The UN Sustainable Development Goals include a renewed commitment to inclusive and equitable education for all and will maintain pressure on governments in low-income countries to ensure this provision. A range of prominent researchers and institutional actors continue to explore and to promote low-fee private schools (LFPSs) as a viable option for achieving universal access to basic education. The emphasis on LFPSs can be seen as part of the push for education policies that attempt to improve educational access and quality not through the strengthening of public education but through the establishment of public–private partnerships.
Focus of Study
In this paper we explore the Kenyan government's engagement with LFPSs, document and assess the impact of this support on the behavior of LFPS and clarify key actor perspectives and responses within this context.
Research Design
Through a qualitative case study of two LFPSs in a large urban informal settlement near Nairobi, we focus on the dynamic interaction and delicate equilibrium within which government officials, LFPS representatives, parents, and students not only interact with but influence each other. Data for the study were gathered over the course of 8 weeks during May and June of 2010 in the urban slum called Mathare Village in Nairobi through document review, 35 interviews, and school visits.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that LFPSs do not function in practice as in theory, and crucially, that there are inherent trade-offs, tensions, and unexpected dynamics in operation that have serious consequences for such issues as quality and equity, even when supported by formal government policy designed to address these aspects. The study reinforces the importance of national governments and international bodies increasing the resources devoted to improving access to, and the quality of, public education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkaguriL. (2013) Fee-free public or low-fee private basic education in rural Ghana: How does the cost influence the choice of the poor?Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 44(2), 140—61.
2.
BallS., JunemannC., & SantoriD. (2015). Following policy: Global education policy networking: The case of low fee private schools. The Leverhulme Trust.
3.
BangayC., & LathamM. (2013). Are we asking the right questions? Moving beyond the state vs non-state providers debate: Reflections and a case study from India. International Journal of Educational Development, 33, 244—252.
4.
BrayM. (2004). Sharing the burden of financing: Government and household partnerships for basic education, Economic Affairs, 22—26.
5.
CaddellM. (2006). Private schools as battlefields: Contested visions of learning and livelihood in Nepal. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 36(4), 463—479.
6.
CaddellM., & Day AshleyL. (2006). Blurring boundaries: Towards a reconceptualisation of the private sector in education, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 36(4), 411—419.
7.
CarronG., & Carr-HillR. A. (1991). Non-formal education: Information and planning issues. Paris, UNESCO-IIEP.
8.
ChengT. K., & KariithiS. (2008). More than one struggle: Ensuring quality education for the next generation in Mathare Valley. Nairobi, Kenya: Dignitas.
9.
CurtisM. (2015). Profiting from poverty, again: DFID's support for privatizing education and health. London, UK: Global Justice Now.
10.
Day AshleyL., McloughlinC., AslamM., EngelJ., WalesJ., RawalS., Rose… P. (2014). The role and impact of private schools in developing countries: A rigorous review of the evidence. London, UK: Department for International Development.
11.
Dignitas (2008a). Community scoping report: Mathare Valley, Nairobi, Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: Author.
12.
Dignitas (2008b). Community profile research report: Mathare Valley, Nairobi, Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: Author.
13.
DixonP. (2004). The regulation of private schools serving low-income families in Hyderabad, India: An Austrian economic perspective. Economic Affairs, 24(4), 31—36.
14.
DixonP., & TooleyJ. (2005). The regulation of private schools serving low-income families in Andhra Pradesh, India. Review of Austrian Economics, 18(1), 29—54.
15.
Elimu Kwa Wanavijiji Coalition. (2004). Rapid assessment of non-formal basic education in informal settlements in Nairobi. Nairobi, Kenya: Author.
16.
FennellS., & MalikR. (2012). Between a rock and a hard place: The emerging educational market for the poor in Pakistan. Comparative Education, 48(2), 249—261.
17.
GenevoisI. (2008). Can and should public private partnerships play a role in education? [Working document]. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, International Institute for Educational Planning (UNESCO-IIEP).
18.
Government of Kenya, Ministry of Education. (2007). Educational statistics report. Nairobi, Kenya: Author.
19.
Government of Kenya, Ministry of Education. (2009). Status of non-formal education institutions: Initial analysis of funded sites. Nairobi, Kenya: Author.
20.
Government of Kenya, Ministry of Education. (2010). Policy for alternative provision of basic education and training. Nairobi, Kenya: Author.
21.
HärmäJ. (2009) Can choice promote education for all? Evidence from growth in private primary schooling in India, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 39(2), 151—65.
22.
HärmäJ. (2011). Low cost private schooling in India: Is it pro poor and equitable?International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 350—356.
23.
HavemanR., & WolfeB. (1984). Schooling and economic well-being: The role of nonmarket effects. Journal of Human Resources, 19(3), 377—407.
HeynemanS. P., SternJ. M. B., & SmithT. M. (2011). The search for effective EFA policies: The role of private schools for low-income children. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development, Economic Growth and Trade (USAID/EGAT).
27.
KitaevI. (2007). Education for all and private education in developing and transitional countries. In SrivastavaP., & WalfordG. (Eds.), Private schooling in less economically developed countries: Asian and African perspectives. (pp. 89—109). Oxford, UK: Symposium.
28.
KleesS. (2008). A quarter century of neoliberal thinking in education: Misleading analyses and failed policies. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(4), 311—348.
LaRocqueN. (2010). Non-state providers and public–private partnerships in education for the poor. Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) East Asia and Pacific Regional Office.
31.
LewinK. M. (2007). The limits to growth of non-government private schooling in sub-Saharan Africa (Research Monograph No. 5). Sussex, UK: Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions & Equity. Retrieved from http://www.create-rpc.org/pdf_documents/PTA5.pdf
32.
MacphersonI., RobertsonS., & WalfordG. (Eds.). (2014). Education, privatization and social justice: Case studies from Africa, South Asia and South East Asia. Oxford, UK: Symposium.
33.
McloughlinC. (2013, September). Low-cost private schools: Evidence, approaches and emerging issues. N.p.: Economic and Private Sector Professional Evidence and Applied Knowledge Services (EPS PEAKS). Retrieved from www.enterprise-development.org/download.ashx?id=2260
34.
MerkelS., & OtaiJ. (2007). Meeting the health needs of the urban poor in informal settlements: Best practices and lessons learned. Nairobi, Kenya: Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics (JHPIEGO).
35.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
36.
MertensD. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
MotalaS. (2009). Privatising public schooling in post-apartheid South Africa: Equity considerations. Compare, 39(2), 185—202.
40.
MugishaF. (2006). School enrollment among urban non-slum, slum and rural children in Kenya: Is the urban advantage eroding?International Journal of Educational Development26, 471—482.
NishimuraM., & YamanoT. (2013). Emerging private education in Africa: Determinants of school choice in rural Kenya. World Development, 43, 266—275.
43.
OharaY. (2012). Examining the legitimacy of unrecognised low-fee private schools in India: Comparing different perspectives. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 42(1), 69—90.
44.
OhbaA. (2013). Do low-cost private school leavers in the informal settlement have a good chance of admission to a government secondary school? A study from Kibera in Kenya. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43(6), 763—782. doi:10.1080/03057925.2012.733536
45.
OketchM., MutisyaM., NgwareM., & EzehA. C. (2010). Why are there proportionately more poor pupils enrolled in non-state schools in urban Kenya in spite of FPE policy?International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 23—32. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.08.001
46.
OketchM., MutisyaM., NgwareM., EzehA. C., & EpariC. (2010). Free primary education policy and pupil school mobility in urban Kenya. International Journal of Educational Development, 49, 173—183. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.01.002
47.
PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
PawsonR. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London, UK: Sage.
RollestonC., & Adefeso-OlatejuM. (2014). De facto privatization of basic education in Africa: a market response to government failure? A comparative study of the cases of Ghana and Nigeria. In MacphersonI., RobertsonS., & WalfordG. (Eds.) Education, privatization and social justice: Case studies from Africa, South Asia and South East Asia (pp. 25—44). Oxford, UK: Symposium.
51.
RoseP. (2002, November). Is the non-state education sector serving the needs of the poor? Evidence from East and Southern Africa. Paper presented at the “Making Services Work for Poor People” World Development Report Workshop 2003/4, Oxford, UK.
52.
RoseP. (2006). Collaborating in education for all? Experiences of government support for non-state provision of basic education in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Public Administration and Development, 26, 219—229. doi:10.1002/pad.420
53.
RoseP. (2009). Non-state provision of education: Evidence from Africa and Asia. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 39(2), 127—134.
54.
SamoffJ. (2007). Education quality: The disabilities of aid. International Review of Education, 53, 485—507.
55.
SarangapaniP., & WinchC. (2010). Tooley, Dixon and Gomathi on private education in Hyderabad: A reply. Oxford Review of Education, 36(4), 499—515.
SrivastavaP. (2008). The shadow institutional framework: Towards a new institutional understanding of an emerging private school sector in India. Research Papers in Education, 23(4), 451—475. doi:10.1080/02671520701809783
SrivastavaP. (2013b). Low-fee private schooling: Issues and evidence. In SrivastavaP. (Ed.), Low-fee private schooling: Aggravating equity or mitigating disadvantage? (pp. 7—35). Oxford, UK: Symposium.
60.
SrivastavaP., & WalfordG. (2007). Private schooling in less economically developed countries: Asian and African perspectives. Oxford, UK: Symposium.
61.
SteerL., GillardJ., Gustafsson-WrightE., & LathamM. (2015, October). Non-state actors in education in developing countries. Background Paper to the Annual Research Symposium of the Center for Universal Education, Washington, DC.
62.
SternJ. M. B., & HeynemanS. P. (2013). Low-fee private schooling: the case of Kenya. In SrivastavaP. (Ed.), Low-fee private schooling: aggravating equity or mitigating disadvantage? (pp. 105—130) Oxford, UK: Symposium.
63.
SuttonM., & ArnoveR. F. (Eds.). (2004). Civil society or shadow state? State/NGO relations in education. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
64.
TooleyJ. (2004a). “A luta continua” (The struggle continues): rejoinder to Watkins. Economic Affairs, 24(4), 12—16.
65.
TooleyJ. (2004b). Private education and “education for all.” Economic Affairs, 24(4), 4—7.
TooleyJ. (2008). Impact of free primary education in Kenya: A case study of private schools in Kibera. Education Management Administration and Leadership, 36(4), 449—469.
68.
TooleyJ. (2009). The beautiful tree: A personal journey into how the world's poorest people are educating themselves. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
69.
TooleyJ. (2013). Challenging educational injustice: “Grassroots” privatisation in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Oxford Review of Education, 39(4), 446—463. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.820466
70.
TooleyJ., & DixonP. (2005a). An inspector calls: The regulation of “budget” private schools in Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of Educational Development22, 269—285.
71.
TooleyJ., & DixonP. (2005b). Is there a conflict between commercial gain and concern for the poor? Evidence from private schools for the poor in India and Nigeria. Economic Affairs, 25(2), 20—26.
72.
TooleyJ., & DixonP. (2005c). Private education is good for the poor: A study of private schools serving the poor in low-income countries. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
73.
TooleyJ., & DixonP. (2006). “De facto” privatisation of education and the poor: Implications of a study from Sub-Saharan Africa and India. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 36(4), 443—462.
74.
TooleyJ., DixonP., & GomathiS. V. (2007). Private schools and the millennium development goal of universal primary education: a census and comparative survey in Hyderabad, India. Oxford Review of Education, 33(5), 539—560. doi:10.1080/03054980701425664
75.
TooleyJ., DixonP., ShamsanY., & SchagenI. (2010). The relative quality and cost-effectiveness of private and public schools for low-income families: A case study in a developing country. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 21(2), 117—144. doi:10.1080/09243450903255482
76.
TooleyJ., DixonP., & StanfieldJ. (2008). Impact of free primary education in Kenya: A case study of private schools in Kibera. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 36(4), 449—469.
TooleyJ., & StanfieldJ. (2004). “Education for all” through privatisation. Economic Affairs, 24(4), 2—3.
79.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2015). Education for all 2000–2015: Achievements and challenges. Paris, France: Author.
80.
WatkinsK. (2000). The Oxfam Education Report. Bath, UK: Oxfam.
81.
WatkinsK. (2004). Private education and “education for all”: Or how not to construct an evidence-based argument: A reply to Tooley. Economic Affairs, 24(4), 8—11.
82.
WildishJ. (2011). Government support for “private schools for the poor”: A case study in Mathare informal settlement, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.
83.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
