Reading in the Crawl Space: A Study of an Urban School's Literacy-Focused Community of Practice

Abstract

Background/Context

The pressure to understand “what works” to advance adolescents’ reading development has increased as the Common Core State Standards’ call for youth to grapple with a range of complex texts. While we have learned more about promising reading programs and interventions for adolescent students in schools, few programs have had a demonstrable impact on middle and high school students’ reading achievement. As a result, categorical reading underperformance among youth persists in schools nationwide and is worse in urban schools. Instead of examining the effects of a reading program in isolation, we may need to turn our attention to understand how those programs are lived and enacted within the contexts of their school cultures.

Purpose and Research Questions

This study depicts one urban school's efforts to support its middle and high school students in reading. Two research questions guided this study: 1. What are the current practices designed to provide a sociocultural context conducive to growth in reading skills at Grant Street Secondary School? 2. How do various organizational members (i.e., students and staff) perceive and experience these practices at Grant Street Secondary School? Though a range of factors influenced students’ reading at the school, this paper provides an in-depth portrayal of another instructional component — independent reading — that emerged in my analysis as vital to the way students and staff oriented themselves around literacy.

Research Design

Because the theoretical frame for this study assumes that literacy is social and situated, my research design reflected an effort to describe interactions related to reading, the domains where reading activity circulated, and perceptions of those interactions. As such, I drew upon three sources of qualitative data: interviews from staff and students, ethnographic observational data, and documents. These three sources of qualitative data enabled me to describe the literacy activities at the school and locate them in the larger school organizational and cultural processes.

Conclusions and Recommendations

This study suggests that students may benefit from daily, sustained time for independent reading time that is instructional. This study also suggests that coordinated efforts across school staff may ensure youth's positive interactions with texts. This study also holds implications for school-based research focused on disciplinary literacy. Ultimately, this research reconceptualizes our understanding of effective instructional practices for adolescents, emphasizing a multidimensional approach that highlights the role of reading as a social activity.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allington

(2001). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs. New York: Longman.

Alvermann

D. E.

(2001). Reading adolescents’ reading identities: Looking back to see ahead. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 676–690.

Bartlett

(2007). To seem and to feel: Situated identities and literacy practices. Teachers College Record, 109(1), 51–69.

Bell

(1998). Changing bodies, changing lives: A book for teens on sex and relationships. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.

Black

R. W.

, & Steinkuehler

(2009). Literacy in virtual worlds. In Christenbury

, Bomer

, & Smagorinsky

(Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 271–286). New York: Guilford.

Chajet

(2006). But is what we give them enough? Exploring urban graduates’ small school journey through college (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). City University of New York, New York, NY.

Cochran-Smith

, & Lytle

(1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.

Compton-Lily

(2007). The complexities of reading capital in two Puerto Rican families. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 72–99.

Deshler

, Palincsar

, Biancarosa

, & Nair

(2007). Informed choices for struggling adolescent readers: A research-based guide to instructional programs and practices. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

10.

Elkeles

(2008). Perfect chemistry. New York: Walker Books for Young Readers.

11.

Elmore

(2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

12.

Erickson

(1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Wittrock

M. C.

(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.

13.

Francois

(2011a). “We're not just going to teach you how to read”: An urban school's vision of academic press and social support for literacy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).

14.

Francois

(2011b). Intrinsic, contextual, and variable: Exploring the complexity of adolescent reading motivation in an urban secondary “reading school” (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).

15.

Francois

(2012). Getting at the core of literacy improvement: A case study of an urban secondary school. Education and Urban Society. doi:10.1177/0013124512458116.

16.

Garan

E. M.

, & DeVoogd

(2008). The benefits of sustained silent reading: Scientific research and common sense converge. Reading Teacher, 62(4), 336–344.

17.

Gee

J. P.

(1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Critical perspectives on literacy and education. London: Falmer Press.

18.

Gee

(2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

19.

Grant

(2008). Gone. New York, NY: HarperTeen.

20.

Guzetti

B. J.

, & Gamboa

(2004). Zines for social justice: Adolescent girls writing on their own. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 19–25.

21.

Hartinger

(2007). Geography club. New York, NY: HarperTeen.

22.

Heath

S. B.

(1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Jones

, & Newman

(1998). Our America: Life and death on the south side of Chicago. New York: Scribner.

24.

Kinney

(2009). Diary of a wimpy kid: The last straw. New York: Amulet.

25.

Lave

, & Wenger

(1991). Situated learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Lawrence-Lightfoot

, & Davis

J. H.

(1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

27.

Lee

V. E.

, Smith

J. B.

, Perry

T. E.

, & Smylie

M. A.

(1999, October). Social support, academic press, and student achievement: A view from the middle grades in Chicago. Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago.

28.

Levin

, & Arafeh

(2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between internet-savvy students and their schools. Pew Internet & American Life Project

29.

Lewis

, Encisco

, & Moje

(2007). Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

30.

(2009). Introduction. In Li

(Ed.), Literacy, language and learning: Multicultural families, home literacies, and mainstream schooling (pp. xv–xxvii). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

31.

Lieberman

, & Grolnick

(1996). Networks and reform in American education. Teachers College Record, 98(1), 7–45.

32.

Luttrell

, & Parker

(2001). High school students’ literacy practices and identities, and the figured world of school. Journal of Research in Reading, 24(3), 235–247.

33.

Mackall

D. D.

(2007). Crazy in love. New York: Dutton Juvenile.

34.

Maxwell

J. A.

(2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

35.

McLaughlin

M. W.

, & Talbert

J. E.

(2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

36.

Moje

E. B.

(2000). “To be part of the story”: The literacy practices of gangsta adolescents. Teachers College Record, 102(3), 652–690.

37.

Moje

(2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107.

38.

Moore

(2010). The other Wes Moore: One name, two fates. New York: Speigel & Grau.

39.

Moses

(2005). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston, MA: Beacon.

40.

Nasir

(2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 213–247.

41.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). The nation's report card: Grade 12 reading and mathematics national and pilot state results. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsre-portcard/pubs/main2009/2011455.asp

42.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.cfm

43.

Neild

R. C.

, & Balfanz

(2006). Unfulfilled promise: The dimensions and characteristics of Philadelphia's dropout crisis, 2000–2005. Baltimore, MD: Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.

44.

Payne

(2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

45.

Perry

(2003). Achieving in post-civil rights America: The outline of a theory. In Perry

, Steele

, & Hilliard

A. G.

(Eds.), Young, gifted and Black: Promoting high achievement among African-American students (pp. 87–108). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

46.

Pitcher

, Albright

, DeLaney

, Walker

, Seunarinasingh

, Mogge

… Dunston

(2007). Assessing adolescents’ motivation to read. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(5), 378–396.

47.

Purcell-Gates

(1995). Other people's words: The cycle of low literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

48.

Richards

(2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

49.

Sapphire . (1991). Push: A novel. New York: Vintage.

50.

Schein

E. H.

(1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

51.

Scribner

, & Cole

(1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

52.

Seidman

(2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College.

53.

Shanahan

, & Shanahan

(2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59.

54.

Slavin

R. E.

, Cheung

, Groff

, & Lake

(2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 290–322.

55.

Steinberg

(2007). Creating and sustaining a professional learning community at the secondary level. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute for School Leadership.

56.

Strasser

(2007). Mob princess: Count your blessings. New York: Simon Pulse.

57.

Street

B. V.

(1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

58.

Tatum

(2005). Teaching reading to Black adolescent males: Closing the achievement gap. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.

59.

Tuck

(2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–428.

60.

Tyack

, & Cuban

(1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

61.

Wenger

(1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

62.

Yin

R. K.

(2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.) Los Angeles, CA: Sage.