Family Inequality,School Inequalities,and Mathematics Achievement in 65 Countries: Microeconomic Mechanisms of Rent Seeking and Diminishing Marginal Returns

Abstract

Background

While many studies show that greater economic inequality widens the achievement gap between rich and poor students, recent studies indicate that countries with greater economic inequality have lower overall student achievement.

Purpose

This study explores whether family inequalities (family income) or school inequalities (educational materials or teachers with university degrees) reduce overall student achievement through micro-economic mechanisms, such as fewer educational resources (via rent-seeking) or inefficient resource allocation (via diminishing marginal returns).

Population/Participants/Subjects

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development's Programme for International Student Assessment (OECD-PISA) selected 475,760 representative fifteen-year-olds and their principals from 18,094 schools in 65 countries.

Research Design

In this secondary analysis, we tested whether family or school inequalities were related to students’ mathematics test scores, and whether fewer educational resources or inefficient resources allocation mediated these relationships.

Data Collection and Analysis

Each student received a mathematics test. The students and their principals also received a questionnaire. World Bank economic data on each countries were merged with the OECD-PISA data. To analyze this data, we used item response models, Warm indices and multilevel analyses.

Findings/Results

In countries with greater family inequality (GDP Gini) or school inequalities (of educational materials or teacher quality), students had lower mathematics achievement. The results were similar in all student subsamples (high vs. low SES; high vs. low achievement). As the mediation results for each inequality differed, they suggest that these inequalities operate through different mechanisms. Family inequality and school inequality of teacher quality are linked to fewer teachers with post-secondary education and lower mathematics achievement. Meanwhile, school inequality of educational resources is linked to diminishing marginal returns and lower mathematics achievement.

Conclusions/Recommendations

Family inequality and school inequalities (educational materials, teacher quality) are distinct inequalities that are all linked to lower mathematics achievement, but not substantially correlated with one another. Thus, each inequality can be addressed separately. As none of the subgroups of students (not even the richest ones) benefit from any of the inequalities, disseminating the results widely can help more laypeople (especially the richest ones) recognize their mutual benefit in reducing these inequalities –or reduce their inclination to support policies that exacerbate these inequalities. As reducing family inequality can be extremely costly and politically controversial, a strategic intervention at the inequality mechanism level (e.g., increasing teacher quality in schools with few high quality teachers) might be improve mathematics achievement more effectively.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antikainen

, & Luukkainen

(2008). Twenty- five years of educational reform initiatives in Finland. Joensuu, Finland: University of Joensuu.

Baker

D. P.

, Goesling

, & Letendre

G. K.

(2002). Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development. Comparative Education Review, 46(3), 291–312.

Baker

F. B.

, & Kim

S.-H.

(2004). Item response theory. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.

Banerjee

, Mookherjee

, Munshi

, & Ray

(2001). Inequality, control rights and rent seeking: Sugar cooperatives in Maharashtra. Journal of Political Economy, 109(1), 138–190.

Bartels

L. M.

(2012). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Benabou

(2000). Unequal societies: Income distribution and the social contract. American Economic Review, 90, 96–129.

Benjamini

, Krieger

A. M.

, & Yekutieli

(2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika, 93, 491–507.

Bourdieu

(1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.

Bradley

R. H.

, & Corwyn

R. F.

(2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399.

10.

Brown

, Micklewright

, Schnepf

S. V.

, & Waldmann

(2005). Cross-national surveys of learning achievement—how robust are the findings? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A), 170, 623–646.

11.

Center for Responsive Politics (CRP). (2012). Influence and lobbying. Retrieved from http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000055140&year=2012

12.

Central Intelligence Agency. (2012). The world factbook. Washington, DC: CIA.

13.

Chiu

M. M.

(2007). Families, economies, cultures and science achievement in 41 countries. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 510–519.

14.

Chiu

M. M.

(2008). Inequality mechanisms that hurt both privileged and disadvantaged students' learning. In Wadell

I. H.

(Ed.), Income distribution (pp. 79–98). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

15.

Chiu

M. M.

(2009). Inequalities' harmful effects on both disadvantaged and privileged students: Sources, mechanisms, and strategies. Journal of Education Research, 3, 109–128.

16.

Chiu

M. M.

(2010). Inequality, family, school, and mathematics achievement. Social Forces, 88(4), 1645–1676.

17.

Chiu

M. M.

, & Chow

B. W.-Y.

(2010). Culture, motivation, and reading achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 579–592.

18.

Chiu

M. M.

, & Khoo

(2005). Effects of resources, inequality, and privilege bias on achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 575–603.

19.

Chiu

M. M.

, & Klassen

R. M.

(2010). Relations of mathematics self-concept and its calibration with mathematics achievement. Learning and Instruction, 20, 2–17.

20.

Chiu

M. M.

, & McBride-Chang

(2006). Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 331–362.

21.

Chiu

M. M.

, & McBride-Chang

(2010). Family and reading in 41 countries: Differences across cultures and students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 514–543.

22.

Demirguc-Kunt

, & Levine

, (2009). Finance and inequality: Theory and evidence. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 1, 287–318.

23.

Education and Manpower Bureau. (1998). Teacher training and qualifications. hong Kong: hong Kong Printing Department.

24.

Gamoran

, & Long

D. A.

(2006). Equality of educational opportunity: A 40 year perspective. In Teese

, Lamb

, & Duru-Bellat

(Eds.), Education and equity: International perspectives on theory and policy (pp. 3–27). New York: Springer.

25.

Goldstein

(1995). Multilevel statistical models. Sydney, Australia: Edward Arnold.

26.

Halpern

D. F.

(2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). London: Erlbaum.

27.

Hanushek

E. A.

& Wöbmann

(2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116, C63–C76.

28.

House

R. J.

, Hanges

P. J.

, Javidan

, Dorfman

P. W.

, & Gupta

(2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

29.

Ilzetzki

(2011). Rent-seeking distortions and fiscal procyclicality. Journal of Developmental Economics, 96, 1, 30–46.

30.

Kennedy

(2008). Guide to econometrics. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

31.

Konstantopoulos

(2008). The power of the test in three-level cluster randomized designs. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 66–88.

32.

Lee

(2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 355–365.

33.

Lloyd

C. B.

, & Blanc

A. K.

(1996). Children's schooling in sub-Saharan Africa: The role of fathers, mothers, and others. Population and Development Review, 22(2), 265–298.

34.

MacKinnon

D. P.

, Lockwood

C. M.

, & Williams

(2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.

35.

Mankiw

N. G.

(2004). Principles of economics (3rd ed.). Cincinnati: South-Western College.

36.

May

(2006). A multilevel Bayesian IRT method for scaling socioeconomic status in international studies of education. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 63–79.

37.

McKenzie

(2005). Measuring inequality with asset indicators. Journal of Population Economics, 18, 229–260.

38.

McPherson

, Smith-Lovin

, & Cook

J. M.

(2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

39.

Merryman

J. H.

, & Perez-Perdomo

(2007). The civil law tradition: An introduction to the legal systems of Europe and Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

40.

Miller

J. A.

(1992). Private school groups postpone quest for vouchers. Education Week, 11(30), 15.

41.

Monseur

, & Adams

(2009). Plausible values: how to deal with their limitations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10, 320–334.

42.

Murphy

K. M.

, Shleifer

, & Vishny

R. W.

(1993). Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth? The American Economic Review, 83(2), 409–414.

43.

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2005). NAEP 2005 mathematics report card for New Jersey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

44.

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2011). NAEP 2011 mathematics report card for New Jersey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

45.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2003). PISA 2002 technical report. Paris: OECD.

46.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2005). PISA 2003 technical report. Paris: OECD.

47.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2009a). OECD Statistics. Paris: OECD.

48.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2009b). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris: OECD.

49.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2012). PISA 2009 technical report. Paris: OECD.

50.

Pan

B. A.

, Perlmann

R. Y.

, & Snow

C. E.

(2000). Food for thought. In Menn

& Ratner

N. B.

(Eds.), Methods for studying language production (pp. 205–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

51.

Peugh

J. L.

, & Enders

C. K.

(2004). Missing data in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 74, 525–556.

52.

Phillips

, & Chin

(2004). School inequality: What do we know? In Neckerman

Kathryn

(Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 467–519). New York: Russell Sage.

53.

Rao

P. S.

, Manohar

, & Mellam

A. C.

(2008). Impact of cultural dimensions on e-learning under face-to-face learning mode and distance learning mode in Papua New Guinea. In Arabnia

H. R.

(Ed.), Proceedings of the 2008 World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (pp. 1–6). Athens, GA: University of Georgia.

54.

Roscigno

V. J.

, & Ainsworth-Darnell

J. W.

(1999). Race, cultural capital and educational resources. Sociology of Education, 72(3), 158–178.

55.

Rothstein

(2000). Equalizing education resources on behalf of disadvantaged children. In Kahlenberg

R. D.

(Ed.), A notion at risk (pp. 127–168). New York: Century.

56.

Rust

K. F.

, & Rao

J. N. K.

(1996). Variance estimation for complex estimators in sample surveys. Statistics in Medical Research, 5, 381–397.

57.

Samuelson

, & Nordhaus

(2009). Microeconomics. New York: McGraw-hill.

58.

Saxe

G. B.

, & Esmonde

(2012). Cultural development of mathematical ideas: Papua New Guinea studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

59.

Schenk

, & Oldman

(2007). Value added tax: A comparative approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

60.

Schubert

S. R.

(2006). Revisiting the oil curse. Development, 49, 64–70.

61.

Schulz

(2003). Validating questionnaire constructs in international studies. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

62.

Stiglitz

J. E.

(2012). The price of inequality: How today's divided society endangers our future. New York: Norton.

63.

Sukhtankar

(2012) Sweetening the deal? Political connections and sugar mills in India American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(3), 43–63.

64.

United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). (2011). The state of the world's children 2011. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/sowc2011/

65.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2010). Human development report: Papua New Guinea. Paris: UNDP.

66.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2010). Papua New Guinea country report. Paris: UNESCO.

67.

Walker

E. M.

, Achilles

, & Frances

(2007). The impact of the 1998 Abbott v. Burke decision on educational progress in New Jersey high poverty districts. Berkeley, CA: Earl Warren Institute.

68.

Warm

T. A.

(1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika, 54, 427–450.

69.

Wilkinson

R. G.

(2001). Mind the gap. New haven, CT: Yale University Press.

70.

Williams

(2005). Cheating our kids: How politics and greed ruin education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

71.

World Bank. 2010. The World Development Report 2009. Oxford University Press.