“Those who enter the ranks of teachers do not know how to teach, although they may know everything that is in the innumerable books telling them how to teach.”
— Willard Waller, 1932
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alliance for Excellent Education. (2004). Tapping the potential: Retaining and developing new high-quality teachers. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BerlinerD. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5–13.
3.
BerryB. (2009). Children of poverty deserve great teachers: One union's commitment to changing the status quo. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
4.
BerryB. (2011). Teaching 2030: What we must do for our students and our public schools… now and in the future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Feiman-NemserS., & CarverC. L. (2012). Creating conditions for serious mentoring: Implications for induction policy. NSSE Yearbook, 111(2), 342–364.
7.
FriedmanT. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
8.
GoldY. (1996). Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring, and induction. In SikulaJ. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 548–594). New York, NY: Macmillan.
9.
GoldrickL. (2011). State policies on new teachers: 2011. New Teacher Center: Santa Cruz, CA.
IngersollR. (2001) Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.
12.
IngersollR. M., & KralikJ. M. (2004). The impact of mentoring on teacher retention: What the research says. Denver, CO: Education Commission on the States.
13.
KapadiaK., & CocaV. (with EastonJ. Q.). (2007). Keeping new teachers: A first look at the influences of induction in the Chicago public schools. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research at University of Chicago.
National Academy of Education. (2005). A good teacher in every classroom: Preparing the highly qualified teachers our children deserve. San Francisco, CA: Author.
16.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (2007). The high cost of teacher turnover. Washington, DC: Author.
SchlagerM., FuscoJ., KochM., CrawfordV., & PhillipsM. (2003, July). Designing equity and diversity into online strategies to support new teachers. Paper presented at the NECC conference, Seattle, WA. Retrieved from http://tappedin.org/tappedin/web/papers/2003/DesigningEquity.pdf
20.
SmithT. M., & IngersollR. (2003, April). Reducing teacher turnover: What are the components of effective induction? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
21.
U.S. Department of Education (2009). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction results from the second year of a randomized controlled study. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation, U.S. Department of Education.
22.
WallerW. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York, NY: Wiley.
23.
WeiR. C., Darling-HammondK., & AdamsonF. (2010). Professional development in the United States: Trends and challenges. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.
24.
WechslerM. E., CasparyK., HumphreyD. C., & MatskoK. K. (2010). Examining the effects of new teacher induction. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
25.
WengerE., McDermottR., & SnyderW. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
26.
WilsonS. M., Darling-HammondL., & BerryB. (2001). Steady work: The case of Connecticut's school reform. American Educator, 25(3), 34–39, 48.
27.
YoungsP., & BellC. (2007, April). When policy instruments promote reform-oriented practice: An analysis of Connecticut's policies related to teaching and learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
