At the close of the first decade of the twenty-first century, the intersection of race, geography and opportunity is increasingly referred to as spatial racism. School quality and resources, municipal services, employment opportunities, accessibility of transportation, exposure to pollution, and tax rates all vary dramatically across a network of invisible boundary lines that carve up U.S. metro areas into racially and socioeconomically distinctive spaces.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
This analysis explores how district boundary lines and school desegregation policy have impacted metropolitan school and housing integration levels over the past two decades.
Setting
The study focuses specifically on the South, where the most comprehensive desegregation strategies were pursued. Based on varying experiences with city-suburban school district mergers, four metros—Richmond, Virginia; Charlotte-Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; Louisville-Jefferson County, Kentucky; and Chattanooga-Hamilton County, Tennessee— were identified for study between the years 1990 and 2010. This time period encompassed a rising trend of unitary status for school districts, the serious resegregation of students, and growing demographic complexity across the country.
Research Design
This is a quantitative analysis of school and housing segregation trends that relies upon Geographic Information Systems (GIS) maps to depict spatial patterns of isolation. School enrollment and segregation trends are derived from the National Center for Educational Statistics’ Common Core of Data. Housing patterns describing the distribution and segregation of persons by race and poverty status are explored using block group-level information from the U.S. Census Bureau's decennial census. Segregation is measured using the Index of Dissimilarity (D).
Findings/Results
Efforts to overcome the divisive nature of district boundary lines, in conjunction with comprehensive school desegregation policy, were related to unambiguous progress in combating both school and housing segregation. This central finding suggests that, in some ways, school policy can become housing policy.
Conclusions/Recommendations
How we provide equal educational opportunity to an increasingly diverse population of students is one of the principal concerns facing the country today. As a nation, however, we are currently allowing a labyrinthine system of school-district boundary lines to dictate the geographic distribution of learning opportunities. This study provides concrete examples of metros implementing a more regional approach to educational equity. It recommends that other metro area consider taking similar steps to subvert the segregating power of school-district boundaries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnyonJ. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education and a new social movement. New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
ArmorD. (1995). Forced justice: School desegregation and the law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
BalfanzR., & LegtersN. E. (2008). NCLB and reforming the nation's lowest-performing high schools. in SundermanG. L. (ed.), Holding NCLB accountable: Achieving accountability, equity, and school reform (pp. 191–207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
4.
BeckJ. H. (1983). Tax competition, uniform assessment, and the Benet principle. Journal of Urban Economics, 13, 127–146.
5.
BhargavaA., FrankenbergE., & LeC. (2008). Still looking to the future: Voluntary K-12 school integration.New York, NY: NAACP Legal and Defense Fund/Civil Rights Project at UCLA.
6.
BischoffK. (2008). School district fragmentation and racial residential segregation: How do boundaries matter?Urban Affairs Review, 44(2), 182–217.
7.
BogerJ., & OrfieldG. (eds.). (2005). School resegregation: Must the South turn back?Chapel Hill, NC: University of north Carolina Press.
8.
BraddockJ. (1980). The perpetuation of segregation across levels of education: A behavioral assessment of the contact-hypothesis. Sociology of Education, 53, 187–186.
9.
BraddockJ. (2009). Looking back: The effects of court-ordered desegregation. in SmrekarC. & GoldringE. (eds.), From the courtroom to the classroom: The shifting landscape of school desegregation (pp. 3–18). Cambridge, MA: Harvard education Press.
10.
Bradley v. Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696. (1974).
11.
BraddockJ. (1980). The perpetuation of segregation across levels of education: A behavioral assessment of the contact-hypothesis. Sociology of Education, 53, 187–186.
12.
BraddockJ. (2009). Looking back: The effects of court-ordered desegregation. in SmrekarC.C. & GoldringE. (eds.). From the courtroom to the classroom: The shifting landscape of school desegregation (pp. 3–18). Cambridge, MA: Harvard education Press.
13.
Brief of Housing Scholars and Research & Advocacy Organizations as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents, Parents Involved in Community Schools, Petitioner v. Seattle School District No. 1, et al.; Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education, U.S 551 (2006).
14.
Brief of The Swann Fellowship, Former School Board Members, Parents and Children from the Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents, Parents Involved in Community Schools, Petitioner v. Seattle School District No. 1, et al.; Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education, U.S. 551 (2006).
15.
BriggsX. (2005). The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Washington DC: Brookings institution Press.
16.
BrileyK. (1985). School desegregation spurs first housing desegregation gain in forty years in Louisville and Jefferson County. Three decades of increased segregation erased between 1970 and 1980 (Staff Report 85–8). Kentucky Commission on Civil Rights.
17.
Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294. (1954).
18.
ButlerD. (2010). ethnic racial composition and college preference: Revisiting the perpetuation of segregation hypothesis. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 26.
19.
CharlesC. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 167–207.
20.
ChiodoA., Hernández-MurilloR., & OwyangM. (2010). nonlinear effects of school quality on house prices. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 92(3), 185–204.
21.
ClappJ., NandaA., & Ross, StephenL., (2008). which school attributes matter? The influence of school district performance and demographic composition on property values. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2), 451–466.
22.
ClotfelterC. T. (2004). After Brown: The rise and retreat of school desegregation.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
CrainR. L. (1970). School integration and occupational achievement of negroes. American Journal of Sociology, 75, 593–606.
24.
DawkinsM. P. (1983). Black students’ occupational expectations: A national study of the impact of school desegregation. Urban Education, 18, 98–113.
25.
DiZ. & LiuX. (2005). The importance of wealth and income in the transition to homeownership.Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University.
26.
DoughertyJ., HarrelsonJ., MaloneyL., MurphyD., SmithR., SnowM., & ZannoniD. (2009). School choice in suburbia: Test scores, race, and housing markets. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 523–548.
27.
DuP., ColesB., O'CampoP., & McNuttL. (2007). Changes in population characteristics and their implication on public health research. Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, 4(6).
28.
DuBoisW.E.B. (1903). The souls of black folk.Chicago, IL: A.C. McClurg & Co.
29.
DuncanO., & DuncanB. (1955). A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. American Sociological Review, 20, 210–17.
30.
EatonS. (2001). The other Boston busing story: What's won and lost across the boundary line.new Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
FarrellC. (2008). Bifurcation, fragmentation or integration? The racial and geographical structure of U.S. metropolitan segregation, 1990–2000. Urban Studies, 45, 467.
32.
FrankenbergE. (2005). The impact of school segregation on residential housing patterns: Mobile, Alabama and Charlotte, north Carolina. in BogerJ. & OrfieldG., (eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (pp. 164–186). Chapel Hill, NC: University of north Carolina Press.
33.
FrankenbergE. (2009). Splintering school districts: Understanding the link between segregation and fragmentation. Law and Social Inquiry, 34(4), 869–909.
34.
FrankenbergE., LeeC., & OrfieldG. (2003). A multiracial society with segregated schools: Are we losing the dream?Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
35.
FrankenbergE., Siegel-HawleyG., & OrfieldG. (2008). The forgotten choice? Magnet schools in a changing landscape.Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
36.
FreundD. (2007). Colored property: State policy and White racial politics in suburban America.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
FreyW. (2001). Melting pot suburbs: A Census 2000 study of suburban diversity. Washington, DC: The Brookings institution.
38.
FreyW. (2010). Census data: Blacks and Hispanics take different segregation paths (The State of Metropolitan America, no. 21.). Washington, DC: Brookings institution.
39.
National Commission on Fair Housing and equal Opportunity. (2008). Future of fair housing: Report of the National Commission on Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. Washington, DC: The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.civilrights.org/publications/reports/fairhousing/.
40.
GrannisR. (2005). T-Communities: Pedestrian street networks and residential segregation in Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York. City & Community4(3), 295–322.
41.
GrantG. (2009). Hope and despair in the American city: Why there are no bad schools in Raleigh.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Green v. County School Board of new Kent County, 391 U.S. 430. (1968).
43.
HartmanC. & SquiresG. (eds.). (2010). The integration debate: Competing futures for American cities.New York, NY: Routledge.
44.
HarwellM. R., & LeBeauB. (2010). Student eligibility for a free lunch as an SES measure in educational research. Educational Researcher, 39, 120–131.
45.
HawleyW. (2007). Designing schools that use student diversity to enhance learning of all students. in FrankenbergE. & OrfieldG. (eds.), Lessons in integration: Realizing the promise of racial diversity in American schools (pp. 31–56). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
46.
HaynesB. (2001). Red lines, black spaces: The politics of race and space in a black middle-class suburb. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47.
HolmeJ. J. (2002). Buying homes, buying schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 177–205.
48.
HolmeJ. J., & wellsA. S. (2008). School choice beyond district borders: Lessons for the reauthorization of NCLB from interdistrict desegregation and open enrollment plans. in KahlenbergR. (ed.), Improving on No Child Left Behind: Getting education reform back on track (pp. 139–215). Washington, DC: The Century Foundation.
49.
HowlyC., JohnsonJ., & PetrieJ. (2011). Consolidation of schools and districts: What the research says and what it means.Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.
JargowskyP. (1997). Poverty and place: Ghettos, barrios, and the American city. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
52.
JargowskyP., & El KomiM. (2011). Before or after the bell? School context and neighborhood effects on student achievement. in NewburgerH., BirchE., & WachterS. (eds.), Neighborhood and life chances: How place matters in modern America (pp. 50–72). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
53.
JohnsonH. B. (2006). The American dream and the power of wealth: Choosing schools and inheriting inequality in the land of opportunity.New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
KainJ. (1992). The spatial mismatch hypothesis: Three decades later. Housing Policy Debate, 3(2).
55.
KaneT., RieggS., & StegerD. (2010). School quality, neighborhoods and housing prices: effects of free choice among public schools. The Review of Economic Studies, 7 (3), 1164–1191.
56.
KatzB. (2001). Reflections on regionalism. Washington, DC: Brookings institution Press.
KozolJ. (1992). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
60.
KurlaenderM. & YunJ. (2005). Fifty years after Brown: new evidence of the impact of school racial composition on student outcomes. International Journal of Education Policy Research and Practice, 6(1).
61.
LareauA. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Race, class and family life.Berekely, CA: UC Press.
62.
LelandS. M., & ThumaierK. (eds.). (2004). Case studies of city-county consolidation: Reshaping the local government landscape.New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe Publishing.
63.
LinnR., & WelnerK. (eds.). (2007). Race-conscious policies for assigning students to schools: Social science research and the Supreme Court cases. Washington, DC: national Academy of education.
MasnickG. (2001). Home ownership trends and racial inequality in the United States In the 20th century (working paper W01–4). Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University.
66.
MasseyD. S., & DentonN. A. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67, 281–315.
67.
MasseyD. S., & DentonN. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
MasseyD., CharlesC., LundyG., & FischerM. (2003). The source of the river: Social origins of freshmen at America's selective colleges and universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
McDonnellB. (27 January 2010). GOP response to President Barack Obama's State of the Union. Richmond, Virginia.
70.
MickelsonR., SmithS., & SouthworthS. (2009). Resegregation, achievement, and the chimera of choice in post-unitary Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools. in SmrekarC. & GoldringE. (eds.), From the courtroom to the classroom: The shifting landscape of school desegregation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard education Press.
71.
MickelsonR. (2011). exploring the school-housing nexus: A synthesis of social science evidence. in TegelerP. (ed.), Finding common ground: Coordinating housing and education policy to promote integration (pp. 5–8). Washington, DC: Poverty and Race Research Action Council.
72.
MickelsonR., & BottiaM. (2010). integrated education and mathematics outcomes: A synthesis of social science research. North Carolina Law Review, 88, 993.
73.
MitchellD., BatieM., & MitchellR. (2010). The contributions of school desegregation to housing integration: Case studies in two large urban areas. Urban Education, 45, 166.
Nondiscrimination and equal Opportunity Under executive Order 11063: Proposed Rules, 44 Fed. Reg. (1976).
76.
OliverM., & ShapiroT. (1995). Black wealth, White wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality.New York, NY: Routledge.
77.
OrfieldG. (1978). Must we bus? Segregated schools and national policy. Washington, DC: Brookings institution Press.
78.
OrfieldG. (1981). Toward a strategy for urban integration: Lessons in school and housing policy from twelve cities. A Report to the Ford Foundation.
79.
OrfieldG. (2001). Metropolitan school desegregation: impacts on metropolitan society. in PowellJ. & KayJ. (ed.), In pursuit of a dream deferred: Linking housing and education policy.New York, NY: Peter Lang.
80.
OrfieldG. (2009). Reviving the goal of an integrated society: A 21st century challenge.Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
81.
OrfieldG., & EatonS. (1996). Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of education. New York, NY: The new Press.
82.
OrfieldG., & McArdleN. (2006). The vicious cycle: Segregated housing, schools and intergenerational inequality.Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
83.
OrfieldG., & FrankenbergE. (2008). The last have become the first: Rural and small town America lead the way on desegregation.Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Civil Rights Project.
84.
OrfieldG., FrankenbergE., & GarcesL. M. (2008). Statement of American social scientists of research on school desegregation to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson County. The Urban Review, 40(1).
85.
OrfieldG., & FrankenbergE. (2011). Experiencing integration in Louisville: How parents and students see the gains and challenges. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project at UCLA.
86.
OrfieldM. (2002). American metropolitics: The new suburban reality.Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
87.
OrfieldM. (2006). Minority suburbanization, stable integration, and economic opportunity in fifteen metropolitan regions. Minneapolis, MN: institute on Race and Poverty.
88.
OrfieldM., & LuceT. (2010). Region: Planning the future of the twin cities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
89.
Parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District no. 1, 551 U.S. 701. (2007).
90.
PearceD. (1980). Breaking down the barriers: New evidence on the impact of metropolitan school desegregation on housing patterns.Washington, DC: national institute of education.
91.
PetrovichJ., & wellsA. (eds.) (2005). Bringing equity back: Research from a new era in American educational policy.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
92.
PettigrewT., & TroppL. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751.
93.
PfeifferD. (2009). The opportunity illusion: Subsidized housing and failing schools in California. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project at UCLE.
94.
PhillipsK., RodoskyR., MunozM., & LarsenE. (2009). integrated schools, integrated futures? A case study of school desegregation in Jefferson County, Kentucky. in SmrekarC. & GoldringE. (eds.). From the courtroom to the classroom: The shifting landscape of school desegregation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard education Press.
95.
PowellJ. (2009). Reinterpreting metropolitan space as a strategy for social justice. in PavelM. P.. (ed.), Breakthrough communities: Sustainability and justice in the next American metropolis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
96.
PowellJ., & KayJ. (eds.) (2001). In pursuit of a dream deferred: Linking housing and education policy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
97.
PrattR.A. (1991). The color of their skin: Education and race in Richmond, Virginia, 1954–89. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
98.
ReadyD., & SilanderM. (2011). School racial and ethnic composition and young children's cognitive development: isolating family, neighborhood and school influences. in FrankenbergE. & DeBrayE. (eds.), Integrating schools in a changing society: New policies and legal options for a multiracial generation (pp. 91–113). Chapel Hill, NC: University of north Carolina Press.
99.
ReardonS. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: new evidence and possible explanations. in DuncanG. & MurnameR. (eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools and children's life changes (pp. 91–116). New York, NY: Russell Sage Press.
100.
ReardonS., YunJ., & EitleT. (2000). The changing structure of school segregation: Measurement and evidence of multi-racial metropolitan school segregation, 1989–1995. Demography, 37(3), 351–364.
101.
ReardonS., & YunJ. (2002). Suburban racial change and suburban school segregation, 1987–95. Sociology of Education, 74(2), 79–101.
RyanJ. (2010). Five miles away, a world apart: One city, two schools and the story of modern educational inequality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
106.
SchofieldJ. (1995). Review of research on school desegregation's impact on elementary and secondary school students. in BanksJ. A. and BanksC. A.M. (eds.), Handbook of multicultural education.New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.
ShapiroT. (2004). The hidden cost of being African American: How wealth perpetuates inequality.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
109.
SmithS. (2004). Boom for whom? Education, desegregation and development in Charlotte.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
110.
SmrekarC., & GoldringE. (2000). Magnet schools and the pursuit of racial balance. Education and Urban Society, 33(17).
111.
SohoniD., & SaporitoS. (2009). Mapping school segregation: Using GIS to explore racial segregation between schools and their corresponding attendance areas. American Journal of Education, 115, 569.
112.
Southern education Foundation (2010). A new diverse majority: Students of color in the South's public schools.Atlanta, GA: Southern education Foundation.
113.
StearnsE. (2010). Long-term correlates of high school racial composition: Perpetuation theory reexamined. Teachers College Record, 112(6).
114.
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of education, 402 U.S. 1. (1971).
115.
Siegel-Hawley. (2011). Integrating suburban schools: How to benefit from growing diversity and avoid segregation.Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project at UCLA.
116.
TegelerP. (ed.). Finding common ground: Coordinating housing and education policy to promote integration. Washington, DC: Poverty and Race Research Action Council.
117.
TieboutC. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.
TurnerM., & RossS. (2003). Housing discrimination in metropolitan America: Findings from the latest national paired testing study (working paper 2003–08). Storrs, CN: University of Connecticut, Department of economics.
120.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1977). Statement on metropolitan school desegregation. Washington, DC.: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
121.
WeiherG. (1992). The fractured metropolis: Political fragmentation and metropolitan segregation.Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
122.
WellsA. S., BaldridgeB., DuranJ., LoftonR., RodaA., WarnerM., whiteT., & GrzesikowskiC. (2009). Why boundaries matter: A study of five separate and unequal Long Island school districts. New York, NY: Long island index.
123.
WellsA. S., & CrainR. L. (1994). Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of Educational Research, 6, 531–555.
124.
WellsA. S., DuranJ., & whiteT. (2011). Southern graduates of school desegregation: A double consciousness of resegregation yet hope. in FrankenbergE. & DeBrayE. (eds.), Integrating schools in a changing society: New policies and legal options for a multiracial generation (pp. 114–130). Chapel Hill, NC: UNC Press.
125.
WilsonW. J. (1991). Public policy research and the truly disadvantaged. in JenksC. & PetersonP. (eds). The urban underclass. Washington, DC: The Brookings institution.
126.
WilsonR. (2011). Visualizing racial segregation differently—exploring changing patterns from the effect of underlying geographic distributions. Cityscape: A journal of policy development and research, 13(2). U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
