Alliance for Excellent Education. (2004). Tapping the potential: Retaining and developing high-quality new teachers. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
AthanasesS., & AchinsteinB. (2003). Focusing new teachers on individual and low performing students: The centrality of formative assessment in the mentor's repertoire of practice. Teachers College Record, 105, 1486–1520.
3.
BartellC. A., & OwnbyL. (1994). Report on the implementation of the beginning teacher support and assessment program, 1992-1994. Sacramento: California Commission on Teacher Credentialing and California Department of Education.
4.
California Commission on Teacher Credentialing and California Department of Education. (1997). California standards for the teaching profession: A description of professional practice for California teachers. Sacramento: Author.
5.
CarverC. L. (2002). Principals’ supporting role in new teacher induction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.
6.
CarverC. L., & Feiman-NemserS. (2009). Using policy to improve teacher induction: Critical elements and missing pieces. Educational Policy, 23, 295–328.
7.
Cincinnati Public Schools. (1998). Peer assistance and evaluation program guidelines. Cincinnati, OH: Author.
8.
CoburnC. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 145–170.
9.
CohenD. K., & BallD. L. (1990). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 331–338.
10.
CohenD. K., & HillH. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
Connecticut State Department of Education. (1999a). Connecticut's commitment to excellence in teaching: The second generation. Hartford: Author.
12.
Connecticut State Department of Education. (1999b). A guide to the BEST program for beginning teachers. Hartford: Author.
13.
Darling-HammondL. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of the state policy evidence. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
14.
EvertsonC. M., & SmitheyM.W. (2000). Mentoring effects on proteges’ classroom practice: An experimental field study. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 294–304.
15.
Feiman-NemserS. (1998). Teachers as teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 21, 63–74.
16.
Feiman-NemserS. (2000). Beginning teacher induction: A study of three promising programs. Final report for the National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching (NPEAT). East Lansing: Michigan State University.
17.
Feiman-NemserS., & ParkerM. B. (1993). Mentoring in context: A comparison of two U.S. programs for beginning teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 699–718.
18.
FidelerE. F., & HaselkornD. (1999). Learning the ropes: Urban teacher induction programs and practices in the United States. Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers.
19.
FletcherS. H., & StrongM. (2009). Full-release and site-based mentoring of elementary grade new teachers: An analysis of changes in student achievement. New Educator, 5, 329–341.
20.
FletcherS., StrongM., & VillarA. (2008). An investigation of the effects of variations in mentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Teachers College Record, 110, 2271–2289.
21.
GoldY. (1996). Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring and induction. In SikulaJ. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 548–594). New York, NY: Macmillan.
22.
Huling-AustinL. (1990). Teacher induction programs and internships. In HoustonW. R. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 535–548). New York: Macmillan.
23.
HobsonA. J., AshbyP., MalderezA., & TomlinsonP. D. (2009). Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don't. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 207–216.
24.
Johnson, S. M. & The Project on the Next Generation of Teachers. (2004). Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
KapadiaK., CocaV., & EastonJ. Q. (2007). Keeping new teachers: A first look at the influences of induction in the Chicago Public Schools. Research report by the Consortium on Chicago School Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
26.
KatzD. (2002). Every possible chance—New teachers’ understanding and use of learning opportunities within induction (Unpublished dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.
27.
LittleJ. W. (1990). The “mentor” phenomenon and the social organization of teaching. In CazdenC. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 16, pp. 297–351). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
28.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1997). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
MoirE., & GlessJ. (2001). Quality induction: An investment in teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28, 109–114.
30.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York, NY: Author.
31.
New Teacher Center at University of California, Santa Cruz. (2002). Continuum of teacher development. Santa Cruz: Author.
32.
NormanP. J., & Feiman-NemserS. (2005). Mind activity in teaching and mentoring. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 681–697.
33.
OlebeM. (2001). A decade of policy support for California's new teachers: The Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment Program. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28, 71–84.
34.
SmithT. M., & IngersollR. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover?American Educational Research Journal, 41, 681–714.
35.
SpillaneJ. P., & ThompsonC. L. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 185–203.
36.
StrongM. (2009). Effective teacher induction and mentoring: Assessing the evidence. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
37.
WangJ., OdellS. J., & SchwilleS. A. (2008). Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers’ teaching: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 132–152.
38.
WangJ., StrongM., & OdellS. J. (2004). Mentor-novice conversations about teaching: A comparison of two U.S. and two Chinese cases. Teachers College Record, 106, 775–813.
39.
WilliamsA., PrestageS., & BedwardJ, (2001). Individualism to collaboration: The significance of teacher culture to the induction of newly qualified teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27, 253–267.
40.
WilsonS. M., Darling-HammondL., & BerryB. (2000). Teaching policy: Connecticut's long term efforts to improve teaching and learning. Paper prepared for the Center for Teaching Policy, University of Washington, Seattle.
YinR. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
YuskoB., & Feiman-NemserS. (2008). Embracing contraries: Combining assistance and assessment in new teacher induction. Teachers College Record, 110, 923–953.