Sociopolitical development (SPD) refers to the processes by which an individual acquires the knowledge, skills, emotional faculties, and commitment to recognize and resist oppressive social forces. A growing body of scholarship has found that such sociopolitical capabilities are predictive in marginalized adolescents of a number of key outcomes, including resilience, academic achievement, and civic engagement. Many scholars have long argued that schools and educators have a central role to play in fostering the sociopolitical development of marginalized adolescents around issues of race and class inequality. Other scholars have investigated school-based practices for highlighting race and class inequality that include youth participatory-action research, critical literacy, and critical service-learning.
Objective of Study
The present study sought to add to the existing scholarship on schools as opportunity structures for sociopolitical development. Specifically, this study considered the role of two different schooling models in fostering adolescents’ ability to analyze, navigate, and challenge the social forces and institutions contributing to race and class inequality.
Setting
The six high schools participating in the present study were all urban charter public high schools located in five northeastern cities. All six schools served primarily low-income youth of color and articulated explicit goals around fostering students’ sociopolitical development. Three of these high schools were guided by progressive pedagogy and principles, and three were guided by no-excuses pedagogy and principles.
Research Design
The present study compared the sociopolitical development of adolescents attending progressive and no-excuses charter high schools through a mixed methods research design involving pre-post surveys, qualitative interviews with participating adolescents and teachers, and ethnographic field notes collected during observations at participating schools.
Results
On average, adolescents attending progressive high schools demonstrated more sig-nificant shifts in their ability to analyze the causes of racial inequality, but adolescents attending no-excuses high schools demonstrated more significant shifts in their sense of efficacy around navigating settings in which race and class inequality are prominent. Neither set of adolescents demonstrated significant shifts in their commitment to challenging the social forces or institutions contributing to race and class inequality.
Conclusions
Both progressive and no-excuses schools sought to foster adolescents’ commitment to challenging race and class inequality, but focused on different building blocks to do so. Further research is necessary to understand the pedagogy and practices that show promise in catalyzing adolescents’ analytic and navigational abilities into a powerful commitment to collective social action—the ultimate goal of sociopolitical development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdairJ., & PastoriG. (2011). Developing qualitative coding frameworks for educational research: Immigration, education and the Children's Crossing Borders Project. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 34(1), 31—47.
2.
BarryD., KovaleskiS., RobertsonC., & AlvarezL. (2012, April 1). Race, tragedy and outrage collide after a shot in Florida. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/02/us/trayvon-martin
3.
Black Lives Matter (2015). All #Blacklivesmatter: This is not a moment, but a movement. Retrieved on August 14, 2015, from http://blacklivesmatter.com/about
Bonilla-SilverE. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
6.
BourdieuP., & PasseronJ. (1977). Reproduction in education, culture and society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
CabreraN., MilemJ., JaquetteO., & MarxR. (2014). Missing the (student achievement) forest for all the (political) trees: Empiricism and the Mexican American studies controversy in Tucson. American Educational Research Journal, 51(6), 1084—1118.
8.
CammarotaJ. (2007). A social justice approach to achievement: Guiding Latina/o students toward educational attainment with a challenging, socially relevant curriculum. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40, 87—96.
9.
CammarotaJ., & FineM. (Eds.). (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
10.
CampbellD. E. (2012). Civic education in traditional public, charter, and private schools: Moving from comparison to explanation. In LevinsonM., & HessF. M. (Eds.), Making civics count: Citizenship for a new generation (pp. 229—246). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
CarterD. (2008). Achievement as resistance: The development of critical race achievement ideology among Black achievers. Harvard Education Review, 78(3), 466—497.
13.
CarterS. (2000). No excuses: Lessons from 21 high performing schools. Washington DC: Heritage Foundation.
14.
ChristensB., & PetersonN. (2012). The role of empowerment in youth development: A study of sociopolitical control as mediator of ecological systems' influence on developmental outcomes. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 41(5), 623—635.
CoatesT. (2015). Between the world and me. New York, NY: Spiegel & Grau.
17.
ColvinR. (2013). Creating capital citizens: Cesar Chavez Public Charter Schools for Public Policy and Civic Education (AEI Program on American Citizenship Policy Brief 8). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
18.
CorningA., & MyersD. (2002). Individual orientation toward engagement in social action. Political Psychology, 23(4), 703—729.
19.
CroteauJ., TalbotD., LanceT., & EvansN. (2002). A qualitative study of the interplay between privilege and oppression. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 30, 239—258.
20.
CurtinN. (2011). The role of experiences of discrimination, collective identification, and structural awareness in own-group and ally activism (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
21.
DawesN. P., & LarsonR. W. (2011). How youth get engaged: Grounded-theory research on motivational development in organized youth programs. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 259—269.
DelpitL. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280—299.
24.
DeweyJ. (1915). The school and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
DiemerM., & BlusteinD. (2006). Critical consciousness and career development among urban youth. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 220—232.
26.
DiemerM., & HsiehC. (2008). Sociopolitical development and vocational expectations among lower socioeconomic status adolescents of color. Career Development Quarterly, 56(3), 257—267.
27.
DiemerM., & LiC. (2011). Critical consciousness development and political participation among marginalized youth. Child Development, 82(6), 1815—1833.
Duncan-AndradeJ., & MorrellE. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
32.
EatoughV., & SmithJ. (2006). I was like a wild wild person: Understanding feelings of anger using interpretative phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 97(4), 483—498.
33.
El-AminA. (2015). “Until justice rolls down like water”: Revisiting emancipatory schooling for African Americans—A theoretical exploration of concepts for liberation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
34.
EricksonP., & MurphyL. (2008). A history of anthropological theory. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
35.
Essed, Philomena (1991). Understanding everyday racism: An interdisciplinary theory and analysis of the experiences of black women. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
FreireP. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: Continuum.
38.
FryerR. (2011). Creating “no excuses”' (traditional) public schools: Preliminary evidence from an experiment in Houston (Working paper 17494). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website: http://www.nber.org/papers/w17494
39.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of culture: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
40.
GinwrightS. (2010). Black youth rising: Activism and racial healing in urban America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
41.
GinwrightS., & JamesT. (2002). From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing and youth development. New Directions for Youth Development, 96, 27—46.
42.
GodfreyE., & GraymanJ. (2014). Teaching citizens: The role of open classroom climate in fostering critical consciousness among youth. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 43, 1801—1817.
43.
GordonC. (2013). Critical democratic citizenship: The effects of community-engaged scholarship and inequality content on student learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
GurinP., NagdaB., & ZunigaX. (2011). Dialogue across difference: Practice, theory and research on intergroup dialogue. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
46.
GurinP., NagdaB., & SorensenN. (2011). Intergroup dialogue: Education for a broad conception of civic engagement. Liberal Education, 97(2), 46—51.
47.
GurinP., & TownsendA. (1986). Properties of gender identity and their implications for gender consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 139—148.
HaymesS. (2003). Toward a pedagogy of place for Black urban struggle. In MayS. (Ed.), Critical multiculturalism: Rethinking multicultural and antiracist education (pp. 42–76). London, UK: Falmer.
50.
HedlundJ., ForsythG., HorvathJ., WilliamsW., SnookS., & SternbergR. (2003). Identifying and assessing tacit knowledge: Understanding the practical intelligence of military leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(2), 117—140.
51.
HessD. (2002). Teaching controversial public issues discussions: Learning from skilled teachers. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30(1), 10—41.
52.
HortonM., & FreireP. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social change. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
53.
HyersL. (2007). Resisting prejudice every day: Exploring women's assertive responses to anti-black racism, anti-semitism, heterosexism and sexism. Sex Roles, 56, 1—12.
54.
InhelderB., & PiagetJ. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York, NY: Basic Books.
55.
IyerA., & RyanM. (2009). Why do men and women challenge gender discrimination in the workplace? The role of group status and in-group identification in predicting pathways to collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 791—814.
56.
JonesD., GreenbergM., & CrowleyM. (2015). Early social-emotional functioning and public health: The relationship between kindergarten social competence and future wellness. American Journal of Public Health, 105(11), 2283—2290.
57.
JonesK., & DayJ.D. (1997). Discrimination of two aspects of cognitive-social intelligence from academic intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 486—497.
58.
KirshnerB. (2015). Youth activism in an era of education inequality. New York, NY: New York University Press.
59.
KirshnerB., Hipolito-DelgadoC., & ZionS. (2014). PAR as classroom pedagogy: Evidence of positive impact on youth development and school climate. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
LittleT., & EllisonK. (2015). Loving learning: How progressive education can save America's schools. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
66.
LopezG. E., GurinP., & NagdaB. A. (1998). Education and understanding structural causes for group inequalities. Political Psychology, 19, 305—329.
67.
MacqueenL., McLellanE., KayK., & MilsteinB. (1998). Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cultural Anthropology Methods10(2), 31—36.
68.
MastenA., & PowellJ. (2003). A resilience framework for research, policy, and practice. In LutharS. (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 1–28), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69.
MaxwellJ. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
MollL. (2000). Inspired by Vygotsky: Ethnographic experiments in education. In LeeC., & SmagorinskyP. (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 256—268). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73.
NagdaB. A., GurinP., & LopezG. E. (2003). Transformative pedagogy for democracy and social justice. Race Ethnicity and Education, 6(2), 165—191.
74.
NPR-Kaiser-Harvard (2001). National survey on poverty in America. Retrieved on October 1, 2009 from http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls.
O'ConnorC. (1997). Dispositions toward (collective) struggle and educational resilience in the inner city. American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 593—629.
77.
OysermanD., GantL., & AgerJ. (1995). A socially contextualized model of African American identity: Possible selves and school persistence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1216—1232.
78.
PancerS., PrattM., HunsbergerB., & AlisatS. (2007). Community and political involvement in adolescence: What distinguishes the activists from the uninvolved?Journal of Community Psychology, 35(6), 741—759.
79.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93—97.
80.
ParkN., & PetersonC. (2005). The values in action inventory of character strengths for youth. Search Institute Series on Developmentally Attentive Community and Society, 3, 13—23.
81.
PerryT. (2003). Achieving in post-civil rights America: The outline of a theory. In PerryT., SteeleC., & HilliardA. (Eds.), Young, gifted and black: Promoting high achievement among African American students (pp. 87—108). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
82.
PerryT., SteeleC., & HilliardA. (2003). Young, gifted and black: Promoting high achievement among African-American students. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
83.
PetersonN., PetersonC., AgreL., ChristensB., & MortonC. (2011). Measuring youth empowerment: Validation of a sociopolitical control scale for youth in an urban community context. Journal of Community Psychology, 39(5), 592—605.
84.
PikketyT., & SaezE. (2003). Income inequality in the United States: 1913–1998. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 1—39.
85.
PondiscioR. (2013). “No excuses” kids go to college. Education Next, 13(2), 9—14.
86.
PottsR. (2003). Emancipatory education versus school-based prevention in African American communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1–2), 173—183.
87.
RaginC. (1989). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
88.
Ramos-zayasA. (2003). National performances: The politics of class, race and space in Puerto Rico. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
89.
RitchhartR. (2002). Intellectual character: What it is, why it matters, and how to get it. New York, NY: Jossey Bass.
90.
RomeroA., ArceS., & CammarotaJ. (2009). A Barrio pedagogy: Identity, intellectualism, activism, and academic achievement through the evolution of critically compassionate intellectualism. Race ethnicity and education, 12(2), 217—233.
91.
RyanG., & BernardH. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85—109.
92.
RyffC. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069—1081.
93.
SteinbergL. (2014). Age of opportunity: The new science of adolescence. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
94.
ShorI. (1987). Critical teaching and everyday life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
95.
SteeleC. (2012). Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
96.
SternbergR. (2011). The theory of successful intelligence. In SternbergR., & KaufmanS. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 504—527). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
97.
SternbergR., & HedlundJ. (2002). Practical intelligence, g, and work psychology. Human Performance, 15(1–2), 143—160.
98.
StraussA. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
99.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
100.
StraussC. (1992). What makes Tony run? Schemas as motive reconsideration. In D'AndradeR., & StraussC. (Eds.), Human motives and cultural models (pp. 191—224). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
101.
SturmerS., & SimonB. (2004). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the gay German movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 263—277.
102.
TatumB. (1994). Teaching White students about racism: The search for White allies and the restoration of hope. Teachers College Record, 95(6), 462—476.
103.
TatumB. (1997). Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?New York, NY: Basic Books.
104.
TenopyrM. (1967). Social intelligence and academic success. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 27, 961—965.
105.
ThernstromA., & ThernstromS. (2003). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
106.
ThomasA., BarrieR., BrunnerJ., ClawsonA., HewittA., Jeremie-BrinkG., & Rowe-JohnsonM. (2014). Assessing critical consciousness in youth and young adults. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(3), 485—496.
107.
ThorndikeE. L. (1920). Intelligence and its use. Harper's Magazine, 140, 227—235.
108.
WalkerE. S. (1993). Caswell County Training School, 1933–1969: Relationships between community and school. Harvard Educational Review, 63(2), 161—183.
109.
WangM., & HuguleyJ. (2012). Parent racial socialization as a moderator of the effects of racial discrimination on educational success among African American adolescents. Child Development, 83(5), 1716—1731.
110.
WardJ. (1996). Raising resisters: The role of truth telling in the psychological development of African American girls. In LeadbeaterB., & WayN. (Eds.), Urban girls: Resisting stereotypes, creating identities (pp. 84—106). New York, NY: New York University Press.
111.
WattsR., & FlanaganC. (2007). Pushing the envelope on youth civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(6), 779—792.
112.
WattsR., GriffithD., & Abdul-AdilJ. (1999). Sociopolitical development as an antidote for oppression: A theory. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(2), 255—271.
113.
WattsR., DiemerM., & VoightA. (2011). Critical consciousness: Current status and future directions. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 134, 43—57.
114.
WattsR., WilliamsN., & JagersR. (2003). Sociopolitical development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31 (1–2), 185—194.
115.
WohlstetterP., WenningR., & BriggsK. (1995). Charter schools in the United States: The question of autonomy. Educational Policy, 9(4), 331—358.
116.
YounissJ., & YatesM. (1997). Community service and social responsibility in youth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
