This article draws on previous work about narrative, which regards the practice of storying our lives as a basic human impulse and one that draws on cultural resources to do so. Neophyte digital resources have fascinated and enticed us as devices to immerse ourselves ever deeply and widely to create shinier, polished narratives. Our new modes and media have impacted on the nature of our narratives, and we reflect on our lives as we read them back to ourselves. Yet the affordances of the devices have allowed us to play also with the modes of time and space. This article draws on theories suggested by Burnett et al.; Leander and Sheehy; Massey; and Lemke to unpack the slippery nature of these notions of space and time.
Purpose/Objective/Research
The article provides a series of examples from a range of scenarios and research projects to consolidate the proposal that the contexts of literacy events are difficult to delineate, that contexts slip and slide across space and time in ways that seem to defy absolute specificity—that they are “in motion,” mercurial, and subject to change. Nevertheless, within these uncertain spaces, individuals use the cultural resources at their disposal to make sense of who they are and what the world is, through the creation of stories.
Research Design
This is an analytical essay, which draws on the research of others to create a series of examples of “digital encounters.”
Conclusions/Recommendations
The article argues that despite the many changes that digital tools have brought to our lives, the narrative impulse and the desire to represent ourselves through images and other media have remained constant. The new tools seem to allow us, however, to play more explicitly with time and space and to incorporate these aspects into our meaning-making practices. We can use tools to explore new types of space and arenas for communication—not just because of our capacity to keep in touch across time and space (which is not new), but because we can disrupt how we perceive these concepts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamB. (1995). Timewatch: The social analysis of time. London, England: Polity Press.
2.
AllenL. (2013). Behind the bikesheds: Sexual geographies of schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(1), 56–75).
3.
AshJ. (2010). Teleplastic technologies: Charting practices of orientation and navigation in videogaming. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(3), 414–430).
4.
BakhtinM. (1981). Discourse in the novel (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). In HolquistM. (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (pp. 269–422)). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5.
BakhtinM. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (EmersonC., & HolquistM., & McGeeV.W., Eds. Austin: University of Texas Press.
6.
BartonD. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
7.
BartonD., & HamiltonM. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London, England: Routledge.
8.
BartonD., & HamiltonM. (2000). Literacy practices. In BartonD., HamiltonM., & IvaničR. (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7–15)). New York, NY: Routledge.
BhattI. (2014). A sociomaterial account of assignment writing in Further Education classrooms (Unpublished doctoral thesis). School of Education, University of Leeds, England.
11.
BhattI., de RoockR., & AdamsJ. (2015). Diving deep into digital literacy: Emerging methods for research. Language and Education, 29(6), 477–492). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1041972
12.
BoldC. (2012). Using narrative in research. London, England: Sage.
13.
BrabazonT. (2015). Digital fitness: Self-monitored fitness and the commodification of movement. Communication, Politics & Culture, 48(2), 1–23).
14.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
BrunerJ. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691–711).
16.
BurgessA. (2010). The use of space-time to construct identity and context. Ethnography and Education, 5(1), 17–31).
17.
BurnettC., DaviesJ., MerchantG., & RowsellJ. (Ed.). (2014). New literacies around the globe: Policy and Pedagogy. London, England: Routledge.
18.
BurnettC., & MerchantG. (2014). Points of view: Reconceptualising literacies through an exploration of adult and child interactions in a virtual world. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 36–50).
19.
CopeB., & KalantzisM. (Ed.). (1999). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London, England: Macmillan.
CzarniawskaB. (2004). The narrative turn in social studies. In Narratives in Social Science Research (pp. 1–16)). London, England: Sage.
22.
DaviesJ. (2006). Affinities and beyond!! Developing ways of seeing in online spaces. Digital Interfaces, 3(2), 217–234).
23.
DaviesJ. (2007). Display, identity and the everyday: Self-presentation through online image sharing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(4), 549–564).
24.
DaviesJ. (2012). Facework on Facebook as a new literacy practice. Computers and Education, 59, 19–29).
25.
DaviesJ. (2013). Trainee hairdressers' uses of Facebook as a community of gendered literacy practice. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 21(1), 147–149).
26.
DaviesJ. (2014). (Im)material girls living in (im)material worlds: Identity curation through time and space. In BurnettC., DaviesJ., MerchantG., & RowsellJ. (Eds.), New literacies around the globe: Policy and pedagogy (pp. 72–87)). London, England: Routledge.
27.
DaviesJ. (2015). Facebook narratives. In RowsellJ., & PahlK. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 396–409)). London, England: Routledge.
28.
DeleuzeG., & GuattariF. (2003). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
DysonA. H. (2002). A Bakhtinian buzz about teacher talk: Discourse matters in “What difference does difference make?”English Education, 35(1), 6–20).
30.
GeeJ. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave.
31.
GeeJ. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London, England: Routledge.
32.
GibsonJ. (2014). The theory of affordances. In GiesekingJ., MangoldW., KatzC., LowS., & SaegertS. (Eds.), The people, place, and space reader (pp. 56–60)). London, England: Routledge.
33.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
34.
HammondC. (2013). Time-warped: Unlocking the mysteries of time perception. London, England: Cannongate.
35.
HardyB. (1975). Tellers and listeners: The narrative imagination. London, England: Athlone Press.
36.
HeathS. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37.
HymesD. (1996). Ethnography, linguistics and narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
38.
JegersK. (2007). Pervasive game flow: Understanding player enjoyment in pervasive gaming. Computers in Entertainment, 5(1), 9–12).
39.
KressG. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London, England: Routledge.
40.
LangellierK. M., & PetersonE. (2004). Storytelling in everyday life. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
41.
LeanderK., & SheehyM. (2004). Spatializing literacy research (Vol. 15, New Literacies and Digital Epistemologies). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
42.
LemkeJ. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290).
MarshJ. (2011). Young children's literacy practices in a virtual world: Establishing an online interaction order. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(2), 101–118).
45.
MarshJ. (2016). “Unboxing” videos: Co-construction of the child as cyberfâneur. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3) 369–380).
46.
MarshJ., & BishopJ. C. (2015). Changing play: Play, media and commercial culture from the 1950s to the present day. London, England: McGraw-Hill.
47.
MasseyD. B (2005). For space. London, England: Sage.
StevensR., SatwiczT., & McCarthyL. (2008). In-game, In-room, In-world: Reconnecting video game play to the rest of kids' lives. In SalenK. (Ed.), The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games, and learning (pp. 41–66)). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53.
StirlingE. (2014). Why waste your time on Facebook? A temporal analysis of first-year undergraduate students and transition in UK Higher Education (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England. Available at http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/6377
StreetB. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
57.
StreetB. (1993). Culture is a verb: Anthropological aspects of language and cultural process. In GraddolD., & ByramM. (Eds.), Language and culture (pp. 23–43)). Clevedon, England: BAAL.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society (LuriaA., Lopez-MorillasM., & ColeM., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1935)
60.
Walker RettbergJ. (2014). Seeing ourselves through technology. London, England: Palgrave.
61.
WohlwendK. J. (2009). Early adopters: Playing new literacies and pretending new technologies in print-centric classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(2), 117–140).
