J., BavelaarL., De WolfL., & Van HaarenM. G. P. (2014). The on-line assessment of metacognitive skills in a computerized environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 123–130.
45.
VeenmanM. V. J., & BeishuizenJ. J. (2004). Intellectual and metacognitive skills of novices while studying texts under conditions of text difficulty and time constraint. Learning and Instruction, 14, 619–638.
46.
VeenmanM. V. J., ElshoutJ. J., & BusatoV. V. (1994). Metacognitive mediation in learning with computer-based simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 93–106.
47.
VeenmanM. V. J., ElshoutJ. J., & GroenM. G. M. (1993). Thinking aloud: Does it affect regulatory processes in learning?Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 18, 322–330.
48.
VeenmanM. V. J., ElshoutJ. J., & MeijerJ. (1997). The generality vs. domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains. Learning and Instruction, 7, 187–209.
49.
VeenmanM. V. J., HaanN., & DignathC. (2009). An observation scale for assessing teachers’ implicit and explicit use of metacognition in classroom settings. Paper presented at the 13th Biennial Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
50.
VeenmanM. V. J., KerseboomL., & ImthornC. (2000). Test anxiety and metacognitive skillfulness: Availability versus production deficiencies. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 13, 391–412.
51.
VeenmanM. V. J., KokR., & BlöteA. W. (2005). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills at the onset of metacognitive skill development. Instructional Science, 33, 193–211.
52.
VeenmanM. V. J., PrinsF. J., & VerheijJ. (2003). Learning styles: Self-reports versus thinking-aloud measures. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 357–372.
53.
VeenmanM. V. J., & SpaansM. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 159–176.
54.
VeenmanM. V. J., & Van CleefD. (2007). Validity of assessing metacognitive skills for mathematic problem solving. In EfklidesA., & KosmidisM.H. (Eds.), 9th European Conference on Psychological Assessment. Program and abstracts (pp. 87–88). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
55.
VeenmanM. V. J., Van Hout-WoltersB. H. A. M., & AfflerbachP. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.
56.
VeenmanM. V. J., & VerheijJ. (2003). Identifying technical students at risk: Relating general versus specific metacognitive skills to study success. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 259–272.
57.
VeenmanM. V. J., WilhelmP., & BeishuizenJ. J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14, 89–109.
58.
VoletS. E. (1991). Modelling and coaching of relevant metacognitive strategies for enhancing university students’ learning. Learning and Instruction, 1, 319–336.
59.
WangM. C., HaertelG. D., & WalbergH. J. (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 30–43.
60.
WhitebreadD., ColtmanP., PasternakD. P., SangsterC., GrauV., BinghamS., … DemetriouD. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 63–85.
61.
WinneP. H. (2014). Issues in researching self-regulated learning as patterns of events. Metacognition and Learning, 9, 229–237.
62.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000). Attainment of self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In BoekaertsM., PintrichP., & ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, research, and applications (pp. 13–39). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
63.
ZimmermanB. J., & Martinez-PonsM. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628.
