Booher-JenningsJ. (2005). Below the bubble: ‘Educational triage' and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231—268.
2.
CianiK. D., MiddletonM. J., SummersJ. J., & SheldonK. M. (2010). Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: The importance of autonomy support and classroom community. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 88—99.
3.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2015-2016).
4.
FriendM. (2011). Special education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
HarryB., & KlingnerJ. (2014). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race and disability in schools. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
6.
NicholsS., & BerlinerD. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America's schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
7.
NicholsS. L., GlassG. V., & BerlinerD. C. (2006). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability pressure increase student learning?Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(1). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/72
8.
NicholsS. L., GlassG. V., & BerlinerD. C. (2012). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Updated analyses with NAEP data. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20 (20) Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1048
9.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 6319 (2001).
10.
PerlsteinL. (2007). Tested: One American school struggles to make the grade. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
11.
RavitchD. (2011). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
12.
RyanR. M., & WeinsteinN. (2009). Undermining quality teaching and learning: A self-determination theory perspective on high-stakes testing. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 224—233
13.
TimarT. B., & Maxwell-JollyJ. (Eds.) (2012). Narrowing the achievement gap: Perspectives and strategies for challenging times. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
14.
ValasH. (1999). Students with learning disabilities and low-achieving students: Peer acceptance, loneliness, self-esteem, and depression. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 173—192.
15.
YsseldykeJ., NelsonR., ChristensonS., JohnsonD. R., DennisonA., TriezenbergH., … HawesM (2004). What we know and need to know about the consequences of high-stakes testing for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71, 75—95.