As many students face the enduring challenge of maintaining their motivation to complete homework assignments, there is a critical need to pay close attention to homework motivation management (i.e., students’ efforts to sustain or enhance their motivation in order to complete homework assignments that might be boring or difficult). Yet, in spite of research showing that homework motivation has a powerful influence on homework performance and academic achievement, there have been few attempts to systematically investigate models of factors that influence homework motivation management.
Purpose
The current investigation examines empirical models of motivation management for Chinese students in the context of math homework, with models informed by key motivation theories, including self-regulation of motivation, expectancy-value, and volitional control.
Research Design
The study reported here used cross sectional survey data.
Participants
The participants were 1,799 high school students from 46 classes in China.
Results
Results from multilevel analyses indicated that, at the class level, motivation management was positively associated with homework interest, but was negatively associated with teacher feedback. At the student level, motivation management was positively related to managing emotion, managing time, students’ interest in homework, cognitive reappraisal, expectancy belief, and time on sports. Meanwhile, motivation management was negatively associated with value belief and time on TV.
Conclusion
The current investigation found that some results were in line with key motivation theories and related findings with U.S. students (e.g., managing time, and homework interest at the student level). In addition, it suggests that other results may be influenced by cultural and societal differences (e.g., gender, value belief, and teacher feedback). Consequently, it would be informative to pursue this line of research in cross-cultural settings. With respect to promoting student motivation in the homework process, it would be beneficial to pay more close attention to the role of homework interest, expectancy belief, and student initiatives (e.g., managing time, managing emotion, and cognitive reappraisal).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoekaertsM. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186.
2.
BoekaertsM. (2011). What have we learned about the social context-student engagement link?Teachers College Record, 113, 375–393.
3.
BoekaertsM., & CornoL. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199–231.
4.
CaiJ. (2003). Investigating parental roles in students' learning of mathematics from a cross-national perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 87–106.
5.
CalderwoodC., AckermanP. L., & ConklinE. M. (2014). What else do college students “do” while studying? An investigation of multitasking. Computers and Education, 75, 19–29.
6.
ChenC., & StevensonH. W. (1989). Homework: A cross-cultural examination. Child Development, 60, 551–561.
7.
ChenC., & UttalD. H. (1988). Cultural values, parents' beliefs, and children's achievement in the United States and China. Human Development, 31, 351–358.
8.
CooperC. A., & CorpusJ. H. (2009). Learners' developing knowledge of strategies for regulating motivation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 525–536.
9.
CooperH., LindsayJ. J., NyeB., & GreathouseS. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 70–83.
10.
CooperH., RobinsonJ. C., & PatallE. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1–62.
11.
CornoL. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 14–22.
12.
CornoL. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In ZimmermanB. & SchunkD. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 191–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
CornoL., & MandinachE. B. (2004). What we have learned about student engagement in the past twenty years. In McInerneyD. M. & EttenS. V. (Eds.), Big theories revisited: Vol 4. Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 299–328). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
14.
CornoL., & XuJ. (2004). Doing homework as the job of childhood. Theory Into Practice, 43, 227–233.
15.
DenissenJ. J., ZarrettN. R., & EcclesJ. S. (2007). I like to do it, I'm able, and I know I am: Longitudinal couplings between domain specific achievement, self-concept, and interest. Child Development, 78, 430–447.
16.
DuckworthA. L., & SeligmanM. E. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 198–208.
17.
EcclesJ. S. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In SpenceJ. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: Freeman.
18.
EcclesJ. S., & MidgleyC. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In AmesR. & AmesC. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139–181). New York: Academic Press.
19.
EcclesJ. S., & WigfieldA. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
20.
FriesS., DietzF., & SchmidS. (2008). Motivational interference in learning: The impact of leisure alternatives on subsequent self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 119–133.
21.
FulmerS. M., & FrijtersJ. C. (2009). A review of self-report and alternative approaches in the measurement of student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 219–246.
22.
GrossJ. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequence. Psychophysiology, 39, 281–291.
23.
GrossJ. J., & ThompsonR. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York: Guilford Press.
24.
HoD. Y. F. (1994). Cognitive socialization in Confucian heritage cultures. In GreenfieldP. & CockingR. (Eds.), The development of minority child: Culture in and out of context (pp. 285–313). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
HollandA., & AndreT. (1987). Participation in extracurricular activities in secondary school: What is known, what needs to be known?Review of Educational Research, 57, 437–466.
26.
HongE., PengY., & RowellL. L. (2009). Homework self-regulation: Grade, gender, and achievement-level differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 269–276.
27.
HongE., WanM., & PengY. (2011). Discrepancies between students' and teachers' perceptions of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 280–308.
28.
HonigsfeldA., & DunnR. (2003). High school male and female learning-style similarities and differences in diverse nations. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 195–206.
29.
IflazogluA., & HongE.E. (2012). Relations of homework motivation and preferences to homework achievement and attitudes in Turkish students. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 26, 57–72.
30.
KitsantasA., CheemaJ., & WareH. W. (2011). Mathematics achievement: The role of homework and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 310–339.
31.
KreftI., & de LeeuwJ. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
32.
KuhlJ. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In KuhlJ. & BeckmannJ. (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 101–128). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
33.
KuhlJ. (2000). The volitional basis of personality systems interaction theory: Applications in learning and treatment contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 665–704.
34.
LarsonR. W., HansenD. M., & MonetaG. (2006). Differing profiles of developmental experiences across types of organized youth activities. Developmental Psychology, 42, 849–863.
35.
LiJ. (2001). Chinese conceptualization of learning. Ethos, 29, 111–137.
36.
LiJ. (2002). A cultural model of learning: Chinese “heart and mind for wanting to learn.”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 246–267.
37.
LiJ. (2003). U.S. and Chinese cultural beliefs about learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 258–267.
38.
LinJ., & ChenQ. (1995). Academic pressure and impact on students' development in China. McGill Journal of Education, 30, 149–168
39.
McCannE., & GarciaT. (1999). Maintaining motivation and regulating emotion: Measuring individual differences in academic volitional strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 3, 250–279.
40.
McRaeK., OchsnerK. N., MaussI. B., GabrieliJ. J. D., & GrossJ. J. (2008). Gender differences in emotion regulation: An fMAI study of cognitive reappraisal. Group Process and Intergroup Relations, 11, 143–162.
41.
MendicinoM., RazzaqL., & HeffernanN. T. (2009). A comparison of traditional homework to computer-supported homework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 331–359.
42.
MuG. M. (2014). Chinese Australians' Chineseness and their mathematics achievement: The role of habitus. Australian Educational Researcher, 41, 1–18.
43.
OECD. (2010). Mathematics teaching and learning strategies in PISA. Paris: OECD.
44.
ParkersonA. H. (2001). Young Women's Career and Educational Development through Extracurricular Activity Participation: A Qualitative Study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED457409)
45.
PatallE. A., CooperH., & WynnS. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 896–915.
46.
PengY., HongE., LiX., WanM., & LongY. (2010). Homework problems: Do students from rural and urban schools perceive differently. International Journal of Learning, 17(3), 81–95.
47.
PezdekK., BerryT., & RennoP. A. (2002). Children's mathematics achievement: The role of parents' perceptions and their involvement in homework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 771–777.
48.
PintrichP. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.
49.
PintrichP. R., SmithD. A. F., GarciaT., & McKeachieW. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MLSQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.
50.
PintrichP. R., & ZushoA. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In WigfieldA. & EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego, CA: Academic.
51.
PokayP., & BlumenfeldP. C. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 41–50.
52.
PoolM. M., van der VoortT. H. A., BeentjesJ. W. J., & KoolstraC. M. (2000). Background television as an inhibitor of performance on easy and difficult homework assignments. Communication Research, 27, 293–326.
53.
RaoN., MoelyB. E., & SachsJ. (2000). Motivational beliefs, study strategies, and mathematics attainment in high- and low-achieving Chinese secondary school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 287–316.
54.
RaudenbushS., & BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models Applications and data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
SaliliF.ZhouH., & HoosainR. (2003). Adolescent education in Hong Kong and Mainland China: Effects of culture and context of learning on Chinese adolescents. In PajaresF. & UrdanT. (Eds.), Adolescence and education, Vol. III: International perspectives on adolescence (pp. 277–302). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
56.
SchunkD. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 85–94.
57.
SellarS., & LingardB. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49, 464–485.
58.
SiuM. K. (1995). Mathematics education in ancient China: What lesson do we learn from it?Historia Scientiarum, 4, 223–232.
59.
SunJ., DunneM. P., & HouX. Y. (2012). Academic stress among adolescents in China. Australasian Epidemiologist, 19(1), 9–12.
60.
SunX., & WongN. Y. (2005). A culture-bound look on mathematics beliefs: Differences between China and U.S.A. students. Mathematics Educator, 8(2), 95–105.
61.
TamV. C. W. (2009). Homework involvement among Hong Kong primary school students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29, 213–227.
62.
TrautweinU., & LüdtkeO. (2009). Predicting homework motivation and homework effort in six school subjects: The role of person and family characteristics, classroom factors, and school track. Learning and Instruction, 19, 243–258.
63.
TrautweinU., LudtkeO., SchnyderI., & NiggliA. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 438–456.
64.
VermaS., SharmaD., & LarsonR. (2002). School stress in India: Effects on time and daily emotions. International Journal of Behavior Development, 26, 500–508.
65.
Von SeckerC. (2002). Effects of inquiry-based teacher practices on science excellence and equity. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 151–160.
66.
WangD. B. (2004). Family background factors and mathematics success: A comparison of Chinese students. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 40–54.
67.
WartonP. M. (2001). The forgotten voices in homework: Views of students. Educational Psychologist, 36, 155–165.
68.
WinneP. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In ZimmermanB. & SchunkD. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69.
WinneP. H., & MarxR. (1989). A cognitive-processing analysis of motivation with classroom tasks. In AmesC. & AmesR. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 223–257). Orlando, FL: Academic.
70.
WinshipC., & SobelM. E. (2004). Causal inferences in sociological studies. In HardyM. & BrymanA. (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 481–503). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71.
WoltersC. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189–204.
72.
WoltersC. (2011). Regulation of motivation: Contextual and social Aspects. Teachers College Record, 113, 265–283.
73.
XuJ. (2006). Gender and homework management reported by high school students. Educational Psychology, 26, 73–91.
74.
XuJ. (2008a). Models of secondary students' interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1180–1205.
75.
XuJ. (2008b). Validation of scores on the homework management scale for high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 304–324.
76.
XuJ. (2008c). Validation of scores on the homework management scale for middle school students. Elementary School Journal, 109, 82–95.
77.
XuJ. (2010). Predicting homework time management at the secondary school level: A multilevel analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 34–39.
78.
XuJ. (2011). Homework emotion management at the secondary school level: Antecedents and homework completion. Teachers College Record, 113, 529–560.
79.
XuJ. (2014). Regulation of motivation: Predicting homework motivation management at the secondary school level. Research Papers in Education, 29, 457–478.
80.
XuJ. (2015). Investigating factors that influence conventional distraction and tech-related distraction in math homework. Computers and Education, 81, 304–314
81.
XuJ., & CornoL. (1998). Case studies of families doing third grade homework. Teachers College Record, 100, 402–436.
82.
XuJ., & CornoL. (2003). Family help and homework management reported by middle school students. Elementary School Journal, 103, 503–518.
XuJ., FanX., & DuJ. (2015). Homework management scale: Confirming the factor structure with middle school students in China. Psychology in the Schools, 52, 419–429.
85.
XuJ., & YuanR. (2003). Doing homework: Listening to students', parents', and teachers' voices in one urban middle school community. School Community Journal, 13(2), 25–44.
86.
YangF., & XuJ. (2015). Examining the psychometric properties of the Homework Management Scale for high school students in China. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 268–277.
87.
ZimmermanB. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183.
88.
ZimmermanB. J., & Martinez-PonsM. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.
