Alternative Teacher Certification and the New Professionalism: The Pre-service Preparation of Mathematics Teachers in the New York City Teaching Fellows Program
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2013
Alternative Teacher Certification and the New Professionalism: The Pre-service Preparation of Mathematics Teachers in the New York City Teaching Fellows Program
For more than a decade, large alternative teacher certification programs (ATCP) such as the New York City Teaching Fellows (NYCTF) have provided qualified applicants with fast-track or “early entry” routes to paid teaching. While early-entry ATCPs enjoy powerful support in the public and private sectors, critics (e.g., Zeichner, 2010) claim that early-entry ATCPs are aligned with a “new professionalism” which views teaching as a technical undertaking and teachers as easily replaceable implementers of others’ prescriptive ideas. Yet little is known about the knowledge, skills, and dispositions these programs seek to develop in teachers during pre-service preparation.
Purpose/Focus of Study
This study seeks to understand the nature of teacher preparation in early-entry ATCPs and how this reflects both the trends associated with the new professionalism and broader traditions of teacher education. The paper focuses on preparation of pre-service mathematics teachers who began the NYCTF program in the summer of 2007.
Research Design
Results for this paper are based on a mixed-methods analysis of curriculum and survey data. Curriculum data included course materials, journal entries and daily audio reflections, and exit interviews for nine mathematics teacher candidates who began NYCTF in the summer of 2007. The two authors coded this qualitative data with a high degree of inter-rater reliability. Survey data was collected from 90% of the approximately 300 mathematics candidates who began NYCTF in the summer of 2007. The analysis focused on responses to Likert-scale survey items that inquired about the focus of pre-service coursework. The Mann Whitney test was used to gauge the statistical significance of curricular differences reported by mathematics candidates in different sections of the NYCTF program.
Findings/Results
We find that only some of the major components of NYCTF summer preparation were well aligned with the expectations of the new professionalism. In particular, the curriculum delivered by NYCTF staff and staff at one of the four university coursework providers seemed to meet these expectations. Whereas, to varying degrees, the curriculum delivered by staff at the three other university partners did not. We also find that pre-service preparation was subject-general and featured little in the way of mathematics-specific teaching methods.
Conclusions/Recommendations
The results simultaneously support, extend, nuance, and challenge the hypothesis that such early-entry ATCPs such as NYCTF prepare program participants to meet the expectations of the new professionalism. The conclusion includes discussions of both the promise of early-entry ATCPs and how schools of education might respond to the rise of early-entry ATCPs and the trend of the new professionalism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppleM. (2001). Markets, standards, teaching, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(3), 182–196.
2.
BeyerL. (2007). Teacher education and the new professionalism: The case of the USA. In Freeman-MoirJ. & ScottA. (Eds.), Shaping the future: Critical essays on teacher education (pp. 25–42). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
3.
BoydD., GrossmanP., LankfordH., LoebS., & WyckoffJ. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176–216.
4.
BransfordJ., BrownA., & CockingR. (1999). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5.
BrantlingerA., CooleyL., & BrantlingerE. (2010). Families, values, and class relations: The politics of alternative certification. In AppleM., BallS. & GandinL. (Eds.), International handbook of the sociology of education: Critical research for social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
CohenJ. A. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
7.
CountsG. (1932). Dare the schools build a new social order?New York, NY: The John Day Co.
8.
Darling-HammondL. (1994). Who Will Speak for the Children? How “Teach for America” Hurts Urban Schools and Students, Phi Delta Kappan, 76(1), 21–34.
9.
Darling-HammondL., & BransfordJ. (Eds.) (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Darling-HammondL., ChungR., & FrelowF. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach?Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286–302.
11.
Darling-HammondL.HammernessK., GrossmanP., RustF., & ShulmanL. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In Darling-HammondL. & BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390–441). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Darling-HammondL., HoltzmanD. J., GatlinS. J., & HeiligJ. V. (2005). Does Teacher Preparation Matter? Evidence about Teacher Certification, Teach for America, and Teacher Effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives13(42). Retrieved 10/5/2011 from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/147.
13.
DoddE. (2007, July 16). Personal Communication from a Teaching Fellow Advisor in the Minutes from a University Faculty Collaborative Meeting.
14.
DuncanA. (2009). Teacher preparation: Reforming the uncertain profession – Remarks of Secretary Arne Duncan at Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved 5/01/2011 from http://www2.ed.gov/news/speeches/2009/10/10222009.html.
15.
EvertsonC. (1990). Bridging knowledge and action through clinical experiences. In D. Dill & associates (Eds.), What teachers need to know (pp. 94–109). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
FeistritzerE. (2010). Alternative teacher certification: A state by state analysis 2010. Washington D.C.: National Center for Education Information.
17.
FinnC. & PetrilliM. (2007). In WalshK. & JacobsS., Alternative certification isn't alternative (pp. 7–11). Washington DC: Thomas Fordham Institute and National Council on Teacher Quality.
FooteD. (2008). Relentless pursuit: A year in the trenches with Teach for America. New York, NY: Vintage.
20.
FooteM., BrantlingerA., HaydarH., SmithB., & GonzalezL. (2011). Are we supporting teacher success: Insights from an alternative route mathematics teacher certification program for urban public schools. Education and Urban Society, 43(3), 396–425.
21.
FooteM., SmithB., & GellertL. (2011). The evolution of mathematics teacher identity in an urban context. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 4(2), 67–95.
22.
FreireP. (1971). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Ramos, M. B., Trans.). New York, NY: Seabury Press.
23.
FurlongJ. (2005). New Labour and teacher education: The end of an era. Oxford Review of Education, 31(1), 119–134.
GoodnoughA. (2004). Ms. Moffett's first year: Becoming a teacher in America. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
26.
GreeneH., & GreeneM. (2000). Hidden Ivies: Thirty colleges of excellence. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
27.
GreeneH., & GreeneM. (2001). The Public Ivies: America's flagship public universities.New York, NY: HarperCollins.
28.
HanushekE. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 466–479.
29.
HumphreyD., & WechslerM. (2008). Getting beyond the label: What characterizes alternative certification programs? In GrossmanP. & LoebS. (Eds.) Alternative routes to teaching. Mapping the new landscape of teacher education (pp. 65–97). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
30.
HumphreyD., WechslerM., & HoughH. (2008). Characteristics of effective alternative teacher certification programs. Teachers College Record, 110(1), 1–63.
31.
JohnsonS. M., & BirkelandS. (2008). Is fast-track preparation enough? It depends. In GrossmanP. & LoebS. (Eds.) Alternative routes to teaching. Mapping the new landscape of teacher education (pp. 101–128). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
32.
KoppW. (2001). One day, all children: The unlikely triumph of Teach for America and what I learned along the way. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
LabareeD. (2005). Progressivism, schools, and schools of education: An American romance. Paedagogica Historica, 41(1&2), 275–288.
35.
LabareeD. (2010). Teach for America and teacher ed: Heads they win, tails we lose. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1&2), 48–55.
36.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1999). Preparing teachers for diverse student populations: A critical race theory perspective. Review of Research in Education, 24, 211–247.
LipmanP. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
39.
ListonD., & ZeichnerK. (1991). Teacher education and the social conditions of schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
MartinD. B. (2007). Beyond missionaries or cannibals: Who should teach mathematics to African American children. The High School Journal, 91(1), 6–28.
41.
MeagherM., & BrantlingerA. (2011). When am I going to learn to be a mathematics teacher? A case study of a novice New York City Teaching Fellow. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 4(2), 96–130.
42.
MonkD. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125–145.
43.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Focal points for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
44.
National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy.Committee on the Study of Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
45.
New York State Education Department (NYSED). (2000). 52.21 Registration of curricula in teacher education. Retrieved 9/17/2010 from http://www.highered.nysed.gov/ocue/52.21.htm
46.
New York City Department of Education (NYCDOE). (2006). RFP #R0018 Master's and certification services to alternative route teachers. New York, NY: Author.
ScribnerJ., & AkibaM. (2010). Exploring the relationship between prior career experience and instructional quality among mathematics and science teachers in alternative teacher certification programs. Educational Policy, 24(4), 602–627.
StiglerJ., & HiebertJ. (1999). The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom. New York, NY: The Free Press.
55.
TamirE. (2008). Theorizing the politics of educational reform: The case of New Jersey's alternate route to teacher certification. American Journal of Education115(1), 65–95.
U.S. Department of Education. (2010). A blueprint for reform: The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved 5/01/2011 from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/index.html
Van de WalleJ. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
65.
VeltriB. T. (2008). Teaching or service? The site-based realities of Teach for America teachers in poor, urban schools. Education and Urban Society, 40(5), 511–542.
66.
VeltriB. T. (2010). Learning on other people's kids: Becoming a Teach for America teacher. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
WigginsG. & McTigheJ. (2005). Understanding by design. (Expanded 2nd Ed.)USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
69.
WillG. (2011, February 27). Teach for America: Letting the cream rise. The Washington Post. Downloaded 12/11/2011 from http://www.washingtonpost.com
70.
ZeichnerK. (1993). Traditions of practice in U.S. pre-service teacher education programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 1–13.
71.
ZeichnerK. (2010). Competition, economic rationalization, increased surveillance, and attacks on diversity: Neo-liberalism and the transformation of teacher education in the U.S. Teaching and Teacher Education26, 1544–1552.
72.
ZeichnerK. & HutchinsonE. (2008). The development of alternative certification policies and programs in the United States. (Chapter 1, pp. 15–29). In GrossmanP. & LoebS. (Eds.) Alternative routes to teaching: Mapping the new landscape of teacher education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
