This article examines the contemporary implications of the Milliken v. Bradley (1974) decision for educational inequality between school districts in U.S. metropolitan areas. We focus upon four metropolitan areas that were highly segregated in the 1970s but which met different fates in court: We first examine Detroit and Philadelphia, where plaintiffs sought but ultimately failed to obtain a metropolitan-wide desegregation ruling. We then examine St. Louis, where a court imposed a metropolitan desegregation remedy. We finally include Jefferson County, where the court order resulted in a merger of city and suburban schools.
Objective
Through this comparative analysis we seek to tease out the effects of the ruling on patterns of inequity between urban and suburban school districts over time. We specifically examine how districts within these metro areas differed over time in terms of patterns of school segregation, fiscal resources, and academic performance.
Research Design
We employed qualitative case study methodology. We purposively selected three case study districts within each of the four metro areas (total of 12 school districts) based on their contextual status in 1970, i.e., whether they were in each of these three categories: urban, segregated suburban, or affluent suburban. We compared them along three dimensions: patterns of segregation, academic outcomes, and fiscal resources.
Conclusions
We found that the segregated and high poverty districts in the three metro areas where courts left districts intact (Detroit, Philadelphia, and St. Louis) have been, since Milliken, increasingly hemmed in by their boundaries: struggling with growing concentrations of need, low resources to meet those needs, and as a result falling into fiscal and academic decline. In contrast, the maintenance of district boundaries by the courts has allowed the affluent suburbs in these contexts, over time, to benefit from a number of policies and practices that allowed them to accrue and protect advantage through exclusionary zoning policies and housing discrimination. Together, these policies have promoted and protected the affluence and advantage in each of these contexts, which has in turn attracted investment and allowed these districts to maintain strong financial standing over time. Our study suggests that socially constructed political boundaries, like school district boundary lines, by carving up political geography along the lines of race and class, can take on an active role in the reproduction of inequality.
Daniel Jones & Associates. (2014). School district of the city of Ladue audited financial statements. Ladue, MO.
22.
DenisonD., YanW., & ZhaoZ. (2007). Is management performance a factor in municipal bond credit ratings? An analysis of Texas school districts. Public Budgeting & Finance, 27(4), 86–98.
DicksonJ. (2013). All together now: Metro Detroit in a period of unprecedented diversity. The Journal of Law in Society, 15(1), 63–76.
25.
DiemS. (2012). The relationship between policy design, context, and implementation in integration plans. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(23), 1–39.
26.
DrierP., MollenkopfJ., & SwanstromT. (2013). Place matters: Metropolitics for the 21st century. Wichita, KS: University of Kansas Press.
FinniganK. F., & HolmeJ. J. (2015, September). Regional educational equity policies: Learning from inter-district integration programs. Washington, DC: Poverty and Race Research Action Council.
31.
FrievogelW. H. (2002). St. Louis: Desegregation and school choice in the land of Dredd Scott. In KahlenbergR. (Ed.), Divided we fail: Coming together through public school choice. (pp. 209–235). Washington, DC: Century Foundation Press.
32.
FordR. T. (1994). The boundaries of race: Political geography in legal analysis. Harvard Law Review, 107(8), 1844–1921.
33.
FordR. T. (2004). Brown's ghost. Harvard Law Review, 117(5), 1305–1333.
34.
GarsonG. D. (2002). Case study research in public administration and public policy: Standards and strategies. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 8(3), 209–216.
HerronW. P. (1975). School desegregation, the Philadelphia experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington DC.
KurlaenderM., & YunJ. (2001). Is diversity a compelling educational interest? Evidence from Louisville. In OrfieldG. (Ed.), Diversity challenged: Evidence on the impact of affirmative action (pp. 111–141). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
53.
KweitR., & KweitM. (1999). People and politics in urban America. New York, NY: Routledge.
LawtonS., & CurtnerG. (1972). Black schools, White schools: A descriptive analysis of attendance patterns in Detroit. Toronto, ON: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
57.
MerriamS. B. (2014). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Missouri Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1981). School desegregation in the St. Louis and Kansas City metropolitan areas. Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
62.
Missouri State Auditor. (2013). St. Louis Public School District. Jefferson City, MO: Thomas A. Schweich.
63.
MontiD. (1979) Governmental abandonment of desegregation in Missouri. Equity and Excellence in Education, 17(1), 2–8.
NCES. (2014). Number of schools, students, and teachers in regular schools with membership for the 100 largest school districts in the United States, by school operational and charter status and state: School years 2000–01 through 2010–11 [Table 2]. Common Core of Data. Retrieved from: https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/data_tables.asp
72.
Newburg Area Council Inc v. Board of Education of Jefferson County Kentucky 489 F. 2d 925 - (1973).
73.
OrfieldG., FrankenbergE., EeJ., & KusceraJ. (2014). Brown at 60: Great progress, a long retreat and an uncertain future. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project.
74.
OrfieldM. (2002). American metropolitics: The new suburban reality. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
75.
PA Human Rel. v. School Dist. of Phila., 167 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 1 (1993) 651 A.2d 177
RobertsJ. (2000). Privatizing schools: Edison manages Detroit-area district. Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Retrieved from https://www.mackinac.org/2957
School Improvement Grants. (2013). Application for FY 2013 New Awards Competition (Pennsylvania). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/apps2013/paapp13.pdf
84.
SedlerR. (2007). The Louisville-Jefferson County school desegregation case: A lawyer's retrospective. The Register of the Kentucky Historical Society, 105(1), 3–32.
85.
Siegel-HawleyG. (2013). City lines, county lines, color lines: The relationship between school and housing segregation in four Southern metro areas. Teachers College Record, 115(6), 1–45.
TonkissF. (2011). Spatial causes, social effects: A response to Soja, City: Analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action. City, 15(1), 85–86.
