The postdoctorate has become an important component of research careers in a growing number of science and engineering (S&E) fields. However, a tight academic job market, the growing number of postdocs, and the heightened internationalization of the position in the United States call the traditional definition of the position into question.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
Doctorate recipients who aspire to research careers may be forced to remain postdocs while waiting for their desired permanent position to become available. We hypothesize that foreign-born doctoral recipients, particularly those who are female and/or non-White, are more likely than their U.S.-born, male, or White counterparts to become a postdoc for reasons not related to professional training and development.
Research Design
To explore these hypotheses, we have analyzed individual-level data from the 2006 administration of the U.S. National Science Foundation's Survey of Doctorate Recipients using multinomial logistic regression.
Findings/Results
We find that the reasons for working as a postdoc differ by race, foreign-born status, and the interaction of these two factors. In particular, foreign-born Asians are much more likely than their White U.S. counterparts to accept a postdoc job because no other options are available.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgresT. (2006). Best places to work survey. The Scientist, 20(3), 53.
2.
AkerlofG., & KrantonR. E. (2010). Identity economics: How our experiences shape our work, wages, and well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
AltonjiJ. G., & BlankR. M. (1999). Race and gender in the labor market. Handbook of Labor Economics, 3, 3143—3259.
4.
BaezB. (2000). Race-related service and faculty of color: Conceptualizing critical agency in academe. Higher Education, 39(3), 363—391.
5.
BalibarE. (2005). Racism and nationalism. In SpencerP., & WollmanH. (Eds.), Nations and nationalism: A reader (pp. 163—172). Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
6.
BellasM. L. (1999). Emotional labor in academia: The case of professors. ANNALS, AAPS, 561, 96—110.
7.
BentleyJ. T., & AdamsonR. (2003). Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review. Division of Resource Statistics, Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, National Science Foundation.
8.
BrewerR. M., ConradC. A., & KingM. C. (2011). The complexities and potential of theorizing gender, caste, race, and class. Feminist Economics, 8(2), 3—17
9.
CameronA. C., & TrivediP. K. (2010). Microeconometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
10.
CantwellB. (2011). Academic in-sourcing: International postdoctoral employment and new modes of academic production. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33, 101—114.
11.
CantwellB., & LeeJ. J. (2010). Unseen workers in the academic factory: Perceptions of neo-racism among international postdocs in the US and UK. Harvard Educational Review80(4), 490—516.
12.
CantwellB., & TaylorB. J. (2013). A demand-side approach to the employment of international postdocs in the US, Higher Education [Online first]. doi: 10.1007/s10734-013-9621-0.
13.
CantwellB., & TaylorB. J. (in press). The rise of the postdoctorate and the restructuring of academic research. Journal of Higher Education.
14.
CorleyE., & SabharwalM. (2007). Foreign-born academic scientists and engineers: Producing more and getting less than their U.S.-born peers?Research in Higher Education, 48(8), 909—940.
15.
CrandallC. S., & EshlemanA. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 414—446.
FligsteinN., & McAdamD. (2012). A theory of fields. New York: Oxford. Fox, F. M., & Stephan, P. (2001). Careers of young scientists: Preferences, prospects and realities by gender field. Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 109—122.
18.
FreemanR. B., WeinsteinE., MarincolmE., RosenbaumJ., & SolomonF. (2001). Careers and rewards in bio-sciences: The disconnect between scientific progress and career progression. A report to the American Society of Cell Biology, Bethesda, Maryland.
19.
GreenmanE., & XieY. (2008). Double jeopardy? The interaction of gender and race on earnings in the United States. Social Forces, 86(3), 1217—1244
20.
HofferT., GrigorianK., & HedbergE. (2008). Postdoc participation of science, engineering and health doctoral recipients. NSF Info Brief (No. NSF 08-307). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
21.
HortaH. (2009). Holding a post-doctoral position before becoming a faculty member: does it bring benefits for the scholarly enterprise?Higher Education, 58(5), 689—721.
22.
LanX. (2012). Permanent visas and temporary jobs: Evidence from postdoctoral participation of foreign Ph.D.s in the United States. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(3), 623—640.
23.
LeeJ. J. (2007). Bottom line—Neo-racism toward international students. About Campus, 11(6), 28—30.
24.
LeeJ. J., & RiceC. (2007). Welcome to America? International student perceptions of discrimination, Higher Education, 53, 381—409.
LesterJ. (2008). Performing gender in the workplace: Gender socializations, power, and identity among women faculty members. Community College Review, 35, 277—305.
27.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
McFadyenM. A., & CannellaA. A. (2004). Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 735—746.
29.
McMahonW. W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
National Research Council [NRC]. (1969). The invisible university: Postdoctoral education in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
32.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2005). Bridges to independence: Fostering the independence of new investigators in biomedical research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
33.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2014). Science and engineering indicators. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
National Science Foundation [NSF]. (2013). Web Caspar data portal. Available at https://webcaspar.nsf.gov/
36.
Nature Editorial (2004). Wanted: Career path for postdocs, Nature: Materials, 3(1), 1.
37.
NelsonD. J., & RogersD. C. (2003). A national analysis of diversity in science and engineering faculties at research universities. Washington, DC: National Organization for Women.
38.
NeradM., & CernyJ. (1999). Postdoctoral patterns, career advancement, and problems. Science, 285(5433), 1533—1535.
39.
NettlesM. T., & MillettC. M. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to Ph. D. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40.
NorthD. (1995). Soothing the establishment: The impact of foreign-born scientists and engineers on America. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
41.
O'MearaK. (2002). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. The Review of Higher Education, 26(1), 57—80.
42.
OreopoulosP. (2011). Why do skilled immigrants struggle in the labor market? A field experiment with thirteen thousand resumes. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(4), 148—171.
43.
OreopoulosP., WachterT., & HeiszA. (2012). The short- and long-term career effects of graduating in a recession. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(1), 1—29.
RetherfordR. D., & ChoeM. K. (1993). Statistical models for causal analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
47.
Sanchez-HuclesJ. (1997). Jeopardy not bonus status for African American women in the work force: Why does the myth of advantage persist?American Journal of Community Psychology, 25(5), 565—580.
48.
ScaffidiA. K., & BermanJ. E. (2011). A positive postdoctoral experience is related to quality supervision and career mentoring, collaborations, networking and a nurturing research environment. Higher Education, 62(6), 685—698.
49.
SkachkovaP. (2007). Academic careers of immigrant women professors in the US. Higher Education, 53(6), 697—738.
50.
StephanP. E. (2005, September). Job market effects on scientific productivity. Paper presented at the Conference on the Future of Science, Venice, Italy.
51.
StephanP. E. (2012). How economics shapes science?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
StephanP. E. (2013). How to exploit postdocs?BioScience, 63(4), 245—246.
53.
StephanP. E., & MaJ. (2005). The increased frequency and duration of the postdoctorate career stage. American Economic Review, 95(2), 71—75.
54.
SuX. (2013). The impacts of postdoctoral training on scientists' academic employment. Journal of Higher Education, 84(2), 239—265.
55.
TaylorB. J., & CantwellB. (in press). Global competition, US research universities, and international doctoral education: Growth and consolidation of an organizational field. Research in Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s11162-014-9355-6
56.
ToutkoushianR. K., BellasM. L., & MooreJ. V. (2007). The interaction effects of gender, race, and marital status on faculty salaries. Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 572—601.
57.
WebberK. L. (2012). Research productivity of foreign- and US-born faculty: Differences by time on task. Higher Education, 64, 709—729.
58.
ZumetaW. (1985). Extending the educational ladder: The changing quality and value of postdoctoral study. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
