Explanations for the relatively low numbers of Latinas pursuing higher education have tended to focus on socialization into traditional gender roles. However, recent scholarship has challenged this view, suggesting that gender roles—partic-ularly among recent immigrants—are mutable and subject to constant renegotiation.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
This article suggests that forgoing college, far from representing a retreat into traditional women's roles, might in some cases represent emergent feminism and a means for Latina immigrants to contest and reshape those roles.
Setting
A new Latino diaspora community in the rural southeastern United States.
Research Design
Longitudinal qualitative case study of an adolescent immigrant Latina.
Findings/Results
Both risk factors and facilitative factors previously identified by research as contributing to Latino/a college enrollment were found to be present in the case study student's background. The article argues, however, that some gender-specific factors often used to explain Latina school-leaving and low academic ambitions, such as close association with teenage mothers and responsibilities for household chores and child care, served instead as deterrents for this Latina adolescent from taking traditional gender roles. On the other hand, the article argues that the association between higher education and increased independence and a break from traditional gender roles that is often assumed for American-born women did not hold for a working-class Latina. Rather, her wage-earning represented a better position from which to challenge traditional gender roles within her family.
Conclusions/Recommendations
This case study confirms the heterogeneity and diversity to be found in the individual schooling paths of Latino/a immigrant youth, and thus the value of close examination of the protracted and as yet little understood process through which Latinas/os make the decision to pursue or forgo higher education over the course of high school. The article lends support to arguments in recent scholarship suggesting the mutability of gender roles in immigrant communities. It suggests that new attention be paid in research and college recruitment programs to growing evidence of gender-specific factors at work in Latino/a immigrant students’ academic achievement and college-going decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlfaroE. C., Umaña-TaylorA., Gonzales-BackenM. A., BámacaM. Y., & ZeidersK. H. (2009). Latino adolescents’ academic success: The role of discrimination, academic motivation, and gender. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 941–962.
2.
American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (1992). How schools shortchange girls. The AAUW report: A study of major findings on girls and education. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation; National Education Association.
3.
Antrop-GonzálezR., VélezW., & GarrettT. (2008). Examining familial-based academic success factors in urban high school students: The case of Puerto Rican female high achievers. Marriage and Family Review, 43(1/2), 140–163.
4.
AudS., FoxM. A., & KewalRamaniA. (2010). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups (NCES 2010-015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010015.pdf
5.
AudS., HussarW., KenaG., BiancoK., FrohlichL., KempJ., . (2011). The condition of education 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
6.
BarajasH. L., & PierceJ. L. (2001). The significance of race and gender in school success among Latinas and Latinos in college. Gender and Society, 15, 859–878.
7.
BeattieI. R. (2002). Are all “adolescent econometricians” created equal? Racial, class, and gender differences in college enrollment. Sociology of Education, 75, 19–75.
8.
BerryE. H., ShillingtonA. M., PeakT., & HohmanM. (2000). Multi-ethnic comparison of risk and protective factors for adolescent pregnancy. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 17(2), 79–96.
9.
BloomJ. (2007). (Mis)reading social class in the journey towards college: Youth development in urban America. Teachers College Record, 109, 343–368.
10.
BourdieuP., & WacquantL. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
BrodieM., SuroR., SteffensonA., ValdezJ., & LevinR. (2002). 2002 national survey of Latinos: Summary of findings. Menlo Park, CA & Washington, DC: Kaiser Family Foundation & Pew Hispanic Center.
12.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011). Occupational outlook handbook, 2010-2011 edition: Overview of the 2008-18 projections. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/oco/oco2003.htm
13.
CallahanR. (2005). Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 305–328.
14.
CallahanR. M. (2007/2008). Latino language-minority college going: Adolescent boys’ language use and girls’ social integration. Bilingual Research Journal, 31(1/2), 175–200.
15.
CammarotaJ. (2004). The gendered and racialized pathways of Latina and Latino youth: Different struggles, different resistances in the urban context. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 35(1), 53–74.
16.
CarterP. L. (2006). Straddling boundaries: Identity, culture, and school. Sociology of Education, 79, 304–328.
17.
CejaM. (2006). Understanding the role of parents and siblings as information sources in the college choice process of Chicana students. Journal of College Student Development, 47(1), 87–104.
18.
ColomerS. E., & HarklauL. (2009). Spanish teachers as impromptu translators and liaisons in new Latino communities. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 658–672.
19.
CôtéJ. E., & LevineC. (1988). A critical examination of the ego identity status paradigm. Developmental Review, 8, 147–184.
20.
CrawfordG., & BrunnerC. C. (1998). Marginalized by the web of meaning: Marion is missing. Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 4(3), 284–306.
21.
CrottyM. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
DavidsonA. L. (1996). Making and molding identity in schools: Student narratives on race, gender, and academic engagement. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23.
DennerJ., & DunbarN. (2004). Negotiating femininity: Power and strategies of Mexican American girls. Sex Roles, 50(5/6), 301–314.
24.
DolanS. L. (2009, April). Missing out: Latino students in America's schools (NCLR Statistical Brief 2009). Washington, DC: National Council of La Raza.
25.
DumkaL. E., GonzalesN. A., BondsD. D., & MillsapR. E. (2009). Academic success of Mexican origin adolescent boys and girls: The role of mothers’ and fathers’ parenting and cultural orientation. Sex Roles, 60, 588–599. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9518-z
26.
DurandJ., MasseyD. S., & ZentenoR. M. (2001). Mexican immigration to the United States: Continuities and changes. Latin American Research Review, 36(1), 107–127.
27.
EastP. L., & KiernanE. A. (2001). Risks among youths who have multiple sisters who were adolescent parents. Family Planning Perspectives, 33(2), 75–80.
28.
EderD., & FingersonL. (2003). Interviewing children and adolescents. In HolsteinJ. A. & GubriumJ. F. (Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 33–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Education Week. (2006). Diplomas count. Georgia. An essential guide to graduation policy and rates. The Graduation Project 2006. Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education Research Center.
30.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
31.
FryR. (2009). The changing pathways of Hispanic youths into adulthood. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
32.
FryR. (2011). Hispanic college enrollment spikes, narrowing gaps with other groups. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center, Pew Research Center.
33.
FryR., & GonzalesF. (2008). One-in-five and growing fast: A profile of Hispanic public school students. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
34.
GándaraP. C. (1995). Over the ivy walls: The educational mobility of low-income Chicanos. Albany: State University of New York Press.
35.
Gándara, P. C. (with Bial, D., & the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Access Working Group). (2001). Paving the way to postsecondary education: K-12 intervention programs for underrepresented youth (NCES 2001-205). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
36.
GándaraP. C., & ContrerasF. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
GibsonM. (1988). Accommodation without assimilation: Sikh immigrants in an American high school. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
39.
GilR. M., & VazquezC. I. (1996). The Maria paradox: How Latinas can merge Old World traditions with New World self-esteem. New York, NY: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
40.
GinorioA., & HustonM. (2001). Si, se puede! Yes, we can. Latinas in school. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
41.
GoffmanE. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York, NY: Pantheon.
42.
GonzálezK. P., JovelJ. E., & StonerC. (2004). Latinas: The new Latino majority in college. New Directions for Student Services, 105, 17–27.
43.
Governor's Office of Student Achievement, State of Georgia. (2004). 2003-2004 annual report cards on K-12 public schools: School system reports. Retrieved from http://www.doe.k12.ga.us
44.
GurinP., DeyE. L., HurtadoS., & GurinG. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcome. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330–366.
45.
GushueG. V., & WhitsonM. L. (2006). The relationship of ethnic identity and gender role attitudes to the development of career choice goals among Black and Latina girls. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 379–385.
46.
HamannE. T., WorthamS., & MurilloE. G. (2002). Education and policy in the new Latino diaspora. In WorthamS., MurilloE. G., & HamannE. T. (Eds.), Education in the new Latino diaspora: Policy and the politics of identity (pp. 1–16). Westport, CT: Ablex.
47.
HamrickF. A., & StageF. K. (2003). College predisposition at high-minority enrollment, low-income schools. Review of Higher Education, 27(2), 151–168.
48.
HarklauL. (2008). Developing qualitative longitudinal case studies of advanced language learners. In OrtegaL. & BrynesH. (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 23–35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49.
HarklauL. (2009). Heritage speakers’ experiences in new Latino diaspora Spanish classrooms. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 6, 211–242. doi:10.1080/15427580903118689
50.
HolsteinJ. A., & GubriumJ. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
HosslerD., SchmitJ. L., & VesperN. (1999). Going to college: How social, economic, and educational factors influence the decisions students make. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
52.
Housing and Demographics Research Center, University of Georgia. (2009). Georgia facts: Georgia County facts and figures. Retrieved from http://www.fcs.uga.edu/hace/gafacts/list.html
53.
KaoG., & TiendaM. (1995). Optimism and achievement: The educational performance of immigrant youth. Social Science Quarterly, 76(1), 1–19.
54.
KochharR., SuroR., & TafoyaS. (2005). The new Latino South: The context and consequences of rapid population growth. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
LindholmJ. (2006). Deciding to forgo college: Non-college attendees’ reflections on family, school, and self. Teachers College Record, 108, 577–603.
57.
LouieV. (2005). Immigrant newcomer populations, ESEA, and the pipeline to college: Current considerations and future lines of inquiry. Review of Research in Education, 29, 69–105.
58.
LutzA., & CristS. (2009). Why do bilingual boys get better grades in English-only America? The impacts of gender, language and family interaction on academic achievement of Latino/a children of immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32, 346–368.
59.
MeadorE. (2005). The making of marginality: Schooling for Mexican American immigrant girls in the rural Southwest. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36(2), 149–164.
60.
OngA. D., PhinneyJ. S., & DennisJ. (2006). Competence under challenge: Exploring the protective influence of parental support and ethnic identity in Latino college students. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 961–979.
61.
OropesaR. S., & LandaleN. S. (2004). The future of marriage and Hispanics. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 901–920.
62.
ParradoE., & FlippenC. A. (2005). Migration and gender among Mexican women. American Sociological Review, 70, 606–632.
63.
PasselJ. S., & CohnD. V. (2008). U.S. Population Projections: 2005–2050. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center, Pew Research Center.
64.
PavichE. G. (1986). A Chicana perspective on Mexican culture and sexuality. Journal of Social Work & Human Sexuality, 4(3), 47–65.
65.
PérezE. (1999). The decolonial imaginary: Writing Chicanas into history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
66.
PernaL. W. (2000). Differences in the decision to attend college among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. Journal of Higher Education, 71(2), 117–141.
67.
PessarP. (1999). Engendering migration studies: The case of new immigrants in the United States. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 577–600.
68.
PlunkettS. W., & Bámaca-GómezM. Y. (2003). The relationship between parenting, acculturation, and adolescent academics in Mexican-origin immigrant families in Los Angeles. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25, 222–239.
69.
PortesA., & RumbautR. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press & Russell Sage Foundation.
70.
QuinnN. (2005). Introduction. In QuinnN. (Ed.), Finding culture in talk: A collection of methods (pp. 1–34). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
71.
RaffaelliM., & OntaiL. L. (2004). Gender socialization in Latino/a families: Results from two retrospective studies. Sex Roles, 50(5/6), 287–299.
72.
ReeseL. (2002). Parental strategies in contrasting cultural settings: Families in México and “El Norte.”Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 33(1), 30–59.
73.
Riegle-CrumbC., & CallahanR. M. (2009). Exploring the academic benefits of friendship ties for Latino boys and girls. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 611–631.
74.
RivadeneyraR., & WardL. M. (2005). From Ally McBeal to Sábado Gigante: Contributions of television viewing to the gender role attitudes of Latino adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20, 453–475.
75.
Rolón-DowR. (2004). Seduced by images: Identity and schooling in the lives of Puerto Rican girls. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 35(1), 8–29.
76.
Ruiz de VelascoJ., & FixM. (with ClewellB. C.). (2000). Overlooked and underserved: Immigrant students in U.S. secondary schools. Washington DC: Urban Institute.
77.
RumbautR. G. (2005). Turning points in the transition to adulthood: Determinants of educational attainment, incarceration, and early childbearing among children of immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28, 1041–1086.
78.
SabatiukL., & FloresR. (2009, May). Toward a common future: Latino teens and adults speak out about teen pregnancy. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.
79.
SáenzV. B., & PonjuanL. (2009). The vanishing Latino male in higher education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 8(1), 54–89. doi:10.1177/1538192708326995
80.
ShotterJ. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81.
SmithR. C. (2002). Gender, ethnicity, and race in school and work outcomes of second-generation Mexican Americans. In Suárez-OrozcoM. M. & PáezM. M. (Eds.), Latinos: Remaking America (pp. 110–125). Berkeley: University of California Press.
82.
SolbergV. S. H., CarlstromA. H., HowardK. A. S., & JonesJ. E. (2007). Classifying at-risk high school youth: The influence of exposure to community violence and protective factors on academic and health outcomes. Career Development Quarterly, 55, 313–327.
83.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin support networks of U.S.-Mexican youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
84.
Suárez-OrozcoC., PimentelA., & MartinM. (2009). The significance of relationships: Academic engagement and achievement among newcomer youth. Teachers College Record, 111, 712–749.
85.
Suárez-OrozcoC., & Qin-HilliardD. B. (2004). The cultural psychology of academic engagement: Immigrant boys’ experiences in U.S. schools. In WayN. & ChuJ. Y. (Eds.), Adolescent boys: Exploring diverse cultures of boyhood (pp. 295–317). New York, NY: New York University Press.
86.
Suárez-OrozcoC., & Suárez-OrozcoM. M. (2001). Children of immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87.
SyS. R. (2006). Family and work influences on the transition to college among Latina adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28, 368–386.
88.
TierneyW. G. (1993). The college experience of native Americans: A critical analysis. In WeisL. & FineM. (Eds.), Beyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States schools (pp. 309–323). Albany: State University of New York Press.
89.
TornatzkyL. G., CutlerR., & LeeJ. (2002). College knowledge: What Latino parents need to know and why they don't know it. Los Angeles, CA: Tomás Rivera Policy Institute.
90.
Toro-MornM. I. (2008). Beyond gender dichotomies: Toward a new century of gendered scholarship in the Latina/o experience. In RodríguezH., SáenzR., & MenjívarC. (Eds.), Latinas/os in the United States: Changing the face of America (pp. 277–293). New York, NY: Springer.
91.
TurnerS. G., KaplanC. P., & BadgerL. W. (2006). Adolescent Latinas’ adaptive functioning and sense of well-being. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 21(3), 272–281.
92.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). State & county QuickFacts. DP-1 General Population and Housing Characteristics. Retrieved September 29, 2009, from http://factfinder.census.gov
93.
ValdésG. (1996). Con respeto: Bridging the distances between culturally diverse families and schools: An ethnographic portrait. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
94.
ValdésG. (2001). Learning and not learning English: Latino students in American schools (Vol. 27). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
95.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
96.
VillenasS. (2001). Latina mothers and small-town racisms: Creating narratives of dignity and moral education in North Carolina. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 32(1), 3–28.
97.
VillenasS. (2002). Reinventing educacion in new Latino communities: Pedagogies of change and continuity in North Carolina. In WorthamS. E. F., MurilloE. G., & HamannE. T. (Eds.), Education in the new Latino diaspora: Policy and the politics of identity (pp. 17–35). Westport, CT: Ablex.
98.
VillenasS., & MorenoM. (2001). To valerse por si misma between race, capitalism, and patriarchy: Latina mother-daughter pedagogies in North Carolina. Qualitative Studies in Education, 14, 671–687.
99.
WilliamsL. S., AlvarezS. D., & HauckK. S. A. (2002). My name is not Mária: Young Latinas seeking home in the heartland. Social Problems, 49, 563–584.
100.
WillisP. E. (1981). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs (Morningside ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
101.
WitkowM. R., & FuligniA. J. (2011). Ethnic and generational differences in the relations between social support and academic achievement across the high school years. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 531–552.
102.
YowellC. M. (2000). Possible selves and future orientation: Exploring hopes and fears of Latino boys and girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 20, 245–280.
103.
ZambranaR. E., & ZoppiI. M. (2002). Latina students: Translating cultural wealth into social capital to improve academic success. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 11(1/2), 33–53.
104.
ZareteM. E., & GallimoreR. (2005). Gender differences in factors leading to college enrollment: A longitudinal analysis of Latina and Latino students. Harvard Educational Review, 75, 383–408.
