Policy makers, school district officials, teachers and parents have embraced science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects as a way to promote a stronger pipeline to college and career STEM. In so doing, these varied groups seek to raise job prospects for next-generation workers, increase opportunities for low-income and minority students, and enhance U.S. competitiveness in a global economy.
Purpose/Objective
In this article we explore the ways in which the work of counseling departments in two different school environments shape students’ STEM participation in high school, with important potential consequences for college and career STEM. High school counselors operate at a critical access point to high-level science and math coursework in high school and STEM postsecondary majors and programs after high school. A fuller understanding of the role that school counselors play in improving math and science outcomes and strengthening pathways to STEM is increasingly important, particularly given the push for STEM careers in new global economic context.
Research Design
In this article we delve deeply into the day-to-day workings of the high school counseling office in two schools that serve markedly different populations of students. Utilizing data gathered through full ethnographic investigation over a 1-year period, we focus on the ways in which the work of counselors collectively constrain and /or enhance short and long-term STEM-linked outcomes for varying populations. We address two interrelated research questions: (1) In what ways and to what extent does the work of counseling departments in two different school environments shape students’ STEM participation in high school? (2) In what ways and to what extent does the work of the counseling departments differ in schools that serve markedly different populations of students in terms of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status?
Conclusions/Recommendations
Our data reveal stark differences between students’ high school STEM participation at the two schools. Evidence also points to differences in the work and role of school counselors in aiding students to access STEM in college and career. However, in spite of the fact that one school offers a far more robust pipeline to STEM than does the other, in neither case do the schools take concrete steps to maximize access to STEM in college or career for their top math and science students who express strong inclination in this direction. Although it is arguably the case that a number of factors contribute to STEM college and career outcomes, data highlight the differential yet simultaneously central role of high school counselors in the pipeline to STEM.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AaronsonD., BarrowL., & SanderW. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 95—135.
2.
Barron's College Division. (2009). Profiles of American Colleges 2009. Hauppauge, NY: Barron's Educational Series.
3.
Barron's College Division. (2012). Profiles of American Colleges 2012. Hauppauge, NY: Barron's Educational Series.
4.
BirminghamD., & Calabrese BartonA. (2014). Putting on a green carnival: Youth taking educated action on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 286—314.
5.
BishopK., & WaltersH. (2007). The national ocean sciences bowl: Extending the reach of a high school academic competition to college, careers, and a lifelong commitment to science. American Secondary Education, 35(3), 63—76.
6.
Bonous-HammarthM. (2002). Pathways to success: Affirming opportunities for science, mathematics, and engineering majors. The Journal of Negro Education, 69, 92—111.
7.
BordersL. D., & GibbonsM. M. (2010). A measure of college-going self-efficacy for middle school students. Professional School Counseling, 13, 234—243. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2010-13.234
8.
BowenW. G., ChingosM. M., & McPhersonM. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America's public universities. Trusteeship, 17(6), 24—29. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
9.
BurkamD. T., & LeeV. E. (2003). Mathematics, foreign language, and science coursetaking and the NELS:88 transcript data (NCES 2003–01). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
10.
CamposN. (2014). Persistence and negotiations of race: The experiences of graduate students of color in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Unpublished doctoral dissertation defense, SUNY Buffalo.
11.
CipolloneK. (2012). Leveraging privilege: The college process and the mobilization of social advantage in an affluent public high school. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No.3541094)
12.
CorwinZ. B., VenegasK. M., OliverezP. M., & ColyarJ. E. (2004). School counsel: How appropriate guidance affects educational equity. Urban Education, 39(4), 442—457.
13.
EisenhartM., MorrisT., Kotys-SchwartzD., KantorJ., ProsserR., & StarbirdK. (2009). Empty choice: Can girls “want” engineering if they don't know what it is? Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
14.
EisenhartM., WeisL., AllenC. D., CipolloneK., StichA., & DominguezR. (2015). High school opportunities for STEM: Comparing inclusive STEM-focused and comprehensive high schools in two US cities. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 52(5),
15.
EngbergM. E., & WolniakG. C. (2009). Navigating disparate pathways to college: Examining the conditional effects of race on enrollment decisions. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2255—2279. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
16.
Farmer-HintonR. (2008). Social capital and college planning: Students of color using school networks for support and guidance. Education and Urban Society, 41(1), 127—157.
17.
FellerR. (2009). STEM centric career development: Sputnik II or a thud?Career Planning and Adult Development Journal, 25(1), 19—35.
18.
Ferrini-MundyJ. (2013). Driven by diversity. Science, 340(6130), 278.
19.
GamoranA., & MareR. D. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality?. American journal of Sociology, 1146—1183
20.
GamoranA., PorterA. C., SmithsonJ., & WhiteP. A. (1997). Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(4), 325—338.
21.
HaneyW., AbramsL., MadausG., WheelockA., MiaoJ., & GruiaI. M. (2006). The education pipeline in the United States, 1970–2000: Trends in attrition, retention, and graduation rates. In WeisL., & FineM. (Eds.), Beyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States schools. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
22.
HardingeG. B., RokutaniL. J., & SchmidtC. D. (2012). Expanding the school counselor repertoire through STEM-focused career development. Career Development Quarterly, 60(1), 25.
23.
HillL. (2008). School strategies and the “college-linking” process: Reconsidering the effects of high schools on college enrollment. Sociology of Education, 81(1), 53—76.
24.
HillS. T., & GreenM. M. (2007). Science and engineering degrees, by race/ethnicity of recipients: 1995–2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2007.
25.
HofferT. B. (1992). Middle school ability grouping and student achievement in science and mathematics. Educational and Policy Analysis, 13, 205—227.
HornL., KojakuL. K., & CarrollC. D. (2001). High school academic curriculum and the persistence path through college. National Center for Education Statistics, 163.
28.
HosslerD., SchmitJ., & VesperN. (1999). Going to college: How social, economic, and educational factors influence the decisions students make. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
29.
KekelisL., AnchetaR., & HeberE. (2005). Hurdles in the pipeline: Girls and technology careers. Frontiers, 26(1), 99—108.
30.
LareauA. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
31.
LeeV. E., CroningerR. G., & SmithJ. B. (1997). Course-taking, equity, and mathematics learning: Testing the constrained curriculum hypothesis in U.S. secondary schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 99—121.
32.
LucasS. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, Track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642—1690.
33.
MaX., & McIntyreL. J. (2005). Exploring differential effects of mathematics courses on mathematics achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 29, 827—852.
34.
McDonoughP. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: SUNY Press.
35.
McDonoughP. M. (2005). Counseling matters: Knowledge, assistance, and organizational commitment in college preparation. In TierneyW. G., CorwinZ. B., & ColyarJ. E. (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
36.
MuhammadC. G. (2008). African American students and college choice: A consideration of the role of school counselors. NASSP Bulletin, 92(2), 81—94.
37.
MullerC., Riegle-CrumbC., SchillerK., WilkinsonL., & FrankK. (2010). Race and academic achievement in racially diverse high schools: Opportunity and stratification. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1038—1063.
38.
National Office for School Counselor Advocacy. (2010). Eight components of college and career readiness counseling. New York, NY: College Board Advocacy Policy Center.
39.
National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NikischerA. (2013). Social class and the STEM career pipeline: An ethnographic investigation of opportunity structures in a high-poverty versus affluent high school. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. 3598726)
42.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
OakesJ., JosephR., & MuirK. (2003). Access and achievement in mathematics and science. In BanksJ. A., & BanksC. A. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education, (2nd ed.) (pp. 69—90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
44.
PernaL. W. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 99—157). Dordrecht: Springer.
45.
Riegle-CrumbC. (2006). The path through math: Course sequences and academic performance at the intersection of race-ethnicity and gender. American Journal of Education, 113, 101—122.
46.
Riegle-CrumbC., & GrodskyE. (2010). Racial-ethnic differences at the intersection of math course-taking and achievement. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 248—270.
47.
RoderickM., NagaokaJ., CocaV., MoellerE., & Consortium on Chicago School Research. (2008). From high school to the future: Potholes on the road to college, case studies. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
48.
Savitz-RomerM. (2012). The gap between influence and efficacy: College readiness training, urban school counselors, and the promotion of equity. Counselor Education and Supervision, 51(2), 98.
49.
SchmidtC., HardingeG., & RokutaniL. (2012). Expanding the school counselor repertoire through STEM-focused career development. The Career Development Quarterly, 60(1), 25—35.
50.
SchneiderB., SwansonC. B., & Riegle-CrumbC. (1998). Opportunities for learning: Course sequences and positional advantages. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 25—53.
51.
TysonW., LeeR., BormanK., & HansonM. (2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(3), 243—270.
WeisL., CipolloneK., & JenkinsH. (2014). Class warfare: Class, race, and college admissions in top-tier secondary schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
WeisL., & FineM. (2004). Working method: Research and social justice. New York: Routledge.
