The Politics of Paternalism: Adult and Youth Perspectives on Youth Voice in Public Policy

Abstract

Background/Context

Over the last two decades, youth involvement in policy advocacy has increased sharply, through youth councils, organizing coalitions, and new media forums. Currently 12 states and 140 American cities have youth councils or commissions established to advise policymakers on the impact of their legislation on youth. Despite their growing presence, we know little about what these councils do, how they are viewed, or how, if at all, they influence policy-making processes.

Purpose

This study explores manifestations of adultism during the first 4 years of the Ballou City Youth Commission (BCYC) from the perspectives of 22 youth members and adult allies.

Research Design

Though primarily interview-based, this study also draws on field notes collected during a BCYC meeting and a BCYC community forum and organizational artifacts to explore the nature and dynamics of adultism as they played out in BCYC.

Data Collection and Analysis

In-depth, individual interviews were conducted with 11 current and former youth commissioners and 11 adults who represented the target audience for BCYC's work or who partnered with the commission on various initiatives. The theoretical framework of adultism guided the analysis, which included open and axial coding, memo writing, and the construction of matrices and charts to track emergent patterns.

Findings/Results

Using a critical theory lens, we find that adultism has played a prominent role in limiting BCYC from achieving the goals laid out in its charter. We identify a “roller coaster of adultism” that illustrates how weak initial structures coupled with deeply entrenched views of youths’ limited capacity adversely impacted the functioning of BCYC and propelled a cycle of externalized and internalized adultism.

Conclusions

The study adds to the scant literature on youth voice in public policy, raises six clear implications for policy and practice, and extends theory by illustrating the complex ways in which external and internalized forms of adultism interact with and reinforce each other.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

, Bell

L. A.

, & Griffin

(Eds.). (1997). Teaching for diversity and social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.

Bell

(1995). Understanding adultism: A key to developing positive youth-adult relationships. Olympia, WA: The Freechild Project.

Camino

(2005). Pitfalls and promising practices in youth-adult partnerships: An evaluator's refections. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 75–85.

Carlson

(2006). The Hampton experience as a new model for youth civic engagement. Journal of Community Practice, 14, 89–106.

Charmaz

(1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In McCall

& Simmons

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Checkoway

(2011). What is youth participation? Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 340–345.

Checkoway

, Allison

, & Montoya

(2005). Youth participation in public policy at the municipal level. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 1149–1162.

Christens

, & Dolan

(2011). Interweaving youth development, community development, and social change through youth organizing. Youth and Society, 43, 528–548.

Colatos

A. M.

, & Morrell

(2003). Apprenticing urban youth as critical researchers: Implications for increasing equity and access in diverse urban schools. In Rubin

& Silva

(Eds.), Critical voices in school reform: Students living through change (pp. 113–131). London: RoutlegeFalmer.

10.

Conner

, Zaino

, & Scarola

(2013). “Very powerful voices”: The influence of youth organizing on educational policy. Educational Policy, 27, 561–588.

11.

Cook-Sather

(2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 359–390.

12.

Delgado

, & Staples

(2008). Youth-led community organizing. Theory and action. New York: Oxford University Press.

13.

Fielding

(2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 123–141.

14.

Fletcher

(2006). The Washington youth voice handbook: The what, who, why, where, when, and how youth voice happens. Olympia, WA: CommonAction.

15.

Fletcher

(2011). Ladder of youth voice. Retrieved from http://www.freechild.org/ladder.htm

16.

Glaser

, & Strauss

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.

17.

Hammer

, & Berland

(2014). Confusing claims for data: A critique of common practices for presenting qualitative research on learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 37–46.

18.

Hart

R. A.

(1992). Children's participation from tokenism to citizenship. Florence, Italy: UNICEF International Child Development Centre.

19.

HoSang

(2001). Youth community organizing today. Occasional Papers Series on Youth Organizing (no. 2). New York: Funders' Collaborative on Youth Organizing.

20.

Ishihara

(2007). Urban transformations: Youth organizing in Boston, New York City, Philadelphia and Washington DC. Occasional Paper Series on Youth Organizing (no. 9). New York: Funders' Collaborative on Youth Organizing.

21.

Lincoln

, & Guba

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

22.

Males

M. A.

(1996). The scapegoat generation: America's war on adolescents. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.

23.

Martin

, Pittman

, Ferber

, & McMahon

(2007, July). Building effective youth councils: A practical guide to engaging youth in policymaking. Washington, DC: The Forum for Youth Investment.

24.

McMahon

(2012). Education in and for democracy: Conceptions of schooling and student voice. In McMahon

& Portelli

(Eds.), Student engagement in urban schools: Beyond neoliberal discourses (pp. 29–47). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

25.

Mediratta

, Shah

, & McAlister

(2009). Community organizing for stronger schools: Strategies and success. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

26.

Mitra

D. L.

(2007). Student voice in school reform: From listening to leadership. In Thiessen

& Cook-Sather

(Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 727–744). AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

27.

Mitra

D. L.

(2008). Student voice in school reform. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

28.

Mitra

D. L.

(2009). Student voice and student roles in education policy and policy reform. In Sykes

, Schneider

, & Plank

D. N.

(Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 819–830). New York: Routledge.

29.

Mitra

D. L.

, & Kirshner

(2012). Insiders versus outsiders: Examining variability in student voice initiatives and their consequences for school change. In McMahon

& Portelli

(Ed.), Student engagement in urban schools: Beyond neoliberal discourses (pp. 49–71). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

30.

Moore

(2011). No transportation, no education! Voices in Urban Education, 30, 5–12.

31.

Mullahey

, Susskind

, & Checkoway

(1999). Youth participation in community planning. Chicago: American Planning Association.

32.

National Council of Young Leaders. (2012). Recommendations to decrease poverty and increase opportunity in America. Washington, DC: National Council of Young Leaders.

33.

National League of Cities. (2002). Promoting youth participation. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.

34.

National League of Cities. (2010). Authentic youth civic engagement: A guide for municipal leaders. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.

35.

O'Donoghue

J. L.

, Kirshner

, & McLaughlin

M. W.

(2002). Moving youth participation forward. New Directions for Youth Development, 96, 15–26.

36.

Pautsch

(2010). Leadership to support student voice: The role of school leaders in supporting meaningful student government and voice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

37.

Peshkin

(1988). In search of subjectivity: One's own. Educational Researcher, 17, 17–21.

38.

Richards-Schuster

, & Checkoway

(2010). Youth participation in public policy at the local level: new lessons from Michigan municipalities. National Civic Review, 98, 26–31.

39.

Rudduck

(2007). Student voice, student engagement, and school reform. In Thiessen

& Cook-Sather

(Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 587–610). AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

40.

Schoenfeld

A. H.

(1992). On paradigms and methods: What do you do when the ones you know don't do what you want them to? Issues in the analysis of data in the form of videotapes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 179–214.

41.

Shah

(2011). Building transformative youth leadership: Data on the impacts of youth organizing. Brooklyn, NY: Funders' Collaborative on Youth Organizing.

42.

Sirianni

(2005). Youth civic engagement: Systems change and culture change in Hampton, Virginia. CIRCLE, Working Paper 31.

43.

SooHoo

(1993). Students as partners in research and restructuring schools. The Educational Forum, 57, 386–393.

44.

Spradley

J. P.

(1979). The Ethnographic Interview. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

45.

Tate

T. F.

, & Copas

R. L.

(2003) Insist or enlist? Adultism versus climates of excellence. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 12, 40–45.

46.

Zeldin

, Camino

, & Calvert

(2003). Toward an understanding of youth in community governance: Policy priorities and research directions. Social Policy Report, 17(3), 3–20.

47.

Zeldin

, Petrokubi

, & MacNeil

(2007). Youth participation in community decision- making. What does it take to engage adults in youth-adult partnerships? Chevy Chase, MD: National 4-H Council.