In this chapter, we examine youth voice within intergenerational collectives where youth and adults are in consultation with each other about school and community issues. The three projects discussed in this chapter reflect the use of participatory action research (PAR) to address educational policies and practices viewed as counterproductive by youth within poor and working class neighborhoods. The use of PAR to inform policy makers and establish alternative educational approaches reflects a critical theoretical framework in that it considers the complexity of experiences and social identities among youth who are positioned differently in relation to educational and opportunity access. The use of the arts as a strategy for inquiry and action is discussed as a way to identify alternative frames of analysis—ways of seeing from different angles the explanations offered by decision makers for the use of particular educational policies. The chapter outlines strategic planning for public engagement at significant junctures of the PAR projects to ensure youth voices are heard and prevailing discourses and theories of action challenged, thus bringing into clear focus the imperative for more equitable and humanizing conditions within education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshfordE. (2011). Eviction notice. [Spoken word performance]. In v. jones & E. Schilling (Producers), Lives in Transition: Eviction Notice [Motion Picture]. Retrieved from http://vimeo.com/27023571
2.
AyalaJ. (2009). Split scenes, converging visions: The ethical terrains where PAR and borderlands scholarship meet. Urban Review: Special issue on Participatory Action Research and Critical Race theory, 41(1), 66–84.
3.
AyalaJ., & GallettaA. (2012). Documenting disappearing spaces: Erasure and remembrance in two high school closures. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18(2), 149–155.
4.
CahillC., Rios-MooreI., & ThreattsT. (2008). Different eyes/open eyes: Community-based participatory action research. In CammarotaJ. & FineM. (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 89–124). New York, NY: Routledge
5.
CammarotaJ., & FineM. (Eds.). (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
CarspeckenP. F., & AppleM. (1992). Critical qualitative research: Theory, methodology, and practice. In LeCompteM. D., MillroyW. L., & PreissleJ. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 507–553). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7.
ChawlaL., Blanchet-CohenN., CoscoN., DriskellD., KrugerJ., MaloneK., … Percy-SmithB. (2005). “Don't just listen—Do something!” Lessons learned about governance from the Growing Up in Cities Project. Children, Youth and Environments, 15(2), pp. 53–88.
8.
CollinsP. H. (1998). Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
de JesusF., & CarterJ. (Producers). (2010). See between the Lines: The making of the New Jersey Urban Youth Research Initiative [DVD].
10.
Fals BordaO. (Ed.). (1985). The challenge of social change. London: Sage.
11.
FineM., AyalaJ., & ZaalM. (2012). Public science and participatory policy development: Reclaiming policy as a democratic project. Special issue “What would a socially-just education system look like?” Journal of Education Policy, 27(5), 685–692.
12.
FineM., RobertsR., & WeisL. (2000). Refusing the betrayal: Latinas redefining gender, sexuality, culture and resistance. Review of Education, Pedagogy & Cultural Studies, 22(2), 87–119.
13.
FoxM., & FineM. (2013). Accountable to whom? A critical science counter-story about a city that stopped caring for its young. Children & Society, 27(4), 321–335.
14.
FoxM., MedirattaK., RuglisJ., StoudtB., ShahS., & FineM. (2010). Critical youth engagement: Participatory action research and organizing. In SherrodL. R., Torney-PurtaJ., & FlanaganC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 621–649). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
15.
FreedmanK. (2007). Artmaking/Troublemaking: Creativity, policy, and leadership in art education. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 48, 204–217.
16.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
17.
GallettaA. (2013). “In the Spirit of Equality”: Conflict, dissonance, and the potential for transformative educational change. In NiedtC. (Ed.), Social justice in the diverse suburb: History, politics, and prospects (pp. 73–90). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
18.
GuishardM. (2009). The false paths, the endless labors, the turns now this way, and now that: Participatory action research, mutual vulnerability, and the politics of inquiry. Urban Review, 41, 85–105.
19.
GuishardM., FineM., DoyleC., JacksonJ., StatenT., & WebbA. (2005). The Bronx on the move: Participatory consultation with mothers and youth. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 16(1&2), 35–54.
20.
jonesv. (2012). Art as method: Complicating tales of visual stenography and implications for urban education and research [Electronic dissertation]. Available at https://etd.ohiolink.edu/
21.
jonesv., & SchillingE. (Producers). (2011). Lives in transition: Eviction notice [Video webcast]. Retrieved from http://vimeo.com/27023571
22.
KemmisS., & McTaggartR. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–603). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
23.
KirklandD. E., & GilyardK. (2009). Conversation with David E. Kirkland. In TaylorV. (Ed.) Conversations in cultural rhetoric and composition studies (pp. 223–243). Aurora, CO: The Davies Group.
24.
KirshnerB. (2010). Productive tensions in youth participatory action research. National Society for the Study of Education, 109(1), 238–251.
25.
LewinK. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics (1935-1946). New York, NY: Harper.
26.
Martín-BaróI. (1994). Writings for a liberation psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
O'DonoghueJ. L., KirshnerB., & McLaughlinM. (2002). Introduction: Moving youth participation forward. New Directions for Youth Development, 96, 15–26.
28.
OzerE. J., & WrightD. (2012). Beyond school spirit: The effects of youth-led participatory action research in two urban high schools. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(2), 267–283.
29.
RubinB., HayesB., & BensonK. (2009). “It's the worst place to live”: Urban youth and the challenge of school-based civic learning. Theory Into Practice, 48, 213–221.
TorreM. E. (2009). Participatory action research and critical race theory: Fueling spaces for nos-otras to research. Urban Review, 41, 106–120.
32.
TorreM. E., & AyalaJ. (2009). Envisioning participatory action research entremundos. Feminism & Psychology, 19(3), 387–393.
33.
TorreM. E., & FineM. (2011). A wrinkle in time: Tracing a legacy of public science through community self-surveys and participatory action research. Journal of Social Issues, 67(1), 106–121.
34.
TorreM. E., & FineM., (with AlexanderN., BillupsA. B., BlandingY., GenaoE., … UrdangK.) (2008). Participatory action research and the contact zone. In CammarotaJ. and FineM. (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 23–44). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
Tuhiwai SmithL. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books.
36.
WangC. C. (2006). Youth participation in Photovoice as a strategy for community change. Journal Of Community Practice, 14(1/2), 147–161.
