Currently, there is great enthusiasm surrounding place-based initiatives for school reform, such as the Harlem Children's Zone, Promise Neighborhoods, and other initiatives that attend to the multiple contexts that influence child development. However, past efforts to bridge schools, families, and communities have been undermined by mistrust between and among stakeholders. Although trust is a building block for effective collaboration, there is little deliberate attention to cultivating it.
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to use a case example of a low-income neighborhood currently developing a Promise Neighborhoods initiative to explore how variations in trust between and among community residents, local institutions, and school staff in the problem definition and assessment phase may threaten or facilitate the success of the initiative.
Setting
We conducted this study in a low-income, predominantly African-American neighborhood in a midsize southeastern city.
Participants
There were 44 participants, including parents, school administrators and staff, service providers, and high school students.
Research Design
We used qualitative research methods, including eight focus groups and observations.
Data Collection and Analysis
Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Multiple researchers coded the transcripts. Trust emerged as a key theme through open coding, and we used focused coding to explore this theme in detail.
Findings
The findings corroborate previous studies that have found relatively low levels of relational trust between residents, between residents and local institutions, and between residents and school staff. Additionally, we identified “seeds of trust” that indicate opportunities to cultivate trusting relationships between stakeholders that can be developed and replicated in this neighborhood and others undertaking similar initiatives.
Conclusions
Promise Neighborhoods and similar initiatives should intentionally address low levels of trust through activities such as community asset mapping, programs with a deliberate relational focus, and partnerships with agencies that address the systematic roots of trust.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AberM., & NietoM. (2000). Suggestions for the investigation of psychological wellness in the neighborhood context: Toward a pluralistic neighborhood theory. In CicchettiD., RappaportJ., SardlerI., & WeissbergR. (Eds.), The promotion of wellness in children and adolescents (pp. 185–219). Washington, DC: CWLA Press.
AnyonJ. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BarrettK. L. (2011). The school-to-prison pipeline: structuring legal reform, Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22(4), 593–596.
5.
BergB. L. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (7th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
6.
BerkowitzB. (2001). Studying the outcomes of community-based coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 213–227.
7.
BolivarJ. M., & ChrispeelsJ. H. (2011). Enhancing parent leadership through building social and intellectual capital. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 4–38.
8.
BollandJ. M., & McCallumD. M. (2002). Community mobilizations in high-poverty inner-city neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 42–69.
BriggsX. (1998). Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 177–214.
11.
Brooks-GunnJ., DuncanG. J., KlebanovP. K., SealandN. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development?American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 353–395.
12.
BrowningC. R., FeinbergS. L., & DietzR. D. (2004). The paradox of social organization: Networks, collective efficacy, and violent crime in urban neighborhoods. Social Forces, 82, 503–534.
13.
BrykA. S., BenderSebring P., AllensworthE., Luppescu, & S., EastonJ. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
BrykA. S., & SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
15.
CapperC. A. (1996). We're not housed in an institution, we're housed in a community: Possibilities and consequences of neighorhood-based interagency collaboration. In CibulkaJ. & KritekW. (Eds.), Coordination among schools, families, and communities: prospects for reform (pp. 299–322). New York: State University of New York Press.
16.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
ChaskinR. J. (2001). Building community capacity: A definitional framework and case studies from a comprehensive community initiative. Urban Affairs Review, 36, 291–323.
18.
ChavisD. M. (2001). The paradoxes and promise of community coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 309–320.
19.
ChavisD. M., & WandersmanA. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 55–81.
20.
CibulkaJ. G (1996). Conclusion: Toward an interpretation of school, family, and community connections: Policy challenges. In CibulkaJ. G & KritekW. J. (Eds.), Coordination among schools, families, and communities (pp. 403–435). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
21.
ClotfelterC. T., LaddH. F., & VigdorJ. L. (2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 377–392.
22.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital and the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
23.
CoultonC. J., KorbinJ. E., & SuM. (1996). Measuring neighborhood context for young children in an urban area. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24(1), 6–32.
24.
CurleyA. M. (2010). Neighborhood institutions, facilities, and public space: A missing link for HOPE VI residents’ development of social capital?Cityscape: Ajournai of Policy Development and Research, 12(1), 33–63.
25.
DomínguezS., & WatkinsC. (2003). Creating networks for survival and mobility: Social capital among African-American and Latin-American low-income mothers. Social Problems, 50(1), 111–135.
26.
EdwardsR. W., Jumper-ThurmanP., PlestedB. A, OettingE. R., & SwansonL. (2000). Community readiness: Research to practice. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3), 291–307.
27.
EmersonR. M., FretzR. I., & ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
FauthR. C, RothJ. L., & Brooks-GunnJ. (2007). Does the neighborhood context alter the link between youth's after-school time activities and developmental outcomes? A multilevel analysis. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 760–777.
FineM. (1993). [Ap]parent involvement: Reflections on parents, power, and urban public schools. Teachers College Record, 94(4), 682–710.
31.
Foster-FishmanP. G., CantillonD., PierceS. J., & Van EgerenL. A. (2007). Building an active citizenry: The role of neighborhood problems, readiness, and capacity for change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 91–106.
32.
Foster-FishmanP. G., FitzgeraldK., BrandellG, NowellB., ChavisD., & Van EgerenL. A. (2006). Mobilizing residents for action: The role of small wins and strategic supports. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 143–152.
33.
FraserJ., LepofskyJ., KickE. L., & WilliamsP. J. (2003). The construction of the local and the limits of contemporary community building in the United States. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 417–445.
34.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London, England: Penguin.
35.
FurmanG G, & MerzG (1996). Schools and community connections: Applying a sociological framework. In CibulkaJ. G & KritekW. J. (Eds.), Coordination among schools, families, and communities.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
36.
FurstenbergF. F. (1993). How families manage risk and opportunity in dangerous neighborhoods. In WilsonW. J. (Ed.), Sociology and the public agenda (pp. 231–258). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
GardnerM., & Brooks-GunnJ. (2009). Adolescents’ exposure to community violence: Are neighborhood youth organizations protective?Journal of Community Psychology, 37(4), 505–525.
38.
GeorgeP., ColemanB., BarnoffL. (2007). Beyond “providing services”: Voices of service users on structural social work practice in community-based social service agencies. Canadian Social Work Review, 24(1), 5–22.
39.
Gilde Zúñiga, H., & ValenzuelaS. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38(3), 397–421.
40.
GlaserB. G (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
41.
GoddardR. D., Tschannen-MoranM., & HoyW. K. (2001). A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 3–17.
42.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
43.
HongS. (2011). A cord of three strands: A new approach to parent engagement in schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
44.
HorvatE. M., WeiningerE. B., & LareauA. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319–351.
45.
KahneJ., O'BrienJ., BrownA., & QuinnT. (2001). Social capital and school improvement: The case of a school network and a comprehensive community initiative in Chicago. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 429–461.
46.
KavanaughA, CarrollJ. M., RossonM. B., ZinT. T., & ResseD. B. (2005). Community networks: Where offline communities meet online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communcation, 10(4).
47.
KavanaughA., ReeseD., CarrollJ., & RossonM. (2005). Weak ties in networked communities. Information Society, 21, 119–131.
48.
KeeneD. E., & GeronimusA. T. (2011). Community-based support among African American public housing residents. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 88(1), 41–53.
49.
KissaneR. J., & GingerichJ. (2004). Do you see what I see? Nonprofit and resident perceptions of urban neighborhoods. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(2), 311–333.
50.
KivelP. (2009). Social service or social change? In INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence (Ed.), The revolution will not be funded: Beyond the non-profit industrial complex.Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
51.
KourbinJ. E., & CoultonC. J. (1997). Understanding the neighborhood context for children and families: Combining epidemiological and ethnographic approaches. In Brooks-GunnJ., DuncanG.J., & AberJ. L. (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty (pp. 65–79). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
52.
KubischA. G, AusposP., BrownP., & DewarT. (2010). Voices from the field III: Lessons and challenges from two decades of community change efforts. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
53.
LareauA. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60(2), 73–85.
54.
LinN. (2001). Social capital: A theory of structure and action. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
55.
MatonK. I. (2008). Empowering community settings: Agents of individual development, community betterment, and positive social change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1-2), 4–21.
56.
McDonaldJ., & StokesR. J. (2006). Race, social capital, and trust in the police. Urban Affairs Review, 41(3), 358–375.
57.
MonahanT, & FisherJ. A. (2010). Benefits of “observer effects”: Lessons from the field. Qualitative Research, 10(3), 357–376.
58.
NicoteraN. (2008). Children speak about neighborhoods: Using mixed methods to measure the construct neighborhood. Journal of Community Psychology, 36(3), 333–351.
59.
NogueraP. A. (2001). Transforming urban schools through investments in the social capital of parents. In SaegertS., ThompsonJ. P., & WarrenM. (Eds.), Social capital in poor communities (pp. 189–212). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
60.
NogueraP., & WellsL. (2011). The politics of school reform: A broader and bolder approach for Newark. Berkeley Review of Education, 2(1), 5–25.
61.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
PortneyK. E., & BerryJ. M. (2010). Participation and the pursuit of sustainability in U.S. cities. Urban Affairs Review, 46(1), 119–139.
63.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
64.
SampsonR. J. (2001). Crime and public safety: Insights from community-level perspectives on social capital. In SaegertS., ThompsonJ. P., & WarrenM. R. (Eds.), Social capital in poor communities (pp. 89–114). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
65.
SampsonR. J. (2012a). Neighborhood inequality, violence, and the social infrastructure of the American city. In TateWilliam F. (Ed.), Research on schools, neighborhoods, and communities: Toward civic responsibility (pp. 11–28). Plymouth, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
66.
SampsonR. J. (2012b). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
67.
SchutzA. (2006). Home is a prison in the global city: The tragic failure of school-based community engagement strategies. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 691–743.
68.
SmallM. L., JacobsE. M., & MassengillR. P. (2008). Why organizational ties matter for neighborhood effects: Resource access through childcare centers. Social Forces, 87(1), 387–414.
69.
SmrekarC, & Cohen-VogelL. (2001). The voices of parents: Rethinking the intersection of family and school. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 75–100.
70.
SmrekarG, & GoldringE. (2009). Neighborhood schools in the aftermath of court-ended schooling. In SmrekarC. & GoldringE. (Eds.), From the courtroom to the classroom: The shifling landscape of school desegregation (pp. 157–190). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
71.
SmrekarC. E., & MawhinneyH. B. (1999). Integrated services: Challenges in linking schools, families, and communities. In MurphyJ. & LouisK. Seashore (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 443–461). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
72.
SnavelyK., & MartinT. (2002). Development of trust in rural nonprofit collaborations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly., 31, 62–83.
73.
SonJ., & LinN. (2008). Social capital and civic action: A networkbased approach. Social Science Research, 37(1), 330–349.
74.
StagnerM. W., & DuranM. A. (1997). Comprehensive community initiatives: Principles, practice and lessons learned. The Future of Children, 7(2), 132–140.
75.
StoneG, DohertyK., JonesC, & RossT. (1999). Schools and disadvantaged neighborhoods: The community development challenge. In FergusonR. F. & JonesW. T. (Eds.), Urban problems and community development (pp. 339–380). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
76.
SwaroopS., & MorenoffJ. (2006). Building community: The neighborhood context of social organization. Social Forces, 84(3), 1665–1695.
77.
SztompkaP. (1999) Trust:A Sociological Theory, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
78.
TesterG, RuelE., AndersonA., ReitzesD. G, & OakleyD. (2011). Sense of place among Atlanta public housing residents. Journal of Urban Health, 88(3), 436–453.
79.
Tschannen-MoranM., & HoyW. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.
80.
TyackD. (1992). Health and social services in public schools: Historical perspectives. The Future of Children, 2(1), 19–31.
ValeL. J. (2002). Reclaiming public housing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83.
VangenS., & HuxhamG (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 5–31.
84.
VerbaS., SchlozmanK. L., & BradyH. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
85.
WacquantL., & WilsonW. J. (1989). The costs of racial and class exclusion in the inner city. Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science, 501, 8–25.
86.
WarrenM. R. (2010). Community organizing for education reform. In RogersJ. & OrrM. (Eds.), Public engagement for public education.Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
87.
WarrenM., & MappK. (2011). A match on dry grass: Community organizing as a catalyst for school reform. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
88.
WarrenM. R., ThompsonJ. P., & SaegertS. (2001). The role of social capital in combating poverty. In SaegertS., ThompsonJ. P., & WarrenM. R. (Eds.), Social capital in poor communities (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
89.
WehlageG, SmithG, & LipmanP. (1992). Restructuring urban schools: The New Futures Experience. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 51–93.
90.
WilsonW. J. (1997). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York, NY: Vintage.
91.
WilsonW. J. (2010). The Obama Administration's proposals to address concentrated urban poverty. City & Community9(1), 41–49.
92.
ZeldinS. (2002). Sense of community and positive adult beliefs toward adolescents and youth policy in urban neighborhoods and small cities. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 331–358.
