The Fragmentation of Metropolitan Public School Districts and the Segregation of American Schools: A Longitudinal Analysis

Abstract

Context

Scholars have increasingly raised concerns about the “fragmentation” or proliferation of metropolitan public school districts, citing the potential for fragmentation to facilitate racial/ethnic segregation by permitting individuals to sort more efficiently across district boundaries. In addition, scholars have expressed particular concern about the rapid growth of charter districts and their potential to exacerbate segregation.

Purpose of Study

In this study, we provide initial evidence on the effect of public school district fragmentation on the trajectory of racial/ethnic segregation in metropolitan areas, attending to the differential effects of regular school district fragmentation as well as charter district fragmentation.

Research Design

Using NCES Common Core data for the 2002–2010 school years, we computed measures of regular public school district fragmentation and charter district fragmentation as well as nine measures of racial/ethnic segregation for all 366 U.S. metropolitan areas (3 geographic x 3 racial/ethnic decompositions). We then estimated a series of multilevel longitudinal models predicting change in each measure of segregation as a function of regular and charter school district fragmentation.

Results

We found that school district fragmentation is unrelated to the overall level of segregation in a metropolitan area. More fragmented metropolitan areas have higher levels of segregation across districts than less fragmented metropolitan areas; however, they have lower levels of segregation within districts and equivalent levels of total metropolitan segregation. Likewise, school district fragmentation was not associated with worsening segregation over time or with attenuation of the secular trend toward declining segregation. More fragmented metropolitan areas had smaller declines in between-district segregation over the study period than less fragmented metropolitan areas; however, they had equivalent declines in within-district and total metropolitan segregation. In addition, charter district fragmentation was unrelated to the level or trajectory of school segregation in a metropolitan area.

Conclusions

Our results provide a somewhat more sanguine assessment of school district fragmentation than previous research. We found that the fragmentation of regular public school districts serves to shift the geographic scale of segregation from within districts to between districts; however, fragmentation does not exacerbate metropolitan racial/ethnic segregation. In addition, despite the rapid growth of charter districts, we find no evidence that charter district fragmentation has worsened overall metropolitan racial/ethnic segregation. Moreover, metropolitan areas are not experiencing the “fragmentation” of their traditional public school districts; rather, traditional school districts are consolidating despite increasing enrollment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alesina

, Baqir

, & Hoxby

(2004). Political jurisdictions in heterogeneous communities. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 348–396.

Barr

D. J.

, Levy

, Scheepers

, & Tily

H. J.

(2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.

Bifulco

, Ladd

H. F.

, & Ross

(2008). Public school choice and integration: Evidence from Durham, North Carolina. Social Science Research, 38(1), 71–85.

Bischoff

(2008). School district fragmentation and racial residential segregation: How do boundaries matter? Urban Affairs Review, 44(2), 182–217.

Briffault

(1996). The local government boundary problem in metropolitan America. Stanford Law Review, 48(5), 1115–1171.

Clotfelter

C. T.

(2004). After Brown: The rise and retreat of school desegregation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Cobb

C. D.

, & Glass

G. V.

(1999). Ethnic segregation in Arizona charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(1). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/536/659

Danielson

M. N.

(1976). The politics of exclusion. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Dawkins

C. J.

(2005). Tiebout choice and residential segregation by race in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1980-2000. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 734–755.

10.

Drier

, Mollenkopf

, & Swanstrom

(2004). Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

11.

Duncombe

, & Yinger

(2007). Does school district consolidation cut costs? Education Finance and Policy, 2(4), 341–375.

12.

Frankenberg

(2009). Splintering school districts: Understanding the link between segregation and fragmentation. Law & Social Inquiry, 34(4), 869–909.

13.

Frankenberg

, Lee

, & Orfield

(2003). A multiracial society with segregated schools: Are we losing the dream? The Civil Rights Project, University of California, Los Angeles.

14.

Frankenberg

, Siegel-Hawley

, & Wang

(2010). Choice without equity: Charter school segregation and the need for civil rights standards. The Civil Rights Project, University of California, Los Angeles.

15.

Garcia

D. R.

(2008). The impact of school choice on racial segregation in charter schools. Educational Policy, 22(6), 805–829.

16.

Hendrick

R. M.

, Jimenez

B. S.

, & Lal

(2011). Does local government fragmentation reduce local spending? Urban Affairs Review, 47(4), 467–510.

17.

Holme

J. J.

, & Finnigan

K. S.

(2013). School diversity, school district fragmentation, and metropolitan policy. Teachers College Record, 115(11), 1–29.

18.

Jackson

K. T.

(1985). Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

19.

Logan

J. R.

(2004). Resegregation in American public schools? Not in the 1990s. Albany: University at Albany, State University of New York, Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research.

20.

Maciag

(2012, August 30). Which states have the most fragmented local governments? Governing. Retrieved from http://www.governing.com/blogs/by-the-numbers/local-government-consolidation-fragmentation.html

21.

Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974).

22.

Molloy

, Smith

C. L.

, & Wozniak

(2013). Declining migration within the US: The role of the labor market. Finance and Economic Discussion Series, Division of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Board.

23.

Orfield

(2002). American metropolitics: The new suburban reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

24.

Orfield

, Bachmeier

M. D.

, James

D. R.

, & Eitle

(1997). Deepening segregation in American public schools: A special report from the Harvard Project on School Desegregation. Equity & Excellence in Education, 30(2), 5–24.

25.

Orfield

, Kucsera

, & Siegel-Hawley

(2012). E pluribus…separation: Deepening double segregation for more students. The Civil Rights Project, University of California, Los Angeles.

26.

Orfield

, Schley

, Glass

, & Reardon

(1994). The growth of segregation in American schools: Changing patterns of separation and poverty since 1968. Equity & Excellence, 27(1), 5–8.

27.

Orfield

, & Yun

J. T.

(1999). Resegregation in American schools. The Civil Rights Project, University of California Los Angeles.

28.

Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007).

29.

Reardon

S. F.

, & Firebaugh

(2002). Measures of multigroup segregation. Sociological Methodology, 32(1), 33–67.

30.

Reardon

S. F.

, Yun

J. T.

, & Eitle

T. M.

(2000). The changing structure of school segregation: Measurement and evidence of multiracial metropolitan-area school segregation, 1989-1995. Demography, 37(3), 351–364.

31.

Stroub

K. J.

, & Richards

M. P.

(2013). From resegregation to reintegration: Trends in metropolitan school segregation, 1993-2010. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 497–531.

32.

Teaford

(1979). City and suburb: The political fragmentation of metropolitan America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

33.

Theil

(1972). Statistical decomposition analysis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.

34.

Tiebout

C. M.

(1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.

35.

Urquiola

(2005). Does school choice lead to sorting? Evidence from Tiebout variation. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1310–1326.

36.

Weiher

G. R.

(1991). The fractured metropolis: Political fragmentation and metropolitan segregation. Albany: State University of New York Press.

37.

Wells

A. S.

, Bladridge

, Duran

, Lofton

, Roda

, Warner

, … Grzesikowski

(2009). Why boundaries matter: A study of five separate and unequal Long Island school districts. Report to the Long Island Index. Retrieved from http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/bitstreams/95995.pdf

38.

Wells

A. S.

, Ready

D. D.

, Duran

, Grzesikowski

, Hill

, Roda

, … White

(2012). Still separate, still unequal, but not always so “suburban”: The changing nature of suburban school districts in the New York metropolitan area. In Tate

W. F.

IV (Ed.), Research on schools, neighborhoods and communities: toward civic responsibility (pp. 125–149). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield for the American Educational Research Association.