This article employs critical policy analysis as it examines the historical underpinnings of racialized policy discrimination in Detroit. It considers histories, discourses, and oppressive structures as it seeks to understand how policies have been and currently are implemented by Whites in predominantly Black urban areas.
Focus of Study
As we seek to understand how policy is constructed in relationship to predominantly Black communities, we argue that White actions toward Detroit are based on deep-rooted and historical biases, stereotypes, and fears of Blacks.
Research Design
We used critical policy analysis around the famed Milliken v. Bradley (1974) Supreme Court case to explore 20th century White American behaviors and policy regarding Black urban spaces, specifically in Detroit.
Data Collection and Analysis
We pull from political, educational, and legal literature surrounding Milliken I and critically examine prior research and policies related to the case.
Conclusions/Recommendations
Our analysis suggests that Milliken had a long-term deleterious impact on Black students (and families) in the city of Detroit, including the resegregation of separate and inequitable schools and the (re)entrenchment of White fears and stereotypes about Black Detroiters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AguirreA. (2003). Racial and ethnic diversity in America: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
2.
AndersonJ. D. (1988). Education of Blacks in the South: 1860-1935.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
3.
BaughJ. A. (2011). The Detroit school busing case: Milliken v. Bradley and the controversy over desegregation (Landmark law cases & American society). Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
4.
BhabhaH. (1994). The location of culture.London: Routledge.
5.
BoyleK. (2007). Arc of justice: A saga of race, civil rights, and murder in the Jazz Age. London: Macmillan.
6.
CrossleyM., & TiklyL. (2004). Postcolonial perspectives and comparative and international research in education: A critical introduction. Comparative Education, 40(2), 147–156.
7.
DardenT., & KamelS. (2000). Black residential segregation in suburban Detroit: Empirical testing of the ecological theory. The Review of Black Political Economy, 27(3), 103–123.
8.
DardenJ. T., & WylyE. (2010). Cartographic editorial—Mapping the racial/ethnic topography of subprime inequality in urban America. Urban Geography, 31(4), 425–433.
9.
DeLeonA. P. (2012). “A perverse kind of sense”: Urban spaces, ghetto places and the discourse of school shootings. The Urban Review, 44(1), 152–169.
10.
DouglasT. R. M., & PeckC. (2013). Education by any means necessary: Peoples of African descent and community-based pedagogical spaces. Educational Studies, 49(1), 67–91.
11.
EastonD. (1953) The political system. An Inquiry into the state of political science.New York, NY: Knopf.
12.
FanonF. (1963). The wretched of the earth [Trans. Constance Farrington]. New York, NY: Grove Press.
13.
FanonF. (1967). Black skin, white masks. 1952. In MarkmannC. L. (Ed.). New York, NY: Grove Press.
14.
FarleyR. (1974). Population trends and school segregation in the Detroit metropolitan area. Wayne Law Review, 21(3), 867.
15.
FarleyR., DanzigerS., & HolzerH. J. (2000). Detroit divided. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
16.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
17.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Random House LLC.
18.
FurumotoR. (2005). No poor child left unrecruited: How NCLB codifies and perpetuates urban school militarism. Equity & Excellence in Education, 38(3), 200–210.
19.
GonzalesS. M., & ShieldsC. M. (2015). Education “reform” in Latino Detroit: Achievement gap or colonial legacy?Race Ethnicity and Education, 18(3), 321–340.
20.
GreenR. L., & CarlB. R. (2000). A reform for troubled times: Takeovers of urban schools. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 569(1), 56–70.
21.
GreenT. L. (2015). Leading for urban school reform and community development. Educational Administration Quarterly, 0013161X15577694.
22.
GreenT. L., & GoodenM. A. (2014). Transforming out-of-school challenges into opportunities community schools reform in the urban Midwest. Urban Education, 49(8), 930–954.
23.
GressonA. D.III. (2008). Race and education primer.New York, NY: Peter Lang.
24.
HallS. (1993). New ethnicities. In DonaldJ. & RattansiA. (Eds.), Race, culture and difference (pp. 252–259). London: Sage Publications and Open University.
25.
HallS. (1996). When was ‘the post-colonial’? Thinking at the limit. In ChambersI. & CurtiL. (Eds.), The post-colonial question: Common skies, divided horizons (pp. 242–260). London: Routledge.
26.
HallS. (2003). Cultural identity and the diaspora. In BrazielE. J. & MannurA. (Eds.), Theorizing diaspora (pp. 233–246). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
27.
HallS. (2005). Old and new identities. In RothenbergP. S. (Ed.), Beyond borders: In thinking critically about global issues (pp. 167–173). New York: Worth Publishers.
28.
HalpinD. (1994). Practice and prospects in education policy research. In HalpinD. & TroynaB. (Eds.), Researching education policy ethical and methodological issues (pp. 205–212).
29.
HartiganJ. (1999). Racial situations: Class predicaments of whiteness in Detroit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
HendersonM. (1996). “Where, by the way, is this train going?”: A case for Black (cultural) studies. Callaloo, 19(1), 60–67.
31.
HenigJ. R., HulaR. C., OrrM., & PedescleauxD. S. (2001). The color of school reform: Race, politics, and the challenge of urban education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Hickling-HudsonA. (1998). When Marxist and postmodern theories won't do: The potential of postcolonial theory for educational analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 19(3), 327–339.
33.
HurshD. (2007). Assessing No Child Left Behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 493–518.
34.
HurshD., & MartinaC. A. (2003). Neoliberalism and schooling in the U.S.: How state and federal government education policies perpetuate inequality. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 1(2), 1–13.
35.
IronsP. (2002). Jim Crow's children: The broken promise of the Brown decision. New York: Viking.
36.
KennedyV. (2000). Edward Said: A critical introduction.Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
37.
KhalifaM., ArnoldN. W., & NewcombW. (2015). Understand and advocate for communities first. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(7), 20–25.
38.
KhalifaM. A., Bashir-AliK., AbdiN., & Witherspoon ArnoldN. (2014). From post-colonial to neoliberal schooling in Somalia: The need for culturally relevant school leadership among Somaliland principals. Planning & Changing, 45(1), 1–43.
39.
KhalifaM., DunbarC., & DouglasT. R. (2013). Derrick Bell, CRT, and educational leadership 1995–present. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(4), 489–513.
40.
KhalifaM. A., JenningsM. E., BriscoeF., OleszweskiA. M., & AbdiN. (2014). Racism? Administrative and community perspectives in data-driven decision making systemic perspectives versus technical-rational perspectives. Urban Education, 49(2), 147–181.
41.
KinneyR. J. (2011). The mechanics of race: The discursive production of Detroit's landscape of difference. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
42.
KrupatA. (2000). Postcolonialism, ideology, and Native American literature. In SinghA. & SchmidtP. (Eds.), Postcolonial theory and the United States: Race, ethnicity, and literature (pp. 73–94). Jackson, MS: University of Mississippi Press.
43.
LeonardoZ. (2007). The war on schools: NCLB, nation creation and the educational construction of whiteness. Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 261–278.
44.
LipmanP. (2003). Cracking down: Chicago school policy and the regulation of Black and Latino youth. In SaltmanK. J. & GabbardD. A. (Eds.), Education as enforcement: The militarization and corporatization of schools (pp. 81–101). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
45.
LipmanP. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
Memmi, (1991). The Colonizer and the Colonized.Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
47.
Milliken v. Bradley (1974), 418 U.S. 717 (1974).
48.
Milliken v. Bradley (1977), 433 U.S. 267 (1977).
49.
MirelJ. (1999). The rise and fall of an urban school system: Detroit, 1907-81. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
50.
MorrisJ. E. (2012). God's will or government policy? Katrina's unveiling of history and the mass dispersion of Black people. In TateW. F. (Ed.), Research on schools, neighborhoods, and communities (pp. 455–477). New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
51.
OrwellG. (1968). To see what is in front of one's nose takes constant effort. In OrwellS. & AngusI. (Eds.), The collected essays, journalism and letters of George Orwell: In front of your nose, 1945–1950 (p. 125). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
52.
PruntyJ. J. (1985). Signposts for a critical educational policy analysis. Australian Journal of Education, 29(2), 133–140.
53.
RizviF. (2009). Postcolonialism and globalization in education. In ColomaR. S. (Ed.), Postcolonial challenges in education (pp. 46–54). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
54.
SaidE. (1978). Orientalism.New York, NY: Vintage Books.
55.
SaidE. (1994). Culture and imperialism.New York, NY: Vintage Books.
56.
ShahjahanR. A. (2011). Decolonizing the evidence-based education and policy movement: Revealing the colonial vestiges in educational policy, research, and neoliberal reform. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 181–206.
57.
SharpJ (2009). Geographies of post-colonialism. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
58.
SinghA., & SchmidtP. (Eds.). (2000). Postcolonial theory and the United States: Race, ethnicity, and literature. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
59.
SleeterC. (2003, Winter). Reform and control: An analysis of SB 2042. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 19–30.
60.
SperbJ. (2008). Islands of Detroit: Affect, nostalgia and whiteness. Culture, Theory & Critique, 49(2), 183–201.
61.
SpivakG. C. (1990). The post-colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues.New York: Routledge.
62.
SpivakG. C. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
TyackD. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
Venzant ChambersT. T., LockeL. A., & TagaraoA. M. (2015). “That fuego, that fire in their stomach”: Academically successful Latinas/os and racial opportunity cost. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(7), 800–818.
69.
VillaverdeL. E. (2008). Feminist theories and education primer.New York, NY: Peter Lang.
70.
WilkesR., & IcelandJ. (2004). Hypersegregation in the twenty-first century. Demography, 41(1), 23–36.
71.
WoodD. M. (2007). Beyond the Panopticon? Foucault and surveillance studies. In CramptonJ. W. & EldenS. (Eds.), Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography (pp. 245–263). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
72.
WrightM. M. (2004). Becoming Black: Creating identity in the African Diaspora.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
