Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background/Context

Teacher preparation programs (TPPs) face increasing pressure from the federal government, states, and accreditation agencies to improve the quality of their practices and graduates, yet they often do not possess enough data to make evidence-based reforms.

Purpose/Objective

This manuscript has four objectives: (a) to present the strengths and shortcomings of accountability-based TPP evaluation systems; (b) to detail the individual-level data being shared with TPPs at public universities in North Carolina; (c) to describe how data sharing can lead to TPP improvement and the challenges that programs will need to overcome; and (d) to detail how three TPPs are using the data for program improvement.

Setting

North Carolina public schools and schools of education at public universities in North Carolina. Importantly, this individual-level data sharing system can be instituted among TPPs in other states.

Population/Participants/Subjects

Teachers initially-prepared by public universities in North Carolina.

Research Design

With individual-level data on program graduates, TPPs can conduct a range of analyses—e.g., regression analyses with program data, primary data collection with interviews, and rubric-based observations—designed to aid program improvement efforts.

Conclusions/Recommendations

Teacher preparation programs and researchers or state education agencies need to establish partnerships to share individual-level data on program graduates with TPPs. This individual-level data sharing would help TPPs to develop systems of continuous improvement by examining whether their preparation practices align with the types of environments in which their graduates teach and how graduates’ preparation experiences predict their characteristics and performance as Teachers of Record. Unlike other initiatives targeted at TPP improvement, individual-level data sharing, and its focus on within-program variability, can benefit TPPs at all levels of performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achenbach

T. M.

(2005). Advancing assessment of children and adolescents: Commentary on evidence-based assessment of child and adolescent disorders. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(3), 541—547.

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (2013). Ensuring fair and reliable measures of effective teaching: Culminating findings from the MET project's three-year study. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED540958.pdf

Boyd

, Grossman

, Lankford

, Loeb

, & Wyckoff

(2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176—216.

Boyd

, Grossman

, Lankford

, Loeb

, & Wyckoff

(2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416—440.

Cochran-Smith

(2005). Teacher education and the outcomes trap. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(5), 411—417.

Cochran-Smith

, & The Boston College Evidence Team. (2009). “Re-culturing” teacher education: Inquiry, evidence, and action. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 458—468.

Corcoran

, & Goldhaber

(2013). Value-added and its uses: Where you stand depends on where you sit. Education Finance and Policy, 8(3), 418—434.

Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2013). CAEP Accreditation Standards. Retrieved from http://caepnet.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/final_board_approved1.pdf

Danielson

(2013). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument. Retrieved from http://www.loccsd.ca/∼div15/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/2013-framework-for-teaching-evaluation-instrument.pdf

10.

Darling-Hammond

, Chung

, & Frelow

(2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286—302.

11.

Estabrooks

(2007). A program of research on knowledge translation. Nursing Research, 56(4), 4—6.

12.

Fallon

(2006). Improving teacher education through a culture of evidence. Paper presented at the sixth annual meeting of the Teacher Education Accreditation Council, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.teac.org/membership/meetings/Fallonremarks.pdf

13.

Feuer

M. J.

, Floden

R. E.

, Chudowsky

, & Ahn

(2013). Evaulation of teacher preparation programs: Purposes, methods, and policy options. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.

14.

Floden

R. E.

(2012). Teacher value-added as a measure of program quality: Interpret with caution. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 356—360.

15.

Gansle

K. A.

, Noell

G. H.

, & Burns

J. M.

(2012). Do student achievement outcomes differ across teacher preparation programs? An analysis of teacher education in Louisiana. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 304—317.

16.

Goldhaber

, Liddle

, & Theobald

(2013). The gateway to the profession: Assessing teacher preparation programs based on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 34(2), 29—44.

17.

Henry

G. T.

, Campbell

S. L.

, Thompson

C. L.

, Patriarca

L. A.

, Luterbach

K. J.

, Lys

D. B.

, & Covington

(2013). The predictive validity of measures of teacher candidate programs and performance: Toward an evidence-based approach to teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 439—453.

18.

Henry

G. T.

, Patterson

K. M.

, Campbell

S. L.

, & Yi

(2013). UNC teacher quality research: 2013 teacher preparation program effectiveness report. Education Policy Inititative at Carolina. Retrieved from http://publicpolicy.unc.edu/files/2013/11/UNC_TqR_OverallProgramReport_Final.pdf

19.

Henry

G. T.

, Purtell

K. M.

, Bastian

K. C.

, Fortner

C. K.

, Thompson

C. L.

, Campbell

S. L.

, & Patterson

K. M.

(2014). The effects of teacher entry portals on student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(1), 7—23.

20.

Hill

H. C.

, Kapitula

, & Umland

(2011). A validity argument approach to evaluating teacher value-added scores. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 794—831.

21.

Kane

, Rockoff

, & Staiger

(2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615—631.

22.

Koedel

, Parsons

, Podgursky

, & Ehlert

(2015). Teacher preparation programs and teacher quality: Are there real differences across programs? Education Finance and Policy, 10(4), 508–534.

23.

National Council on Teacher quality. (2014). 2014 teacher prep review: A review of the nation's teacher preparation programs. Retrieved from http://www.nctq.org/dmsView/Teacher_Prep_Review_2014_Report

24.

National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

25.

Nye

, Konstantopoulos

, & Hedges

(2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237—257.

26.

Peck

C. A.

, Gallucci

, Sloan

, & Lippincott

(2009). Organizational learning and program renewal in teacher education: A socio-cultural theory of learning, innovation, and change. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 16—25.

27.

Peck

C. A.

, Gallucci

, & Sloan

(2010). Negotiating implementation of high-stakes performance assessment policies in teacher education: From compliance to inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 451—463.

28.

Peck

C. A.

, & McDonald

M. A.

(2014). What is a culture of evidence? How do you get one? And … should you want one? Teachers College Record, 116, 1—27.

29.

Peck

C. A.

, Singer-Gabella

, Sloan

, & Lin

(2014). Driving blind: Why we need standardized performance assessment in teacher education. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8(1), 8—30.

30.

Predictive Analytics Reporting framework. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.parframework.org/

31.

President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2010). Prepare and Inspire: K–12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America's Future. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stemed-report.pdf

32.

Rich

(2014, April 25). Obama administration plans new rules to grade teacher training programs. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/26/us/obama-administration-plan-seeks-to-rate-teacher-training-programs.html?_r=0

33.

Rose

R. A.

, Henry

G. T.

, & Lauen

D. L.

(2012). Comparing value-added models for estimating teacher effectiveness: Technical briefing. Consortium for Education Research and Evaluation—North Carolina. Retrieved from http://cerenc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/EE_VAM_Briefing_2-7-12.pdf

34.

Tennessee State Board of Education. (2012). 2012 report card on the effectiveness of teacher training programs. Retrieved from https://www.tn.gov/assets/entities/thec/attachments/Report_Card_2012_on_the_Effectiveness_of_Teacher_Training_Programs.pdf

35.

Tennessee State Board of Education. (2013). 2013 report card on the effectiveness of teacher training programs. Retrieved from https://www.tn.gov/assets/entities/thec/attachments/Report_Card_2013_on_the_Effectiveness_of_Teacher_Training_Programs.pdf

Data Sharing to Drive the Improvement of Teacher Preparation Programs

Abstract

Background/Context

Purpose/Objective

Setting

Population/Participants/Subjects

Research Design

Conclusions/Recommendations

Get full access to this article

References