The Promise and Limitations of a College-Going Culture: Toward Cultures of Engaged Learning for Low-SES Latina/o Youth

Abstract

Background/Context

Literatures on college-going cultures offer patterns and lists of practices that promote schoolwide attention to college-going for nondominant youth, often with organization-level analyses of policies and procedures. Other literature identifies promising practices and challenges to conventional instruction, often examining pedagogical discourse. Seldom are ideas from these two literatures brought together to examine promises and tensions of effectively preparing youth of color for higher education. Our study examined both school and classroom levels to develop such understanding.

Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study

The purpose was to learn how high schools committed to reversing historic underrepresentation of low-SES students of color in higher education may leverage two dimensions of schooling to hit this goal: development of a school-wide college-going culture with norms and roles that articulate high expectations and provide extensive supports toward college admissions and academically engaging classroom experiences that include rigorous and meaningful disciplinary challenges, supported by language-rich communication, collaboration, culture, and context. To learn about one school's complex college-for-all efforts, we asked: How is a college-going culture enacted at the school, and by whom, to support Latina/o students in gaining access to college? What is the nature of academic engagement at the school that may help prepare Latina/o students for college?

Setting

Urban College Academy (UCA) is a public charter high school whose population was 98% Latina/o, 35% English learners, 81% receiving free/reduced price lunch. UCA's entering students were predominantly two or more years below grade level in reading and computing, according to standardized tests. The school explicitly recruits students who have previously failed a course, and the mission statement identifies “underachieving students” as UCA's target population. Students are mostly of Mexican origin, with roughly 80% first generation.

Population/Participants/Subjects

We collected data from school leaders, teachers, counselors, parents, and students. At classroom level, we selected six focal teachers (diverse in subject areas, ethnicity/race, and gender). We examined work and perspectives of focal students representative of academic performance and English language proficiency per focal class.

Research Design

We treat UCA as a “critical case,” holding strategic importance to the problem on which the study focuses. Using qualitative methods, a survey, and structured observation scores, we worked to integrate, associate, and counter themes and findings between and across school organization and classroom levels.

Data Collection and Analysis

School-level analysis focused on normative social structures (goals, values, norms, and roles); resource allocations associated with advancing a mission to promote Latina/o students’ academic success and college acceptance; and factors UCA identified as relevant. Drawing on over 40 hours of transcribed interviews with a wide range of participants, we developed themes and triangulated with other data. Classroom observation data were analyzed using CLASS and Standards Performance Continuum protocols, supported by other analyses. Teacher cases used teacher history and refections on practice; videos, annotated fieldnotes; materials of teaching; and student work samples and focus groups. We found comparisons, contrasts, and tensions across lessons and classes; one case emerges as “a pocket of promise.”

Conclusions/Recommendations

The study reveals a need for ongoing attention to both a college-going culture and instructional interactions. It highlights distinctions between college talk (talk about college) and college-level academic discourse, or socialization versus academic functions of schooling for college access and success. The study uncovers promising instructional interactions, as well as tensions, in engaging low-SES Latina/o students in academically rigorous work. Results suggest schools supporting low-SES youth of color may need a schoolwide culture of engaged learning that is rigorous, meaningful, and infused throughout school.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achinstein

, Curry

M. T.

, & Ogawa

R. T.

(2015). (Re)labeling social status: Promises and tensions of developing a college going culture for Latina/o youth in an urban high school. American Journal of Education.

Achinstein

, Curry

M. W.

, Ogawa

R. T.

, & Athanases

S. Z.

(2014). Organizing high schools for Latina/o youth success: Boundary crossing to access and build community wealth. Urban Education. doi:10.1177/0042085914550413

ACT. (2007). State of college readiness for Latino students. ACT.

Alexie

(2007). The absolutely true diary of a part-time Indian. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Co.

Andrés-Hyman

R. C.

, Ortiz

, Añez

L. M.

, Paris

, & Davidson

(2006). Culture and clinical practice: Recommendations for working with Puerto Ricans and other Latinas(os) in the United States. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37(6), 694–701.

Applebee

A. N.

, Langer

J. A.

, Nystrand

, & Gamoran

(2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730.

Athanases

S. Z.

, & de Oliveira

L. C.

(2014). Scaffolding versus routine support for Latina/o youth in an urban school: Tensions in building toward disciplinary literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 263–299.

K. H.

, & Kawakami

A. J.

(1994). Cultural congruence in instruction. In Hollins

E. R.

, King

J. E.

, & Hayman

W. C.

(Eds.), Teaching diverse populations: Formulating a knowledge base (pp. 5–23). New York: State University of New York.

Bidwell

C. E.

(1965). The school as a formal organization. In March

J. G.

(Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 972–1022). New York, NY: Rand McNally.

10.

Brown

A. L

, & Campione

J. C.

(1990). Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name. Contributions to Human Development, 21, 108–126.

11.

Bruer

J. T.

(1994). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

12.

California Department of Education. (2013). Statewide enrollment by ethnicity. Retrieved from http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/

13.

Carney

D. R.

, Cuddy

A. J. C.

, & Yap

A. J.

(2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1363–1368.

14.

Carter

(2007). Ways of knowing, doing, and writing in the disciplines. College Composition and Communication, 58(3), 385–418.

15.

Carter

(2005). Keepin' it real: School success beyond Black and White. New York, NY: Oxford Press.

16.

Cicourel

A. V.

, & Kitsuse

J. I.

(1977). The school as a mechanism of social differentiation. In Karabel

& Halsey

A. H.

(Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 282–292). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

17.

Cochran-Smith

(2004). Walking the road: Race, diversity, and social justice in teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

18.

Cooper

K. S.

(2013). Safe, affirming, and productive spaces: Classroom engagement among Latina high school students. Urban Education, 48(4), 490–528.

19.

Cooper

K. S.

(2014). Eliciting engagement in the high school classroom: A mixed-methods examination of teaching practices. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 363–402.

20.

Corwin

Z. B.

, & Tierney

W. G.

(2007). Getting there–and beyond: Building a culture of college-going in high schools. Retrieved from http://ffiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED498731.pdf

21.

Costigan

A. T.

(2008). Canaries in the coal mine: Urban rookies learning to teach Language Arts in “high priority” schools. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(2), 85–103.

22.

Curry

M. W.

(2013). Being the change: An inner city school builds peace. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(4), 23–27.

23.

Doherty

R. W.

, Hilberg

R. S.

, Pinal

, & Tharp

R. G.

(2003). Five standards and student achievement. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 1(1), 1–24.

24.

Engeström

(2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.

25.

Faltis

, Arias

M. B.

, & Ramirez-Marin

(2010). Identifying relevant competencies for secondary teachers of English learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 33, 307–328.

26.

Farmer-Hinton

(2011). On being college prep: Examining the implementation of a “college for all” mission in an urban charter school. Urban Review, 43, 567–596.

27.

Flyvbjerg

(2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Fry

, & Taylor

(2013). Hispanic high school graduates pass Whites in rate of college enrollment. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/files/2013/05/PHC_college_enrollment_2013-05.pdf

29.

Gee

J. P.

(2003). Opportunity to learn: A language-based perspective on assessment. Assessment in Education, 10(1), 27–46.

30.

Gibbons

(2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

31.

Hammond

, & Gibbons

(2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, 20(1), 6–30.

32.

Hilberg

R. S.

, Doherty

R. W.

, Tharp

R. G.

, Estrada

, & Lee

(2003). Standards performance continuum (SPC) manual for classroom observation. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence (CREDE).

33.

Holland

N. E.

, & Farmer-Hinton

R. L.

(2009). Leave no schools behind: The importance of a college culture in urban public high schools. The High School Journal, 92(3), 24–43.

34.

Horn

I. S.

(2006). Lessons learned from detracked mathematics departments. Theory into Practice, 45(1), 72–81.

35.

Intersegmental Committee of the Academic Senates. (2002, Spring). Academic literacy: A statement of competencies expected of students entering California's public colleges and universities. Intersegmental Committee of the Academic Senates of the California Community Colleges, the California State University, and the University of California.

36.

Irvine

J. J.

(2002). In search of wholeness: African American teachers and their culturally specific classroom practices. New York, NY: Palgrave.

37.

Knapp

L. G.

, Kelly-Reid

J. E.

, & Ginder

S.A.

(2010). Enrollment in postsecondary institutions, fall 2008; graduation rates, 2002 & 2005 cohorts; and financial statistics, fiscal year 2008 (NCES 2010-152). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch

38.

Knight

M. G.

, & Marciano

J. E.

(2013). College-ready: Preparing Black and Latino youth for higher education—A culturally relevant approach. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

39.

Ladson-Billings

(1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

40.

Ladson-Billings

(1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.

41.

Landis

J. R.

, & Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

42.

Lascher

E. L.

(2011). Retaining Latino and Non-Latino college students: Key similarities and differences. Report for the Serna Center, California State University, Sacramento. Retrieved from http://www.csus.edu/sernacenter/assets/publications/retention.pdf

43.

Lave

, & Wenger

(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

44.

Lawson

M. A.

, & Lawson

H. A.

(2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479.

45.

Lee

C. D.

(2007). Culture, literacy, and learning: Taking bloom in the midst of the whirlwind. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

46.

Lee

V. E.

, & Smith

J. B.

(1999). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 907–945.

47.

Lucas

, & Villegas

A. M.

(2010). The missing piece in teacher education: The preparation of linguistically responsive teachers. National Society for the Study of Education, 109(2), 297–318.

48.

McCarthey

S. J.

(2008). The impact of No Child Left Behind on teachers' writing instruction. Written Communication, 25(4), 462–205.

49.

McClafferty

K. A.

, McDonough

P. M.

, & Nuñez

A. M.

(2002). What is a college culture? Facilitating college preparation through organizational change. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana.

50.

McDonough

P. M.

(1998). Structuring opportunity: A cross-case analysis of organizational cultures, climates, and habiti. In Mitchell

C.A.

& Mitchell

T. R.

(Eds.), Sociology of education: Emerging perspectives (pp. 181–210). New York, NY: SUNY Press.

51.

McKillip

M. E. M.

, Godfrey

K. E.

, & Rawls

(2012). Rules of engagement: Building a college going culture in an urban school. Urban Education, 48(4), 529–556.

52.

Mehan

(2012). In the front door: Creating a college-going culture of learning. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

53.

Menken

(2006). Teaching to the test: How No Child Left Behind impacts language policy, curriculum, and instruction for English Language Learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 30(2), 521–546.

54.

Merriam

S. B.

(1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

55.

Meyer

J. W.

(1977). The effects of education. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 55–77.

56.

Middaugh

, & Kahne

(2013). Technology can help get kids “community ready.” Contra Costa Times. Retrieved from http://www.contracostatimes.com/opinion/ci_23955458/

57.

Moll

, Amanti

, Neff

, & Gonzalez

(1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.

58.

National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2010). Total fall enrollment in degree-granting institutions, by race/ethnicity, sex, attendance status, and level of student: Selected years, 1976 through 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from nces. ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_235.asp

59.

National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2011). Status dropout rates of 16- through 24-year-olds in the civilian, noninstitutionalized population, by race/ethnicity: Selected years, 1980-2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=16

60.

Nystrand

(1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

61.

Oakes

(2003). Critical conditions for equity and diversity in college access: Informing policy and monitoring results. Retrieved from http://ucaccord.gseis.ucla.edu/publications/pdf/criticalconditions.pdf

62.

Oakes

(2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

63.

Oakes

, Rogers

, & Lipton

(2006). Learning power: Organizing for education and justice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

64.

Obama

(2009, February 24). President addresses Joint Session of Congress. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-of-President-Barack-Obama-Address-to-Joint-Session-of-Congress

65.

Padilla

L. M.

(2001). “But you're not a dirty Mexican”: Internalized oppression, Latinos & law. Texas Hispanic Journal of Law and Policy, 7(1), 59–113.

66.

Pallas

, Entwhistle

D. R.

, Alexander

K. L.

, & Slutka

M. F.

(1994). Ability group effects: Instructional, social, or institutional? Sociology of Education, 67, 27–46.

67.

Pianta

R. C.

, Hamre

B. K.

, Haynes

N. J.

, Mintz

, & La Paro

K. M.

(2006). CLASS Classroom assessment scoring system: Manual middle secondary version pilot, July 2006. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.

68.

Postsecondary Education Opportunity. (2012). Bachelor's degree attainment by Age 24 by family income quartiles, 1970 to 2010. Retrieved from http://www.postsecondary.org.

69.

Rist

R. C.

(1977). On understanding the processes of schooling: The contributions of labeling theory. In Karabel

& Halsey

A. H.

(Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 292–305). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

70.

Rumberger

, & Gándara

(2004). Seeking equity in the education of California's English Learners. Teachers College Record, 106, 2031–2055.

71.

Sawyer

R. K.

(Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

72.

Schleppegrell

M. J.

(2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

73.

Scott

W. R.

(2008). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

74.

Shanahan

, & Shanahan

(2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59.

75.

Strauss

, & Corbin

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

76.

Sturtevant

E. G.

, Boyd

F. B.

, Brozo

W. G.

, Hinchman

K. A.

, Moore

D. W.

, & Alvermann

D. E.

(2006). Adolescent literacy: A framework for instruction and policy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

77.

Tomas Rivera Center. (2001). College knowledge: What Latino parents need to know and why they don't know it. Claremont, CA: Author.

78.

Valenzuela

(1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

79.

Venezia

, Kirst

, & Antonio

(2003). Betraying the college dream: How disconnected K-12 and post-secondary education systems undermine student aspirations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University's Bridge Project. Retrieved from http://www.csun.edu/∼krowlands/Content/PolicyDocuments/College_Readiness/betrayingthecollegedream.pdf

80.

Vernez

, & Mizell

(2001). Goal: To double the rate of Hispanics earning a bachelor's degree. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

81.

Villegas

A. M.

, & Lucas

(2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers: A coherent approach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

82.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

83.

Walqui

(2011). The growth of teacher expertise for teaching English language learners: A socio-culturally based professional development model. In Lucas

(Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms (pp. 160–177). New York, NY: Routledge.

84.

Wong-Fillmore

, & Snow

(2005). What teachers need to know about language. In Adger

C. T.

, Snow

C. E.

, & Christian

(Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 7–54). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

85.

Woolley

M. E.

(2009). Supporting school completion among Latino youth: The role of adult relationships. Prevention Researcher, 16(3), 9–12.

86.

Yin

R. K.

(1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

87.

Yonezawa

, Jones

, & Joselowsky

(2009). Youth engagement in high schools: Developing a multidimensional, critical approach to improving engagement for all students. Journal of Educational Change, 10, 191–209.