Teachers’ Autonomy-Relevant Practices within an Inquiry-Based Science Curricular Context: Extending the Range of Academically Significant Autonomy-Supportive Practices

Abstract

Background

Research in traditional classrooms and laboratories has indicated that autonomy support by teachers is infrequent and focused on the narrow provision of choice. One explanation for the limited autonomy support in classrooms is that typical school resources and tasks limit the availability of experiences that are interesting, relevant, with meaningful choice. Accordingly, it is critical to extend observation to contexts that enhance the likelihood of detecting significant autonomy support. In this way, it will be possible to (a) determine whether existing conceptualizations map onto behaviors in real classrooms and (b) enrich our understanding of the variety of ways in which teachers provide autonomy when the curriculum is designed not to constrain it but to expand it.

Objective

In the current study, we extend and develop conceptualizations of autonomy support based on our observations within an inquiry context that offers a broad range of forms of autonomy, thus gaining access to a more elaborated understanding of how real teachers offer this support. We elaborate on and richly describe how classroom teachers support autonomy in ways that extend the range of current conceptualizations, with implications for lending validity to the construct and providing concrete description for practitioners.

Research Design

Qualitative analyses were conducted based on videotaped observations of four 7th-grade science teachers, each enacting five inquiry-based science lessons designed to encourage scientific reasoning. We developed a coding protocol grounded in theoretical conceptualizations organized around five autonomy-support dimensions (i.e., procedural and organizational support, rationale and relevance, responsiveness, feedback, cognitive autonomy support). We were exploratory in our use of content analysis in ways that evolved our initial codes, given our aim to enrich and extend available characterizations of autonomy-supportive practice to incorporate new conceptualizations of higher quality practice.

Conclusions

Observed enactments provide support for modifying our conceptualizations of the upper end points of autonomy support to include more academically significant forms as well as for making new distinctions in forms of autonomy support. This high quality and multifaceted enactment was possible because practice was embedded within an inquiry-based curriculum context that expanded opportunities for student agency. Implications for supporting educational leaders in facilitating teacher practice using this thick description and set of exemplars are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Assor

, Kaplan

, & Roth

(2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278.

Bernard

H. R.

, & Ryan

G. W.

(2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Blumenfeld

P. C.

(1992). Classroom learning and motivation: Clarifying and expanding goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 272–281.

Blumenfeld

, Kempler

, & Krajcik

(2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In Sawyer

R. K.

(Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475–488). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Blumenfeld

, Soloway

, Marx

, Krajcik

, Guzdial

, & Palincsar

(1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369–398.

Bozack

A. R.

, Vega

, McCaslin

, & Good

T. L.

(2008). Teacher support of student autonomy in comprehensive school reform classrooms. Teachers College Record, 110, 2389–2407.

Chinn

C. A.

, Anderson

R. C.

, & Waggoner

M. A.

(2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 378–411.

Chinn

C. A.

, & Buckland

L. A.

(2011). Differences in epistemic practices among scientists, young earth creationists, intelligent design creationists, and the scientist creationists of Darwin's era. In Taylor

and Ferrari

(Eds.), Epistemology and science education: Understanding the evolution vs. intelligent design controversy (pp. 38–76). New York: Taylor & Francis.

Chinn

C. A.

, & Clark

D. B.

(2013). Learning through collaborative argumentation. In Hmelo-Silver

C. E.

, O'Donnell

A. M.

, Chan

C. K. K.

, & Chinn

C. A.

(Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 314–332). New York: Taylor & Francis.

10.

Chinn

C. A.

, Duncan

R. G.

, Dianovsky

, & Rinehart

(2013). Promoting conceptual change through inquiry. In Vosniadou

(Ed.), International handbook of conceptual change (2nd ed.) (pp. 539–559). New York: Routledge.

11.

Chinn

C. A.

, Duschl

R. A.

, & Duncan

R. G.

, Buckland

L. A.

, & Pluta

W. P.

(2008). A microgenetic classroom study of learning to reason scientifically through modeling and argumentation. Proceedings of International Society of the Learning Sciences, 3, 14–15.

12.

Chinn

C. A.

, & Malhotra

B. A.

(2002). Epistemologically authentic reasoning in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175–218.

13.

Cohen

E. G.

(1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35.

14.

Cordova

D. I.

, & Lepper

M. R.

(1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730.

15.

deCharms

(1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.

16.

Deci

E. L.

, Eghrari

, Patrick

B. C.

, & Leone

D. R.

(1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142.

17.

Deci

E. L.

, Nezlek

, & Sheinman

(1981). Characteristics of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1–10.

18.

Deci

E. L.

, & Ryan

R. M.

(1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

19.

Deci

E. L.

, Schwartz

A. J.

, Sheinman

, & Ryan

R. M.

(1981). An instrument to assess adults’ orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Refections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 642–650.

20.

Deci

E. L.

, Vallerand

R. J.

, Pelletier

L. G.

, & Ryan

R. M.

(1991). Motivation in education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325–346.

21.

Duncan

R. G.

, Freidenreich

H. B.

, Chinn

C. A.

, & Bausch

(2011). Promoting middle-school students’ understanding of molecular genetics. Research in Science Education, 41, 147–167.

22.

Furtak

E. M.

, & Kunter

(2012). Effects of autonomy-supportive teaching on student learning and motivation. Journal of Experimental Education, 80, 284–316.

23.

Greeno

J. G.

(2006). Learning in activity. In Sawyer

R. K.

(Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Gresalfi

, Martin

, Hand

, & Greeno

(2009). Constructing competence: An analysis of student participation in the activity systems of mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 49–70.

25.

Grolnick

W. S.

, & Ryan

R. M.

(1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual differences investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890–898.

26.

Henningsen

, & Stein

M.K.

(1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524—549.

27.

Hmelo- Silver

C. E.

, Duncan

R. G.

, & Chinn

C. A.

(2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99–107.

28.

Jang

, Reeve

, & Deci

E. L.

(2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600.

29.

Kirschner

P. A.

, Sweller

, & Clark

R. E.

(2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.

30.

Krajcik

J. S.

, & Blumenfeld

P. C.

(2006). Project-based learning. In Sawyer

R. K.

(Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–333). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Miles

M. B.

, & Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

32.

National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

33.

National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

34.

National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Available at http://www.nextgenscience.org/

35.

Patrick

, Anderman

L. H.

, Ryan

A. M.

, Edelin

, & Midgley

(2001). Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 35–58.

36.

Pomerantz

E. M.

, Moorman

E. A.

, & Litwack

S. D.

(2007). The how, whom and why of parents’ involvement in children's academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77, 373–410.

37.

Reeve

, Bolt

, & Cai

(1999). Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 537–548.

38.

Reeve

, Deci

E. L.

, & Ryan

R. M.

(2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding sociocultural influences on student motivation. In McInerney

D. M.

& Etten

S. V.

(Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 31–60). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

39.

Reeve

, & Jang

(2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209–218.

40.

Reeve

, Jang

, Carrell

, Jeon

, & Barch

(2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147–169.

41.

Rivet

, & Krajcik

(2008). Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students’ prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 79–100.

42.

Rogat

T. K.

, Linnenbrink-Garcia

, & DiDonato

(2013). Motivation in collaborative groups. In Hmelo-Silver

, Chinn

, Chan

, & O'Donnell

(Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 250–267). New York: Taylor & Francis, Inc.

43.

Ryan

R. M.

, & Deci

E. L.

(2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.

44.

Skinner

E. A.

, & Belmont

M. J.

(1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across a school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.

45.

Stefanou

C. R.

, Perencevich

K. C.

, DiCintio

, & Turner

J. C.

(2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39, 97–110.

46.

Stein

M. K.

, Grover

B. W.

, & Henningsen

(1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 455–488.

47.

Turner

J. C.

, Warzon

K. B.

, & Christensen

(2011). Motivating mathematics learning: Changes in teachers’ practices and beliefs during a nine-month collaboration. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 719–762.

48.

Wiley

C. R. H.

Good

T. L.

, & McCaslin

, (2008). Comprehensive school reform instructional practices throughout a school year: The role of subject matter, grade level, and time of year. Teachers College Record, 110, 2361–2388.