Social justice orientation (SJO) is the motivation to promote justice and equity among all in society. Researchers argue that students of Color with high SJO can resist structural racism in their schools/society and have positive academic outcomes.
Purpose
In the present study, a longitudinal model of cultural and environmental predictors (i.e., school relational climate, school language climate, Spanish language background, and English proficiency) and civic/educational outcomes (i.e., community engagement, grades, school engagement, school dropout) of SJO among Latina/o youths was developed and tested.
Participants
The study was conducted with a subsample of Latinas/os taken from the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988. Participants were enrolled in eighth grade (N = 1,472), sampled from different schools and regions in the U.S., and followed through three waves of data collection from 8th through 12th grade.
Research Design
A longitudinal, correlational design was used to explore the association among the constructs studied.
Data Collection and Analysis
Secondary data analyses were conducted. Structural equation modeling techniques were used to analyze the data.
Results
Early school relational climate (8th grade) was a positive predictor of SJO, which in turn predicted more community and school engagement, higher grades, and decreased likelihood of dropping out of school (12th grade) via personal agency. In addition, school language climate and language skills predicted a greater sense of personal agency, which in turn predicted higher grades and a decreased likelihood of dropping out.
Conclusions
The results of the present study underscore the importance of strengths-based and cultural approaches in education in a sample of Latina/o students. Specifically, close attention should be paid to school cultural climate variables in which positive relational climates and cultural language climates are addressed in schools. The integration of sociopolitical context, critical consciousness, and SJO may be key factors in improving the educational and counseling experiences of Latina/o youths.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlfaroE. C., Umaña-TaylorA. J., Gonzales-BackenM. A., BámacaM. Y., & ZeidersK. H. (2009). Latino adolescents' academic success: The role of discrimination, academic motivation, and gender. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 941–962. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.08.007
2.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
3.
BinghamG. E., & OkagakiL. (2012). Ethnicity and student engagement. In ChristensonS., ReschlyA., & WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 65–95). New York, NY: Springer.
4.
BronfenbrennerU. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In GauvainM. & ColeM. (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (2nd ed. pp. 37–43). New York, NY: Freeman.
5.
BurielR., PerezW., DeMentT. L., ChavezD. V., & MoranV. R. (1998). The relationship of language brokering to academic performance, biculturalism, and self-efficacy among Latino adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20, 283–297. doi:10.1177/07399863980203001
6.
CammarotaJ. (2004). The gendered and racialized pathways of Latina and Latino youth: Different struggles, different resistances in the urban context. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35, 53–74. doi:10.1525/aeq.2004.35.1.53
7.
CammarotaJ. (2007). A social justice approach to achievement: Guiding Latina/o students toward educational attainment with a challenging, socially relevant curriculum. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40(1), 87–96.
8.
CarpenterD. M., & RamirezA. (2007). More than one gap: Dropout rate gaps between and among Black, Hispanic, and White students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 32–64.
9.
ChristensonS., ReschlyA., & WylieC. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY: Springer.
10.
CloseW., & SolbergS. (2008). Predicting achievement, distress, and retention among lower-income Latino youth. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 31–42. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.007
ConchasG. Q. (2001). Structuring failure and success: Understanding the variability in Latino school engagement. Harvard Educational Review, 71, 475–504.
14.
CurtinT. R., IngelsS. J., WuS., & HeuerR. (2002, July). National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988: Base year to fourth follow-up data file user's manual (NCES 2002-323). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2002323
15.
De la PiedraM. T. (2011). “Tanto necesitamos de aquí como necesitamos de alla”: Leer juntas among Mexican trasnational mothers and daughters. Language and Education, 25, 65–78.
16.
DiemerM. A. (2009). Pathways to occupational attainment among poor youth of color: The role of sociopolitical development. Counseling Psychologist, 37, 6–35. doi:10.1177/0011000007309858
17.
DiemerM. A. (2012). Fostering marginalized youths' political participation: Longitudinal roles of parental political socialization and youth sociopolitical development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 246–256. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9495-9
18.
DiemerM. A., HsiehC., & PanT. (2009). School and parental influences on sociopolitical development among poor adolescents of color. Counseling Psychologist, 37, 317–344. doi:10.1177/0011000008315971
FineM. (1986). Why urban adolescents drop into and out of public high school. Teachers College Record, 87, 393–409.
21.
FineM., BurnsA., PayneY. A., & TorreM. E. (2004). Civics lessons: The color and class of betrayal. Teachers College Record, 106, 2193–2223. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00433.x
22.
FinnJ. D., & RockD. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk of school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221–234. doi:0021-9010/97/s3.00
23.
FredricksJ. A., BlumenfeldP. C., & ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
24.
FreidlinB., & SalvucciS. (1995, March). Empirical evaluation of social, psychological, and educational construct variables used in NCES surveys (Working Paper No. 95-14). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=9514
25.
GinwrightS., & CammarotaJ. (2007). Youth activism in the urban community: Learning critical civic praxis within community organizations. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 693–710. doi:10.1080/09518390701630833
26.
GlanvilleJ. L., & WildhagenT. (2007). The measurement of school engagement: Assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 1019–1041. doi:10.1177/0013164406299126
27.
GonzalezR. (2009). Beyond affirmation: How the school context facilitates racial/ethnic identity among Mexican American adolescents. Hispanic Journal of the Behavioral Sciences, 31, 5–31. doi:10.1177/0739986308328387
28.
GregoireM., & AlginaJ. (2000, April). Reconceptualizing the debate on school climate and students' academic motivation and achievement: A multilevel analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
29.
GuglielmiR. S. (2008). Native language proficiency, English literacy, academic achievement, and occupational attainment in limited-English-proficient students: A latent growth modeling perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 322–342. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.322
30.
HelmsJ. E. (2003). Racial identity and racial socialization as aspects of adolescents' identity development. In LernerR., JacobsF., & WertliefD. (Eds.), Handbook of applied developmental science: Promoting positive child, adolescent, and family development through research, policies, and programs (Vol. 1, pp. 143–163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
HelmsJ., & CookD. (1999). Using race and culture in counseling and psychotherapy: Theory and process. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
32.
IngelsS. J., DowdK. L., BaldridgeJ. D., StipeJ. L., BartotV. H., & FrankelM. R. (1994, September). National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988: Second follow-up: Student component data file user's manual (NCES 94-374). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=94374
33.
IngelsS. J., DowdK. L., TaylorJ. R., BartotV. H., FrankelM. R., & PullianP. A. (1995, March). National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988: Second follow-up: Transcript component data file user's manual (NCES 95-377). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=95377
34.
JayakumarU. M. (2008). Can higher education meet the needs of an increasingly diverse and global society? Campus diversity and cross-cultural workforce competencies. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 615–651.
35.
JerniganM. M., & DanielJ. H. (2011). Racial trauma in the lives of Black children and adolescents: Challenges and clinical implications. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 4, 123–141.
La RocheM., D'AngeloG., GualdrónL. G., & LeavellJ. (2006). Culturally sensitive guided imagery for allocentric Latinos: A pilot study. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 34, 555–560.
38.
La RocheM. J., & ShribergD. (2004). High stakes exams and Latino students: Toward a culturally sensitive education for Latino children in the United States. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 15, 205–223. doi:10.1207/s1532768xjepc1502_8
39.
Lindholm-LearyK., & BorsatoG. (2005). Hispanic high schoolers and mathematics: Follow-up of students who had participated in two-way bilingual elementary programs. Bilingual Research Journal, 29, 641–652.
40.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
41.
LittleT. D., CunninghamW. A., ShaharG., & WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighting the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
42.
LittleT. D., LindenbergerU., & NesselroadeJ. R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When “good” indicators are bad and “bad” indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192–211. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.2.192
43.
LockeT. F., NewcombM. D., DuclosA., & GoodyearR. K. (2007). Psychosocial predictors and correlates of dysphoria in adolescent and young Latinas. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 135–149. doi:10.1002/jcop.20139
44.
MarínG., & MarínB. V. (1991). Research with Hispanic populations, Applied Social Research Methods (Vol. 23). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
MartínezC. R., DeGarmoD. S.Jr., & EddyJ. M. (2004). Promoting academic success among Latino youths. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 26, 128–151. doi:10.1177/0739986304264573
46.
MattisonE., & AberM. S. (2007). Closing the achievement gap: The association of racial climate with achievement and behavioral outcomes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9128-x
47.
MillerJ., & GarranJ. M. (2008). Racism in the United States: Implications for the helping professions.Belmont, CA: Thompson Brooks/Cole.
48.
MorsilloJ., & PrilleltenskyI. (2007). Social action with youth: Interventions, evaluation, and psychopolitical validity. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 725–740. doi:10.1002/jcop.20175
NewbergN. A. (2010). Rebirth: Civic engagement from adolescence to adulthood. In SwansonD. P., EdwardsM. C., & SpencerM. B. (Eds.), Adolescence: Development during a global era (pp. 367–387). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
52.
NorthC. (2008). What is all this talk about “social justice”? Mapping the terrain of education's latest catchphrase. Teachers College Record, 110, 1182–1206.
53.
OakesJ., RogersJ., & LiptonM. (2006). Learning power: Organizing for education and justice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
54.
O'ConnorC. (1997). Dispositions toward (collective) struggle and educational resilience in the inner city: A case analysis of six African-American high school students. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 593–629. doi:10.2307/1163351
55.
PortesA., & HaoL. (2002). The price of uniformity: Language, family and personality adjustment in the immigrant second generation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25, 889–912. doi:10.1080/0141987022000009368
56.
Quintanar-SarellanaR. (2004). ¡Si se puede! Academic excellence and bilingual competency in a K–8 two-way dual immersion program. Journal of Latinos and Education, 3, 87–102. doi:10.1207/s1532771xjle0302_3
57.
ReamR. K., & RumbergerR. W. (2008). Student engagement, peer social capital, and school dropout among Mexican American and non-Latino White students. Sociology of Education, 81, 109–139. doi:10.1177/003804070808100201
58.
RubinB. C. (2007). “There's still not justice”: Youth civic identity development amid distinct school and community contexts. Teachers College Record, 109, 449–481.
59.
RumbergerR. W., & RotermundS. (2012). The relationship between engagement and high school dropout. In ChristensonS., ReschlyA., & WylieC. (Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 491–513). New York, NY: Springer.
60.
SchneiderS. H., & DuranL. (2010). School climate in middle schools: A cultural perspective. Journal of Research in Character Education, 8, 25–37.
61.
SolórzanoD. G., & BernalD. D. (2001). Examining transformational resistance through a critical race and LatCrit theory framework: Chicana and Chicano Students in an urban context. Urban Education, 36, 308–342. doi:10.1177/0042085901363002
62.
StearnsE., & GlennieE. J. (2006). When and why dropouts leave high school. Youth and Society, 38, 29–57. doi:10.1177/0044118X05282764
63.
Suárez-OrozcoC., & Suárez-OrozcoM. M. (2001). Children of immigration.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
Suárez-OrozcoM. M., & PáezM. M. (Eds.). (2008). Latinos: Remaking America.Berkeley: University of California Press.
65.
Suárez-OrozcoC., Suárez-OrozcoM. M., & TodorovaI. (2008). Learning a new land: Immigrant students in American society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
TabachnickB. G., & FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
ThapaA., CohenJ., GuffeyS., & Higgins-D'AlessandroA. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83, 357–385. doi:10.2102/0034654313483907
TriandisH. (1994). Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of collectivism and individualism. In KimU., TriandisH., KagitcibasiC., ChoiS. & YoonG. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism (pp. 41–51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71.
WattsR. J., & FlanaganC. (2007). Pushing the envelope on youth civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 779–792. doi:10.1002/jcop.20178
72.
WattsR. J., GriffithD. M., & Abdul-AdilJ. (1999). Sociopolitical development as an antidote for oppression: Theory and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 225–271. doi:10.1023/A:1022839818873
73.
WattsR. J., WilliamsN. C., & JagersR. J. (2003). Sociopolitical development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 185–194. doi:10.1023/A:1023091024140
74.
Weisman de MamaniA., RosalesG. A., & NavarroM. (2007). Personal efficacy, attitudes towards immigrants, and voting behavior among Latino and White university students. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología/Iberoamerican Journal of Psychology, 41, 341–348.
