Prevailing perceptions of Asian Americans as model minorities have long situated this population within postracial discourse, an assumption that highlights their educational success as evidence of the declining significance of race and racism, placing them as models of success for other people of color. Despite evidence to repudiate the model minority thesis, the visibility of Asian Americans in higher education continues to reinforce essentialist paradigms about their presumed success while rendering invisible the educational experiences and diminished educational earning power of low-income, women, and noncitizen Asian populations.
Purpose
The purpose of this article is to situate the most recent data on the mobility of Asian American students within the K–Ph.D. educational system in the new so-called colorblind postracial America. This article presents the most recent national educational outcomes for Asian Americans by looking at differences in attainment across race, class, gender, citizenship, and educational earning power.
Research Design
Drawing from the March Supplement of the Census’ 2010 Current Population Survey (CPS), we carried out multiple cross-tabulations that allowed us to disaggregate the educational attainment and earning power for Asian Americans across various social categories. The March Supplement of the CPS, referred to as the Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC), is given once a year over 3 months—the 2010 ASEC was given to 77,000 households, with a response rate of over 91.5%. This quantitative analysis of the intersectional effect of race, class, gender, and citizenship provides a more nuanced examination of their interactional impact on educational attainment.
Findings/Results
Our intersectional analysis of educational attainment and earning power reveals the multiplicity of experiences and heterogeneity among Asian Americans. There is a clear positive relationship between class and educational attainment, but the intersectional impact of gender with class, and gender with citizenship points to a nonlinear relationship between these constructs and educational attainment when they are examined together. The data also make evident important gaps in earning power for Asian Americans compared with White Americans, and an especially disproportionate burden of diminished earnings for Asian American women.
Conclusions/Recommendations
This study sounds the alarm as postracial discourse has created several new challenges on issues related to Asian Americans, affirmative action policies, and the vitality of ethnic studies in the K–Ph.D. system. As a result of this study, the authors warn that the model minority thesis inaccurately depicts Asian Americans in policy discussions on education, race relations, poverty, and civil rights. This article makes important recommendations for coalition building, research approaches, and a new educational policy framework that can mediate current policy failures to include Asian Americans in discussions of equity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbregoL. J., & GonzalesR. G. (2010). Blocked paths, uncertain futures: The postsecondary education and labor market prospects of undocumented Latino youth. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 15(1–2), 144–157.
2.
AltbachP. G., & KnightJ. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305.
3.
ArnoveR. F., & TorresC.A. (1999). Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
4.
BaconD. (2009). Illegal people: How globalization creates migration and criminalizes people. Boston, MA: Beacon.
5.
BaldozR. (2011). The third Asiatic invasion: Empire and migration in Filipino America, 1898–1946.New York: New York University Press.
6.
BellD. (1980). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 93(3), 518–533.
7.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
8.
BowlegL. (2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312–325.
9.
BrahA., & PhoenixA. (2004). Ain't I a woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of International Women's Studies, 5(3), 75–86.
10.
BuenavistaT. L. (2010). Issues affecting U.S. Filipino student access to postsecondary education: A Critical race theory perspective. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 15(1-2), 114–126.
11.
BuenavistaT. L. (2012). Citizenship at a cost: Undocumented Asian youth perceptions and the militarization of immigration. AAPI Nexus: Asian Americans & Pacific Islanders Policy, Practice, and Community, 10(1), 101–124.
12.
Bureau of the Census. (2006). Employment and earnings: Source and accuracy. Washington, DC: Author.
13.
Bureau of the Census. (2010). Current Population Survey, 2010. ASEC Technical Documentation. Washington, DC: Author.
14.
CamachoK. (2006). Cultures of commemoration: The politics of war, memory and history in the Mariana Islands. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
15.
CarbadoD. W., & GulatiM. (2001). The fifth Black woman. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 11, 701–729
ChenH. J. (2005). Asian American and their culture. Proceedings from the Department of Mental Health Law & Policy Louis de la Parte, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida.
18.
ChouR. S., & FeaginJ. R. (2008). The myth of the model minority: Asian Americans facing racism.Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
19.
CovarrubiasA. (2011). Quantitative intersectionality: A critical race analysis of the Chicana/o educational pipeline. Journal of Latinos and Education, 10(2), 86–105.
20.
CovarrubiasA., & LaraA. (2013). The undocumented (im)migrant educational pipeline: The influence of citizenship on educational attainment for people of Mexican origin. Urban Education. Published online.
21.
CovarrubiasA., & VelezV. (2013). Critical race quantitative intersectionality: An anti-racist research paradigm that refuses to “let the numbers speak for themselves.” In LynnM. & DixsonA. (Eds.), Handbook of critical race theory in education (pp. 270–285). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–166.
23.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1252.
24.
CrisseyS. R. (2009). Educational attainment in the United States: 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
25.
Delgado BernalD. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical race-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 105–126.
DonatoK. M., DurandJ., & MasseyD. S. (1992). Stemming the tide? Assessing the deterrent effects of the Immigration Reform and Control Act. Demography, 29(2), 139–157.
28.
FongT. P. (1994). The first suburban Chinatown: The remaking of Monterey Park, California. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
HankivskyO., & CormierR. (2009). Intersectionality: Moving women's health research and policy forward. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Women's Health Research Network.
31.
Hill CollinsP. (1998a). Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
Hill CollinsP. (1998b). It's all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia, 13(3), 62–82.
33.
KiangP. N. (1995). From different shores again. In NgW. L., OkihiroG. Y., ChinS., & MoyJ. S. (Eds.), Revisioning Asian America: Locating diversity (pp. 207–211). Pullman: Washington State University Press.
34.
KnudsenS. V. (2006). Intersectionality: A theoretical inspiration in the analysis of minority cultures and identities in textbooks. In BruillardB., AamotsbakkenB., KnudsenS. V., & HorsleyM. (Eds.), Caught in the web or lost in the textbook? (pp. 61–76). Caen, France: IARTEM, Stef, Iufm.
35.
Ladson-BillingsG., & TateW. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47–68.
LeeS. J. (1996). Unraveling the “model minority” stereotype: Listening to Asian American youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
38.
LeeS. J., & KumashiroK. K. (2005). A report on the status of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in education: Beyond the “model minority” stereotype.Washington, DC: National Educational Association.
39.
LewJ. (2006). Asian Americans in class: Charting the achievement gap among Korean American youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
40.
LiG. (2005). Other people's success: Impact of the “model minority” myth on underachieving Asian students in North America. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 2(1), 69–86.
41.
LouieV. S. (2004). Compelled to excel: Immigration, education, and opportunity among Chinese Americans. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
42.
LoweL. (1996). Immigrant acts: On Asian American cultural politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
MasemannV. L. (1999). Culture and education. In ArnoveR. F. & TorresC.A. (Eds.), Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (pp. 115–133). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
45.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.
46.
McGowanM. O., & LindgrenJ. (2006). Testing the model minority myth. Northwestern University Law Review, 100(1), 331–378.
47.
McIntoshP. (1988). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Race, Class, and Gender in the United States: An Integrated Study, 4, 165–169.
48.
NakanishiD. T., & LaiJ. S. (Eds.). (2003). Asian American politics: Law, participation, and policy.Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
49.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2009–2010). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/
50.
NgJ. C., LeeS. S., & PakY. K. (2007). Contesting the model minority and perpetual foreigner stereotypes: A critical review of literature on Asian Americans in education. Review of Research in Education, 31(1), 95–130.
51.
NgaiM. (2004). Impossible subjects: Illegal aliens and the making of modern America.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
OnoK., & PhamV. (2009). Asian Americans and the media. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
53.
PasselJ. (2005). Unauthorized migrants: Numbers and characteristics. Background briefing prepared for the task force on immigration and America's future. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
54.
PasselJ. S. (2006). The size and characteristics of the unauthorized migrant population in the U.S.: Estimates based on the March 2005 Current Population Survey (Research Report). Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/files/reports/61.pdf.
55.
PasselJ. S. (2007). Unauthorized migrants in the United States: Estimates, methods, and characteristics (OECD, Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper No. 57). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/110780068151
56.
PasselJ. S., & CohnD. (2009). A portrait of unauthorized immigrants in the United States. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
57.
PasselJ. S., & TaylorP. (2010). Unauthorized immigrants and their U.S.-born children. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
58.
Pew Research Center. (2012). The rise of Asian Americans.Washington, DC: Pew Social & Demographic Trends.
59.
PoonO. A. (2006). Asian American college students in education studies: A review of three journals, 1996–2006. Proceedings from the annual conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Anaheim, CA.
60.
PulidoL. (2006). Brown, black, yellow, and left: Radical activism in Southern California.Los Angeles: University of California Press.
61.
SaitoN. T. (1997). Model minority, yellow peril: Functions of “foreignness” in the construction of Asian American legal identity. Asian Law Journal, 4, 71–90.
SethiR. C. (1994). Smells like racism: A plan for mobilizing against anti-Asian bias. In Aguilar-San JuanK. (Ed.), The state of Asian America: Activism and resistance in the 1990s (pp. 235–249). Boston, MA: South End Press.
64.
SolorzanoD. (1997). Images and words that wound: Critical race theory, racial stereotyping, and teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24, 5–19.
65.
SolorzanoD. (1998). Critical race theory, racial and gender microaggressions, and the experiences of Chicana and Chicano scholars. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11, 121–136.
66.
SolorzanoD., & Delgado BernalD. (2001). Critical race theory, transformational resistance, and social justice: Chicana and Chicano students in an urban context. Urban Education, 36, 308–342.
67.
SolorzanoD., & OrnelasA (2002). A critical race analysis of advanced placement classes: A case of educational inequality. Journal of Latinos in Education, 1, 215–229.
68.
SolorzanoD., & OrnelasA. (2004). A critical race analysis of Latina/o and African American advanced placement enrollment in public high schools. The High School Journal, 87(3), 15–26.
69.
SolorzanoD., & YossoT. (2001) Critical race and LatCrit theory and method: Counterstorytelling Chicana and Chicano graduate school experiences. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(4), 471–495.
70.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.
71.
SteeleC. M. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi: And other clues to how stereotypes affect us (issues of our time). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
72.
TakagiD. Y., & OmiM. (1996). Situating Asian Americans in the political discourse of affirmative action. Representations, 55, 155–162.
73.
TakakiR. (1998). Strangers from a different shore: A history of Asian Americans.New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.
74.
TaylorP., ParkerK., FryR., CohnD., WangW., VelascoG., & DocktermanD. (2011). Is college worth it? College presidents, public access value, quality and mission of higher education. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2011/05/higher-ed-report.pdf
75.
TeranishiR. T. (2010). Asians in the ivory tower: Dilemmas of racial inequality in American higher education.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
76.
ThernstromA., & ThernstormS. (2003). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
77.
TuanM. (1998). Forever foreigners or honorary Whites? The Asian ethnic experience today.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
78.
UmK. (2003). A dream denied: Educational experiences of Southeast Asian American youth: Issues and recommendations.Washington, DC: Southeast Asia Resource Action Center.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010, August 4). Current Population Survey (CPS). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/cps/
81.
ValdesF. (1995). Sex and race in queer legal culture: Ruminations on identities and interconnectivities. Southern California Review of Law and Women Studies, 5, 25–49.
WilsonW. J. (1978). The declining significance of race. Society, 15(5), 11–11.
84.
WingJ. Y. (2007). Beyond Black and White: The model minority myth and the invisibility of Asian American students. Urban Review, 39(4), 455–487.
85.
WiseT. (2010). Colorblind: The rise of post-racial politics and the retreat from racial equity.San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.
86.
WuF. H. (1995). Neither Black nor White: Asian Americans and affirmative action. Boston College Third World Law Journal, 15(2), 225–282.
87.
WuF. H. (2002). Yellow: Race in America beyond Black and White. New York, NY: Basic Books.
88.
Yuval-DavisN. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13(3), 193–209.
89.
ZengZ., & XieY. (2004). Asian-Americans’ earnings disadvantage reexamined: The role of place of education. American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), 1075–1108.
