In spite of the widely acknowledged importance of creativity to society and the economy, scholars have had difficulty providing research-based recommendations for how to foster creativity in schools. The article extends three strands of research that have attempted to provide such recommendations: studies of whether creativity training enhances domain-general creativity; studies of whether arts education and arts integration enhance cognitive skills that transfer to other content areas; and studies of collaborative learning environments, designed to foster deeper conceptual understanding in the content areas.
Purpose/Objective
The focus of the article is to provide recommendations for how to design learning environments to foster greater creativity. I bring together arts education research, creativity research, and learning sciences research to provide recommendations for how to design learning environments to foster creative learning outcomes.
Research Design
This is primarily a review article. It provides meta-analyses of three strands of research—creativity training, arts education, and learning sciences. The conclusion of this review is that domain-general creativity training is less effective than domain-specific changes in how each subject is taught.
Conclusions
We are not likely to enhance student creativity by teaching for creativity in a distinct, domain general way. Instead, educating for creativity is most effective when schools change the way each subject is taught. Learning sciences research has provided strong evidence that the most creative learning, in all subjects, results from pedagogical strategies that are active, constructivist, collaborative, and improvisational. I provide research-based recommendations for how to design learning environments that result in creative learning outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndriessenJ. (2006). Arguing to learn. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 443–459). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AnsburgP. I., & DominowskiR. L. (2000). Promoting insightful problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(1), 30–60.
3.
BaerJ. (1998). The case for domain specificity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173–177.
4.
BereiterC. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
BroadC. D. (1925). The mind and its place in nature. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Company.
6.
BurnafordG. (2007). Arts integration frameworks, research, & practice: A literature review. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
7.
BurnsT., & StalkerG. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London, England: Tavistock Publications.
8.
Business Roundtable. (2005). Tapping America's potential: The education for innovation initiative. Washington, DC: Business Roundtable.
9.
ColeK. C. (2009). Something incredibly wonderful happens: Frank Oppenheimer and the world he made up. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Trade.
10.
ConfreyJ. (2006). The evolution of design studies as a methodology. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 135–151). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CornettC. E. (1999). The arts as meaning makers: Integrating literature and the arts throughout the curriculum. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
12.
Council on Competitiveness. (2005). Innovate America: National innovation initiative summit and report. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness.
13.
CovingtonM. V., CrutchfieldR. S., DaviesL., & OltonR. M. (1974). The productive thinking program: A course in learning to think. Columbus, Oh: Merrill.
14.
CraftA. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. New York, NY: Routledge.
CreminT., BurnardP., & CraftA. (2006). Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the early years. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 108–119.
17.
CropleyA. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In RuncoM. A. (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 83–114). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
18.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
20.
CunninghamJ. B., & MacGregorJ. N. (2008). Training insightful problem solving: Effects of realistic and puzzle-like contexts. Creativity Research Journal, 20(3), 291–296.
21.
DavidsonJ. E., & SternbergR. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 58–64.
22.
DavisG. A. (2003). Identifying creative students, teaching for creative growth. In ColangeloN. & DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 312–324). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
23.
de BonoE. (1973). CoRT thinking. Blanford, England: Direct Educational Services.
24.
DeZutterS. (2011). Professional improvisation and teacher education: Opening the conversation. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 27–50). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25.
DowG. T., & MayerR. E. (2004). Teaching students to solve insight problems: Evidence for domain specificity in creativity training. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 389–402.
26.
DruckerP. F. (1993). Post-capitalist society. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
27.
EflandA. D. (2002). Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
EisnerE. W. (1982). Cognition and curriculum: A basis for deciding what to teach. New York, NY: Longman.
29.
EisnerE. W. (2002a). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
EricssonK. A. (2002). Attaining excellence through deliberate practice: Insights from the study of expert performance. In FerrariM. (Ed.), The pursuit of excellence in education (pp. 21–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1983). The Purdue creative thinking program. In SatoI. S. (Ed.), Creativity research and educational planning (pp. 41–46). Los Angeles, CA: Leadership Training Institute for the Gifted and Talented.
33.
FeldhusenJ. F., & TreffingerD. J. (1980). Creative thinking and problem solving in gifted education. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/hunt.
34.
FeldmanD. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
35.
FleithD. d. S. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3), 148–157.
36.
FreudS. (1989). Creative writers and day-dreaming. In GayP. (Ed.), The Freud reader (pp. 436–443). New York, NY: Norton. (Paper originally presented December 6, 1907.)
37.
GantchevD. (2007, October 29). Assessing the economic contribution of creative industries: WIPO's experience. Paper presented at the WIPO International Conference on Intellectual Property and the Creative Industries. Geneva, Switzerland.
38.
GardnerH. (1973). The arts and human development: A psychological study of the artistic process. New York, NY: Wiley.
39.
GardnerH. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
40.
GardnerH. (2007). Five minds for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
41.
GilbertD. T. (2006). Stumbling on happiness. New York, NY: Knopf.
42.
HaidtJ. (2006). The happiness hypothesis: Finding modern truth in ancient wisdom. New York, NY: Basic Books.
43.
HetlandL., & WinnerE. (2004). Cognitive transfer from arts education to non-arts outcomes: Research evidence and policy implications. In EisnerE. W. & DayM. D. (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 135–162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44.
HetlandL., WinnerE., VeenemaS., & SheridanK. M. (2007). Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
45.
HuntM. E. (2009, November 1). Experimental Exploratorium activities awe at 40. San Francisco Chronicle, p. q14.
46.
JayE. S., & PerkinsD. N. (1997). Problem finding: The search for mechanism. In RuncoM. A. (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 257–293). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
47.
JoubertM. M. (2001). The art of creative teaching: NACCCE and beyond. In CraftA., JeffreyB., & LeiblingM. (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 17–34). London, England: Continuum.
48.
KimJ. (1992). “Downward causation” in emergentism and nonreductive physicalism. In BeckermannA., FlohrH., & KimJ. (Eds.), Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism (pp. 119–138). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
49.
KindP. M., & KindV. (2007). Creativity in science education: Perspectives and challenges for developing school science. Studies in Science Education, 43, 1–37.
50.
MackR. W. (1987). Are methods of enhancing creativity being taught in teacher education programs as perceived by teacher educators and student teachers?Journal of Creative Behavior, 21, 22–33.
51.
MacKinnonD. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17(7), 484–495.
52.
MaslowA. H. (1959). Creativity in self-actualizing people. In AndersonH. H. (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 83–95). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
53.
MayR. (1959). The nature of creativity. In AndersonH. H. (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 55–68). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
54.
MayerR. E. (1989). Cognitive views of creativity: Creative teaching for creative learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 203–211.
55.
MayerR. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.
56.
McLaughlinB. P. (1992). The rise and fall of British emergentism. In BeckermannA., FlohrH., & KimJ. (Eds.), Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism (pp. 49–93). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
57.
MercerN. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London, England: Routledge.
58.
MogaE., BurgerK., HetlandL., & WinnerE. (2000). Does studying the arts engender creative thinking? Evidence for near but not far transfer. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 91–104.
59.
MorganC. L. (1923). Emergent evolution. London, England: Williams and Norgate. (Originally presented as the 1922 Gifford lectures at the University of St. Andrews.)
60.
NACCCE (National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education). (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London, England: DFEE.
61.
NickersonR. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), The handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). New York, NY: Cambridge.
62.
OECD. (2004). Innovation in the knowledge economy: Implications for education and learning. Paris, France: OECD Publications.
63.
OECD. (2008). Innovating to learn, learning to innovate. Paris, France: OECD Publications.
64.
PalincsarA. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. In SpenceJ. T., DarleyJ. M., & FossD. J. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 345–375). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
65.
PapertS. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York, NY: Basic Books.
66.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007). The intellectual and policy foundations of the 21st century skills framework. Tucson, AZ: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
67.
PiagetJ. (1971a). Comment on Beilin's paper. In GreenD. R., FordM. P., & FlamerG. B. (Eds.), Measurement and Piaget (pp. 192–194). New York, NY: McGraw-hill.
68.
PiagetJ. (1971b). The theory of stages in cognitive development. In GreenD. R., FordM. P., & FlamerG. B. (Eds.), Measurement and Piaget (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: McGraw-hill.
69.
PiirtoJ. (1998). Understanding those who create (2nd ed.). Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
70.
PiirtoJ. (2004). Understanding creativity.Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
71.
qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). (2005). Creativity: Find it, promote, promoting pupils' creative thinking and behaviour across the curriculum at key stages 1 and 2, practical materials for schools. London, England: qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
72.
RejskindG. (2000). TAG teachers: Only the creative need apply. Roeper Review, 22(3), 153–157.
73.
RogersC. R. (1954). Toward a theory of creativity. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 11(4), 249–260.
74.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
75.
RogoffB. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In KuhnD. & SieglerR. S. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, Cognition, perception, and language, pp. 679–744). New York, NY: Wiley.
76.
SawyerR. K. (1999). The emergence of creativity. Philosophical Psychology, 12(4), 447–469.
77.
SawyerR. K. (2002). Emergence in psychology: Lessons from the history of non-reductionist science. Human Development, 45, 2–28.
78.
SawyerR. K. (2003a). Emergence in creativity and development. In SawyerR. K., John-SteinerV., MoranS., SternbergR., FeldmanD. H., CsikszentmihalyiM., & NakamuraJ. (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 12–60). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
79.
SawyerR. K. (2003b). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
80.
SawyerR. K. (2003c). Improvised dialogues: Emergence and creativity in conversation. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
81.
SawyerR. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.
82.
SawyerR. K. (2006a). Analyzing collaborative discourse. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 187–204). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
83.
SawyerR. K. (2006b). Educating for innovation. The International Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 41–48.
84.
SawyerR. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York, NY: Basic Books.
85.
SawyerR. K. (Ed.). (2011a). Structure and improvisation in creative teaching. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
86.
SawyerR. K. (2011b). What makes good teachers great? The artful balance of structure and improvisation. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
87.
SawyerR. K. (2012a). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
88.
SawyerR. K. (Ed.). (2012b). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
89.
SawyerR. K. (2014). Introduction: The new science of learning. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
90.
SawyerR. K., & BersonS. (2004). Study group discourse: How external representations affect collaborative conversation. Linguistics and Education, 15(4), 387–412.
91.
SawyerR. K., ScribnerJ. P., WatsonS. T., & MyersV. L. (2005). Talking leadership: Conversation analysis and distributed leadership. In HoyW. K. & MiskelC. (Eds.), Educational leadership and reform (pp. 169–185). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
92.
ScardamaliaM., & BereiterC. (2006). Knowledge building. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–115). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
93.
SchacterJ., ThumY. M., & ZifkinD. (2006). How much does creative teaching enhance elementary students' achievement?Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(1), 47–72.
94.
SchillerF. (1968). On the aesthetic education of man, in a series of letters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Originally published as über die aesthetische Erziehung des Menschen, in einer Reihe von Briefen, 1793/1794.)
95.
SchrammS. L. (2002). Transforming the curriculum: Thinking outside the box. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
96.
ScottG., LeritzL. E., & MumfordM. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388.
97.
SerrellB. (1996). Exhibit labels: An interpretive approach. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
98.
SteinM. I. (1963). Creativity in a free society. Educational horizons, 41, 115–130. (Reprinted with minor changes from the October 1961 issue of Graduate Comment at Wayne State University, Detroit, MI)
99.
SternbergR. J., & WilliamsW. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
100.
StrokrockiM. (Ed.). (2005). Interdisciplinary art education: Building bridges to connect disciplines and cultures. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
101.
TaylorC. W. (Ed.). (1959). The third (1959) University of Utah research conference on the identification of creative scientific talent. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
102.
TaylorC. W. (Ed.). (1964a). Creativity: Progress and potential. New York, NY: McGraw-hill.
103.
TaylorC. W. (Ed.). (1964b). Widening horizons in creativity: The proceedings of the fifth Utah creativity research conference. New York, NY: Wiley.
104.
TaylorC. W., & BarronF. (Eds.). (1963). Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York, NY: Wiley.
105.
TellerP. (1992). A contemporary look at emergence. In BeckermannA., FlohrH., & KimJ. (Eds.), Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism (pp. 139–153). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
106.
TorranceE. P. (1965). Rewarding creative behavior: Experiments in classroom creativity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall.
107.
TorranceE. P. (1970). Encouraging creativity in the classroom. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown.
108.
TorranceE. P. (1972). Can we teach children to think creatively?Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114–143.
109.
TorranceE. P. (2008). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
110.
TorranceE. P., BruchC. B., & TorranceJ. P. (1976). Interscholastic futuristic creative problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 117–125.
111.
TorranceE. P., & SafterH. T. (1986). Are children becoming more creative?Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 1–13.
112.
TrillingB., & FadelC. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
113.
WhiteheadA. N. (1926). Science and the modern world. New York, NY: Macmillan.
114.
WhyteW. H. (1956). The organization man. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
115.
WinslowL. (1939). The integrated school art program. New York, NY: McGraw-hill.
