Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-10
The Role of Parent Social Capital and College-Aligned Actions in Explaining Differences in Intergenerational Resource Transfer among Hispanic and White Youth on the Path to College
A growing number of scholars argue that Hispanic—White disparities in college pathways are at least partly attributable to the fact that Hispanic students experience the college preparation and enrollment process differently from their White peers. Recent research suggests that one way in which the process differs between the two groups is in how parent resources, and particularly forms of parent social capital, facilitate college preparation and enrollment.
Purpose
This study examines whether group-level variability in the utility of parent social capital can help explain the recent finding that parent income and education confer greater benefits among White youth, relative to similar Hispanic youth, when it comes to 4-year college enrollment. The study also asks whether engagement in college-aligned actions might mediate the association between parent social capital and college enrollment.
Participants
The study focuses on a nationally representative sample of Hispanic and White 10th graders in 2002 who completed high school expecting to complete a bachelor's degree.
Research Design
The study uses multiple group structural equation modeling techniques and three waves of data from the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS: 2002) to test whether forms of parent social capital indirectly influence 4-year college enrollment through an association with college-aligned actions. Multiple group invariance testing is used to test whether associations of interest are measurably different across the two groups.
Conclusions
The results suggest that Hispanic-White differences in the intergenerational transmission of parents’ educational and economic resources can be partly attributed to differences in the functioning of parent social capital. This finding is consistent with the assertion that social capital often serves as a hidden form of capital—and mechanism of stratification—by facilitating the conversion of tangible resources into advantageous outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanC. (2002). The relationship between urbanicity and educational outcomes. In TierneyW. G. & HagedornL. S. (Eds.), Increasing access to college: Extending possibilities for all students (pp. 35–64). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
2.
AlonS., DominaX., & TiendaM. (2010). Stymied mobility or temporary lull? The puzzle of lagging Hispanic college degree attainment. Social Forces, 88(4), 1807–1832.
3.
AlvarezC. (2015). A model for understanding the Latina/o student and parent college-going navigation process. In PerezP. & CejaM. (Eds.), Higher education access and choice for Latino students (pp. 55–68). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
ArbonaC., & NoraA. (2007). The influence of academic and environmental factors on Hispanic college degree attainment. Review of Higher Education, 30(3), 247–269.
5.
AuerbachS. (2004). Engaging Latino parents in supporting college pathways: Lessons from a college access program. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(2), 125–145.
6.
AveryC., & KaneT.J. (2004). Student perceptions of college opportunities: The Boston COACH program. In HoxbyC. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 355–394). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
8.
BerknerL., & ChavezL. (1997). Access to postsecondary education for the 1992 high school graduates.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
9.
BohonS., JohnsonJ., & GormanB. (2006). College aspirations and expectations among Latino adolescents in the United States.Social Problems, 53, 207–225.
10.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
11.
BozickR., AlexanderK., EntwistleD., DauberS., & KerrK. (2010). Framing the future: Revisiting the place of educational expectations in status attainment. Social Forces, 88(5), 2027–2052.
12.
CabreraA. F., & LaNasaS. M. (2001). On the path to college: Three critical tasks facing America's disadvantaged. Research in Higher Education, 42, 119–150.
13.
CalderónM., SlavinR., & SanchezM. (2011). Effective instruction for English learners. Future of Children, 21(1), 103–127.
14.
CarbonaroW.J. (1998). A little help from my friend's parents: Intergenerational closure and educational outcomes. Sociology of Education, 71, 295–313.
15.
CarnevaleA. P., & StrohlJ. (2014). How increasing college access is increasing inequality and what to do about it. In KahlenbergR. D. (Ed.), Rewarding strivers: Helping low-income students succeed in college.New York, NY: Century Foundation Press.
16.
CejaM. (2006). Understanding the role of parents and siblings as information sources in the college choice process of Chicana students. Journal of College Student Development, 47(1), 87–104.
17.
ChoyS. (2001). Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access, persistence, and attainment.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
18.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
19.
ColemanJ. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
ColemanJ. S., & HofferT. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities.New York, NY: Basic Books.
21.
ConchasG. Q., OsegueraL., & VigilJ. D. (2012). Acculturation and school success: Understanding the variability of Mexican American youth adaptation across urban and suburban contexts. Urban Review, 44(4), 401–422.
22.
ContrerasF. (2005). Access, achievement, and social capital: Standardized exams and the Latino college-bound population. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4, 197–214.
23.
De La RosaM., & TierneyW. G. (2006). Breaking through the barriers to college.Los Angeles, CA: Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis.
24.
Deil-AmenR., & TurleyR. N. L. (2007). A review of the transition to college literature in sociology. Teachers College Record, 109(10), 2324–2366.
25.
Delgado-GaitanC. (1992). School matters in the Mexican-American home: Socializing children to education. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 495–513.
26.
DesmondM., & TurleyR. N. L. (2009). The role of familism in explaining the Hispanic-White college application gap. Social Problems, 56(2), 311–334.
27.
DikaS. L., & SinghK. (2002). Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 72, 31–60.
28.
FryR., & TaylorP. (2013). Hispanic high school graduates pass whites in rate of college enrollment.Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
29.
GandaraP. (2002). A study of high school puente: What we have learned about preparing Latino youth for postsecondary education. Educational Policy, 16(4), 474–495.
30.
GándaraP., & ContrerasF. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
GándaraP., OsegueraL., HuberL. P., LocksA., EeJ., & MolinaD. (2013, December). Making education work for Latinos in the U.S.Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project at the University of California Los Angeles.
32.
GonzálezK. P., StonerC., & JovelJ. E. (2003). Examining the role of social capital in access to college for Latinas. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 2, 146–170.
33.
GrodskyE., & Riegle-CrumbC. (2010). Those who choose and those who don't: Social background and college orientation. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 627, 14–35.
34.
HartB., & RisleyT. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children.Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
35.
HornL. J., & NunezA. M. (2000, March). Mapping the road to college: First-generation students’ math track, planning strategies, and context of support (NCES 2000–153). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
36.
HorvatE. M., WeiningerE. G., & LareauA. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319–351.
37.
HuL., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
38.
HurtadoS., InkelasK. K., BriggsC., & RheeS. (1997). Differences in college access and choice among racial/ethnic groups: Identifying continuing barriers. Research in Higher Education, 38(1), 43–64.
39.
IngelsS. J., PrattD. J., WilsonD., BurnsL. J., CurrivanD., RogersJ. E., & Hubbard-BednaszS. (2007). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Base-year to second follow-up data file documentation.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
40.
KaoG., & RutherfordL. T. (2007). Does social capital still matter? Immigrant minority disadvantage in school-specific social capital and its effects on academic achievement. Sociological Perspectives, 50(1), 27–52.
41.
KaoG., & TiendaM. (1998). Educational aspirations of minority youth. American Journal of Education, 106, 349–384.
42.
KaoG., VaqueraE., & GoyetteK. (2013). Education and immigration.Maiden, MA: Polity.
43.
KerckhoffA. C. and CampbellR. T. (1977). Race and social status differences in the explanation of educational ambition. Social Forces, 55, 701–714.
44.
KimE., & DíazJ. (Eds.). (2013). Immigrant students and higher education [Special issue]. ASHE Higher Education Report, 38(6).
45.
KimD. H., & SchneiderB. (2005). Social capital in action: Alignment of parental support in adolescents’ transition to postsecondary education.Social Forces, 84(2), 1181–1206.
46.
KiyamaJ. (2011). Family lessons and funds of knowledge: College going paths in Mexican American Families. Journal of Latinos and Education, 10(1), 23–42.
47.
KlasikD. (2012). The college application gauntlet: A systematic analysis of the steps to four-year college enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 53(5), 506–549.
48.
LinN. (2001). Building a network theory of social capital. In LinN., CookK., & BurtR. S. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 3–29). New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
49.
MackinnonD. P., LockwoodC. M., HoffmanJ. M., WestS. G., & SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test the significance of the mediated effect. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.
50.
MarsicoM., & GetchY. Q. (2009). Transitioning Hispanic seniors from high school to college. Professional School Counseling, 12(6), 458–462.
51.
MartinezG. F., & Deil-AmenR. (2015). College for all Latinos? The role of high school messages in facing college challenges. Teachers College Record, 117, 1–50.
52.
MartinezM. A. (2013). (Re)considering the role familismo plays in Latina/o high school students’ college choices. High School Journal, 97(1), 21–40.
53.
McintoshC. (2007). Rethinking fit assessment in structural equation modeling: A commentary and elaboration on Barrett (2007). Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 859–67.
54.
MickelsonR. A. (1990). The attitude-achievement paradox among black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63(1), 44–61.
55.
MorganS. L. (2005). On the edge of commitment: Educational attainment and race in the United States.Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
56.
MorganS. L., & GelbgiserD. (2014). Mexican ancestry, immigrant generation, and educational attainment in the United States. Sociological Science, 1, 397–422
57.
MuthénB. O., & AsparouhovT. (2002). Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus (Web Note No. 4). Los Angeles, CA: Mplus.
58.
MufhénL. K., & MuthénB. O. (2015). Mplus User's Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
59.
NoraA., & CrispG. (2009). Hispanics and higher education: An overview of research, theory, and practice. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 24, pp. 321–358). New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
60.
NunezA. M., & CrispG. (2012). Ethnic diversity and Latino/a college access: A comparison of Mexican American and Puerto Rican beginning college students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 5(2), 78—95.
61.
NunezA. M., & KimD. (2012). Building a multicontextual model of Latino college enrollment: Student, school, and state-level effects. Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 237–263.
62.
O'ConnorN., HammackF. M., & ScottM. A. (2010). Social capital, financial knowledge, and Hispanic student college choices. Research in Higher Education, 51(1), 195–219.
63.
OvinkS. M., & KalogridesD. (2015). No place like home? Familism and Latino/a-white differences in college pathways. Social Science Research, 52, 219–235.
64.
ParkS., WellsR., & BillsD. (2015). Changes in educational expectations between 10th and 12th grades across cohorts. Social Psychology of Education, 18(3), 561–581.
65.
PérezP. A., & CejaM. (Eds.). (2015). Higher education access and choice for Latino students: Critical findings and theoretical perspectives.New York, NY: Routledge.
66.
PerezP. A., & McDonoughP. M. (2008). Understanding Latina and Latino college choice: A social capital and chain migration analysis. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 7, 249–265.
67.
PernaL. W., & TitusM. A. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 486–518.
68.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.
69.
ReamR. K. (2005). Uprooting children: Mobility, social capital, and Mexican American underachievement.New York, NY: LFB Scholarly Publishing, LLC.
70.
ReamR. K., & PalardyG.P. (2008). Student engagement, peer social capital, and school dropout among Mexican American and non-Latino white students. Sociology of Education, 81(2), 109–139.
71.
Riegle-CrumbC. (2010). More girls go to college: Exploring the social and academic factors behind female postsecondary advantage among Hispanic and White students. Research in Higher Education, 51, 573–593.
72.
RobinsonK. J., & RoksaJ. (2016). Counselors, information, and high school college-going culture: Inequalities in the college application process. Research in Higher Education, 57(1), 845–868.
73.
RoderickM., CocaV., & NagaokaJ. (2011). Potholes on the road to college: High school effects in shaping urban students’ participation in college application, four-year college enrollment, and college match. Sociology of Education, 84(3), 178–211.
74.
RodriguezM., & MorrobelD. (2004). A review of Latino youth development research and a call for an asset orientation. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 26, 107–127.
75.
RosenbaumJ. E., & PersonA. (2006). Chain enrollment and college enclaves: Benefits and drawbacks for Latino college students. In OrfieldG., HornC. L., & FloresS. (Eds.), New directions for community colleges: Community colleges and Latino educational opportunity (pp. 51–60). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
76.
Rowan-KenyonH. T., BellA., & PernaL. W. (2008). Contextual influences on parental involvement and college-going: Variations by socioeconomic class. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 564–586.
77.
RyanS. (2016). Investigating college enrollment among Hispanic youth who expect to complete abachelor's degree. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 15(1), 3–21.
78.
RyanS., & ReamR. K. (2016). Variation across Hispanic immigrant generations in parent social capital, college-aligned actions, and four-year college enrollment. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 953–986.
79.
SchneiderB. (2007). Forming a college-going community in U.S. public high schools.Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
80.
SchneiderB., JudyJ., EbmeyerC. M., & BrodaM. (2014). Trust in elementary and secondary urban schools: A pathway for student success and college ambition. In Van MaeleD., ForsythP. B., & Van HoutteM. (Eds.), Trust and school life (pp. 37–56). New York, NY: Springer.
81.
SchneiderB., & StevensonD. (1999). The ambitious generation: America's teenagers, motivated but directionless.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
82.
SewellW. H., HauserR. M., SpringerK. W., & HauserT. A. (2003). As we age: A review of the Wisconsin longitudinal study, 1957-2001.Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 20, 3–111.
83.
SólorzanoD. G., VillalpandoO., & OsegueraL. (2005). Educational inequities and Latina/o undergraduate students in the United States: A critical race analysis of their educational progress. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4(3), 272–294.
84.
StageF. K. (2007). Answering critical questions using quantitative data. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133), 5–16.
85.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin support networks of US-Mexican youth.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
86.
Stanton-SalazarR. D., & DornbuschS. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high-school students. Sociology of Education, 68, 116–135.
87.
TiendaM. (2011). Hispanics and U.S. schools: Problems, puzzles and possibilities. In HallinanM. T. (Ed.), Frontiers in Sociology of Education (pp. 303–310). New York, NY: Springer.
88.
TierneyW. G., & AuerbachS. (2005). Toward developing an untapped resource: The role of families in college preparation. In TierneyW. G., CorwinZ. B., & ColyarJ. E. (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 29–48). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
89.
TornatzkyL. G., CutlerR., & LeeJ. (2002). College knowledge: What Latino parents need to know and why they don't know it.Los Angeles, CA: Tomás Rivera Policy Institute.
90.
WellsR., SeifertT., & SaundersD. (2013). Gender and realized educational expectations: The roles of social origins and significant others. Research in Higher Education, 54(6), 599–626.
91.
WeltonA. D., & MartinezM. A. (2014). Coloring the college pathway: A more culturally responsive approach to college readiness and access for students of color in secondary schools. Urban Review, 46(2), 197–223.
92.
YamamuraE. K., MartinezM. A., & SaenzV. B. (2010). Moving beyond high school expectations: Examining stakeholders’ responsibility for increasing Latina/o students’ college readiness. High School Journal, 93(3), 126–148.
93.
YossoT.J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.
