English language learners (ELLs) are the fastest growing segment of the K–12 student population in the United States, yet they encounter substantial problems entering higher education. The gap between ELLs and non-ELLs is particularly acute for four-year college access. Research has been largely silent on ELLs’ college advancement, and we know little about what inhibits ELLs’ college access.
Purpose
To examine the process of ELLs’ college planning in order to determine which stages of college planning present difficulties to ELLs and why. College planning is conceptualized as consisting of five milestones: (a) aspiring to college, (b) acquiring college qualifications, (c) graduating from high school, (d) applying to college, and (e) enrolling in college.
Research Design
Secondary data analysis of the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002. Only students who participated in all of the first three waves (2002, 2004, and 2006) of data collection were included (N = 12,450). Students were divided into three language background groups: (a) ELLs, (b) English-proficient linguistic minority students (EPs), and (c) native speakers of English (NSs). We first compared the college-access patterns of the three language groups. We then mapped out each group's pathways through the milestones. Finally, we conducted multigroup analyses to examine whether and to what extent a different set of predictors shape the groups’ college pathways.
Findings/Results
It is the early stages of college planning (aspirations and college qualifications stages) that are particularly challenging to ELLs, such that the majority of ELLs never reach the later milestone of applying to a four-year college. Predictors known to matter significantly for the general population's college access are not all significant for ELLs.
Conclusions/Recommendations
In order to enable more ELLs to reach four-year colleges, we should make a targeted effort to support them in the early stages of college planning. Racial/ ethnic minority ELLs are particularly vulnerable and need more support. We also need to invest more effort into identifying the factors and conditions that specifically influence ELLs’ college planning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Involvement.
2.
AlmonP. C. (2010). English language learner engagement and retention in a community college setting (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3408684).
3.
BatalovaJ., HookerS., & CappsR. (with BachmeirD., & CoxE.) (2013). Deferred action for childhood arrivals at the one-year mark: A profile of current eligible youth and applicants. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/pubs/CIRbrief-DACAatOneYear.pdf
4.
BatteyD. (2013). Access to mathematics: “A possessive investment in Whiteness.”Curriculum Inquiry, 43(3), 332–359. doi:10.1111%2Fcuri.12015
5.
BenniciF. J., & StrangW. E. (1995). An analysis of language minority and limited English proficient students from NELS:88. Washington, DC: Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Language Affairs, U.S. Department of Education.
6.
BerknerL., & ChavezL. (1997). Access to postsecondary education for the 1992 high school graduates (NCES 98-105). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
7.
BourdieuP. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In KarabelJ. & HalseyA. H. (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–511). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
9.
BourdieuP. (1987). What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 1–8.
10.
BourdieuP. (1991). Language and symbolic power. (ThompsonJ. B., Ed.; RaymondG. & AdamsonM., Trans.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BowenW. G., KurzwellM. A., & TobinE. M. (2005). Equity and excellence in American higher education. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
12.
BunchG. C., & EndrisA. K. (2012). Navigating “open access” community colleges: Matriculation policies and practices for US-educated linguistic minority students. In KannoY. & HarklauL. (Eds.), Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence (pp. 165–183). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
CabreraA. F., BurkumK. R., & La NasaS. M. (2005). Pathways to a four-year degree: Determinants of degree completion among socioeconomically disadvantaged students. In SeidmanA. (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for student success: Formula for student success (pp. 155–214). Westport, CT: Praeger.
14.
CabreraA. F., & La NasaS. M. (2000). Three critical tasks America's disadvantaged face on their path to college. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2000(107), 23–29. doi:10.1002/ir.10702
15.
CabreraA. F., & La NasaS. M. (2001). On the path to college: Three critical tasks facing America's disadvantaged. Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 119–149. doi:10.1023/A:1026520002362
16.
CallahanR. M. (2005). Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 305–328. doi:10.3102/00028312042002305
17.
CallahanR. M., & GándaraP. (2004). On nobody's agenda: Improving English-language learners' access to higher education. In MichaelS. (Ed.), Teaching immigrant and second-language students: Strategies for success (pp. 107–127). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
18.
CallahanR. M., WilkinsonL., & MullerC. (2010). Academic achievement and course taking among language minority youth in U.S. schools: Effects of ESL placement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(1), 84–117. doi:10.3102/0162373709359805
CherngH.-Y. S., CalarcoJ. M., & KaoG. (2013). Along for the ride: Best friends' resources and adolescents' college completion. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 76–106. doi:10.3102/0002831212466689
ConleyD. T. (2005). College knowledge: What it really takes for students to succeed and what we can do to get them ready. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
CrosnoeR. (2006). Health and the education of children from race/ethnic minority and immigrant families. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47, 77–79. doi:10.1177/002214650604700106
Deil-AmenR., & TurleyR. L. (2007). A review of the transition to college literature in sociology. Teachers College Record, 109(10), 2324–2366.
27.
Education Week. (2009, January). A distinctive population. Quality Counts 2009: Portraits of a Population, How English Language-Learners Are Putting Schools to the Test, 15.
28.
EstradaP. (2014). English learner curricular streams in four middle schools: Triage in the trenches. The Urban Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11256-014-0276-7
29.
FryR. (2008). The role of schools in the English language learner achievement gap. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center. Retrieved from http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/89.pdf
30.
GándaraP., & ContrerasF. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
GarcíaO. (2009). Emergent bilinguals and TESOL: What's in a name?TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 322–326. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00172.x
32.
GarcíaO., KleifgenJ. A., & FalchiL. (2008). From English language learners to emergent bilinguals. Equity Matters: Research Review No. 1. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED524002.pdf
33.
HarklauL. (1994). Tracking and linguistic minority students: Consequences of ability grouping for second language learners. Linguistics and Education, 6, 217–244.doi:10.1016/0898-5898(94)90012-4
34.
HarklauL. (2013). Why Izzie didn't go to college: Choosing work over college as Latina feminism. Teachers College Record, 115(1), 1–32.
35.
HirschmanC., & LeeJ. (2005). Race and ethnic inequality in educational attainment in the United States. In RutterM. & TiendaM. (Eds.), Ethnicity and causal mechanisms (pp. 107–138). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
HolmesM., FanningC., MoralesA., EspinozaP., & HerreraS. (2012). Contextualizing the path to academic success: Culturally and linguistically diverse students gaining voice and agency in higher education. In KannoY. & HarklauL. (Eds.), Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence (pp. 201–219). New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
HopstockP. J., & StephensonT. G. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities. Special topic report #2: Issues in studying learning outcomes for LEP students. Washington, DC: Office of English Language Acquisition, U.S. Department of Education.
38.
HosslerD., & GallagherK. S. (1987). Studying college choice: A three-phase model and the implication for policy makers. College and University, 63(2), 207–221.
39.
HuL.-T., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit idexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
40.
KannoY., & CromleyJ. (2013). English language learners' access to and attainment in postsecondary education. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 89–121. doi:10.1002/tesq.49
41.
KannoY., & GrosikS. A. (2012). Immigrant English learners' transitions to university: Student challenges and institutional policies. In KannoY. & HarklauL. (Eds.), Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence (pp. 130–147). New York, NY: Routledge.
42.
KannoY., & HarklauL. (Eds.) (2012). Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence. New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
KannoY., & KangasS. E. N. (2014). “I'm not going to be, like, for the AP”: English language learners access to advanced college-preparatory courses in high school. American Education Research Journal, 51(5), 848–878. doi:10.3102/0002831214544716
44.
KannoY., & VargheseM. (2010). Immigrant English language learners' challenges to accessing four year college education: From language policy to educational policy. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 9(5), 1–19. doi:10.1080/15348458.2010.517693
45.
KaoG., & ThompsonJ. S. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 417–442. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100019
46.
KaoG., & TiendaM. (1995). Optimism and achievement: The educational performance of immigrant youth. Social Science Quarterly, 76(1), 1–19.
47.
KimE., & DíazJ. (2013). Immigrant students and higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 38(6), 1–170.
48.
KimJ. (2011). Relationships among and between ELL status, demographic characteristics, enrollment history, and school persistence (CRESST Report 810). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
49.
LeeS. J. (1996). Unraveling the “model minority” stereotype: Listening to Asian American youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
50.
MartinD. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 11(2), 295–338.
51.
McDonoughP. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
52.
MenkenK., & KleynT. (2010). The long-term impact of subtractive schooling in the educational experiences of secondary English language learners. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(4), 399–417. doi:10.1080/13670050903370143
53.
MosquedaE. (2011). Teacher quality, academic tracking and the mathematics performance of Latino English learners. In TéllezK., MoschkovichJ. N., & CivilM. (Eds.), Latina/os and mathematics education: Research on learning and teaching in classrooms and communities (pp. 315–339). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
54.
MuthénL. K., & MuthénB. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
NuñezA.-M., & Cuccaro-AlaminS. (1998). First-generation students: Undergraduates whose parents never enrolled in postsecondary education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/98082.pdf
59.
NuñezA.-M., & KimD. (2012). Building a multicontextual model of Latino college enrollment: Student, school, and state-level effects. Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 237–263. doi:10.1353/rhe.2012.0004
60.
NuñezA.-M., & SparksP. J. (2012). Who are linguistic minority students in higher education; An analysis of the Beginning Postsecondary Students Study 2004. In KannoY. & HarklauL. (Eds.), Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence (pp. 110–129). New York, NY: Routledge.
PernaL. W., & ThomasS. L. (2008). Theoretical perspectives on student success: Understanding the contributions of the disciplines. ASHE Higher Education Report, 34(1), 1–87. doi:10.1002/aehe.3401
63.
PernaL. W., & TitusM. A. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 485–518. doi:10.1353/jhe.2005.0036
64.
PimentalC. (2010). Color-coded bilingualism. In SotoL. D. & KharemH. (Eds.), Teaching bilingual/bicultural children: Teachers talk about language and learning (pp. 19–27). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
65.
RazfarA., & SimonJ. (2011). Course-taking patterns of Latino ESL students: Mobility and mainstreaming in urban community colleges in the United States. TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), 595–627. doi:10.5054/tq.2011.268060
RodriguezG. M., & CruzL. (2009). The transition to college of English learner and undocumented immigrant students: Resource and policy implications. Teachers College Record, 111(10), 2385–2418.
68.
RueckerT. (2012). Writing across institutions: Studying the curricular and extracurricular journeys of Latino/a students transitioning from high school to college (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3512021)
69.
RueckerT. (2013). High-stakes testing and Latino/a students: Creating a hierarchy of college readiness. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 12(4), 303–320. doi:10.1177/1538192713493011
70.
SchneiderB., & StevensonD. (1999). The ambitious generation: America's teenagers, motivated but directionless. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
71.
SnijdersT. A. B., & BoskerR. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling.London, England: Sage.
72.
SwailW. S. (2000). Preparing America's disadvantaged for college: Programs that increase college opportunity. New Directions for Institutional Research, 107, 85–101. doi:10.1002/ir.10706
73.
UmanskyI. M., & ReardonS. F. (2014). Reclassificaton patterns among Latino English learner students in bilingual, dual immersion, and English immersion classrooms. American Education Research Journal, 51(5), 879–912. doi:10.3102/0002831214545110
U.S. Department of Education Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2006). Mortgaging out future: How financial barriers to college undercut America's global competitiveness. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/acsfa/mof.pdf
WalpoleM. (2007). Economically and educationally challenged students in higher education: Access to outcomes. ASHE Higher Education Report, 33(3), 1–113. doi:10.1002/aehe.3303
78.
WangJ., & GoldschmidtP. (1999). Opportunity to learn, language proficiency, and immigrant status effects on mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(2), 101–111. doi:10.2307/27542253
79.
WolfM. K., HermanJ. L., BachmanL. F., BaileyA. L., & GriffinN. (2008). Recommendations for assessing English language learners: English language proficiency measures and accommodation uses (CRESST Report 737). Retrieved from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R737.pdf
80.
WorthamS., MortimerK., & AllardE. (2009). Mexicans as model minorities in the new Latino diaspora. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 40(4), 388–404. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01058.x
81.
WrightW. (2010). Foundations for teaching English language learners: Research, theory, policy, and practice. Philadelphia, PA: Caslon Publishing.
82.
YonezawaS., WellsA. S., & SernaI. (2002). Choosing tracks: “Freedom of choice” in detracking schools. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 37–67. doi:10.3102/00028312039001037
83.
ZehlerA., FleischmanH. L., HostockP. J., StephensonT. D., PendzickM. L., & SapruS. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students in and ELP students with disabilities (Volume 1, Research Report). Retrieved from http://ncela.net/files/rcd/BE021199/special_ed4.pdf
