BidwellC. (1965). The school as a formal organization. In MarchJ. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 973–1002). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
2.
ChalmersT. (1981). The clinical trial. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 59(3), 324–339.
3.
CohenB., & FullerE. (2006, April). Effects of mentoring and induction on beginning teacher retention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
4.
DavisB., & HigdonK. (2008). The effects of mentoring/induction support on beginning teachers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22(3), 261–274.
5.
DukeL., KarsonA., & WheelerJ. (2006). Do mentoring and induction programs have greater benefits for teachers who lack preservice training?Journal of Public and International Affairs, 17(2), 61–82.
6.
EvertsonC. M., & SmitheyM. W. (2000). Mentoring effects on protégés’ classroom practice: An experimental field study. Journal of Educational Research, 93(5), 294–304.
7.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
8.
FletcherS. H., & StrongM. (2009). Full-release and site-based mentoring of elementary grade new teachers: An analysis of changes in student achievement. The New Educator, 5(4), 329–341.
9.
FletcherS. H., StrongM., & VillarA. (2008). An investigation of the effects of variations in mentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Teachers College Record, 110(10), 2271–2289.
10.
FullerE. (2003). Beginning teacher retention rates for TxBESS and non-TxBESS teachers. Unpublished document, State Board for Educator Certification, Austin, TX.
11.
GanserT. (2002). The new teacher mentors: Four trends that are changing the look of mentoring programs for new teachers. American School Board Journal, 189(12), 25–27.
12.
GlazermanS., DolfinS., BleekerM., JohnsonA., IsenbergE., Lugo-GilJ., … AliM. (2008). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Results from the first year of a randomized controlled study (NCEE 2009-4034). Washington, DC: U.S. Department Of Education.
13.
GlazermanS., IsenbergE., DolfinS., BleekerM., JohnsonA., GriderM., & JacobusM. (2010). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Final results from a randomized controlled study (NCEE 2010-4027). Washington, DC: U.S. Department Of Education.
14.
GlazermanS., SeneskyS., SeftorN., & JohnsonA. (2006). Design of an impact evaluation of teacher induction programs (Final Report No. 6137–070) Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/PDFs/designimpact.pdf
15.
GoldY. (1999). Beginning teacher support. In SikulaJ., ButteryT., & GuytonE. (Eds.), Handbook of research in teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 548–594). New York, NY: Macmillan.
16.
GoldrickL., OstaD., BarlinD., & BurnJ. (2012). Review of state policies on teacher induction.Santa Cruz, CA: New Teacher Center. Retrieved from http://www.newteachercenter.org
17.
GrissmerD., & KirbyS. (1987). Teacher attrition: The uphill climb to staff the nation's schools. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
18.
GrissmerD., & KirbyS. (1992). Patterns of attrition among Indiana teachers, 1965-1987. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
19.
GrissmerD., & KirbyS. (1997). Teacher turnover and teacher quality. Teachers College Record, 99, 45–56.
20.
HafnerA., & OwingsJ. (1991). Careers in teaching: Following members of the high school class of 1972 in and out of teaching. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
21.
Hahs-VaughnD., & ScherffL. (2008). Beginning English teacher attrition, mobility, and retention. Journal of Experimental Education, 77(1), 21–53.
22.
HegstadC. D. (1999). Formal mentoring as a strategy for human resource development: A review of research. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(4), 383–390.
23.
HenkeR. R., ChenX., & GeisS. (2000). Progress through the teacher pipeline: 1992-93 College graduates and elementary/secondary school teaching as of 1997. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
24.
IngallC. K. (2006). Down the up staircase: Tales of teaching in Jewish day schools. New York, NY: Jewish Theological Seminary Press.
25.
IngersollR. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage?Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
26.
IngersollR. (2012). Beginning teacher induction: What the data tell us. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(8), 47–51.
27.
IngersollR., & MayH. (2011). Recruitment, retention and the minority teacher shortage.Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
IngersollR., & PerdaD. (2010). Is the supply of mathematics and science teachers sufficient?American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 563–595.
30.
IngersollR., & PerdaD. (2012). How high is teacher turnover and is it a problem?Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
31.
IngersollR., & SmithT. (2004a). Do teacher induction and mentoring matter?NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 28–40. doi:10.1177/019263650408863803.
32.
IngersollR., & SmithT. (2004b, April). The impact of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover in high and low poverty schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
33.
IngersollR., & StrongM. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233.
34.
IsenbergE., GlazermanS., BleekerM., JohnsonA., Lugo-GilJ., GriderM., & DolfinS. (2009). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Results from the second year of a randomized controlled study (NCEE 2009-4072). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
35.
JenningsJ., & CorcoranS. (2011). Beyond high-stakes tests: Teacher effects on other educational outcomes. In KellyS. (Ed.), Understanding teacher effects (pp. 77–95). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
36.
JohnsonS. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York, NY: Basic Books.
37.
JohnsonS., & BirkelandS. (2003). Pursuing a sense of success: New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 581–617.
38.
KapadiaK., CocaC., & EastonJ. Q. (2007). Keeping new teachers: A first look at the influences of induction in the Chicago Public Schools. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research. Retrieved from http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/publications/keeping_new_teachers012407.pdf
39.
KyleD. W., MooreG. H., & SandersJ. L. (1999). The role of the mentor teacher: Insights, challenges, and implications. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(3&4), 109–122.
40.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
MurnaneR., SingerJ., WillettJ., KempleJ., & OlsenR. (1991). Who will teach? Policies that matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
RiehlC. (2006). Feeling better: A comparison of medical research and education research. Educational Researcher, 35(5), 24–29.
43.
RockoffJ. E. (2008). Does mentoring reduce turnover and improve skills of new employees? Evidence from teachers in New York City (Working Paper No. 13868) Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w13868
44.
RoehrigA. D., BohnC. M., TurnerJ. E., & PressleyM. (2008). Mentoring beginning primary teachers for exemplary teaching practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 684–702.
45.
SizerT. (1992). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
46.
SmithT., & IngersollR. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover?American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681–714.
47.
StanulisR. N., & FlodenR. E. (2009). Intensive mentoring as a way to help beginning teachers develop balanced instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 112–122.
48.
StrongM. (2009). Effective teacher induction and mentoring: Assessing the evidence. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
49.
ThompsonM., PaekP., GoeL., & PonteE. (2004). Study of the impact of the California formative assessment and support system for teachers: Report 2: Relationship of BTSA/CFASST engagement and teacher practices (ETS-RR-04-31). Washington, DC: Educational Testing Service.
50.
TyackD. (1974). The one best system. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
VillarA., & StrongM. (2007). Is mentoring worth the money? A benefit-cost analysis and five-year rate of return of a comprehensive mentoring program for beginning teachers. ERS Spectrum, 25(3), 1–17.
52.
WallerW. (1932) The sociology of teaching.New York, NY: Wiley.