Booher-JenningsJ. (2005). Below the bubble: ‘Educational triage’ and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231–268).
2.
HarryB., & KlingnerJ. (2014). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race and disability in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
3.
NicholsS. L., & BerlinerD. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America's schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
4.
NicholsS. L., GlassG. V., & BerlinerD. C. (2006). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability pressure increase student learning?Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(1). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n1/.
5.
NicholsS. L., GlassG. V., & BerlinerD. C. (2012). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Updated analyses with NAEP data. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(20). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1048.
6.
OrfieldG., LosenD., WaldJ., & SwansonC. (2004). Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
7.
PerlsteinL. (2007). Tested: One American school struggles to make the grade. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Co.
8.
RavitchD. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
9.
TimarT. B., & Maxwell-JollyJ. (Ed.). (2012). Narrowing the achievement gap: Perspectives and strategies for challenging times. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
10.
ValasH. (1999). Students with learning disabilities and low-achieving students: Peer acceptance, loneliness, self-esteem, and depression. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 173–192).
11.
YsseldykeJ., NelsonJ. R., ChristensonS., JohnsonD. R., DennisonA., TriezenbergH., … HawesM. (2004). What we know and need to know about the consequences of high-stakes testing for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 75–94).