Research into digital practices and cultures repeatedly calls attention to the complexity of communication spaces and meaning-making practices. With the blurring of boundaries between online and offline, these entangled practices involve the interweaving of human, material, semiotic, and discursive practices.
Purpose
This introductory article builds on theoretical work by Huizinga and Appadurai and presents the concept of playscapes to help situate the overall collection of articles in this special issue, Virtual Convergence: Synergies in Virtual Worlds and Videogames Research.
Research Design
This analytic essay examines virtual worlds and videogames and offers the concept of playscapes to expand the discourse about space and finitudes of practice.
Conclusions
Playscapes extend current conversations about learning, transmedia, and play ecologies because playscapes can support the discussion of entangled meaning making across space and time, all the while acknowledging the situated nature of the activity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsS. S. (2009). A gaming frame of mind: Digital contexts and academic implications. Educational Media International, 46(4), 335–347).
2.
AbramsS. S. (2011). Association through action: Identity development in real and virtual video game environments. National Society for the Study of Education, 110(1), 220–243).
3.
AbramsS. S. (2012). Powerful gaming structures and practices: Videogames, situated language, and cultural contexts. Languages and Linguistics, 30, 41–63).
4.
AbramsS. S. (2017). Emotionally crafted experiences: Layering literacies in Minecraft. The Reading Teacher, 70(4), 501–506).
5.
AbramsS. S., GerberH. R., & BurgessM. (2012). Digital worlds and shifting borders: Popular culture, perception, and pedagogy. In WilliamsB., & ZengerA. (Eds.), New media literacies and participatory popular culture across borders (pp. 90–105)). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
6.
AbramsS. S., & LammersJ. C. (in press). Belonging in a videogame space: Bridging affinity spaces and communities of practice. Teachers College Record.
7.
AbramsS. S., & RowsellJ. (2011). Dynamic learning in virtual spaces: Producers and consumers of meaning. Journal on School Educational Technology, 7(1), 7–13).
8.
AppaduraiA. (2001). Globalization: A public culture book. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
ArakiM., & CarlinerS. (2008). What the literature says about using game worlds and social worlds in cyberspace for communicating technical and educational content. Technical Communication, 55(3), 251–260).
10.
BaileyC., BurnettC., & MerchantG. (2017). Assembling literacies in virtual play. In MillsK., StornaiuoloA., SmithA., & PandyaJ. (Eds.), The handbook of writing, literacies and education in digital cultures (pp. 187–197)). London, England: Routledge.
11.
Behm-MorawitzE. (2013). Mirrored selves: The influence of self-presence in a virtual world on health, appearance, and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 119–128).
12.
BlackR. (2005). Access and affiliation: The literacy and composition practices of English-language learners in an online fanfiction community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(2), 118–128).
13.
BlackR. W., AlexanderJ., & KorobkovaK. A. (2017). Flows of literacy across corporate and user-produced virtual worlds. Teachers College Record, 119(12).
14.
BurnettC. (2015). (Im)materialising literacies. In RowellJ., & PahlK. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 520–531)). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
15.
BurnettC., & BaileyC. (2014). Conceptualising collaboration in hybrid sites: Playing Minecraft together and apart in a primary classroom. In BurnettC., DaviesJ., MerchantG., & RowsellJ. (Eds.), New literacies around the globe: Policy and pedagogy (pp. 50–71)). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
16.
BurnettC., DaviesJ., MerchantG., & RowsellJ. (2014). New literacies around the globe. London, England: Routledge.
17.
BurnettC., & MerchantG. (2014). Points of view: Reconceptualising literacies through an exploration of adult and child interactions in a virtual world. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 36–50).
18.
BurnettC., & MerchantG. (2016). Boxes of poison: Baroque technique as antidote to simple views of literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 48(3), 258–279).
19.
BurnettC., MerchantG., PahlK., & RowsellJ. (2014). The (im)materiality of literacy: The significance of subjectivity to new literacies research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(1), 90–103).
20.
CarringtonV. (2009). From blog to bebo and beyond: Text, risk, participation. International Journal of Research in Reading, 32(1), 6–21).
21.
CarringtonV. (2017). How we live now: “I don't think there's such a thing as being offline.”Teachers College Record, 119(12).
22.
Compton-LillyC. (2007). What can video games teach us about teaching reading?Reading Teacher, 60(8), 718–727).
23.
DaviesJ. (2017). Literacy as Tardis: Stories in time and space. Teachers College Record, 119(12).
24.
DeleuzeG., & GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
25.
DooleyC. M., & AssafL. Z. (2009). Contexts matter: Two teachers' language arts instruction in this high-stakes era. Journal of Literacy Research, 41(3), 354–391).
26.
DezuanniM., O'MaraJ., & BeavisC. (2015). “Redstone is like electricity”: Children's performative representations in and around Minecraft. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(2), 147–163).
27.
GeeE., & GeeJ. P. (2017). Games as distributed teaching and learning systems. Teachers College Record, 119(12).
28.
GeeJ. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London, England: Routledge.
29.
GeeJ. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. (Original work published 2003)
30.
GeeJ. P., & HayesE. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
GerberH. R., & PriceD. P. (2011). Twenty-first century adolescents, writing, and new media. Meeting the challenge with game controllers and laptops. English Journal, 101, 68–73).
32.
GillenJ., & MerchantG. (2013). Contact calls: Twitter as a dialogic social and linguistic practice. Language Science, 35, 47–58).
33.
HabermanF. (1991). Giving real meaning to “easy-to-use” interfaces. IEEE Software, 8(4), 90–91).
34.
HollettT., & EhretC. (2015). “Bean's world”: (Mine) crafting affective atmospheres of gameplay, learning, and care in a children's hospital. New Media & Society, 17(11), 1849–1866).
35.
HuizingaJ. (2014). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Eastford, CT: Martino Fine Books. (Original work published 1950)
36.
JenkinsH. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.
37.
JukesI., McCainT., & CrockettL. (2010). Understanding the digital generation: Teaching and learning in the new digital landscape. Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada: 21st Century Fluency Project.
38.
KalantzisM., & CopeB. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39.
KitchinR., & DodgeM. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
KressG. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
LammersJ. C., CurwoodJ. S., & MagnificoA. M. (2012). Towards an affinity space methodology: Considerations for literacy research. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(2), 44–58).
42.
LarsonJ., & MarshJ. (2014). Making literacy real: Theories and practices for learning and teaching (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
LeanderK. M., & McKimK. K. (2003). Tracing the everyday “sitings” of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 211–240).
44.
LeanderK., PhilipsN. C., & TaylorK. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394).
45.
LeanderK., & RoweD. W. (2006). Mapping literacy spaces in motion: A rhizomatic analysis of a classroom literacy performance. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(4), 428–460).
46.
MarshJ. (2017). The Internet of Toys: A posthuman and multimodal analysis of connected play. Teachers College Record, 119(12).
47.
MarshJ., PlowmanL., Yamada-RiceD., BishopJ., & ScottF. (2016). Digital play: a new Classification. Early Years, 36(3), 242–253).
48.
MartinC. (2012). Video games, identity, and the constellation of information. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 32(5), 384–392).
49.
MerchantG. (2009). Literacy in virtual worlds. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(1), 38–56).
50.
MerchantG. (2015). Virtual worlds and online videogames for children and young people: Promises and challenges. In LesleyM., & GuzzettiB. (Eds.), The handbook of research on the societal impact of social media (pp. 291–316)). New York, NY: IGI Global.
51.
MerchantG., GillenJ., MarchJ., & DaviesJ. (2013). Virtual literacies: Interactive spaces for children and young people. New York, NY: Routledge.
52.
NugentW. R. (1991). Virtual reality: Advanced imaging special effects let you roam in cyberspace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(8), 609–617).
53.
O'BrienD., & ScharberC. (2008). Digital literacies go to school: Potholes and possibilities. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 66–68).
54.
OchsnerA., & MartinC. (2013). Learning and cultural participation in Mass Effect and Elder Scrolls affinity spaces. In KaminskiW., & LorberM. (Eds.), Gamebased learning: Clash of realities 2012 (pp. 97–106)). Munich, Germany: Kopäd Verlag.
55.
PrinslooM. (2005). The new literacies as placed resources. Perspectives in Education, 23(4), 87–98).
56.
RowsellJ. (2013). Working with multimodality: Rethinking literacy in a digital age. New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
RowsellJ. (2014). Toward a phenomenology of contemporary reading. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 37(2), 117–127).
58.
SchulzkeM. (2014). The virtual culture industry: Work and play in virtual worlds. The Information Society, 30, 20–30).
59.
SheridanM. P., & RowsellJ. (2010). Design literacies: Learning and innovation in the digital age. New York, NY: Routledge.
60.
SquireK. (2012). Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
61.
SquireK., & SteinkuehlerC. (2017). The problem with screen time. Teachers College Record, 119(12).
62.
Steiner-AdairC., & BarkerT. H. (2013). The big disconnect: Protecting childhood and family relationships in the digital age. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
63.
SteinkuehlerC. (2006). Massively multiplayer online video gaming as participation in a discourse. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 13(1), 38–52).
64.
SteinkuehlerC. A. (2011). Video games and digital literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(1), 61–63).
65.
StornaiuoloA., DiZioJ. K., & HellmichE. A. (2013). Expanding community: Youth, social networking, and school. Scientific Journal of Media Education, 40, 79–87).
66.
StreetB. V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography, and education. New York, NY: Longman.
67.
TheallD. F. (1992). Beyond the orality/literacy dichotomy: James Joyce and the pre-history of cyberspace. Postmodern Culture, 2(3). doi:10.1353/pmc.1992.0036
68.
ThomasD., OrlandK., & SteinbergS. (2007). The videogame style guide and reference manual. Power Play Publishing.
69.
TurkleS. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
70.
WarfB., & AriasS. (2009). The spatial turn: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
71.
WatkinsonD. (1990). Virtual reality: The ultimate special effect. Videography, 107–111).
72.
WilliamsJ. P. (2009). Community, frame of reference, and boundary: Three sociological concepts and their relevance for virtual worlds research. Qualitative Sociology Review, 5(2), 3–16).
73.
WohlwendK. E. (2017). Monster High as a virtual dollhouse: Tracking play practices across converging transmedia and social media. Teachers College Record, 119(12).
74.
WohlwendK. E., & HandsfieldL. J. (2012). Twinkle, twitter little stars: Tensions and flows in interpreting social constructions of the techno-toddler. Digital Culture & Education, 4(2), 185–202).
75.
WolfM. J. P., & PerronB. (2003). Introduction. The Video Game Theory Reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
