A transformative activist stance is a theoretically grounded model for educational research based on a radically revised theory of human development and learning. Its purpose is to advance a transformative agenda that contributes to the creation of equitable futures for students, especially those from disadvantaged populations. A collaborative project conducted in a group home for youth in foster care provides a dramatic illustration for this approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArievitchI. M., & StetsenkoA. (2000). The quality of cultural tools and cognitive development: Galperin's perspective and its implications. Human Development, 43, 69–93.
2.
BakhtinM. M. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays by M. M. Bakhtin (V. Liapunov, Trans.; HolquistM. & LiapunovV., Eds.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
3.
BakhtinM. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (V. Liapunov, Trans.; LiapunovV. & HolquistM., Eds.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
4.
CammarotaJ., & FineM. (2008). Youth participatory action research: A pedagogy for transformational resistance. In CammarotaJ. & FineM. (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
DaiuteC. (2010). Human development and political violence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
DavydovV. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. In KilpatrickJ. (Ed.), Soviet studies in mathematics education: Vol. 2.Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
7.
FreireP. (1970/1990). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published 1970).
8.
GirouxH. (2004/1994). Doing cultural studies: Youth and the challenge of pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64(3), 278–309.
9.
Gal'perinP. Ia. (1989). Study of the intellectual development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 27, 26–44. (Original work published 1969).
10.
GutiérrezK., & LarsonJ. (2007). Discussing expanded spaces for learning. Language Arts, 85, 69–77.
11.
HardingS. (2004). A socially relevant philosophy of science? Resources from standpoint theory's controversiality. Hypathia, 19(1), 25–47.
12.
HardingS. (1992). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity?” In AlcoffL. & PotterE. (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). New York, NY: Routledge.
JaramilloN. (2011). Dialogic action for critical democracy. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 9, 72–94.
17.
LatherP. (2004). Scientific research in education: A critical perspective. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 759–772.
18.
LaveJ., & WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
McLarenP., & JaramilloN. (2007). Pedagogy and praxis in the age of empire: Towards a new humanism. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
20.
MeshcheryakovA. I. (1979). Awakening to life (K. Judelson, Trans.). Moscow, Russia: Progress Publishers.
21.
MorawskiJ. G. (1994). Practicing feminisms, reconstructing psychology: Notes on a liminal science. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
22.
PenuelW. R., & O'ConnorK. (2010). Learning research as a human science: Old wine in new bottles? In PenuelW. R. & O'ConnorK. (Eds.), National Society for the Study of Education, 109, 268–283.
23.
PolskyH. W., & BergerR. (2003). From custodialism to community. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
24.
PolskyH. W. (1962). Cottage six: The social system of delinquent boys in residential treatment. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing.
25.
PrilleltenskyI. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices. Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 52, 517–535.
26.
StetsenkoA. (2014). Transformative activist stance for education: Inventing the future in moving beyond the status quo. In CorcoranT. (Ed.), Psychology in education: Critical theory-practice (pp. 181–198). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
27.
StetsenkoA. (2005). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective types of activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 70–88.
28.
StetsenkoA. (2007). Being-through-doing: Bakhtin and Vygotsky in dialogue. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 25–37.
29.
StetsenkoA. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance: Expanding Vygotsky's (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 465–485.
30.
StetsenkoA. (2010a). Standing on the shoulders of giants: A balancing act of dialectically theorizing conceptual understanding on the grounds of Vygotsky's project. In RothW.-M. (Ed.), Re/structuring science education: ReUniting Psychological and Sociological Perspectives (pp. 53–72). New York, NY: Springer.
31.
StetsenkoA. (2010b). Teaching-learning and development as activist projects of historical becoming: Expanding Vygotsky's approach to pedagogy. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5, 6–16.
32.
StetsenkoA. (2011). Darwin and Vygotsky on development: An exegesis on human nature. In KontopodisM., WulfCh., & FichtnerB. (Eds.), Children, culture and education (pp. 25–41). New York, NY: Springer.
33.
StetsenkoA. (2012). Personhood: An activist project of historical becoming through collaborative pursuits of social transformation. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 144–153.
34.
StetsenkoA. (2013). Theorizing personhood for the world in transition and change: Reflections from a transformative activist stance. In MartinJ. & BickhardM. H. (Eds.), The psychology of personhood (pp. 181–202). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
StetsenkoA., & ArievitchI. M. (2004). Vygotskian collaborative project of social transformation: History, politics, and practice in knowledge construction. The International Journal of Critical Psychology, 12(4), 58–80.
36.
ViannaE. (2009). Collaborative transformations in foster care: Teaching-learning as a developmental tool in a residential program. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller.
37.
ViannaE., & StetsenkoA. (2011). Connecting learning and identity development through a transformative activist stance: Application in adolescent development in a child welfare program. Human Development, 54, 313–338.
38.
VygotskyL. S. (1997). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In RieberR. W. (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 4 (pp. 1–278). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
39.
VygotskyL. S. (1998a). Pedology of the adolescent. In RieberR. W. (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5: Child psychology (pp. 1–184). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
40.
VygotskyL. S. (1998b). The problem of age (M. Hall, Trans., original work written 1933–1934). In RieberR. W. (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5: Child psychology (pp. 187–205). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
