The institutionalization of in loco parentis in the wake of Gott v. Berea College (1913) marked a major turning point in the evolution of student management theory and practice. Focusing on the crucial decade of the 1920s, when American higher education first became a mass enterprise, this study explores the interaction of ideas and institutions by retracing the constitutive relationship between in loco parentis and the development of student services and programs targeted to keeping students in school.
Purpose/Objective
Scholars have tended to think of in loco parentis as primarily a tool of social control used to discipline misbehaving students. This study offers a different interpretation by taking seriously the doctrine's basic terms—namely, administrators’ and faculties’ role as “parents” and students’ role as “children”—and by highlighting the enduring institutional transformations created in the 1920s to help reduce student attrition.
Research Design
This study offers a historical analysis of the changing meanings and widening jurisdiction of in loco parentis during the 1920s.
Conclusions/Recommendations
This study finds that changes in the legal definition of in loco parentis following Gott v. Berea College (1913) triggered a revolution in student services that helped lay the foundation for the creation of the modern undergraduate experience and for the education of the whole student.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottC. M. (1969, June). Demonstrations, dismissals, due process, and the high school: An overview. School Review, 77, 131–133.
2.
American Association of University Professors. (1937). Depression, recovery and higher education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
3.
AngellR. C. (1928). The campus: A study of contemporary American life in the American university. New York, NY: D. Appleton.
4.
AngellR. C. (1930). A study in undergraduate adjustment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
ArumR., & RoksaJ. (2014). Aspiring adults adrift: Tentative transitions of college graduates.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
AydelotteF. (1924). Bulletin of the National Research Council: Honors courses in American colleges and universities. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences.
7.
AydelotteF. (1931). Honors courses at Swarthmore. In HawkesH. E. (Ed.), Five college plans (pp. 59–70). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
8.
BeaneyW. M. (1968). Students, higher education, and the law. Denver Law Journal, 45, 511–524.
BookerI. A. (1933). Reducing withdrawals. Journal of Higher Education, 4, 249–254.
11.
BoucherC. S. (1932). Curriculum provision for the individual in the University of Chicago. In GrayW. S. (Ed.), Provision for the individual in college education (pp. 98–108). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
BraxtonJ. M. (Ed.) (2000). Reworking the student departure puzzle. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
13.
BrubacherJ. S., & RudyW. (1958). Higher education in transition: An American history: 1636-1956.New York, NY: Harper.
14.
ChapinF. S. (1931, April). Research studies of extracurricular activities and their significance in reflecting social change. Journal of Educational Sociology, 4, 491–498.
15.
CohenS. (1999). Challenging orthodoxies: Toward a new cultural history of education. New York, NY: P. Lang.
16.
College records broken. (1927, December 22). The Washington Post.
17.
DunkelbergerG. F. (1935, December). Do extracurricular activities make for poor scholarship?Journal of Educational Sociology, 9, 215–218.
18.
EdwardsR. H. (1928). Undergraduates: A study of morale in twenty-three American colleges and universities. New York, NY: Doubleday, Doran.
19.
EllisH. M. (1926, July 24). Freshman week at the University of Maine. School and Society.
20.
FassP. S. (1977). The damned and the beautiful: American youth in the 1920s.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
FittsC. T., & SwiftF. H. (1928). The construction of orientation courses for college freshmen.Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
FitzgeraldR. H. (1932). Personal adjustments in relation to living conditions. In GrayW. S. (Ed.), Provision for the individual in college education (pp. 189–198). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
GelberS. (2011). The university and the people: Envisioning American higher education in an era of populist protest.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
HallG. S. (1904). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relations to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion and education (Vols. 1–2). New York, NY: D. Appleton.
26.
HannaJ. V. (1930, June). Student-retention in junior colleges. Journal of Educational Research, 22, 1–8.
27.
HopkinsL. B. (1926). Personnel procedures in education: Observations and conclusions resulting from visits to fourteen institutions of higher learning. Educational Record, 7, 15–16.
28.
HorowitzH. L. (1984). Alma mater: Design and experience in the women's colleges from their nineteenth-century beginnings to the 1930s.New York, NY: A.A. Knopf.
29.
HorowitzH. L. (1987). Campus life: Undergraduate cultures from the end of the eighteenth century to the present.New York, NY: A.A. Knopf.
30.
KawinE. (1940, December). Adjustment in the school and college situation. Review of Educational Research, 10, 421–428.
31.
KellyF. J. (1927, November). The training of college teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 14, 332–341.
32.
KleinA. J. (1926). Bureau of Education Bulletin, 20. Washington, DC: GPO.
33.
KleinA. J. (1930). Bureau of Education Bulletin, 9. Washington, DC: GPO.
34.
KnodeJ. C. (1930). Orienting the student in college: With special reference to freshman week.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
35.
KoosL. V. (1928, April). Recent growth of the junior college. School Review, 36, 256–266.
36.
LagemannE. C. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
LeeP. (2014). The case of Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education: From civil rights to students’ rights and back again. Teachers College Record, 116.
38.
LevineD. O. (1986). The American college and the culture of aspiration, 1915-1940.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
39.
LittleC. C. (1926, December 18). Freshman week. School and Society.
40.
LossC. P. (2012). Between citizens and the state: The politics of American higher education in the 20th century.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
LucasR. (1970, January). The right to higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 41, 55–64.
42.
MehusO. M. (1932, November). Extracurricular activities and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Sociology, 6, 143–149.
43.
MenandL. (2010). The marketplace of ideas. New York: W.W. Norton.
44.
MetzgerW. P. (1988). Profession and constitution: Two definitions of academic freedom in America. Texas Law Review, 66, 1265–1322.
45.
MunroW. B. (1932). A self-study of college teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 9, 459–463.
46.
National Association of Deans of Women. (1924). Annual meeting of the national association of deans of women. Washington, DC: The Association.
47.
No college suicide wave is shown by statistics. (1927, June 12). Washington Post.
48.
PalmerA. M. (1930, June). Educating the educators. Journal of Higher Education, 1, 334–338.
49.
ProtzmanM. I. (1929, April 20). Student rating of college teaching. School and Society.
50.
ReimanR. A. (1992). The new deal and American youth.Athens: University of Georgia Press.
51.
ReubenJ. R. (1996). The making of the modern university: Intellectual transformation and the marginalization of morality.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
RightmireG. W. (1930, April). The foundering freshman. Journal of Higher Education, 1, 185–192.
53.
SageJ. R. (1926). Bulletin of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars.Baltimore, MD: AACRAO.
54.
ShawJ. (1981). In loco parentis: A relationship between parent, state, and child. In DaleR., EslandG., FergussonR., & MacDonaldM. (Eds.), Education and the state: politics, patriarchy, and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 257–268). Sussex, England: Falmer Press in association with The Open University Press.
55.
ShumakerW. A., & LongsdorfG. F. (Eds.). (1922) Cyclopedic law dictionary. Chicago, IL: Callaghan Press.
56.
SmithM. F. (1924). Proceedings of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars. Baltimore, MD: AACRAO.
57.
SnyderT. D. (Ed.). (1993). 120 years of American education: A statistical portrait.Washington, DC: NCES.
58.
SteffesT. L. (2012). School, society, and state: A new education to govern modern America, 1890-1940.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
StogdillR. M. (1930, September 20). An undergrad searches for an education in college. School and Society.
60.
Student a suicide, 26th since Jan 1. (1927, March 9). The New York Times.
61.
Student collapses laid to colleges. (1925, April 26). The New York Times.
62.
Student failure rate alarms the colleges. (1928, September 9). The New York Times.
63.
Student suicides stir interest of scientists. (1927, February 20). The New York Times.
64.
ThwingC. F. (1925, June 7). New trend in colleges stresses personal need. The New York Times.
65.
TintoV. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
66.
Van AlstyneW. W. (1967). The demise of the right-privilege distinction in constitutional law. Harvard Law Review, 81, 1439–1464.
67.
Van AlstyneW. W. (1969). The tentative emergence of student power in the United States. American Journal of Comparative Law, 17, 409–410.
68.
VanOverbekeM. (2008). The standardization of American schooling: Linking secondary and higher education, 1870-1910. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
69.
VeyseyL. R. (1965). The emergence of the American university. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
70.
WaltonG. M., & RockoffH. (2010). History of the American economy.Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
71.
WilkinsE. H. (1924, December). Freshman week at the University of Chicago. School Review, 32, 746–751.
72.
WilkinsonR. (2005). Aiding students, buying students: Financial aid in America.Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
