For over two decades, there has been a steady call for deregulating U.S. teacher education, closing down allegedly poor quality college and university programs, and creating greater market competition. In response to this call to disrupt the dominance of colleges and universities in teacher education, and because of the policies and funding allocations of the U.S. Education Department and private foundation funding, non-university providers of teacher education have proliferated in certain areas of the country. A critical aspect of the current call for greater deregulation and market competition in teacher education has been the declaration that university teacher education has failed. While there is no dispute about the need for improvements in the dominant college and university system of teacher education, it is also important to critically evaluate the warrants for the value of programs that critics claim should replace college and university programs.
Purpose
The focus of this paper is to illustrate how research has been misrepresented to support policies and programs that would simultaneously reduce the role of colleges and universities in preparing U.S. teachers and support the expansion of the role of non-university providers. We also examine the print news media's role in uncritically reproducing a narrative of failure about university teacher education and promoting the success of new non-university programs—attention that has served to inflate the public perception of these organizations and programs beyond what is warranted by the available evidence.
Research Design
Four cases are presented that illustrate the efforts to manufacture a narrative of the failure of colleges and universities in preparing teachers, and to construct a narrative of success for the non-university programs that have been funded to replace them. The authors use the concepts of echo chambers and knowledge ventriloquism to show how this process operates.
Conclusions/Recommendations
Following the presentation of the cases, specific recommendations are offered for raising the quality of the debates about the future of U.S. teacher education. These include greater transparency in the process of reform, better communication between researchers and stakeholders, using research that has been vetted to inform the debates, and genuinely exploring different policy options for teacher education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Educational Research Association (2008, July). Alternative definition of scientifically-based research.
2.
American Federation of Teachers Teacher Preparation Task Force. (2012, December). Raising the bar: Aligning and elevating teacher preparation and the teaching profession. Washington, DC.
BakerE. L., BartonP. E., Darling-HammondL., HaertelE., LaddH. F., LinnR. L., RavitchD., RothsteinR., ShavelsonR. J., & ShepardL. A. (2010, August). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers. (EPI Briefing Paper #278). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
6.
BanksJ., Cochran-SmithM., MollL., RichertA., ZeichnerK., LePageP., Darling-HammondL., & DuffyH. (2005). Teaching diverse learners. In Darling-HammondL., & BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 232—274). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
BerlinerD. (2011). Rational responses to high-stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287—302.
9.
BerlinerD. (2013). Effects of inequality and poverty vs. teachers and schooling on America's youth. Teachers College Record, 115(12), 1—26.
10.
BerlinerD. (2014). Exogenous variables and value-added assumptions: A fatal flaw. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 1—31.
BoydD., GrossmanP. L., HammernessK., LankfordR. H., LoebS., McDonaldM., … WyckoffJ (2008). Surveying the landscape of teacher education in New York City: Constrained variation and the challenge of innovation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, (30)4, 319—343.
14.
BoydD., GrossmanP., LankfordH., LoebS., & WyckoffJ. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, (1)2, 439—454.
ChubbJ. E. (2012). The best teachers in the world: Why we don't have them and how we could. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
19.
Cochran-SmithM., CannadyM., McEachernK., MitchellK., PiazzaP., PowerC., & RyanA. (2012). Teachers' education and outcomes: Mapping the research terrain. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1—49.
20.
Cochran-SmithM., & VillegasA. M. (in press). Research on teacher preparation: Charting the landscape of a sprawling field. In GitomerD., & BellC. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
21.
Cochran-SmithM., & ZeichnerK. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
Council of Chief State School Officers (2012, December). Our responsibility, our promise: Transforming educator preparation and entry into the profession. Washington, DC, Author.
CroweE. (2010, July). Measuring what matters: A stronger accountability model for teacher education. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
26.
CroweE. (2011, March). Race to the Top and teacher preparation: Analyzing state strategies for ensuring real accountability and fostering program innovation. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
27.
Darling-HammondL. (2004). Inequality and the right to learn: Access to qualified teachers in California's public schools. Teachers College Record, 106(10), 1936—1966.
Darling-HammondL., & BransfordJ. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Darling-HammondL., & LiebermanA. (Eds.). (2012). Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices. New York, NY: Routledge.
DuncanA. (2011, September). Our future, our teachers: The Obama administration's plan for teacher education reform and improvement. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
33.
DuncanG. J., & MurnaneR. J. (Eds.). (2011). Whither opportunity?: Rising inequality, schools, and children's life chances. New York, NY: Russell Sage and Spencer Foundations.
34.
Eduventures. (2009, July). Executive Summary: Educator preparation—Strengths and areas for improvement in preparation programs. Recruiting and Preparing Teachers Series. Retrieved from http://oapcte.org/Eduventures_Report_on_Teach_Prep.pdf
FlexnerA. (1910). Medical education in the U.S. and Canada: A report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement for Teaching. Bulletin No.4. New York, NY: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
39.
FraserJ. (2007). Preparing America's teachers: A history. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
40.
FullanM., GalluzzoG., MorrisP., & WatsonN. (1998). The rise and stall of teacher education reform. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
41.
FullerE. J. (2014). Shaky methods, shaky motives: A critique of the National Council for Teacher quality's review of teacher preparation programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(1) 63—77. doi: 10.1177/0022487113503872
42.
GasticB. (2014). Closing the opportunity gap: Preparing the next generation of effective teachers. In HessR., & McShaneM. (Eds.), Teacher quality 2.0: Toward a new era in education reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
43.
GattiL., & CatalanoT. (2015). The business of learning to teach: A critical metaphor analysis of one teacher's journey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 149—160.
44.
GoldieD., LinickM., JabbarH., & LubienskiC. (2014). Using bibliometric and social media analysis to explore the “echo chamber” hypothesis. Educational Policy, 28(2), 281—305.
GoodmanJ. (2013). Charter management organizations and the regulated environment: Is it worth the price?Educational Researcher, 42(2), 89—96.
47.
GreenbergJ., WalshK., & McKeeA. (2015). 2014 Teacher prep review. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher quality.
48.
GrossmanP., & LoebS. (2008). Alternative routes to teaching: Mapping the new landscape of teacher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
49.
GrossmanP., RonfeldtM., & CohenJ. (2012). The power of setting: The role of field experience in learning to teach. In HarrisK., GrahamS., UrdinT. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook Vol 3: Application to learning and teaching (pp. 311—334). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
50.
HammernessK., Darling-HammondL., BransfordJ., BerlinerD., Cochran-SmithM., McDonaldM., & ZeichnerK. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In Darling-HammondL., & BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 358—389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
51.
HenigJ. (2008). Spin cycle: How research is used in policy debates—The case of charter schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
52.
HenryG. T., & BastianK. C. (2015, May). Measuring up: The National Council on Teacher Quality's ratings of teacher preparation programs and measures of teacher performance. Chapel Hill, NC: The Education Policy Initiative at Carolina.
53.
HenryG., PurtellK., FortnerC. K., ThompsonC., CampbellS., & PattersonK. M. (2014). The effects of teacher entry portals on student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 439—453.
54.
HessF. (2001). Tear down this wall: The case for a radical overall of teacher certification. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
55.
HessF. M. (2006). Politics, policy, and the promise of entrepreneurship. In HessF. M. (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities (pp. 243—260). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
56.
HollinsE. R., & GuzmanM. T. (2005). Preparing teachers for diverse populations. In Cochran-SmithM., & ZeichnerK. (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 477–548). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
57.
Holmes Partnership. (2007). The Holmes Partnership trilogy: Tomorrow's teachers, tomorrow's schools, tomorrow's schools of education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Hunter statement: Hearing on ‘Education reforms: Discussing the value of alternative teacher certification programs (2012, July 24) (Committee Statement).
60.
KanstoroomM., & FinnC. (1999, July). Better teachers, better schools. Washington, D.C: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
KliebardH. (1973). The question in teacher education. In McCartyD. (Ed.), New perspectives on teacher education (pp. 8–24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
64.
KnowlesT. (2013, January). New pathways for teachers, new promises for students: A vision for developing excellent teachers. Teacher Quality 2.0 (Special Report 3). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
LubienskiC., ScottJ., & DeBrayE. (2014). The politics of research production, promotion, and utilization in educational policy. Educational Policy, 28(2), 131—144.
72.
MalinJ. R., & LubienskiC. (2015). Educational expertise, advocacy, and media influence. Education Policy Analysis Archive, s23(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1706
73.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers.Washington, DC.
74.
National Research Council. (2002) Scientific research in education, Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research (ShavelsonR. J., & TowneL., Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
75.
National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Committee on the Study of Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
PeskeH., & HaycockK. (2006, June 1). Teaching inequality: How poor minority students are shortchanged on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Education Trust.
80.
PiantaR. C. (2011, November). Teaching children well: New evidence-based approaches to teacher professional development and training. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
81.
Public Agenda (2008). Lessons learned: New teachers talk about their jobs, challenges, & long-range plans. Public Agenda & the National Comprehensive Center for Teacher quality. Retrieved from http://www.publicagenda.org/files/lessons_learned_3.pdf
RobertsonS. L. (2012). The strange non-death of neoliberal privatization in the World Bank's Educational Strategy 2020. In KleesS., SamoffJ., & StromquistN. (Eds.), The World Bank and education: Critiques and alternatives, (pp. 190—205). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
85.
RonfeldtM. (2012). Where should student teachers learn to teach? Effects of field placement school characteristics on teacher retention and effectiveness. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(1), 3—26.
86.
RonfeldtM., LoebS., & WycoffJ. (2013, February). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4—36.
87.
RoseM. (2013). The mismeasure of teaching and learning: How contemporary school reform fails the test. In KatzM. B., & RoseM. (Eds.), Public education under siege (pp. 9–20). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
StitzleinS. M., & WestC. K. (2014). New forms of teacher education: Connections to charter schools and their approaches. Democracy and Education, 22(2), Article 2. Retrieved from http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol22/iss2/2
Teacher preparation issues: Proposed rule. 79 Fed. Reg. 71819. (December 3, 2014) (to be codified as 34 C. F. R. pts. 612, 686). Retrieved from https://federalregister.gov/a/2014-28218
WalshK. (2013). 21st century teacher education: Ed schools don't give teachers the tools they need. Education Next, 13(3), 19—24.
103.
WeissC. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426—431.
104.
WelnerK. (2013). Free-market think tanks and the marketing of educational policy. In KatzM., & RoseM. (Eds.), Public education under siege (pp. 67—74). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
WilsonS. (2014, July). Innovation and the evolving system of U.S. teacher preparation. Theory into practice, 53(3), 183—195.
107.
WilsonS., FlodenR., & Ferrini-MundyJ. (2001). Teacher preparation research: current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf
108.
YettickH. (2015). One small droplet: News media coverage of peer-reviewed and university-based education research. Educational Researcher, 44(3), 173—184.
109.
ZeichnerK. (1995). Beyond the divide of teacher research and academic research. Teachers & Teaching, 1(2), 153—172.
110.
ZeichnerK. (2014). The struggle for the soul of teaching and teacher education in the USA. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 40(5), 551—568.
111.
ZeichnerK., & BierM. (2015). Opportunities and pitfalls in the turn toward clinical experiences in U.S. teacher education. In HollinsE. (Ed.), Rethinking clinical experiences in preservice teacher education (pp. 20—46). New York, NY: Routledge.
112.
ZeichnerK., & ConklinH. (2005). Teacher education programs. In Cochran-SmithM., & ZeichnerK. (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 645–735). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
113.
ZeichnerK., & HutchinsonE. (2008). The development of alternative certification policies and programs in the United States. In GrossmanP., & LoebS. (Eds.), Alternative routes to teaching: Mapping the new landscape of teacher education (pp. 15—29). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
ZeichnerK., & Peña-SandovalC. (2015). Venture philanthropy and teacher education policy in the U.S: The role of the New Schools Venture Fund. Teachers College Record, 117(5), 1—44.
