AchinsteinB., OgawaR., & SpeiglmanA. (2004). Are we creating separate and unequal tracks of teachers? The impact of state policy, local conditions, and teacher characteristics on new teacher socialization. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 557–603.
2.
AkerlofG., & KrantonR.E. (2002). Identity and schooling: Some lessons for the economics of education. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 1167–1201.
3.
AshtonP. T., & WebbR. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Longman.
4.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
5.
BanduraA. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
7.
BidwellC. E. (2000). School as context and construction: A social psychological approach to the study of schooling. In HallinanM. T. (Ed.), Handbook of sociology in education (pp. 15–36). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
8.
BidwellC. E. (2001). Analyzing schools as organizations: Long-term permanence and short-term change. Sociology of Education (Extra Issue), 100–114.
9.
BidwellC. E., FrankK. A., & QuirozP. (1997). Teacher types, workplace controls, and the organization of schools. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 285–307.
10.
BidwellC. E., & YasumotoJ. Y. (1999). The collegial focus: Teaching fields, collegial relationships, and instructional practice in American high schools. Sociology of Education, 72, 234–256.
11.
BoydD., GrossmanP., LankfordH., LoebS., & WyckoffJ. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 319–343.
12.
BrykA., & SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
BurchP., & SpillaneJ. P. (2003). Elementary school leadership strategies and subject matter: Reforming mathematics and literacy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 103(5), 519–535.
14.
BurtR. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In SuttonR. I. & StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 22, pp. 339–365). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
15.
ClotfelterC. T., LaddH. F., VigdorJ. L., & DiazR. A. (2004). Do school accountability systems make it more difficult for low-performing schools to attract and retain high-quality teachers?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(2), 251–271.
16.
CoburnC. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170.
17.
ColadarciT. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 323–337.
18.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl. 1988), S95–S120.
19.
ColemanJ. S. (1995). Rights and interests: Raising the next generation. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 782–783.
20.
DeatonA., & MuellbauerJ. (1980). An almost ideal demand system. American Economic Review, 70(3), 312–326.
21.
DeckerP. T., MayerD. P., & GlazermanS. (2004). The effects of Teach for America on students: Findings from a national evaluation. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
22.
DesimoneL., PorterA. C., GaretM., Suk YoonK., & BirmanB. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112.
23.
EbmeierH. (2003). How supervision influences teacher efficacy and commitment: An investigation of a path model. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(2), 110–141.
24.
Education Week. (2010). Fresh course, swift current: Momentum and challenges in the new surge toward common standards. Quality Counts 2010. Washington, DC: Editorial Projects in Education.
25.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
26.
FrankK. A. (1998). The social context of schooling: Quantitative methods. Review of Research in Education, 23, 171–216.
27.
FrankK. A., MullerC., SchillerK., Riegle-CrumbC., Strassman-MullerA., CrosnoeR., … PearsonJ. (2008). The social dynamics of mathematics coursetaking in high school. American Journal of Sociology, 113(6), 1645–1696.
28.
FrankK. A., & ZhaoY. (2005). Subgroups as a meso-level entity in the social organization of schools. In HedgesL. W. & SchneiderB. (Eds.), The social organization of schooling (pp. 279–318). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
29.
FrankK. A., ZhaoY., & BormanK. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77(2), 148–171.
30.
GlazermanS., IsenbergE., DolfinS., BleekerM., JohnsonA., GriderM., … AliM. (2010). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Final results from a randomized controlled study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
31.
GlickmanC., & TamashiroR. (1982). A comparison of first-year, fifth-year, and former teachers on efficacy, go development, and problem solving. Psychology in Schools, 19(4), 558–562.
32.
GoddardR. D., HoyW. K., & HoyA. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and effect on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–507.
33.
GoddardR. D., HoyW. K., & HoyA. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3–13.
34.
GoldY. (1992). Psychological support for mentors and beginning teachers: A critical dimension. In BeyT. M. & HolmesC. T. (Eds.), Mentoring: Contemporary principles and issues (pp. 25–34). Reston, VA: Association of Teacher Educators.
35.
GoldY. (1996). Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring, and induction. In SikulaJ. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 548–616). Washington, DC: Association of Teacher Educators.
36.
GrossmanP. L., & ThompsonC. (2004). District policy and beginning teachers: A lens on teacher learning. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(4), 281–301.
37.
HargreavesA. (1993). Individualism and individuality: Reinterpreting the teacher culture. In LittleJ. & McLaughlinM. (Eds.), Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp. 51–76). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
38.
HenkeR. R., ChenX., & GeisS. (2000). Progress through the teacher pipeline: 1992-93 college graduates and elementary/secondary teaching as of 1997 (NCES No. 2000152). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
39.
HillH., RowanB., & BallD. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.
40.
IngersollR. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.
41.
JohnsonS. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York: Basic Books.
42.
Johnson, S. M., & The Project on the Next Generation of Teachers. (2004). Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43.
KapadiaK., CocaV., & EastonJ. Q. (2007). Keeping new teachers: A first look at the influences of induction in the Chicago Public Schools. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research, University of Chicago.
44.
KardosS. M., JohnsonS. M., PeskeH. G., KauffmanD., & LiuE. (2001). Counting on colleagues: New teachers encounter the professional cultures of their schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 250–290.
45.
KennedyM. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
LeeV. E., & LoebS. (2000). School size in Chicago elementary schools: Effects on teachers’ attitudes and students’ achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 3–31.
47.
LeeV. E., & SmithJ. B. (1996). Collective responsibility for learning and its affects on gains in achievement and engagement for early secondary students. American Journal of Education, 104(2), 103–147.
48.
LipmanP. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
49.
LortieD. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
LouisK. S., KruseS. D., & MarksH. M. (1996). School-wide professional community: Teachers’ work, intellectual quality, and commitment. In F. M. Newmann & Associates, Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179–203). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
51.
McLaughlinM. W., & TalbertJ. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
McNeilL. M., & ValenzuelaA. (2001). The harmful impact of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric. In KornhaberM. & OrfieldG. (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high stakes testing in public education (pp. 127–150). New York, NY: Century Foundation.
53.
MeyerR. H. (1997). Value-added indicators of school performance: A primer. Economics of Education Review, 16(3), 283–301.
54.
MidgleyC., FeldlauferH., & EcclesJ. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self-and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 247–258.
55.
Newmann, F. M., & Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56.
NewmannF. M., KingM. B., & YoungsP. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108(4), 259–299.
57.
PhelpsG., & SchillingS. (2004). Developing measures of content knowledge for teaching reading. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 31–48.
58.
PogodzinskiB. (in press). Socialization of new teachers. Journal of School Leadership.
59.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.
60.
PressleyM., DukeN., & BolingE. (2004). The educational science and scientifically based instruction we need: Lessons from reading research and policymaking. Harvard Educational Review, 74(1), 30–61.
61.
RaudenbushS. W., & BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
ReagansR., & McEvilyB. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240–267.
63.
RockoffJ. E. (2008). Does mentoring reduce turnover and improve skills of new employees? Evidence from teachers in New York City (NBER Working Paper No. 13868). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
64.
RotterJ. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.
65.
RowanB., CamburnE., & CorrentiR. (2004). Using teacher logs to measure the enacted curriculum: A study of literacy teaching in third-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 75–101.
66.
ShepardL. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
67.
SiskinL. S. (1991). Departments as different worlds: Subject subcultures in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2), 134–160.
68.
SmithT. M., & IngersollR. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover?American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681–714.
69.
SmylieM. A., & HartA. W. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital perspective. In MurphyJ. & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp.421–440). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
70.
SpillaneJ. P., HalversonR., & DiamondJ. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28.
71.
SteinM. K., & D'AmicoL. (2002). Inquiry at the crossroads of policy and learning: A study of a district-wide literacy initiative. Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1313–1344.
72.
ThumY. M. (2003). Estimating teacher productivity using a multivariate multilevel model for value-added analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 32(2), 154–207.
73.
Tschannen-MoranM., HoyA. W., & HoyW. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.
74.
YasumotoJ. Y., UekawaK., & BidwellC. (2001). The collegial focus and high school students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 74, 181–209.
75.
YoungsP. (2007a). District induction policy and new teachers’ experiences: An examination of local policy implementation in Connecticut. Teachers College Record, 109(3), 797–837.
76.
YoungsP. (2007b). How elementary principals’ beliefs and actions influence new teachers’ induction experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 101–137.
77.
ZhaoY., & FrankK.A. (2003). An ecological analysis of factors affecting technology use in schools. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.