Beyond Academic Math: The Role of Applied STEM Course Taking in High School

Abstract

Background/Context

Educational policymakers and researchers are concerned about the declining quantity and quality of U.S. students in line to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. As one policy response, a number of federal initiatives have been enacted to enhance STEM curriculum in schools. Part of this push has been to offer applied STEM courses in the K–12 curriculum to reinforce academic STEM material as well as motivate students to remain in these fields. Prior to this current study, no national-level research has evaluated the effectiveness of these courses.

Purpose

(a) What applied STEM courses are most commonly taken by high school students? (b) To what extent are high school students taking both academic math courses and applied STEM courses? (c) Do applied STEM courses in high school improve achievement in math?

Participants

To address the three research questions listed above, this study relies on a comprehensive longitudinal dataset: the Education Longitudinal Survey (ELS:2002). The present study is based on a sample of approximately 11,112 students who participated in the base-year (10th grade, 2002) and first follow-up (12th grade 2004) interviews, who completed math assessments in both years, and for whom valid transcript information was collected.

Research Design

This study begins with a descriptive analysis to evaluate which students have taken applied STEM courses and at which ability level. From this, a common set of applied STEM courses is determined across this nationally representative dataset. Next, this study relies on a linear regression model of math achievement where the dependent variable is a standardized math score. Independent covariates include measures as to whether or not a student had taken applied STEM courses, academic math courses taken by the student, and a range of controls.

Findings

Students who take an applied STEM course had higher math scores than their peers who did not take an applied STEM course, all else equal. These courses may be particularly beneficial for those students who are less oriented toward advanced math.

Conclusions/Recommendations

Applied STEM courses can be used to support learning in math instructed elsewhere in the curriculum, particularly for those students at the lower end of the math pipeline. In providing hands-on learning, often with technology and with direct application to concrete occupationally specific problems, applied STEM courses may serve as a critical means to support an understanding of concepts taught in lower level math pipeline courses.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adelman

(1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor's degree attainment, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Agodini

(2001). Achievement effects of vocational and integrated studies, Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

Bozick

, Lytle

, Siegel

P. H.

, Ingels

S. J.

, Rogers

J. E.

, Lauff

, & Planty

(2006). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002: First follow-up transcript component data file documentation. NCES 2006–338. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Bradby

, & Hudson

(2007). The 2007 revision of the career/technical education portion of the secondary school taxonomy (NCES 2008-030). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

Brody

L. E.

, & Benbow

C. P.

(1990). Effects of high school coursework and time on SAT scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 866–875.

Brophy

, Klein

, Portsmore

, & Rogers

(2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 369–387.

Burkam

D. T.

, & Lee

V. E.

(2003). Mathematics, foreign language, and science coursetaking and the NELS:88 transcript data (Working Paper, NCES 2003–01, 2003). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

Hira

(2010). U.S. policy and the STEM workforce system. American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 949–961.

Hudson

, & Laird

(2009). New indicators of high school career/technical education coursetaking: Class of 2005 (NCES 2009–038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

10.

Ingels

S. J.

, Pratt

D. J.

, Rogers

J. E.

, Siegel

P. H.

, & Stutts

E. S.

(2005). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Base-year to first follow-up data file documentation (NCES 2006–344). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

11.

Iskander

, & Kapila

(2012). Revitalizing achievement by using instrumentation in science education (RAISE), a GK-12 fellows project. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 138, 62–72.

12.

McClure

G. T.

(1998). High school mathematics course taking and achievement among college-bound students: 1987-1996. NASSP Bulletin, 82, 110–118.

13.

National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.

14.

National Science Board. (2010). Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: Author.

15.

Newton

(2010). End of high school mathematics attainment: How did students get there? Teachers College Record, 112, 1064–1095.

16.

Nugent

, Kunz

, Rilett

, & Jones

(2010). Extending engineering education to K-12. The Technology Teacher, 69, 14–19.

17.

Primo

D. M.

, Jacobsmeier

M. L.

, & Milyo

(2007). Estimating the impact of state policies and institutions with mixed-level data. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 7, 446–459.

18.

Rasinski

K. A.

, & Pedlow

(1998). The effect of high school vocational education on academic achievement gain and high school persistence: Evidence from NELS:88. In Gamoran

(Ed.), The quality of vocational education. Washington DC: National Institute on Postsecondary Education, Libraries, and Lifelong Learning.

19.

Riegle-Crumb

(2006). The path through math: Course sequences and academic performance at the intersection of race-ethnicity and gender. American Journal of Education, 113, 101–122.

20.

Schneider

, Carnoy

, Kilpatrick

, Schmidt

W. H.

, & Shavelson

R. J.

(2007). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs. Washington, DC: American Education Research Association

21.

Stone

J. R.

III , Alfeld

, Pearson

, Lewis

M. V.

, & Jensen

(2008). Rigor and relevance: Enhancing high school students' math skills through career and technical education. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 767–795.

22.

Stone

J. R.

III , & Lewis

M. V.

(2012). College and career ready in the 21st century: Making high school matter. New York: Teachers College Press.

23.

Tyson

, Lee

, Borman

K. M.

, & Hanson

M. A.

(2007). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12, 243–270.

24.

Wilson

, Sudol

L. A.

, Stephenson

, & Stehlik

(2010). Running on empty: The failure to teach K–12 computer science in the digital age. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

25.

Wimberly

G. L.

, & Noeth

R. J.

(2005). College readiness begins in middle school. Iowa City: IA: American College Testing.