Facilitating dialogues about racial issues in higher education classroom settings continues to be a vexing problem facing postsecondary educators. In order for students to discuss race with their peers, they need skilled facilitators who are knowledgeable about racial issues and able to support students in these difficult dialogues. Yet previous research on difficult dialogues has largely focused on students’ experiences in these dialogues and the outcomes they gain from participating in them with little knowledge about the roles of facilitators of these dialogues.
Purpose
The purpose of the present study was to examine how postsecondary educators facilitate racial dialogues.
Research Design
In this study, I employed case study methodology and conducted semistructured individual interviews with 22 participants, as well as examined participants’ syllabi to see how they structured their courses.
Findings
Findings reveal the practical strategies educators used to facilitate classroom-based racial dialogues, including utilizing group discussions, using various practical resources, developing ways for learners to apply racial concepts and theories to their lives, and providing ample space for students to debrief at the conclusion of the dialogues.
Conclusions/Recommendations
Major conclusions and recommendations from this study include the importance of White educators facilitating these dialogues, educators conceiving of knowledge differently, the importance of paying attention to the institutional and classroom cultures for these dialogues, fostering collaborations between faculty and student affairs educators to enable students to grapple with racial issues in classroom and cocurricular settings, and connecting racial dialogues with other historical forms of oppression like sexism and classism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbesE. S., JonesS. R., & McEwenM. K. (2007). Reconceptualizing the model of multiple dimensions of identity: The role of meaning-making capacity in the construction of multiple identities. Journal of College Student Development, 48(1), 1–22.
2.
AbesE. S., & KaschD. (2007). Using queer theory to explore lesbian college students’ multiple dimensions of identity. Journal of College Student Development, 48(6), 619–636.
3.
AguirreA., & MessineoM. (1997). Racially motivated incidents in higher education: What do they say about the campus climate for minority students?Equity & Excellence in Education, 30(2), 26–30.
4.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
5.
ApplebaumB. (2008). “Doesn't my experience count?”: White students, the authority of experience and social justice. Race Ethnicity and Education, 11(4), 405–414.
6.
BaberL. D. (2010). Beyond structural diversity: Centering “place” among African American students in predominantly White campuses. In DancyT. E.II (Ed.), Managing diversity: (Re)Visioning equity on college campuses (pp. 221–242). New York: Peter Lang.
7.
Baxter MagoldaM. B. (2001). Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher education to promote self-development. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
8.
Baxter MagoldaM. B. (2004). Learning partnerships model: A framework for promoting self-authorship. In Baxter MagoldaM. B. & KingP. M. (Eds.), Learning partnerships: Theory and models of practice to educate for self-authorship (pp. 37–62). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
9.
BergersonA. A. (2003). Critical race theory and White racism: Is there room for White scholars in fighting racism in education?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(1), 15–63.
10.
ChangM. J. (1999). Does racial diversity matter?: The educational impact of a racially diverse undergraduate population. Journal of College Student Development, 40(4), 377–395.
11.
ChangM. J., AstinA. W, & KimD. (2004). Cross-racial interaction among undergraduates: Some consequences, causes, and patterns. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 529–553.
12.
ChangM. J., DensonN., SáenzV., & MisaK. (2006). The educational benefits of sustaining cross-racial interaction among undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 430–455.
13.
ClandininD. J., & ConnellyF. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
CrottyM. (2003). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
DancyT. E.II. (2010). An introduction to managing diversity: A mandate or an oxymoron? In DancyT. E.II (Ed.), Managing diversity: (Re)Visioning equity on college campuses (pp. 1–7). New York: Peter Lang.
17.
DelgadoR., & StefancicJ. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction.New York: New York University Press.
18.
Delgado BernalD. (2002). Critical race theory, LatCrit theory and critical raced-gendered epistemologies: recognizing Students of Color as holders and creators of knowledge, Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 105–126.
19.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience & education. New York: Simon & Schuster.
20.
FoucaultM. (1995). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.
21.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
22.
GarciaB., & Van SoestD. (2000). Facilitating learning on diversity: Challenges to the professor. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 9(1/2), 21–39.
23.
GardnerH. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
24.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
25.
GayG. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116.
26.
GirouxH. A. (2001). Theory and resistance in education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
27.
GoodmanD. J. (2011). Promoting diversity and social justice: Educating people from privileged groups (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
28.
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 326 (2003).
29.
GubaE. G., & LincolnY. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
GurinP., DeyE. L., HurtadoS., & GurinG. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330–366.
31.
HarperS. R., & antonioa. l. (2007). Not by accident: Intentionality in diversity, learning, and engagement. In HarperS. R. (Ed.), Creating inclusive campus environments for cross-cultural learning and student engagement (pp. 1–18). Washington, DC: NASPA.
32.
HodderI. (2000). The interpretation of documents and material culture. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 703–716). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
HooksB. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
34.
HurtadoS. (2001). Linking diversity and educational purpose: How diversity affects the classroom environment and student development. In OrfieldG. & KurlaenderM. (Eds.), Diversity challenged: Evidence on the impact of affirmative action (pp. 187–203). Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University, Harvard Education Publishing Group.
35.
HurtadoS., DeyE. L., GurinP., & GurinG. (2003). College environments, diversity, and student learning. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 18, pp. 145–190). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
36.
JohnsonA. G. (2006). Privilege, power, and difference (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
KingP. M., & Baxter MagoldaM. B. (2005). A developmental model of intercultural maturity. Journal of College Student Development, 46(6), 571–592.
38.
KowD. (2010). The (un)compelling interest for underrepresented minority students: Enhancing the education of White students underexposed to racial diversity. Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, 20, 157–190.
39.
KuhG. D., & WhittE. J. (1988). The invisible tapestry: Culture in American colleges and universities (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Series, No. 1). Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
40.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
41.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2000). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 257–277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43.
MacGregorJ., & SmithB. L. (2005). Where are learning communities? National leaders take stock. About Campus, 10(2), 2–8.
44.
MarulloS. (1998). Bringing home diversity: A service-learning approach to teaching race and ethnic relations. Teaching Sociology, 26, 259–275.
45.
MayhewM. J., GrunwaldH. E., & DeyE. L. (2005). Curriculum matters: Creating a positive climate for diversity from the student perspective. Research in Higher Education, 46(4), 389–412.
46.
MerriamS. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
MerriamS. B. (2002). Case study. In S. B. Merriam & Associates (Eds.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (pp. 178–180). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48.
MilemJ. F. (2003). The educational benefits of diversity: Evidence from multiple sectors. In ChangM. J., WittD., JonesJ., & HakutaK. (Eds.), Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racial dynamics in colleges and universities (pp. 126–169). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
49.
MitchellR., & RosiekJ. (2005). Searching for the knowledge that enables culturally responsive academic advising. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 16(2), 87–110.
50.
MitchellR. W., WoodG. K., & WitherspoonN. (2010). Considering race and space: Mapping developmental approaches for providing culturally responsive advising. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(3), 294–309.
51.
MuseusS. D., & HarrisF. (2010). Success among college students of color: How institutional culture matters. In DancyT. E.II (Ed.), Managing diversity: (Re)Visioning equity on college campuses (pp. 25–43). New York: Peter Lang.
52.
NashR. J. (2004). Liberating scholarly writing: The power of personal narrative. New York: Teachers College Press.
53.
NietoS. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.
PerryG. K. (2006, September). Is she telling the truth?: Instructors of color struggle to maintain their authority and credibility in the diversity-education classroom. Paper presented at the Race and Pedagogy National Conference, Tacoma, WA.
56.
QuayeS. J. (2012). Think before you teach: Preparing for dialogues about racial realities. Journal of College Student Development, 53(4), 542–562. doi:10.1353/csd.2012.0056
57.
QuayeS. J., & Baxter MagoldaM. B. (2007). Enhancing racial self-understanding through structured learning and reflective experiences. In HarperS. R. & PattonL. D. (Eds.), Responding to the realities of race on campus. New Directions for Student Services (No. 120, pp. 55–66). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
58.
RainesD. M. (2006). Grutter v. Bollinger's strict scrutiny dichotomy: Diversity is a compelling state interest, but the University of Michigan Law School's admissions plan is not narrowly tailored. Marquette Law Review, 89, 845–879.
59.
SolórzanoD. G., CejaM., & YossoT. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. The Journal of Negro Education, 69(1–2), 60–73.
60.
SolórzanoD. G., & VillalpandoO. (1998). Critical race theory, marginality, and the experiences of students of color in higher education. In TorresC. A. & MitchellT. A. (Eds.), Sociology of education: Emerging perspectives (pp. 211–224). New York: State University of New York Press.
61.
StakeR. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
StanleyC. A. (2007). When counter narratives meet master narratives in the journal editorial-review process. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 14–24.
63.
SteeleS. (1990). The content of our character: A new vision of race in America. New York: HarperCollins.
64.
TateW. F.IV. (1997). Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. Review of Research in Education, 22, 195–247.
65.
TatumB. D. (1997). “Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?” And other conversations about race. New York: Basic Books.
66.
TatumB. D. (2007). Can we talk about race?: And other conversations in an era of school resegregation. Boston: Beacon Press.
67.
VillalpandoO. (2004). Practical considerations of critical race theory and Latino critical theory for Latino college students. In OrtizA. M. (Ed.), Addressing the unique needs of Latino students: New directions for student services, 105 (pp. 41–50). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
68.
WahlA., PerezE. T., DeeganM. J., SanchezT. W., & ApplegateC. (2000). The controversial classroom: Institutional resources and pedagogical strategies for a race relations course. Teaching Sociology, 28, 316–332.
69.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70.
ZúñigaX. (2003). Bridging differences through dialogue. About Campus, 7(6), 8–16.
