As policymakers and advocates across the United States look to early childhood educators to improve children's cognitive development so they enter elementary school ready to learn, debates have emerged over what types of practices these educators should be engaged in to achieve this goal. Historically, the field of early childhood education has advocated for teachers to employ developmentally appropriate practices to ready young children for school success. Yet, empirically, the quantitative studies that have examined the impact of these practices on children's cognitive development have produced mixed results. Absent from these debates are qualitative research studies exploring this topic.
Purpose of Study
To address this issue, this article presents findings from a qualitative metasynthesis that studied whether teachers and/or administrators were engaging in developmentally appropriate practices, and if so, how such practices might influence children's cognitive development.
Research Design
This qualitative metasynthesis used a template analysis to code 12 peer-reviewed qualitative studies that were based on original research, took place in the United States, and involved practicing teachers and administrators who worked in early childhood settings (birth through Grade 3).
Findings
The findings appear to demonstrate a positive influence of teachers’ developmentally appropriate practices on children's cognitive development and a negative influence from practices that contrast with this construct. These findings also reveal the need to continue to refine the conception of these practices as well as additional research that examines the influence of such practices on children's development.
Conclusion
It appears that developmentally appropriate practices can positively influence children's cognitive development. Still, it is uncertain as to what these benefits mean in terms of student outcomes, which has become a fundamental issue for publicly funded early education programs. This metasynthesis points to the need for further research that uses a range of measures to examine the influence of developmentally appropriate practices on children rather than teachers. Such work should pay attention to children's cognitive development as well as attend to children's cultural backgrounds. By doing so, it could help inform the fields of early and elementary school education about the impact of developmentally appropriate practices on children's development so that educators across both contexts can provide instructional practices that ready young children for school success.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AuW. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258–267.
2.
Bishop-JosefS. J., & ZiglerE. (2011). The cognitive/academic emphasis versus the whole child approach: The 50-year debate. In ZiglerE., GilliamW. S., & BarnettW. S. (Eds.), The pre-k debates: Current controversies and issues. (pp. 83–88). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing Co.
3.
BlaiseM. (2004). A feminist poststructuralist study of children “doing” gender in an urban kindergarten classroom. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 85–108.
4.
BognerK., RaphaelL., & PressleyM. (2002). How grade 1 teachers motivate literacy activity by their students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 135–165.
5.
BowmanB. T., DonovanM. S., & BurnsM. S. (2000). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6.
BredekampS. (Ed.) (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children birth through age 8.Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
7.
BredekampS., & CoppleC. (Eds.), (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs. (rev. ed.), Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
8.
BrownC. P. (2009). Pivoting a pre-kindergarten program off the child or the standard? A case study of integrating the practices of early childhood education into elementary school. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 202–227.
9.
BrownC. P. (2011). Searching for the norm in a system of absolutes: A case study of standards-based accountability reform in pre-kindergarten. Early Education and Development, 22, 151–177.
10.
BurtsD., HartC., CharlesworthR., DeWolfM., RayJ., MannalK., & FleegeP. (1993). Developmental appropriateness of kindergarten programs and academic outcomes in first grade. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 8, 23–31.
11.
BuzzelliC. A. (2005). Moral reflections from a primary classroom: One teacher's perspective. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6, 92–101.
12.
CannellaG. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education: Social justice and revolution.New York: Peter Lang.
13.
CoppleC., & BredekampS. (2008). Getting clear about developmentally appropriate practice. Young Children, 63, 54–55.
14.
CoppleC., & BredekampS. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age.8 (3rd ed.), Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
15.
CrottyM. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process.London: SAGE.
16.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (2003). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. (2nd ed., pp. 1–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
DunnL., BeachS. A., & KontosS. (1994). Quality of the literacy environment in day care and children's development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 9, 24–34.
20.
EpsteinA. S. (2007). The intentional teacher: Choosing the best strategies for young children's learning.Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
21.
ErlandsonD. A., HarrisE. L., SkipperB. L., & AllenS. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry.London: Sage.
FinfgeldD. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art so far. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 893–904.
24.
FleerM. (2006). The cultural construction of child development: Creating institutional and cultural intersubjectivity. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14, 127–140.
25.
FowellN., & LawtonJ. (1992). An alternative view of appropriate practice in early childhood education. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 53–73.
GinsburgH. P., & AmitM. (2008). What is teaching mathematics to young children? A theoretical perspective and case study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 274–285.
28.
GmitrováV., & GmitrovJ. (2003). The impact of teacher-directed and child-directed pretend play on cognitive competence in kindergarten children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30, 241–246.
29.
GoffinS. G. (2007). Implementing New York's universal pre-kindergarten program: An exploratory study of systemic impacts—A challenge to conventional though: A commentary. Early Education and Development, 18, 597–600.
30.
GoldsteinL. S. (1997). Between a rock and a hard place in the primary grades: The challenge of providing developmentally appropriate early childhood education in an elementary school setting. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 3–27.
31.
GoldsteinL. S. (2007a). Embracing pedagogical multiplicity: Examining two teachers’ instructional responses to the changing expectations for kindergarten in U.S. public schools. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 21, 378–399.
32.
GoldsteinL. S. (2007b). Beyond the DAP versus standards dilemma: Examining the unforgiving complexity of kindergarten teaching in the United States. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 39–54.
33.
GoldsteinL. S. (2008). Kindergarten teachers making “street-level” education policy in the wake of No Child Left Behind. Early Education and Development, 19, 448–478.
34.
GormleyW. T., GayerT., PhillipsD., & DawsonB. (2005). The effects of universal pre-k on cognitive development. Developmental Psychology, 41, 872–884.
35.
GulloD. F. (1994). Understanding assessment and evaluation in early childhood education.New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
HowesC., BurchinalM., PiantaR., BryantD., EarlyD., CliffordR., & BarbarinO. (2008). Ready to learn? Children's pre-academic achievement in pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 27–50.
37.
HuffmanL. R., & SpeerP. W. (2000). Academic performance among at-risk children: The role of developmentally appropriate practices. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15, 167–184.
38.
HyunE. (2007). Cultural complexity in early childhood: Images of contemporary young children from a critical perspective. Childhood Education, 83, 261–266.
39.
JacksonL. A. (2009). Observing children's stress behaviors in a kindergarten classroom. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 11. Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v11n1/jackson.html.
40.
JohnsonA., WernerP. H., & CaverlyD. C. (1992). Developing professionalism in the child care industry: An instructional program guide for child care workers. Retrieved from ERIC Database.
41.
JonesI., & GulloD. (1999). Differential social and academic effects of developmentally appropriate practices and beliefs. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 14, 26–35.
42.
KamiiC. (Ed.) (1990). Achievement testing in the early grades: The games grown-ups play.Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
43.
KingN. (1998). Template analysis. In CassellC., & SymonG. (Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide. (pp. 118–134). London: SAGE.
KurkjianC., Siu-RunyanY., & AbadianoH. R. (2001). Developmentally appropriate practice: Pedagogical interpretations in a bilingual Head Start classroom. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 1, 209–233.
46.
KuschnerD. (2011). Play in the new Developmentally Appropriate Practice: analysis and critique. In CohenL. E., & Waite-StupianskyS. (Eds.), Play. A polyphony of research, theories, and issues. (pp. 191–206). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
47.
LandryS. H., SwankP. R., SmithK. E., AsselM. A., & GunnewigS. B. (2006). Enhancing early literacy skills for preschool children: Bringing a professional development model to scale. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 306–324.
48.
LangfordR. (2010). Critiquing child-centred pedagogy to bring children and early childhood educators into the centre of a democratic pedagogy. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11, 113–127.
49.
LareauA. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
50.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.
LubeckS. (1998). Is DAP for everyone?Childhood Education, 74, 283–292.
52.
MagnusonK. A., MeyersM. K., RuhmC. J., & WaldfogelJ. (2004). Inequality in preschool education and school readiness. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 115–157.
53.
MajorC. H., & Savin-BadenM. (2010). An introduction to qualitative research synthesis: Managing the information explosion in social science research.New York: Routledge.
54.
MalloryB. L., & NewR. S. (Eds.). (1994). Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education.New York: Teachers College Press.
55.
MarconR. A. (1993). Socioemotional versus academic emphasis: Impact on kindergartners’ development and achievement. Early Child Development and Care, 96, 81–91.
56.
MarconR. A. (1999). Differential impact of preschool models on development and early learning of inner-city children: A three-cohort study. Developmental Psychology, 35, 358–375.
57.
McCormickJ., RodneyP., & VarcoeC. (2003). Reinterpretations across studies: An approach to meta-analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 933–944.
58.
MeiselsS. J. (1999). Assessing readiness. In PiantaR. C., & CoxM. J. (Eds.), The transition to kindergarten. (pp. 39–63). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
59.
MeiselsS. J. (2007). Accountability in early childhood. In PiantaR. C., CoxM. J., & SnowK. L. (Eds.), School readiness and the transition to kindergarten in the era of accountability. (pp. 31–47). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing Co.
60.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61.
MirandaM. L. (2000). Developmentally appropriate practice in a Yamaha music school. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 294–309.
62.
MollL. C., & GonzálezN. (2004). Engaging life: A funds-of-knowledge approach to multicultural education. In BanksJ. A., & BanksC. A. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education. (2nd ed., 699–715). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
63.
MoonK. H., & ReifelS. (2008). Play and literacy learning in a diverse language pre-kindergarten classroom. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 9, 49–65.
64.
National Commission on Excellence in Education (1984). A nation at risk: The full account.Cambridge, MA: USA Research.
65.
National Governors’ Association. (1986). Time for results.Washington DC: Author.
66.
Neuharth-PritchettS., Reguero de AtilesJ., & ParkB. (2003). Using integrated curriculum to connect standards and developmentally appropriate practice. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 31, 13–17.
67.
NoblitG. W., & HareR. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies.Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
68.
PatersonB. L., ThorneS. E., CanamC., & JillingsC. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
PhillipsD. A., GormleyW. T., & LowensteinA. E. (2009). Inside the pre-kindergarten door: Classroom climate and instructional time allocation in Tulsa's pre-K programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 213–228.
70.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71.
SandelowskiM., DochertyS., & EmdenC. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 365–371.
72.
SandersK. E., DeihlA., & KylerA. (2007). DAP in the ‘hood’: Perceptions of child care practices by African American child care directors caring for children of color. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 394–406.
73.
SchweberS. (2008). “What happened to their pets?”: Third graders encounter the Holocaust. Teachers College Record, 110, 2073–2115.
74.
ShepardL., & SmithM. L. (1988). Escalating academic demand in kindergarten: Counterproductive policies. Elementary School Journal, 89, 135–145.
75.
ShonkoffJ. P., & PhillipsD. A. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
76.
SipeL., & ConstableS. (1996). A chart of four contemporary research paradigms: Metaphors for the modes of inquiry. Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education, 1, 153–163.
77.
SniderM. H., & FuV. R. (1990). The effects of specialized education and job experience on early childhood teachers’ knowledge of developmentally appropriate practice. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5, 69–78.
78.
SpodekB. (1991). Early childhood curriculum and cultural definitions of knowledge. In SpodekB., & SarachoO. N. (Eds.), Issues in early childhood curriculum. (pp. 1–20). New York: Teacher College Press.
79.
StipekD. (2006). No Child Left Behind comes to preschool. Elementary School Journal, 106, 455–465.
80.
StipekD. J., FeilerR., BylerP., RyanR., MilburnS., & SalmonJ. M. (1998). Good beginnings: What difference does the program make in preparing young children for school?Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 41–66.
81.
StipekD., FeilerR., DanielsD., & MilburnS. (1995). Effects of different instructional approaches on young children's achievement and motivation. Child Development, 66, 209–223.
82.
TarmanB., & Tarmanİ. (2011). Teachers’ involvement in children's play and social interaction. Elementary Education Online, 10, 325–337.
83.
ThorneS. E., JensenL., KearneyM. H., NoblitG. W., & SandelowskiM. (2004). Qualitative metasynthesis: Reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 1342–1365.
84.
TimulakL. (2009). Meta-analysis of qualitative studies: A tool for reviewing qualitative research findings in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 591–600.
85.
TomlinsonH. B., & HysonM. (2009a). Developmentally appropriate practice in the preschool years—ages 3–5: An overview. In CoppleC., & BredekampS. (Eds.), Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age.8 (3rd ed., pp. 111–148). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
86.
TomlinsonH. B., & HysonM. (2009b). Developmentally appropriate practice in the preschool years—ages 3–5: Examples to consider. In CoppleC., & BredekampS. (Eds.), Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age.8 (3rd ed., pp. 149–183). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
87.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Race and Hispanic origin of the foreign-born population in the United States: 2007.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau.
88.
U.S. Department of Education, & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2011). Race to the top—Early learning challenge, guidance and frequently asked questions.Washington, DC: Authors.
89.
van AusdaleD., & FeaginJ. (2001). The first R: How children learn race and racism.Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
90.
Van HornM. L., KarlinE. O., RameyS. L., AldridgeJ., & SnyderS. W. (2005). Effects of developmentally appropriate practices on children's development: A review of research and discussion of methodological and analytical issues. The Elementary School Journal, 105, 325–351.
91.
Van HornM. L., & RameyS. L. (2003). The effects of developmentally appropriate practices on academic outcomes among former Head Start students and classmates, grades 1–3. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 961–990.
92.
VygotskyL. (1933). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. In BrunerJ., JollyA., & SylvaK. (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution. (pp. 461–463). New York: Penguin Books.
93.
WalshD. J. (1991). Extending the discourse on developmental appropriateness. Early Education and Development, 2, 109–119.
WeeS. J. (2011). A case study of drama education for kindergarten children in the United States: Drama specialists’ beliefs and practices. Child Studies in Diverse Contexts, 1, 59–75.
96.
WilliamsJ. M., LandryS. H., AnthonyJ. L., SwankP. R., & CrawfordA. D. (2012). An empirically-based statewide system for identifying quality pre-kindergarten programs. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1014
97.
WilliamsL. R. (1994). Developmentally Appropriate Practice and cultural values: A case in point. In MalloryB., & NewS. (Eds.), Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education. (pp. 155–165). New York: Teachers College Press.
98.
WinslerA., TranH., HartmanS. C., MadiganA. L., ManfraL., & BleikerC. (2008). School readiness gains made by ethnically diverse children in poverty attending center-based childcare and public school pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 314–329.
99.
WohlwendK. E. (2007). Friendship meeting or blocking circle? Identities in the laminated spaces of a playground conflict. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8, 73–88.
100.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. (4th ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
