Research confirms that religion is a significant part of the lives of American youths, that religious texts are an essential part of their experiences in the world, and that as part of their everyday cultural practices, religious youths demonstrate strong commitments to reading religious texts. Currently, however, the field of literacy has yet to develop a body of research that examines the motivations that drive young people to engage with the religious texts that appear to mean so much to them.
Focus of Study and Research Questions
Situated within social and cultural perspectives of literacy and motivation, the purpose of this study is to examine religious youths’ personal motivations for reading complex, religious texts such as the Bible and the Book of Mormon by looking closely at the connections among their literacy practices, religious ideologies, and the expression of their religious identities. Two questions operationalize this purpose: 1. What are the similarities and differences among Latter-day Saint and Methodist youths’ personal motivations to engage with religious texts? 2. In what ways are these motivations influenced by the youths’ religiocultural traditions, ideologies, practices, and commitments.
Research Design
Qualitative methods were used to examine youths’ motivations for religious literacies. Nine months of ethnographic observations in multiple contexts and 59 in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted over two years were transcribed and analyzed to address the purpose of the study. Analytic procedures were informed by grounded theory.
Findings
The findings revealed a broad-level framework that explained the youths’ personal motivations for reading religious texts that transcended religious affiliation. Youths in both congregations were motivated to engage with complex, religious texts because they providing them with (a) knowledge about their religious traditions, (b) tools for applying religious knowledge to the lives, (c) strength to endure life's challenges, (d) comfort during stressful times, and (e) a connection to God.
Conclusions/Recommendations
As a space to explore the interactions among religion, literacy, and motivation, this study contributes to a more robust understand about the manner in which young people engage with complex, religious texts. This research also has implications for conceptualizing motivated literacy, engaging students with complex, academic texts, and studying motivation for literacy as social practice.
AlexanderP. A., KulikowichJ. M., & JettonT. L. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research, 64, 201—252.
3.
AlvermannD. E., & MojeE. B. (2013). Adolescent literacy instruction and the discourse of “every teacher a teacher of reading.” In AlvermannD. E., UnrauN. J., & RuddellR. B. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1072—1103). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
4.
American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33—40. doi:10.3102/0013189X035006033
5.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261—271.
6.
AnzaldúaG. (1999). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
7.
ArmbrusterB. B. (1984). The problem of the “inconsiderate” text. In DuffyG., RoehlerL., & MasonJ. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction (pp. 202—217). New York, NY: Longman.
8.
ArmbrusterB. B. (1996). Considerate texts. In LappD., FloodJ., & FarnanN. (Eds.), Content area reading and learning: Instructional strategies (2nd ed., pp. 47—57). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
ArmbrusterB. B., & AndersonT. H. (1981). Content area textbooks (Reading Education Report No. 23). Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
10.
CambridgeMA, BoltBeranek, and AtkinsonJ. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
11.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman. Banton-Smith, N. (1934/2002) American reading instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
12.
Baquedano-LopezP. (2000). Narrating community in doctrina classes. Narrative Inquiry, 10(2), 429—452.
13.
BartonD., & HamiltonM. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
BartonD., & HamiltonM. (2000). Literacy practices. In BartonD., HamiltonM., & IvanicR. (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7—15). London: Routledge.
15.
BiancarosaG., & SnowC. E. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
16.
Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. (2010). Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
17.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (n.d.). Education. Newsroom: The official resource for news media, opinion leaders and the public. Retrieved from http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/topic/education
18.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (1981a). Book of Mormon: Another testament of Jesus Christ. Salt Lake City, UT: Author.
19.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (1981b). The doctrine and covenants. Salt Lake City, UT: Author.
20.
CorbinJ., & StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
21.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In CsikszentmihalyiM., & CsikszentmihalyiI. S. (Eds.), Optimal experience (pp. 15—35). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
DeanK. C. (2010). Almost Christian: What the faith of our teenagers is telling the American Church. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
24.
DowsonM. (2005). Metaphysical motivation: An expectancy-value perspective on why religious beliefs motivate. In. MaehrM. L., & KarabenickS. A. (Eds.), Motivation and religion (pp. 11—34). Oxford, UK: Elseveir.
25.
DurkheimE. (1915). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press. Eakle, A. J. (2007). Literacy spaces of a Christian faith-based school. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(4), 472—510. doi:10.1598/RRQ42.4.3
26.
Eccles (Parsons)J. S., AdlerT. F., FuttermanR., GoffS. B., KaczalaC. M., MeeceJ. L., & MidgleyC. (1983). Expectations, values and academic behaviors. In SpenceJ. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75—146). San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
27.
EmersonR. M., FretzR. I., & ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
EricksonF. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119—161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
29.
EriksonE. H. (1994). Identity and the life cycle. New York: W.W. Norton.
30.
FerdmanB. M. (1990). Literacy and cultural identity. Harvard Educational Review, 60(2), 181—204.
31.
FindersM. (1996). Queens and teen zines: Early adolescent females reading their way toward adulthood. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 27(1), 71—89.
32.
FindersM. (1997). Just girls: Hidden literacies and life in junior high. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
33.
FleschR. (1946). The art of plain talk. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers. Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. In SecadaW. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 25, pp. 99–125). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
34.
GeeJ. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
GuthrieJ. T., Mason-SinghA., & CoddingtonS. C. (2012). Instructional effects of concept-oriented reading instruction on motivation for reading information text in middle school. In GuthrieJ. T., WigfieldA., & KlaudaS. L. (Eds.), Adolescent' engagement in academic literacy (pp. 155—216). College Park, MA: University of Maryland.
36.
GuthrieJ. T., & McPeakeJ. (2013). Literacy engagement: The missing link. In NeumanS. B., & GambrellL. B. (Eds.), Quality reading instruction in the age of Common Core State Standards (pp. 162–175). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
37.
GuthrieJ. T., & WigfieldA. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In KamilM. L., MosenthalP. B., PearsonP. D., & BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
GuthrieJ. T., WigfieldA., MetsalaJ. L., & CoxK. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 231—256.
40.
GuzzettiB. J., & GamboaM. (2004). Zines for social justice: Adolescent girls writing on their own. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 408—436. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.39.4.4
H. H. (1965). Halley's Bible handbook: An abbreviated Bible commentary (24th ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
43.
HeathS. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549—571.
44.
HidiS. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69—82.
45.
HollandD., & LeanderK. (2004). Ethnographic studies of positioning and subjectivity: An introduction. Ethos, 32(2), 127—139. doi:10.1525/eth.2004.32.2.127
46.
JangH. (2008). Supporting students' motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 798—811. doi:10.1037/a0012841
47.
JuzwikM. M. (2014). American evangelical Biblicism as literate practice: A critical review. Reading Research Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/rrq.72
48.
KapitzkeC. (1995). Literacy and religion: The textual politics and practice of Seventh-day Adventism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
49.
KnobelM., & LankshearC. (2007). A new literacies sampler. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
50.
LewisC., & FabosB. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 470—501. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.4.5
51.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
52.
LuriaA. R. (1981). Language and cognition. (J. V. Wertsch, Trans.). New York, NY: Wiley.
53.
ManseauP., & SharletJ. (2004). Killing the Buddha: A heretic's Bible. New York, NY: Free Press.
54.
McCartheyS. J., & MojeE. B. (2002). Identity matters. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(2), 228—238. doi:10.1598/RRQ.37.2.6
55.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
MishlerE. G. (2004). Historians of the self: Restorying lives, revising identities. Research in Human Development, 1(1), 101—121. doi:10.1207/s15427617rhd0101&2_6
57.
MojeE. B. (2000). “To be part of the story”: The literacy practices of gangsta adolescents. Teachers College Record, 102(3), 651—690. doi:10.1111/0161-4681.00071
58.
MojeE. B. (2006). Motivating texts, motivating contexts, motivating adolescents: An examination of the role of motivation in adolescent literacy practices and development. Perspectives, Summer 2006, 10—14.
59.
MojeE. B. (2008). Youth cultures, literacies, and identities in and out of school. In FloodJ., HeathS. B., & LappD. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 207—219). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60.
MojeE. B., & LukeA. (2009). Literacy and identity: Examining the metaphors in history and contemporary research. Reading Research Quarterly44(4), 415—437. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.44.4.7
61.
MojeE. B., OverbyM., TysvaerN., & MorrisK. (2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: Myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 107—154.
62.
MojeE. B., StockdillD., KimK., & KimH. (2011). The role of texts in disciplinary learning. In KamilM. L., PearsonP. D., MojeE. B., & AfflerbachP. P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 453—486). New York, NY: Routledge.
63.
MooreR. L. (2003). Touchdown Jesus: The mixing of sacred and secular in American history. Louisville, KY: John Knox Press.
64.
National Center for Educational Statistics (2013). The nation's report card: A first look: 2013 mathematics and reading (NCES 2014-451). Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2014451
65.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
66.
Nord, D. P. (1995). Religious reading and readers in antebellum America. Journal of the Early Republic, 15(2), 241—272.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
PearceL. D., & DentonM. L. (2011). A faith of their own: Stability and change in the religiosity of America's adolescents. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
PovedaD., CanoA., & Palomares-ValeraM. (2005). Religious genres, entextualization and literacy in Gitano children. Language in Society, 34, 87—115.
72.
ProtheroS. (2007). Religious literacy: What every American needs to know, but doesn't. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
73.
RackleyE. D. (2010). Motivations for religious literacy practices of religious youth: Examining the practices of Latter-day Saint and Methodist youth in one community (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
74.
RackleyE. D. (2014). Scripture-based discourses of Latter-day Saint and Methodist youths. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 417—435. doi:10.1002/rrq.76
75.
ReyesC. C. (2009). El libro de recuerdos [book of memories]: A Latina student's exploration of self and religion in public school. Research in the Teaching of English, 43(3), 263—285.
76.
RuddellR. B., & UnrauN. J. (2013). Reading as a motivated meaning-construction process: The reader, the text, and the teacher. In AlvermannD. E., UnrauN. J., & RuddellR. B. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1015—1068). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
77.
RustR. D. (1997). Feasting on the word: A literary testimony of the Book of Mormon. Salt Lake City, UT: Deseret Book.
78.
RustR. D., & ParryD. W. (1992). Book of Mormon literature. In Encyclopedia of Mormonism. (Vol. 1, pp. 181—185). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.
79.
SarroubL. K. (2002). In-betweeness: Religion and conflicting visions of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(2), 130—148. doi:10.1598/RRQ.37.2.2
80.
SchweberS. (2006). Donning wigs, divining feelings, and other dilemmas of doing research in devoutly religious contexts. In BartonK. C. (Ed.), Research methods in social studies education: Contemporary issues and perspectives, pp. 111—138. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
81.
ScribnerS., & ColeM. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
82.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
83.
SenA. (2000). Beyond identity: Other people. The New Republic, 223(25), 23—30.
84.
SfardA., & PrusakA. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14—22. doi:10.3102/0013189X034004014
85.
SharletJ. (2008). The family: The secret fundamentalism at the heart of American power. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
86.
SkerrettA. (2013). Religious literacies in a secular literacy classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(2), 233—250. doi:10.1002/rrq.65
87.
SmithC., & DentonM. L. (2005). Soul searching: The religious and spiritual lives of American teenagers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
88.
StraussA. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
89.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
90.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
91.
StreetB. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
92.
StreetB. V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography, and education. London: Longman.
93.
StrommenL. T., & MatesB. F. (2004). Learning to love reading: Interviews with older children and teens. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48(3), 188—200.
94.
TaboadaA., TonksS. M., WigfieldA., & GuthrieJ. T. (2013). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. In AlvermannD. E., UnrauN. J., & RuddellR. B. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 589—610). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
95.
TurnerJ. C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children's motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 410—441.
96.
TurnerJ. C., & ParisS. G. (1995). How literacy tasks influence children's motivation for literacy. The Reading Teacher, 48(8), 662—673.
97.
UnrauN., & SchlackmanJ. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(2), 81—101. doi:10.3200/JOER.100.2.81-101
98.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (ColeM., John-SteinerV., ScribnerS., & SoubermanE., Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
99.
VygotskyL. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In WertschJ. V. (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144—188). New York: Sharpe.
100.
WattJ. M., & FairfieldS. L. (2008). Religious and sacred literacies. In SpoklyB., & HultF. M. (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 355–366). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
101.
WertschJ. V. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. In WertschJ. V., Del RioP., & AlvarezA. (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 56—74). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
102.
WigfieldA., & EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68—81.
103.
WintonD. (2009). Small screen, big picture: Television and lived religion. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
104.
WoodsP. (1992). Symbolic interactionism: Theory and method. In LeCompteM. D., MillroyW. L., & PreissleJ. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 337—404). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
105.
ZinsserC. (1986). For the Bible tells me so: Teaching children in a fundamentalist church. In SchieffelinB., & GilmoreP. (Eds.), The acquisition of literacy: Ethnographic perspectives (pp. 55—71). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
