Transnational Mexican-origin youth comprise a large and increasing number of students in U.S. schools, yet their teachers have often misunderstood their backgrounds and the conditions related to their transnational movement over borders. With such a large number of immigrant/transnational youth in the U.S. of Mexican origin, it is important for educators to begin to understand their ways of knowing.
Purpose
I describe chained knowing, a way of knowing of transnational Mexican-origin families. Family members were chained to the border and to their extended family and communities across borders, with the latter way of knowing as an ends in itself. I offer implications for educators, curriculum, and considerations surrounding immigration policy.
Setting
Washington, DC area and two rural immigrant-sending communities in Mexico in the states of Jalisco and Michoacán.
Participants
Four working-class Mexican-origin families whose primary residence was in the Washington, DC area and who made return trips to Mexico at least every 2 years.
Research Design
This multi-sited, critical ethnographic work draws from participant observation and interviews with four families who were situated in the Washington, DC area. The research was collected over 3 years.
Data Collection and Analysis
Through the interwoven lenses of border theory and Chicana feminism, the data were collected over 3 years and then analyzed and coded for emergent themes in an iterative process. The data were member checked with participants from each of the four participating families and also coded by an outside researcher.
Findings
Mexican-origin transnationals in this study demonstrated an interconnected way of knowing as chained knowing: chained to both the border and to their extended communities spanning borders.
Conclusions
The ways of knowing of transnational families should be understood by educators, researchers, and policy makers in order to help the curriculum better reflect the increasingly global context all students engage and the ways we understand the struggles of people across border.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvarezR. (1995). The Mexican-U.S. border: The making of an anthropology of borderlands. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 447—470.
2.
AnzaldúaG. E. (Ed.). (1990). Making soul/Haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by women of color. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
3.
AnzaldúaG. E., Saldívar-HullS. (1999). La frontera/Borderlands: The new mestiza (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
4.
AnzaldúaG. E. (2000). Making alliances, queerness, and bridging conocimientos: An interview with Jamie Lee Evans (1993). In KeatingA. (Ed.), Interviews/Entrevistas/Gloria E. Anzaldúa (pp. 195—210). New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BanksJ. A., & McGee BanksC. A. (Eds.). (2010). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6.
BradatanC., PopanA., & MeltonR. (2010). Trans-nationality as a fluid social identity. Social Identities, 16(2), 169—178.
7.
CalderónD., Delgado BernalD., Pérez HuberL., MalagónM. C., & VélezV. N. (2012). A Chicana feminist epistemology revisited: Cultivating ideas a generation later. Harvard Educational Review, 82(4), 513—539.
8.
CarrilloJ. F. (2013). I always knew I was gifted: Latino males and the Mestiz@ theory of intelligences (MTI). Berkeley Review of Education, 4(1), 69—95.
9.
CastilloA. (1994). Massacre of the dreamers: Essays on Xicanisma. New York, NY: Plume/ Penguin Books.
10.
ChavezL. (2013). The Latino threat: Constructing immigrants, citizens, and the nation (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Delgado BernalD. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 555—582.
12.
Delgado BernalD. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical raced-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 150—126.
13.
Deportation 101: A community resource on anti-deportation education and organization. (2010). Washington, DC: Detention Watch Network, Families for Freedom, Immigrant Defense Project, National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild.
FoleyD. E. (2002). Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(5), 469—490.
16.
FreireP. (2008). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. Bergman Ramos, Trans. 30th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
17.
GándaraP. C., & ContrerasF. (2010). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed school policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
GarcíaA. M. (1997). Introduction. In GarcíaA. M. (Ed.), Chicana feminist thought: The basic historical writings (pp. 1—20). New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
20.
GonzálezN., MollL. C., & AmantiC. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
GuarnizoL. E., & PortesA. (2003). Assimilation and transnationalism: Determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. American Journal of Sociology, 108(6), 1211—1248.
22.
GuptaA., & FergusonJ. (1992). Beyond ‘culture’: Space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cultural Anthropology, 7(1), 6—23.
23.
HernandezD. J., & NapieralaJ. S. (2012). Children in immigrant famlies: Essential to America's future. New York, NY: Foundation for Child Development.
24.
KasunG. S. (in press). Transnationalism: Competing definitions, individual agency in an age of globalization, and research trends. In BrockR., & Nix-StevensonD. (Eds.), Black Studies and Critical Thinking Reader. New York: Peter Lang.
25.
KasunG. S. (2013). ‘We are not terrorists,’ but more likely transnationals: Reframing understandings about immigrants in light of the Boston Marathon bombings. Multicultural Perspectives, 15(4), 227—233.
26.
KasunG. S. (2014). Hidden knowing of working-class transnational Mexican families in schools: Bridge-building, Nepantlera knowers. Ethnography and Education, 9(3), 313—327.
27.
KasunG. S. (2015). “The Only Mexican in the room”: Sobrevivencia survival as a way of knowing for Mexican transnational students and families. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 46(3), 277—294. doi:10.1111/aeq.12107
28.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teaching of African American children (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
MadisonS. D. (2011). Introduction to critical ethnography: Theory and method. Critical ethnography: Methods, ethics, and performance. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
30.
MasseyD. S., DurandJ., & MaloneN. J. (2002). Beyond smoke and mirrors: Mexican migration in an era of economic integration. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
31.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
32.
MollL. C., AmantiC., NeffD., & GonzálezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132—141.
33.
MoraP. (2008). Nepantla: Essays from the land in the middle. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
34.
NaplesN. A. (2010). Borderlands studies and border theory: Linking activism and scholarship for social hustice. Sociology Compass, 4(7), 505—518. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00290.x
35.
NevinsJ. (2001). Operation gatekeeper: The rise of the “illegal alien” and the remaking of the U.S.Mexico boundary. New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
NgaiM. M. (2004). Impossible subjects: Illegal aliens and the making of modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
OlivosE. M., OchoaA. M., & Jiménez-CastellanosO. (2011). Critical voices in bicultural parent involvement: A framework for transformation. In OlivosE. M., Jiménez-CastellanosO., & OchoaA. M. (Eds.), Bicultural parent engagement: Advocacy and empowerment (pp. 1—20). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
38.
PasselJ., CohnD., & RohalM. (2014). Unauthorized immigrant totals rise in 7 states, fall in 14. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
39.
PérezE. (2005). Gloria Anzaldúa: La gran nueva Mestiza theorist, writer, activist-scholar. NWSA Journal, 17(2), 1—10.
40.
SaavedraC. M. (2011). Langauge and literacy in the Borderlands: Acting upon the world through testimonios. Language Arts, 88(4), 261—269.
41.
SaavedraC. M., & NymarkE. D. (2008). Borderland-Mestizaje feminism: The new tribalism. In DenzinN. K., LincolnY. S., & SmithL. T. (Eds.), Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodology (pp. 255—276). Los Angeles: SAGE.
42.
San MiguelG., & ValenciaR. R. (1998). From the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo to “Hopwood”: The educational plight and struggle of Mexican Americans in the Southwest. Harvard Educational Review, 68(3), 353—412.
43.
SánchezP. (2004). At home in two places: Second generation Mexicanas and their lives as engaged transnationals (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
44.
SánchezP. (2007). Urban immigrant students: How transnationalism shapes their world learning. The Urban Review, 39(5), 489—517.
45.
SánchezP. (2009). Chicana feminist strategies in a participatory action research project with transnational Latina youth. New Directions for Youth Development, 123, 83—97.
46.
SandovalC. (1991). U.S. Third World feminism: The theory and method of oppositional consciousness in the postmodern world. Genders, 10, 1—24.
47.
Santa AnaO. (1999). “Like an animal I was treated”: Anti-immigrant metaphor in U.S. public discourse. Discourse & Society, 10(2), 191—224.
48.
SleeterC. E. (2008). Teaching for democracy in an age of corporatocracy. Teachers College Record, 110(1), 139—159.
49.
SmithL. T. (2006). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, UK: Zed Books Ltd.
50.
SpenerD. (2009). Clandestine crossings: Migrants and coyotes on the Texas-Mexico border. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
51.
SpradleyJ. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
52.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
53.
SteinbergS. R. (2009). Diversity? Multiculturalism? Moving tolerance and tokenism to a critical level. In SteinbergS. (Ed.), Diversity and multiculturalism: A reader (pp. xi–xiii). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
54.
StephenL. (2007). Transborder lives: Indigenous Oaxacans in Mexico, California, and Oregon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
55.
TurkanS., De OliveiraL. C., LeeO., & PhelpsG. (2014). Proposing a knowledge base for teaching academic content to English language learners: Disciplinary linguistic knowledge. Teachers College Record, 116(3). 1–30.
56.
UrrietaL. (2009). Working from within: Chicana and Chicano activist educators in Whitestream schools. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
57.
UrrietaL. (2013). Familia and comunidad-based saberes: Learning in an indigenous heritage community. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 44(3), 320—335.
58.
UrrietaL., & MartínezS. (2011). Diasporic community knowledge and school absenteeism: Mexican immigrant pueblo parents' and grandparents' postcolonial ways of educating. Interventions, 13(2), 256—277.
59.
ValenciaR. R. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
60.
ValenciaR. R., & PearlA. (2011). Conclusion: Toward school reform. In ValenciaR. R. (Ed.), Chicano school failure and success: Past, present, and future (3rd ed., pp. 273—286). New York, NY: Routledge.
61.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S. Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany-: State University of New York Press.
62.
VillenasS. A. (1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization, and co-optation in the field. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 711—731.
63.
VillenasS. A. (2007). Diaspora and the anthropology of Latino education: Challenges, affinities, and intersections. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 38(4), 419—425.
64.
VillenasS. A., GodinezF. E., Delgado BernalD., & ElenesC. A. (2006). Chicanas/Latinas building bridges: An introduction. In Delgado BernalD., ElenesC. A., GodinezF. E., & VillenasS. A. (Eds.), Chicana/Latina education in everyday life (pp. 1—10). Albany: State University of New York Press.
65.
WaldingerR. (2013). Immigrant transnationalism. Current Sociology, 61(5–6), 756—777.
66.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69—91.
67.
YossoT. J. (2006). Critical race counterstories along the Chicana/Chicano educational pipeline. New York, NY: Routledge.
68.
ZúñigaV., & HamannE. T. (2009). Sojourners in Mexico with U.S. school experience: A new taxonomy for transnational students. Comparative Education Review, 53(3), 329—353.
