College attendance has become a crucial determinant of life chances in U.S. society. Besides college costs and academic preparation, college-related cultural and social capital may help explain socioeconomic differences in whether and where students attend college. While high school counselors are seen as potential agents of social capital, the standard counseling model, developed to serve middle-class students, may not translate effectively to schools serving disadvantaged students. The college coach program, introduced in 12 non-selective Chicago Public Schools (CPS) in the fall of 2004, provides an alternative model. In contrast to the standard high school counseling model, college coaches take a “community organizer” role in assisting the college enrollment process. Statistical difference-in-differences analysis suggests that coaches may have improved the kinds of colleges that students attended, particularly for less advantaged students (Stephan, 2010).
Purpose
This qualitative study describes how the coach program works and analyzes key aspects that may explain its positive relationship with college enrollment outcomes.
Participants
Interviews were conducted between the spring of 2006 and spring of 2007 with 9 current and former college coaches, 2 postsecondary specialists (to whom the coaches report), and 30 high school seniors in 2 coach schools, which, like other non-selective CPS high schools, serve students who are predominantly African American or Latino and low-income.
Research Design
Responses to semi-structured interviews with coaches and students were coded for recurring themes and according to interview questions. A model of how coaches create social capital emerged from iterations between coding interviews and studying previous research on the creation of social capital.
Conclusions
The results suggest that coaches use new advising strategies (different from typical school counseling practices) to increase students’ college-related social capital and subsequently increase the number of students completing college actions, which may explain improved enrollment outcomes. This research highlights previously tacit assumptions about how counseling should work and details new advising procedures that may benefit disad-vantaged students in the college enrollment process. More generally, this research discusses specific social mechanisms through which policy or institutions may create social capital to improve educational attainment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerP. S., & KwonS. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
2.
AndrewsK. M., & DelahayB. L. (2000). Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 797–810.
3.
Bakermans-KranenburgM. J., van IJzendoornM. H., & BradleyR. H. (2005). Those who have, receive: The Matthew effect in early childhood intervention in the home environment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 1–26.
4.
BerknerL., & ChavezL. (1997). Access to postsecondary education for the 1992 high school graduates. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education: National Center for Education Statistics.
5.
BloomJ. (2007). (Mis)reading social class in the journey towards college: Youth development in urban America. Teachers College Record, 109(2), 343–368.
6.
BoboK. A., KendallJ., & MaxS. (2001). Organizing for social change: Midwest academy manual for activists (3rd ed.). Santa Ana, CA: Seven Locks Press.
7.
BourdieuP. (2001). The forms of capital. In GranovetterM. & SwedbergR. (Eds.), The sociology of economic life (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
8.
BurdmanP. (2005). The student debt dilemma: Debt aversion as a barrier to college access (No. CSHE.13.05). Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education.
9.
BurtR. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In StawB. M. & SuttonR. I. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 22, pp. 345–423). New York: Elsevier Science.
10.
CoburnC. E., & RussellJ. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235.
11.
ColemanJ. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology Supplement94, S95–S120.
12.
ConstantD., SproullL., & KieslerS. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119–135.
13.
CookT. D. (1975). ‘Sesame Street’ revisited. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
DikaS. L., & SinghK. (2002). Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 31–60.
15.
DynarskiS. M., & Scott-ClaytonJ. E. (2006). The cost of complexity in federal student aid: Lessons from optimal tax theory and behavioral economics. National Tax Journal, 59(2), 2006.
16.
FieldJ. (2009). Social capital (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
17.
FlapH. (2004). Creation and returns of social capital: A new research program. In FlapH. & VölkerB. (Eds.), Creation and returns of social capital (pp. 3–23). New York: Routledge.
18.
FreemanK. (1997). Increasing African Americans’ participation in higher education: African American high-school students’ perspectives. Journal of Higher Education, 68(5), 523–550.
19.
GittellR. J., & VidalA. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategyThousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
GonzálezK. P., StonerC., & JovelJ. E. (2003). Examining the role of social capital in access to college for Latinas: Toward a college opportunity framework. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 2(1), 146–170.
21.
GranovetterM. (1995). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
GrodskyE., & JonesM. T. (2007). Real and imagined barriers to college entry: Perceptions of college cost. Social Science Research, 36, 745–766.
23.
HaggstromW. C. (2001). The tactics of organization building. In RothmanJ., ErlichJ. L., & TropmanJ. E. (Eds.), Strategies of community intervention (6th ed.). Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers.
24.
HirschB. J. (2005). A place to call home: After-school programs for urban youth. New York: Teachers College Press.
25.
KahneJ., & BaileyK. (1999). The role of social capital in youth development: The case of ‘I Have a Dream’ programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(3), 321–343.
26.
KirstM. W., & VeneziaA. (2004). From high school to college: Improving opportunities for success in postsecondary education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
LareauA. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28.
LareauA., & HorvatE. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72, 37–53.
29.
LareauA., & WeiningerE. B. (2008). Class and the transition to adulthood. In LareauA. & ConleyD. (Eds.), Social class: How does it work? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
30.
LeeV. E., & EkstromR. B. (1987). Student access to guidance counseling in high school. American Educational Research Journal, 24(2), 287–310.
31.
LevinD. Z., & CrossR. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490.
32.
LinN. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.
33.
McDonoughP. M. (1994). Buying and selling higher education: The social construction of the college applicant. Journal of Higher Education, 65(4), 427–446.
34.
McDonoughP. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
35.
McDonoughP. M., & CalderoneS. (2006). The meaning of money: Perceptual differences between college counselors and low-income families about college costs and financial aid. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1703–1718.
36.
McDonoughP. M., VentrescaM. J., & OutcaltC. (2000). Field of dreams: Organization field approaches to understanding the transformation of college access, 1965-1995. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 15, pp. 371–405). New York: Agathon Press.
37.
MolesO. C. (1991). Guidance programs in American high schools: A descriptive portrait. School Counselor, 38(3), 163–177.
38.
NaffzigerM. E. (2010). Meaning making, resources and college access for disadvantaged students.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
39.
NaffzigerM. E., & RosenbaumJ. E. (2009). Information is not enough: Cultural capital, cultural capital translators and college access for disadvantaged students. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
40.
ParsadB., AlexanderD., FarrisE., & HudsonL. (2003). High school guidance counseling (NCES 2003-015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
41.
PenuelW., RielM., KrauseA., & FrankK. A. (2009). Analyzing teachers’ professional interactions in a school as social capital: A social network approach. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 124–163.
42.
PérezP. A., & McDonoughP. M. (2008). Understanding Latina and Latino college choice: A social capital and chain migration analysis. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 7(3), 249–265.
43.
PernaL. W. (2000). Differences in college enrollment among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 117–141.
44.
PernaL. W., Rowan-KenyonH. T., ThomasS. L., BellA., AndersonR., & LiC. (2008). The role of college counseling in shaping college opportunity: Variations across high schools. Review of Higher Education, 31(2), 131–159.
45.
PersellC. H., & CooksonP. W.Jr. (1985). Chartering and bartering: Elite education and social reproduction. Social Problems, 33(2), 115–129.
46.
PersonA. E., & RosenbaumJ. E. (2006). Chain enrollment and college enclaves: Benefits and drawbacks for Latino college students. In OrfieldG., HornC. L., & FloresS. (Eds.), New directions for community colleges: Community colleges and Latino educational opportunity (pp. 51–60). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
PlankS. B., & JordanW. J. (2001). Effects of information, guidance, and actions on post-secondary destinations: A study of talent loss. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 947–979.
48.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1-24).
49.
PowellA. G., FarrarE., & CohenD. K. (1985). The shopping mall high school: Winners and losers in the education marketplace. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
50.
RockmanS. (1995). In school or out: Technology, equity, and the future of our kids. Communications of the ACM, 38(6), 25–29.
51.
RoderickM., NagaokaJ., CocaV., & MoellerE. (2008). From high school to the future: Potholes in the road to college. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
52.
RosenbaumJ. E., HallbergK., StephanJ. L., GobleL. J., & NaffzigerM. E. (2009). Institutional Assumptions in the College Application Process in High- and Low-SES High Schools. Paper presented at the Society for the Study of Social Problems Annual Meeting.
53.
RothmanJ. (2001). Approaches to community intervention. In RothmanJ., ErlichJ. L. & TropmanJ. E. (Eds.), Strategies of community intervention (6th ed.). Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers.
54.
RubinH. J., & RubinI. (2001). Community organizing and development (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
55.
SpillaneJ. P., GomezL., & MeslerL. (2009). School organization and policy: Implementation, organizational resources, and school work practice. In PlankD., SykesG. & SchneiderB. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 409–425). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
56.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin support networks of U.S.-Mexican youth.New York: Teachers College Press.
57.
StephanJ. L. (2010). Closing college enrollment gaps: Whether and how high schools can help (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3419092).
58.
StephanJ. L., GobleL. J., & RosenbaumJ. E. (2008). Beyond student deficiencies: Barriers to college for low-SES students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association.
59.
StephanJ. L., & RosenbaumJ. E. (2009). Permeability and transparency in the high school-college transition. In PlankD., SykesG. & SchneiderB. (Eds.), Handbook on education policy research (Vol. AERA Handbook on Education Policy Research). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
60.
StevensM. (2007). Creating a class: College admissions and the education of elites. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
SwartzD. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62.
TierneyW. G., & VenegasK. M. (2006). Fictive kin and social capital: The role of peer groups in applying and paying for college. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1687–1702.
63.
TsaiW., & GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academic Management Journal, 41, 464–476.
64.
UzziB. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35–67.
65.
UzziB., & LancasterR. (2003). Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Science, 49(4), 383–399.
66.
VenegasK. (2007). Low-income, urban Latinas’ student aid decisions: The effect of family ties. Ames, IA: Iowa State University, Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies.
67.
WalpoleM., McDonoughP. M., BauerC. J., GibsonC., KanyiK., & ToliverR. (2005). This test is unfair: Urban African American and Latino high school students’ perceptions of standardized college admission tests. Urban Education, 40(3), 321–349.
