Digital Youth in Brick and Mortar Schools: Examining the Complex Interplay of Students,Technology,Education,and Change

Abstract

Context

The past decade has witnessed a sustained emphasis on information and communication technologies (ICT) in education, coupled with the rise of online social media and increasing pervasiveness of personal media devices.

Research Question

Our research question asked: How has this changing context affected the educational experiences of American high school students?

Setting

The exploratory, qualitative study took place at two high schools in a large metropolitan district in the southeastern United States. One high school was in a downtown area, and the other was in a suburban setting.

Research Design

The researchers used various qualitative research approaches, including interviews, on-site observations, and document analysis. Our interview participants included classroom teachers and support staff as well as students drawn from across each school's grade levels. We also shadowed 10 of the student interview participants through their entire school days.

Findings

In terms of classroom instruction, we found that ICT had affected school, teacher, and student practices in some ways, but traditional teacher-centered practices such as student completion of printed worksheets were still prevalent. However, widespread student access to personal media devices and online social media site influence had a noticeable effect on the two high schools. The researchers encountered specific “types” of students whom technology particularly influenced: “Digital Rebels,” “Cyber Wanderers,” and “eLearning Pioneers.” In addition, we discovered that computer-based remedial programs served as problematic educational lifelines for students at risk of dropping out.

Conclusions

The two study high schools presented a complex portrait. In the end, technology functioned both as an imperfect school reform effort that produced only partial instructional change and as a successful though uninvited disruptive innovation that allowed students to challenge and unsettle existing educational norms. We close by considering implications of our findings.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong

D. E.

(2010). Rites of passage: Coercion, compliance, and complicity in the socialization of new vice-principals. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 685–722.

Buckingham

(Ed.). (2008). Youth, identity, and media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chen

(2010). Education nation: Six leading edges of innovation in our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Christensen

, Horn

M. B.

, & Johnson

C. W.

(2011). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Collins

, & Halverson

(2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Coppola

E. M.

(2004). Powering up: Learning to teach well with technology. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Costabile

, & Spears

B. A.

(2012). The impact of technology on relationships in educational settings. London, England: Routledge.

Creswell

J. W.

(2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five different approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cuban

(2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

10.

Cuban

, Kirkpatrick

, & Peck

(2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.

11.

Darling-Hammond

(2010). The fat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

12.

Enyon

, & Malmberg

(2011). A typology of young people's Internet use: Implications for education. Computers & Education 56(3), 585–595.

13.

Everett

(2008). Learning race and ethnicity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

14.

Garrison

, & Bromley

(2004). Social contexts, defensive pedagogies, and the (mis)uses of educational technology. Educational Policy, 18(4), 589–613.

15.

Glesne

(2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

16.

Greene

(2013). Mapping low-income African American parents' roles in their children's education in a changing political economy. Teachers College Record, 115(10), 1–33.

17.

Harris

F. J.

(2011). I found it on the Internet: Coming of age online. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.

18.

Hohlfeld

T. N.

, Ritzhaupt

A. D.

, Barron

A. E.

, & Kemker

(2008). Examining the digital divide in K–12 public schools: Four-year trends for supporting ICT literacy in Florida. Computers and Education, 51, 1648–1663.

19.

Hope

(2005). Panopticism, play, and the resistance of surveillance: Case studies of the observation of student internet use in UK schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(3), 359–373.

20.

Jensen

(2009). Teaching with poverty in mind: What being poor does to kids' brains and what schools can do about it. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

21.

(2007). Student and teacher views about technology: A tale of two cities? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 377–397.

22.

Lightfoot

S. L.

(1983). The good high school: Portraits of character and culture. New York, NY: Basic Books.

23.

Mama

, & Hennessy

(2013). Developing a typology of teacher beliefs and practices concerning classroom use of ICT. Computers & Education 68, 380–387.

24.

McPherson

(Ed.). (2008). Digital youth, innovation, and the unexpected. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

25.

Means

, Penuel

W. R.

, & Padilla

(2001). The connected school: Technology and learning in high school. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

26.

Merriam

S.B.

(2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

27.

Mesch

G. S.

, & Talmud

(2010). Wired youth: The social world of adolescence in the information age. London, England: Routledge.

28.

Moe

T. M.

, & Chubb

J. E.

(2009). Liberating learning: Technology, politics, and the future of American learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

29.

Palfrey

, & Gasser

(2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York, NY: Basic Books.

30.

Peck

, Cuban

, & Kirkpatrick

(2002). Techno-promoter dreams, student realities. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(6), 472–480.

31.

Peck

, Mullen

C. A.

, Lashley

, & Eldridge

J. A.

(2011). School leadership and technology challenges: Lessons from a new American high school. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice 7(4), 39–51.

32.

Prensky

(2011). Digital wisdom and homo sapiens digital. In Thomas

(Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology, and the new literacies (pp. 15–29). London, England: Routledge.

33.

Robertson

H. J.

(2001). Big change questions: Will educational institutions, within their present structures, be able to adapt sufficiently to meet the needs of the information age? Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 165–170.

34.

Schrum

, Thompson

, Sprague

, Maddux

, McAnear

, Bell

, & Bull

(2005). Advancing the field: Considering acceptable evidence in educational technology research. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 5 (3/4). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss3/editorial/article1.cfm

35.

Selwyn

(2011). Schools and schooling in the digital age. London, England: Routledge.

36.

Selwyn

(2013). Education in a digital world: Global perspectives on technology and education. London, England: Routledge.

37.

Shirley

(2011). The Fourth Way of technology and change. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 187–209.

38.

Spring

J. H.

(2012). Education networks: Power, wealth, cyberspace, and the digital mind. London, England: Routledge.

39.

Sweet

J. R.

, Rasher

S. P.

, Abromitis

B. S.

, & Johnson

E. M.

(2004). Case studies of high-performing schools with predominantly low-income, African-American, or Latino student populations. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.

40.

Tyack

, & Cuban

(1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

41.

Vanderlinde

, Dexter

, & van Braak

(2012). School-based ICT policy plans in primary education: Elements, typologies and underlying processes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 505–519.

42.

Warschauer

(2006). Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

43.

Warschauer

(2011). Learning in the cloud: How (and why) to transform schools with digital media. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

44.

West

D. M.

(2012). Digital schools: How technology can transform education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

45.

Yin

R. K.

(2003). Applications of case study research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

46.

Zucker

A. A.

(2008). Transforming schools with technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.