With 13 million immigrants arriving in the United States between 2000 and 2010, immigration is at its highest level in a century. At the same time, there has been an exponential increase in the number of IB PYP and MYP schools in the United States, from 88 registered in 1997 to 1,470 in 2013. Much of this increase has been in Title I schools serving diverse populations. This work examines classroom practice at the intersection of these phenomena.
Purpose
Within two different schools that offer IB programs and serve substantial numbers of immigrant and refugee youth, how do teachers prepare youth for citizenship?
Setting
This study took place at two public middle schools in suburban neighborhoods in the southeastern United States.
Population
Participants included seven middle school teachers, two administrators, and 27 sixth-grade students from 11 different countries.
Intervention/Program/Practice
Both schools were registered as IB World Schools.
Research Design
This article reports on a comparative case study of six classrooms in two International Baccalaureate schools.
Data Collection and Analysis
The author shares findings based on 65 classroom observations over the course of one semester, nine interviews with adult teachers and administrators. Data was analyzed using a phenomenological approach, beginning with analyzing data from each classroom, then from each school, and finally comparing themes between classrooms and students in the two schools. Data analysis began with codes based on theoretical frameworks for citizenship.
Findings/Results
A wide divergence in teacher practice was observed, with some practices exemplifying a flexible teacher orientation towards global education, acknowledging the global experiences, multiple languages, and variety of viewpoints that students brought into the classroom. Other practices exemplified a fixed teacher orientation towards global education, ignoring the variety of student experiences, languages, and viewpoints in the classroom.
Conclusions/Recommendations
Based on the differences in implemented curricula in the two schools across classrooms, the author proposes expanding frameworks for understanding global education. Global education can be implemented with a flexible or fixed orientation, as educators design activities and present content in ways that recognize or disregard students’ identities and experiences. The study suggests that the use of International Baccalaureate programs is no guarantee of a global education connected to the experiences of immigrant and refugee youth. Modifications in teacher practice and school structures are necessary in order to make global education relevant to diverse youth.
AlgerC. F. (1974). Your city in the world, the world in your city: Discovering the international activities and foreign policies of people, groups and organizations in your community. Columbus: The Mershon Center, The Ohio State University.
3.
AlmazyedM. (2010). Afghan refugee students' academic and social experiences in a U.S. high school (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (822620690)
4.
Alviar-MartinT., & UsherE. L. (2010). Enacting democracy in two international schools. In SaliliF. & HoosainR. (Eds.), Research in multicultural education and international perspectives (pp. 291–316). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
5.
AnS. (2009). Learning U.S. history in an age of globalization and transnational migration. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41, 763–787.
6.
AndersonL. (1979). Schooling and citizenship in a global age. Bloomington, IN: The Mid-America Program for Global Perspectives in Education.
7.
AppleM. (2010). Global crises, social justice, and education. In AppleM. (Ed.), Global crises, social justice, and education (pp. 1–24). London: Routledge.
8.
ArzubiagaA. E., NoguerónS. C., & SullivanA. L. (2009). The education of children in im/migrant families. Review of Research in Education, 33, 246–271.
9.
BabcockR. (1994). Transnational citizenship. Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar.
10.
BanksJ. (2008). Diversity and citizenship education in global times. In ArthurJ., DaviesI., & HahnC. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of education for democratic citizenship (pp. 57–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
BaysuG., & PhaletK. (2012). Staying on or dropping out: The role of the school environment in minority and non-minority school careers. Teachers College Record, 114(5), 1–25.
12.
BunnellT. (2008). The global growth of the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme over the first 40 years: A critical assessment. Comparative Education, 4, 409–424.
13.
BunnellT. (2011). The International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme after 30 years: A critical inquiry. Journal of Research in International Education, 10, 261–274
ConnerJ. O. (2008). From international schools to inner-city schools: The first principles of the International Baccalaureate diploma program. Teachers College Record, 110(2), 322–351.
16.
DolbyN., & RahmanA. (2008). Research in international education. Review of Educational Research, 78, 676–726.
17.
DrakeB. (2004). International education and IB Programmes: Worldwide expansion and potential cultural dissonance. Journal of Research in International Education, 3, 189–205.
18.
Dryden-PetersonS. (2010). Bridging home: Building relationships between immigrant and long-time resident youth. Teachers College Record, 112, 2320–2351.
19.
EisenM.(Producers), & HuangA. (Director). (2006). Diary of Jay-Z: Water for Life. [Motion picture]. United States: MTV.
20.
FortunyK., HernandezD. J., & ChaudryA. (2010). Young children of immigrants: The leading edge of America's future.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
21.
FoxE. (2001). The emergence of the International Baccalaureate as an impetus to curriculum reform. In HaydenM. & ThompsonJ. (Eds.), International education: Principles and practice (pp. 65–76). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
FraserJ. (2009). The school in the United States: A documentary history (2nd ed.). New York: NY: Routledge.
23.
FriedmanT. L. (2005). The world is fat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
GaudelliW., & FernekesW. (2004). Teaching about global human rights for global citizenship: Action research in the social studies. The Social Studies, 97, 16–26.
26.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
27.
GirouxH. (2013). Youth in revolt: Reclaiming a democratic future.Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
28.
GitlinA., BuendíaE., CroslandK., & DoumbiaF. (2003). The production of margin and center: Welcoming-unwelcoming of immigrant students. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 91–122.
29.
GoyetteK., & ConchasG. (2002). Family and non-family roots of social capital among Vietnamese and Mexican American children. Schooling and Social Capital in Diverse Cultures, 13, 41–72.
30.
GramsciA. (1971). In HoareQ. & Nowell-SmithG. (Eds.), Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.
HahnC. L. (1984). Promise and paradox: Challenges to global citizenship. Social Studies Education, 48, 240–243, 297–299.
33.
HanveyR. G. (1979). An attainable global perspective. New York, NY: Global Perspectives in Education, Inc.
34.
HaydenM., ThompsonJ., & WilliamsG. (2003). Student perceptions of international education: A comparison by course of study undertaken. Journal of Research in International Education, 2, 205–232.
35.
HeaterD. B. (2002). World citizenship: Cosmopolitan thinking and its opponents.London: Continuum.
36.
HernandezD. J., DentonN. A., & MacartneyS. E., (2007). Children in immigrant families— The U.S. and 50 States: National origins, language, and early education (Research Brief Series Publication No. 2007–11). Albany: State University of New York, Child Trends and the Center for Social and Demographic Analysis.
37.
HinrichsJ. (2003). A comparison of levels of international understanding among students of the International Baccalaureate diploma and Advanced Placement programs in the USA. Journal of Research in International Education, 2, 331–348.
38.
HobsonD. P., & SilovaI. (2014). The pedagogy and politics of global citizenship in international schools: Setting the context. In SilovaI. & HobsonD. (Eds.), Globalizing minds: Rhetoric and realities in international schools.Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
39.
International Baccalaureate Organization. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.ibo.org
KanuY. (2008). Educational needs and barriers for African refugee students in Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Education, 31, 915–940.
42.
Kia-KeatingM., & EllisH. (2007). Belonging and connection to school in resettlement: Young refugees, school belonging, and psychosocial adjustment. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 12(1), 29–43.
43.
LeeS. J. (2005). Up against Whiteness: Race, school and immigrant youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
44.
LevineP. (2008). The civic engagement of young immigrants: Why does it matter?Applied Developmental Science, 12, 102–104.
45.
LevinsonM. (2010). The civic empowerment gap: Defining the problem and locating solutions. In SherrodL. R., Torney-PurtaJ., & FlanaganC.A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 331–339). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
46.
LiG. (2008). Culturally contested literacies: America's “Rainbow underclass” and urban schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
Lindholm-LearyK. J., & FerranteA. (2005). Follow-up study of middle school two-way students: Language proficiency, achievement and attitudes. In HoosainR. & SaliliF. (Eds.), Language in multicultural education (pp. 157–179). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
48.
LiuJ. (2000). The power of Readers' Theater: From reading to writing. ELT Journal, 54, 354–361.
49.
LopezM. H., & MarceloK. B. (2008). The civic engagement of immigrant youth: New evidence from the 2006 Civic and Political Health of the Nation Survey. Applied Developmental Science, 12, 66–73.
MarlsburyC. (2013). “It's not just learning English, it's learning other cultures”: belonging, power, and possibility in an immigrant contact zone, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.837210
52.
McBrienJ. L. (2005). Educational needs and barriers for refugee students in the United States: A Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 329–364.
53.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54.
MerryfieldM. M. (1998). Pedagogy for global perspectives in education: Studies of teachers' thinking and practice. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26, 342–379.
55.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
56.
MollL. C., AmantiC., NeffD., & GonzálezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
57.
MyersJ. P., & ZamanH. A. (2009). Negotiating the global and national: Immigrant and dominant culture adolescents' vocabularies of citizenship in a transnational world. Teachers College Record, 111(11), 2589–2262.
58.
NiemiR. G., & JunnJ. (1998). Civic education: What makes students learn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
59.
NoddingsN. (2005). The challenge to care in school: An alternative approach to education.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
60.
OkomO. (2008). Uprooted: Liberian refugee students in a Midwest public high school (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (1677843651)
61.
OngA. (1999). Cultural citizenship as subject making: Immigrants negotiate racial and cultural boundaries in the United States. In TorresR., MironL., & IndaJ. (Eds.), In Race, identity and citizenship: A reader (pp. 262–293), Malden, MA: Blackwell.
62.
OngA. (2003). Buddha is hiding: Refugees, citizenship in new America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
63.
OslerA., & StarkeyH. (2005). Citizenship and language learning. London, England: Trentham Books.
64.
OslerA., & VincentK. (2002). Citizenship and the challenge of global education. Stoke, England: Trentham.
65.
ParkerW. C. (2007). International education in the schools: The second wave. Washington State Kappan, 1(1), 4–7.
66.
ParkerW. C., & CamiciaS. P. (2009). Cognitive praxis in today's “international education” movement: A case study of intents and affinities. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34, 42–74.
67.
PieterseJ. N. (2009). Globalization and culture: Global mélange.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
RubinB. C. (2007). “There's still not justice”: Youth civic identity development amid distinct school and community contexts. Teachers College Record, 109, 449–481.
71.
SarrC.U., & MosselsonJ. (2010). Issues in teaching refugees in U.S. Schools. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 109(2), 548–570.
Solano-CamposA.T. (2014). Immigrant and refugee children saying and doing citizenship: Global-Local tensions and common civic spaces in an international school in the United States. Citizenship Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 135–156.
74.
Souto-ManningM. (2010). Teaching English learners: Building on cultural and linguistic strengths. English Education, 42, 248–262.
75.
Stanton-SalazarR. D., & DornbuschS. M. (1995) Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 68(2), 116–135.
76.
Stanton-SalazarR. D., & SpinaS. U. (2000). The network orientations of highly resilient urban minority youth: A network-analytic account of minority socialization and its educational implication. The Urban Review, 32, 227–260.
77.
StepickA., StepickC. D., & LabissiereY. (2008). South Florida's immigrant youth and civic engagement: Major engagement: Minor differences. Applied Developmental Science, 12, 57–65.
78.
Stoops VerplaetseL., & MigliacciN. (2008). Inclusive pedagogy for English language learners: A handbook of research-informed practices. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
79.
Suárez-OrozcoC., & Suárez-OrozcoM.M. (2001). Children of immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80.
SuttonM. (1999). Global education and national interest: The last fifty years. International Journal of Social Education, 13(2), 6–28.
81.
TarcP. (2009). Global dreams, enduring tensions: International Baccalaureate in a changing world. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
82.
Torney-PurtaJ., BarberC., & WilkenfeldB. (2006). Differences in the civic knowledge and attitudes of adolescents in the United States by immigrant status and Hispanic background. Prospects, 36, 343–354.
83.
TyeK. A. (2009). A history of the global education movement in the United States. In Kirkwood-TuckerT.F. (Ed.), Vision in global education: The globalization of curriculum and pedagogy in teacher education and schools: Perspectives from Canada, Russia, and the United States (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
84.
UkpokoduO. N. (2010). Preparing teachers for global perspective pedagogy. In SubediB. (Ed.), Rethinking curricular knowledge on global societies. Information Age Publishing.
85.
UyP. (2011). The educational experiences of Lao and Khmer high school students: The influence of families, friends, and teachers on academic achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (875953433)
86.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.- Mexican youth and the politics of caring.Buffalo, NY: SUNY Press.
87.
van OordL. (2007). To Westernize the nations? An analysis of the International Baccalaureate's philosophy of education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37, 375–390.
88.
VangC. T. (2005). Hmong-American students still face multiple challenges in public schools. Multicultural Education, 13(1), 27.
89.
VertovecS. (1999). Conceiving and researching transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies.22, 447–462.
WallittR. (2005). Breaking the silence: Cambodian students speak out about school, success, and shifting identities (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (932374001)
92.
WillinskyJ. (1998). Learning to divide the world: Education at empire's end.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
93.
ZhouM. (1997). Social capital in Chinatown: The role of community-based organizations and families in the adaptation of the younger generation. In SellerM. & WeisL. (Eds.), Beyond black and white: New faces and voices in U.S. schools (pp. 181–205). Albany: SUNY Press.
94.
ZhouM., & BankstonC. L. (1994). Social capital and the adaptation of the second generation: The case of Vietnamese youth in New Orleans. International Migration Review, 28, 821–846.
