Belonging in a Videogame Space: Bridging Affinity Spaces and Communities of Practice

Abstract

Background

Focusing on ways a common endeavor brings people together, Gee offered the concept of affinity spaces, which suggests that open participation without exclusion or membership is possible. This theory contrasts with Lave and Wenger's communities of practice, which called attention to situated, hierarchical participatory practices. Bridging these two theories, we look to discussions of Discourses and specialist language and behavior to highlight how doing–being–valuing combinations situate people within a particular space in ways that can welcome open participation while supporting both inclusivity and exclusivity.

Purpose

This article defines and illustrates features of belongingness visible in videogame spaces, underscoring the dynamics of hierarchical participation in interest-driven practices, an important element to consider when attempting to make education more responsive to contemporary youth.

Research Design

This retrospective cross-case analysis includes data from two separate ethnographic studies of videogame affinity spaces. Data displays, as well as anecdotal notes, help facilitate the qualitative analysis of observations, interviews, field notes, and artifacts.

Findings

Within these videogaming affinity spaces, there were practices and value systems (i.e., Discourses) that promoted inclusivity and exclusivity. Data reveal specialist knowledge, interaction, and proficiency, in particular, to be prominent features in relationship-building in interest-driven participatory spaces.

Conclusions

This study calls attention to the doing–being–valuing combinations that situate one within a particular space while supporting inclusivity and exclusivity. A focus on belonging, therefore, revives the concept of community-based Discourses, honors the practices that situate learners in contemporary spaces, and helps researchers and educators understand how youth configure and reconfigure their social practices to seek inclusion by using and honing specialist language and behavior.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

S. S.

(2009). Real benefits from virtual experiences: How four avid video gamers used gaming as a resource in their literate activity (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from RUcore: Rutgers University Community Repository: http://dx.doi.org/ doi:10.7282/T3H70G2V

Abrams

S. S.

(2012). Powerful gaming structures and practices: Videogames, situated language, and cultural contexts. Languages and Linguistics, 30, 41–63).

Abrams

S. S.

(2015). Integrating virtual and traditional learning in 6–12 classrooms: A layered literacies approach to multimodal meaning making. New York, NY: Routledge.

Alexander

, Eaton

, & Egan

(2010). Cracking the code of electronic games: Some lessons for educators. Teachers College Record, 112, 1830–1850).

Androutsopoulos

(2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centered online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5, article 8. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1610

Apperley

, & Beavis

(2013). A model for critical games literacy. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(1), 1–12).

Beavis

(2012). Video games in the classroom: Developing digital literacies. Practically Primary, 17(1), 17–20).

Black

R. W.

(2007). Fanfiction writing and the construction of space. E-Learning, 4, 384–397).

Black

R. W.

(2008). Adolescents and online fan fiction. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

10.

Bommarito

(2014). Tending to change: Toward a situated model of affinity spaces. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11, 406–418).

11.

Cope

, & Kalantzis

(Ed.). (2015). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

12.

Creswell

J. W.

(2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

13.

DeVane

(2012). Wither membership? Identity and social learning in affinity spaces. In Hayes

E.R.

, & Duncan

S.C.

(Eds.), Learning in video game affinity spaces (pp. 162–184)). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

14.

Dooley

C. M.

, & Assaf

L. Z.

(2009). Contexts matter: Two teachers' language arts instruction in this high-stakes era. Journal of Literacy Research, 41, 354–391).

15.

Duncan

S. C.

(2010). Gamers as designers: A framework for investigating design in gaming affinity spaces. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(1), 21–34). doi:10.2304/elea.2010.7.1.21

16.

Eakle

A. J.

, & Chavez-Eakle

(2013). Museum literacies in Mexico City: Formations of power, texts, and identities. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–36).

17.

Gee

J. P.

(1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education, 171(1), 5–17).

18.

Gee

J. P.

(1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourses (2nd ed.). London, England: Taylor & Francis.

19.

Gee

J. P.

(2001). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44, 714–725).

20.

Gee

J. P.

(2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.

21.

Gee

J. P.

(2015). Unified Discourse analysis: Language, reality, virtual worlds, and video games. New York, NY: Routledge.

22.

Gee

J. P.

, & Hayes

E. R.

(2010). Women and gaming: The Sims and 21st century learning. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

23.

Gee

J. P.

, & Hayes

E. R.

(2011). Language and learning in the digital age. New York, NY: Routledge.

24.

Gómez

M. V.

, & Kuronen

(2011). Comparing local strategies and practices: Recollections from two qualitative cross-national research projects. Qualitative Research, 11, 683–697).

25.

Hasrati

, & Street

(2009). PhD topic arrangement in ‘D' iscourse communities of engineers and social sciences/humanities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(1), 14–25).

26.

Hayes

E. R.

, & Lee

Y. N.

(2012). Specialist language acquisition and 3D modding in a Sims fan site. In Hayes

E.R.

, & Duncan

S.C.

(Eds.), Learning in video game affinity spaces (pp. 186–211)). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

27.

Kress

G. R.

(2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York, NY: Routledge.

28.

Kress

G. R.

, & Jewitt

(2003). Introduction. In Jewitt

, & Kress

G.R.

(Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 1–18)). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

29.

Lammers

J. C.

(2011). “The Hangout was serious business”: Exploring literacies and learning in an online Sims fan fiction community (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, Tempe.

30.

Lammers

J. C.

(2012). “Is the Hangout … The Hangout?” Exploring tensions in an online gaming-related fan site. In Hayes

E.R.

, & Duncan

S.C.

(Eds.), Learning in video game affinity spaces (pp. 23–50)). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

31.

Lammers

J. C.

(2016). “The Hangout was serious business”: Leveraging participation in an online space to Design Sims fanfiction. Research in the Teaching of English, 50, 309–332).

32.

Lammers

J. C.

, Curwood

J. S.

, & Magnifico

A. M.

(2012). Toward an affinity space methodology: Considerations for literacy research. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(2), 44–58).

33.

Lave

, & Wenger

(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Miles

M. B.

, & Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

35.

Mitchell

, & Parker

W. C.

(2008). I pledge allegiance to … flexible citizenship and shifting scales of belonging. Teachers College Record, 110, 775–804).

36.

Murphy

M. C.

, & Zirkel

(2015). Race and belonging in school: How anticipated and experienced belonging affect choice, persistence, and performance. Teachers College Record, 117(12), 1–40).

37.

New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92).

38.

Peppler

K. A.

(2010). Media arts: Arts education for a digital age. Teachers College Record, 112, 2118–2153).

39.

Saldaña

(2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

40.

Squire

(2010). From information to experience: Place-based augmented reality games as a model for learning in a globally networked society. Teachers College Record, 112, 2565–2602).

41.

Squire

(2011). Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

42.

Turner

K. H.

, Abrams

S. S.

, Katic

, & Donavan

M. J.

(2014). Demystifying digitalk: The what and why of the language teens use in digital writing. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 157–193). doi:10.1177/1086296X14534061

43.

Ukie [The UK Interactive Entertainment Association]. (2014, September 8). The Sims 4 debuts at top of Ukie games chart. Retrieved from http://ukie.org.uk/news/2014/09/sims-4-debuts-top-ukie-games-chart

44.

Van Houtte

, & Van Maele

(2012). Students' sense of belonging in technical/vocational schools versus academic schools: The mediating role of faculty trust in students. Teachers College Record, 114(7), 1–36).

45.

Wenger-Trayner

, & Wenger-Trayner

(2015). Learning in a landscape of practice: A framework. In Wenger-Trayner

, Fenton-O'Creevy

, Hutchinson

, Kubiak

, & Wenger-Trayner

(Eds.), Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning (pp. 13–30)). New York, NY: Routledge Ltd.

46.

S. H.

(2008). Rethinking literacy learning and teaching. In Hinchmann

K.A.

, Sheridan-Thomas

H.K.

, & Alvermann

D.E.

(Eds.), Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction (pp. 39–56)). New York, NY: Guilford Press.