In educational research on children's academic performance, few topics have received more attention than the consequences of school segregation and the impact of self-fulfilling prophecies. However, virtually no research has investigated whether self-fulfilling prophecies account for the impact of school composition on academic achievement.
Purpose & Research Objectives
This study aims to integrate research on the effects of school segregation with that on self-fulfilling prophecies by examining the mediating role of teacher expectancies regarding the impact of school composition on pupils’ math achievement. First, we investigate whether teachers’ teachability expectations are related to the socioe-conomic and ethnic composition of the school. Second, we investigate whether and how the effects of school composition can be explained by self-fulfilling prophecies. Because it is theorized that teacher expectancies might have an impact on pupils’ academic achievement through pupils’ perceptions of control over their achievement, we investigate the role of pupils’ sense of academic futility.
Sample & Research Design
Quantitative data from a survey of 2,845 pupils and 706 teachers in 68 Flemish (Belgian) primary schools and qualitative data obtained through in-depth interviews with 26 teachers in five schools are analyzed. A complementary mixed- method design is used: Findings from the quantitative data are strengthened and illustrated with qualitative data.
Results
The multilevel analysis shows that teachers’ teachability expectations are lower in schools with a high share of nonnative and working-class pupils and that these teachability expectations have an indirect impact on pupils’ achievement through pupils’ feelings of academic futility. The qualitative analysis reveals that the low teacher expectations in these schools are largely triggered by alleged linguistic deficiencies and problematic language use of the pupils and that school staff persistently communicate their preference for Dutch mono-lingualism to pupils.
Recommendations
The results of this study indicate that socioeconomic desegregation may not be needed if it is possible to reform schools with a larger share of working-class pupils. Schools that produce more favorable teachability expectations are recommended. In particular, teachers’ attitudes and beliefs regarding pupils’ linguistic backgrounds might be the focus of educational reforms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbediJ., HofstetterC. H., & LordC. (2004). Assessment accommodations for English language learners: Implications for policy-based empirical research. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 1–28.
2.
AgirdagO. (2010). Exploring bilingualism in a monolingual school system: insights from Turkish and native students from Belgian schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(3), 307–321.
3.
AgirdagO., DemanetJ., Van HoutteM., & Van AvermaetP. (2011). Ethnic school composition and peer victimization: A focus on the interethnic school climate. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(4), 465–473.
4.
AgirdagO., HermansM., & Van HoutteM. (2011). Het verband tussen islamitische religie, religiositeit en onderwijsprestaties [The association between Islamic religion, religiosity, and academic achievement]. Pedagogische Studiën, 88(5), 339–353.
5.
AgirdagO., & Van HoutteM. (2011). A tale of two cities: Bridging families and schools. Educational Leadership, 68(8), 42–46.
6.
AgirdagO., Van HoutteM., & Van AvermaetP. (2011). Ethnic school context and the national and sub-national identifications of pupils. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(2), 357–378.
7.
AgirdagO., Van HoutteM., & Van AvermaetP. (2012). Why does the ethnic and socio-economic composition of schools influence math achievement? The role of sense of futility and futility culture. European Sociological Review, 28(3), 366–378.
8.
AlexanderK. L., EntwisleD. R., & DauberS. L. (1994). On the success of failure: A reassessment of the effects of retention in the primary grades. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BankstonC. L., & CaldasS. J. (1996). Majority African American schools and social injustice: The influence of de facto segregation on academic achievement. Social Forces, 75(2), 535–555.
10.
BankstonC. L., & CaldasS. J. (1998). Family structure, schoolmates, and racial inequalities in school achievement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(3), 715–723.
11.
BeckerH. S. (1952). Social-class variations in the teacher-pupil relationship. Journal of Educational Sociology, 25(8), 451–465.
12.
BlommaertJ., & Van AvermaetP. (2008) Taal, onderwijs en de samenleving. De kloof tussen beleid en realiteit [Language, education and the society. The gap between policy and reality]. Antwerp, Belgium: EPO.
13.
BoadoH. C. (2007). Immigrant concentration in schools: Peer pressures in place?European Sociological Review, 23(3), 341–356.
14.
BrookoverW. B., SchweitzerJ. H., SchneiderJ. M., BeadyC. H., FloodP. K., & WisenbakerJ. M. (1978). Elementary-school social climate and school-achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 301–318.
15.
BrophyJ. E. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(5), 631–661.
16.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
17.
CaracelliV. J., & GreeneJ. C. (1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs. New Directions for Evaluation, 1997(74), 19–32.
18.
ClarkK. B. (1955). Prejudice and your child. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
19.
ColemanJ. S., CampbellE. Q., HobsonC. J., McPartlandJ., MoodA. M., WeinfeldF. D., & YorkR. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
20.
CooperH. M. (1979). Pygmalion grows up. Model for teacher expectation communication and performance influence. Review of Educational Research, 49(3), 389–410.
21.
CooperH. M. (1985). Models of teacher expectation communication. In DusekJ. B. (Ed.), Teacher expectancies (pp. 135–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
DriessenG. (2002). School composition and achievement in primary education: A large-scale multilevel approach. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28(4), 347–368.
23.
DriessenG. (2007). Peer group effecten op onderwijsprestaties. Een internationaal review van effecten, verklaringen en theoretische en methodologische aspecten [Peer group effects on educational achievement. An international review of impacts, explanations and theoretical and methodological aspects]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: ITS–Radboud Universiteit.
24.
DronkersJ. (2010). Positive but also negative effects of ethnic diversity in schools on educational performance? An empirical test using cross-national PISA data. Unpublished manuscript, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
25.
DudalP., & DeloofG. (2004). Vrij centrum voor leerlingenbegeleiding. Leerlingenvolgsysteem. Wiskunde: Toetsen 5 - Basisboek [Free Center for Student Guidance. Pupil tracking system. Mathematics Keys 5: Basic book]. Antwerp, Belgium: Garant.
26.
DumayX., & DupriezV. (2008). Does the school composition effect matter? Evidence from Belgian data. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(4), 440–477.
27.
DusekJ. B., & JosephG. (1985). The bases of teacher expectancies. In DusekJ. B. (Ed.), Teacher expectancies (pp. 229–250). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
EriksonR., GoldthorpeJ. H., & PortocareroL. (1979). Intergenerational class mobility in 3 Western European societies: England, France and Sweden. British Journal of Sociology, 30(4), 415–441.
29.
EsterbergK. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
30.
FekjaerS. N., & BirkelundG. E. (2007). Does the ethnic composition of upper secondary schools influence educational achievement and attainment? A multilevel analysis of the Norwegian case. European Sociological Review, 23(3), 309–323.
31.
FelouzisG. (2003). La ségrégation ethnique au collège et ses conséquences [Ethnic segregation at secondary school and its consequences]. Revue Francaise De Sociologie, 44(3), 413–447.
32.
FieldingN. (1993). Qualitative interviewing In GilbertG. N. (Ed.), Researching social life (pp. 130–145). London, England: Sage.
33.
FindleyM. J., & CooperH. M. (1983). Locus of control and academic-achievement. A literature review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(2), 419–427.
34.
FinnJ. D. (1972). Expectations and the educational environment. Review of Educational Research, 42(3), 387–410.
35.
GlickW. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate. Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 601–616.
36.
HalvorsenA. L., LeeV. E., & AndradeF. H. (2009). A mixed-method study of teachers’ attitudes about teaching in urban and low-income schools. Urban Education, 44(2), 181–224.
37.
HarveyD. G., & SlatinG. T. (1975). Relationship between child's SES and teacher expectations. Test of middle-class bias hypothesis. Social Forces, 54(1), 140–159.
38.
HuismanM. (2000). Imputation of missing item responses: Some simple techniques. Quality and Quantity, 34(4), 331–351.
39.
JacobsD., ReaA., & TeneyC. (2009). De sociale lift blijft steken. De prestaties van allochtone leer-lingen in de Vlaamse Gemeenschap en de Franse Gemeenschap [The social lift stops working. The performance of immigrant pupils in the Flemish community and the French community]. Brussels, Belgium: Koning Boudewijnstichting.
40.
JussimL. (1986). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and integrative review. Psychological Review, 93(4), 429–445.
41.
JussimL. (1989). Teacher expectations. Self-fulfilling prophecies, perceptual biases, and accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 469–480.
42.
JussimL., & EcclesJ. (1992). Teacher expectations: Construction and reflection of student-achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 947–961.
43.
JussimL., EcclesJ., & MadonS. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 281–388.
44.
KornblauB. (1982). The teachable pupil survey: A technique for assessing teachers’ perceptions of pupil attributes. Psychology in the Schools, 19(2), 170–174.
45.
LeeV. E., DedrickR. F., & SmithJ. B. (1991). The effect of the social-organization of schools on teachers efficacy and satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 64(3), 190–208.
46.
LeeV. E., & LoebS. (2000). School size in Chicago elementary schools: Effects on teachers’ attitudes and students’ achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 3–31.
47.
McKownC., & WeinsteinR. S. (2008). Teacher expectations, classroom context, and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46(3), 235–261.
48.
MertonR. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure (1968 enlarged ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
49.
OrfieldG. (1983). Public school desegregation in the United States, 1968-1980. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political Studies.
50.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2006). Where immigrant students succeed: A comparative review of performance and engagement in Pisa 2003.Paris, France: Author.
51.
RiehlC. (2001). Bridges to the future: The contributions of qualitative research to the sociology of education. Sociology of Education, 74, 115–134.
52.
RistR. C. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: Self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 40(3), 411–451.
RosenthalR., & JacobsonL. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. New York, NY: Holt.
55.
RosenthalR., & RubinD. B. (1978). Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(3), 377–386.
56.
RumbergerR. W., & PalardyG. J. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record, 107(9), 1999–2045.
57.
RyabovI., & Van HookJ. (2007). School segregation and academic achievement among Hispanic children. Social Science Research, 36(2), 767–788.
58.
ShroutP. E., & FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations. Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428.
59.
SierensS., & Van AvermaetP. (2010). Taaldiversiteit in het onderwijs: van meertalig onder-wijs naar functioneel veeltalig leren [Linguistic diversity in education: from multilingual education, towards functional multilingual learning] In Van AvermaetP., Van den BrandenK., & HeylenL. (Eds.), Goed gegokt? Reflecties op twintig jaar gelijke-onderwijskansen-beleid in Vlaanderen [Guessed good? Reflections on twenty years of equal opportunity policies in education in Flanders] (pp. 69–87). Antwerp, Belgium: Garant.
60.
SingerJ. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23(4), 323–355.
61.
StrandS. (1997). Pupil progress during key stage 1: A value added analysis of school effects. British Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 471–487.
62.
Van den BerghL., DenessenE., HornstraL., VoetenM., & HollandR. W. (2010). The implicit prejudiced attitudes of teachers: Relations to teacher expectations and the ethnic achievement gap. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 497–527.
63.
Van der SlikF., DriessenG., & De BotK. (2006). Ethnic and socioeconomic class composition and language proficiency: a longitudinal multilevel examination in Dutch elementary schools. European Sociological Review, 22(3), 293–308.
64.
Van EwijkR., & SleegersP. (2010). The effect of peer socioeconomic status on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 134–150.
65.
Van HoutteM. (2003). Reproductietheorieën getoetst. De link tussen SES-compositie van de school en onderwijscultuur van leerkrachten en directie [Testing theories of reproduction: The link between the SES-composition of the school and the teaching culture of teachers and principals]. Mens & Maatschappij, 78(2), 119–143.
66.
Van HoutteM. (2004). Tracking effects on school achievement: A quantitative explanation in terms of the academic culture of school staff. American Journal of Education, 110(4), 354–388.
67.
Van HoutteM. (2011). So where's the teacher in school effects research? The impact of teachers’ beliefs, culture, and behavior on equity and excellence in education. In Van den BrandenK., Van AvermaetP., & Van HoutteM. (Eds.), Equity and excellence in education: Towards maximal learning opportunities for all students (pp. 75–95). New York, NY: Routledge.
68.
Van HoutteM., & StevensP.A.J. (2010). The culture of futility and its impact on study culture in technical/vocational schools in Belgium. Oxford Review of Education, 36(1), 23–43.
69.
DemanetJ., & Van HoutteM. (2012). Teachers’ attitudes and students’ opposition. School misconduct as a reaction to teachers’ diminished effort and affect. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 860–869.
70.
Van MaeleD., & Van HoutteM. (2011). The quality of school life: Teacher-student trust relationships and the organizational school context. Social Indicators Research, 100(1), 85–100.
71.
WellsA. S. (1995). Reexamining social-science research on school-desegregation. Long-ver-sus short-term effects. Teachers College Record, 96(4), 691–706.
72.
WineburgS. S. (1987). The self-fulfillment of the self-fulfilling prophecy. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 28–37.
