Connecting Math Attitudes with STEM Career Attainment: A Latent Class Analysis Approach

Abstract

Background

For many years now, there have been many job vacancies in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), but not enough workers to fill these vacancies. Much attention has been given to understanding and changing this situation in our country.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to address this dilemma by understanding what may be gained by investigating student's attitudes towards STEM in high school. Specifically, we study the relationship between students’ math attitudes and math self-efficacy beliefs and their career outcomes in STEM. Further, we do this across different English proficiency levels to see if any understanding may be gained by studying these groups differently.

Research Design

This study implemented secondary analysis by using a nationally representative sample of U.S. 10th graders from the Education Longitudinal Study. A latent class analysis was used to classify students’ math attitudes and self-efficacy.

Results

The results from this study provide empirical support suggesting that across all three English proficiency groups, students with high math attitudes and high math self-efficacy were more likely to have a career in STEM. When examining demographic characteristics, female students were more likely to have lower math attitude and lower math self-efficacy, which helps to explain why there is an underrepresentation of female students in STEM fields. We also found that race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status operated differently for each of the English proficiency groups.

Conclusions/Recommendations

This study directly links student math attitudes and self-efficacy to later career choice. This study has implications for researchers and policymakers who are developing interventions, suggesting that fostering positive math attitudes and self-efficacy would help encourage more students to pursue careers in STEM, particularly for non-native English speakers and female students.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asparouhov

, & Muthen

B. O.

(2013). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: A 3-step approach using Mplus. Mplus Web Notes: No:15.

Bandura

(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191—215.

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of though and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Betz

N. E.

, & Hackett

(1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23, 329—345.

Callahan

(2005). Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 305—328.

Callahan

, Wilkinson

, & Muller

(2010). Academic achievement and course taking among language minority youth in U.S. schools: Effects of ESL placement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(1), 84—117. doi:10.3102/0162373709359805

Campbell

A. E.

, Davis

G. E.

, & Adams

V. M.

(2007). Cognitive demands and second-language learners: A framework for analyzing mathematics instructional contexts. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(1), 3—30. doi:10.1080/10986060709336603

Collins

L. M.

, & Lanza

S. T.

(2010). General introduction. In Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral and health sciences (pp. 3—22). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Else-Quest

N. M.

, Mineo

C. C.

, & Higgins

(2013). Math and science attitudes and achievement at the intersection of gender and ethnicity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 293—309. doi:10.1177/0361684313480694

10.

Excelencia in Education. (2010). Mother-Daughter Program. University of Texas, El Paso. Retrieved from http://academics.utep.edu/Default.aspx?alias=academics.utep.edu/Mother-daughter

11.

Finkelstein

N. D.

, Huang

, & Fong

(2009). High school course-taking patterns for English Language Learners: A case study from California. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED507598.pdf

12.

Gamoran

(2009). Tracking and inequality: New directions for research and practice (WCER Working Paper No. 2009-6). Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/papers.php

13.

Gándara

, Rumberger

, Maxwell-Jolly

, & Callahan

, (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(36). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/264

14.

Hackett

, & Betz

(1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326—339.

15.

Hackett

, & Betz

N. E.

(1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261—273.

16.

Ing

, & Nylund-Gibson

(2013). Linking early science & mathematics attitudes to long-term science, technology, engineering, and mathematics career attainment: Latent class analysis with proximal and distal outcomes. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(6), 510—524. doi:10.1080/13803611.2013.806218

17.

Ingels

S. J.

, Pratt

D. J.

, Alexander

C. P.

, Jewell

D. M.

, Lauff

, Mattox

T. L.

, & Wilson

(2014). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 Third Follow-up Data File Documentation (NCES 2014-364). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch

18.

Ingels

S. J.

, Pratt

D. J.

, Rogers

J. E.

, Siegel

P. H.

, & Stutts

E. S.

(2004). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Base year data file user's manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

19.

Kanno

, & Cromley

J. G.

(2013). English language learners' access to and attainment in postsecondary education. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 89—121. doi:10.1002/tesq.49

20.

Kanno

, & Harklau

(2012). Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence. New York: Routledge.

21.

Kena

, Aud

, Johnson

, Wang

, Zhang

, Rathbun

, … Kristapovich

(2014). The Condition of Education 2014 (NCES 2014-083). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.

22.

Klein

, Bugarin

, Beltranena

, & McArthur

(2004). Language minorities and their educational and labor market indicators: Recent trends. NCES 2004-009. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2004009

23.

Koelsch

(2011). Improving literacy outcomes for English language learners in high school: Considerations for states and districts in developing a coherent policy framework. National High School Center Research Brief. Retrieved from http://www.ccrscenter.org/products-resources/resource-database/improving-literacy-outcomes-english-language-learners-high

24.

Lent

, Brown

, & Hackett

(1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79—122.

25.

Lent

, & Hackett

(1987). Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 347—382.

26.

Lent

R. W.

, Lopez

F. G.

, Brown

S. D.

, & Gore

P. A.

(1996). Latent structure of the sources of mathematics self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 292—308. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.0045

27.

Lewis

J. L.

, Ream

R. K.

, Bocian

K. M.

, Cardullo

R. A

, & Hammond

K. A.

(2012). Con cariño: Teacher caring, math self-efficacy, and math achievement among Hispanic English learners. Teachers College Record, 114(7), 1—42.

28.

Luzzo

D. A.

, Hasper

, Albert

K. A.

, Bibby

M. A.

, & Martinelli

E. A.

Jr. (1999). Effects of self-efficacy-enhancing interventions on the math/science self-efficacy and career interests, goals, and actions of career undecided college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(2), 233—243. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.46.2.233

29.

(2009). Pre-college influences and college major choice: Gender, race/ethnicity and nativity patterning. Theory in Action, 2(2), 96—122. doi:10.3798/tia.1937-0237.09008

30.

Masyn

(2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In Little

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology, Volume 2 (pp. 551—611). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

31.

McLeod

D. B.

(1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In Grouws

D. A.

(Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 575—596). New York: Macmillan.

32.

Mosqueda

(2010). Compounding inequalities: English proficiency and tracking and their relation to mathematics performance among Latina/o secondary school youth. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(1), 57—81.

33.

Mosqueda

(2012). Linguistic minority students' opportunity to learn high school mathematics. In Kanno

, & Harklau

(Eds.), Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence (pp. 38—54). New York: Routledge.

34.

Mosqueda

, & Maldonado

S. I.

(2013). The effects of English language proficiency and curricular pathways: Latina/os' mathematics achievement in secondary schools. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46(2), 202—219. doi:10.1080/10665684.2013.780647

35.

Muthén

(2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In Marcoulides

G. A.

, & Schumacker

R. E.

(Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1—33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

36.

Muthén

, & Asparouhov

(2006). Item response mixture modeling: Application to tobacco dependence criteria. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 1050—1066.

37.

Nakao

, & Treas

(1992). The 1989 socioeconomic index of occupations: Construction from the 1989 occupational prestige scores. General Social Survey Methodological Report No. 74. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.

38.

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2013) Mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata

39.

National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2013. Special Report NSF 13-304. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/

40.

Nylund

, Asparouhov

, & Muthén

B. O.

(2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study, Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 553—569.

41.

Nylund-Gibson

, Grimm

, Quirk

, & Furlong

(2014). A latent transition mixture model using the three-step specification. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(3), 439—454. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.915375

42.

Oakes

(2005). Tracking. In Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

43.

O'Brien

, Martinez-Pons

, & Kopala

(1999). Mathematics self-efficacy, ethnic identity, gender, and career interests related to mathematics and science. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(4), 231—235.

44.

Pajares

, & Miller

M. D.

, (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematics problem solving: A path analysis, Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193—203.

45.

Pajares

, & Miller

M. D.

(1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performances: The need for specificity of assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(2), 190—198. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.42.2.190

46.

President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf

47.

Schwartz

(1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461—464.

48.

Spanos

, Rhodes

N. C.

, Dale

T. C.

, & Crandall

(1988). Linguistic features of mathematical problem solving: Insights and applications. In Cocking

, & Mestre

(Eds.), Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathematics (pp. 221—240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

49.

Stevens

, Olivarez

, Lan

W. Y.

, & Tallent-Runnels

M. K.

(2004). Role of mathematics self-efficacy and motivation in mathematics performance across ethnicity. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 208—221.

50.

Thomas

(2000). Influences on mathematics learning and attitudes among African American high school students. Journal of Negro Education, 69(3), 165—183. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2696230

51.

Thomas

, & Collier

V. P.

(2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students' long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, & Excellence.

52.

Vermunt

J. K.

(2010) Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18, 450—469.

53.

Wang

M.-T.

, Eccles

J. S.

, & Kenny

(2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770—775. doi:10.1177/0956797612458937

54.

Wang

(2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081—1121. doi:10.3102/0002831213488622

55.

Wolf

M. K.

, & Leon

(2009). An investigation of the language demands in content assessments for English language learners. Educational Assessment, 14(3), 139—159. doi:10.1080/10627190903425883

56.

Zeldin

A. L.

, Britner

S. L.

, & Pajares

(2008). A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1036—1058.