AchinsteinB. (2012). Mentoring for diversity and equity: Focusing on students of color and new teachers of color. NSSE Yearbook, 111(2), 289–308.
2.
AchinsteinB., OgawaR. T., & SpieglmanA. (2004). Are we creating separate and unequal tracks of teachers? The effects of state policy, local conditions, and teacher characteristics on new teacher socialization. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 557–603.
3.
ArendsR. I., & Rigazio-DiGilioA. J. (2000, July). Beginning teacher induction: Research and examples of contemporary practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Japan-United States Teacher Education Consortium (EDRS No. ED450074).
4.
BallD. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449–466.
BerendsM. (2000). Teacher-reported effects of New American School designs: Exploring relationships to teacher background and school context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(1), 65–82.
7.
BermanP., & McLaughlinM. W. (1975). Federal programs supporting educational change. Vol. IV: The findings in review.Santa Monica, CA: RAND. (ED 108 330)
8.
BerryB., & ByrdA. (2012). New teacher induction — in and out of cyberspace. NSSE Yearbook, 111(2), 365–386.
9.
BerryB., Hopkins-ThompsonP., & HokeM. (2002). Assessing and supporting new teachers: Lessons from the Southeast. Retrieved September 23, 2005, from the University of North Carolina, Southeast Center for Teaching Quality Web site: http://www.teachingquality.org
10.
BlaséJ., & BlaséJ. (2002). Teachers’ perceptions of principals’ instructional leadership and implications. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(3), 256–264.
11.
BleekerM., DolfinS., JohnsonA., GlazermanS., IsenbergE., & GriderM. (2012). The state of teacher induction in urban America. NSSE Yearbook, 111(2), 443–465.
12.
BrittonE. (2012). Addressing the mathematics-specific needs of beginning mathematics teachers. NSSE Yearbook, 111(2), 273–288.
13.
Cannata, M., Neergard, L., & Hawkinson (n.d.). A comprehensive framework for understanding the teacher mentoring relationship (Unpublished working paper).
14.
CoburnC. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509.
15.
Cochran-SmithM., & ZeichnerK. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
CohenD. K., & HillH. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Darling-HammondL. (1999). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand and standards: How we can ensure a competent, caring, and qualified teacher for every child. New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, the National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
18.
Darling-HammondL., & BransfordJ. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
DembeleM. (1995). Mentors and mentoring: Frames for action, ways of acting and consequences for novice teachers’ learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.
20.
DesimoneL. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented?Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 433–479.
21.
DesimoneL. (2006). Consider the source: Response differences among teachers, principals, and districts on survey questions about their education policy environment. Educational Policy, 20(4), 640–676.
22.
DesimoneL., PorterA. C., GaretM., YoonK., & BirmanB. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112.
EvertsonC. & SmitheyM. (2000). Mentoring effects on protégés’ classroom practice: An experimental field study. Journal of Educational Research, 9(5), 294–304.
25.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain practice. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
26.
Feiman-NemserS., CarverC., SchwilleS., & YuskoB. (2000). Beyond support: Taking new teachers seriously as learners. In SchererM. (Ed.), A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers (pp. 3–12). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
27.
Feiman-NemserS., & ParkerM. (1990). Making subject matter part of the conversation in learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 32–43.
28.
Feiman-NemserS., SchwilleS., CarverC., & YuskoB. (1999). A conceptual review of literature on new teacher induction. Washington, DC: National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.
29.
FidelerE., & HaselkornD. (1999). Learning the ropes: Urban teacher induction programs and practices in the United States. Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers.
30.
GanserT. (2002). The new teacher mentors: Four trends that are changing the look of mentoring programs for new teachers. American School Board Journal, 189(12), 25–27.
31.
GaretM., PorterA., DesimoneL., BirmanB., & YoonK. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Analysis of a national sample of teachers. American Education Research Journal, 38(3), 915–945.
32.
GlazermanS., IsenbergE., DolfinS., BleekerM., JohnsonA., GriderM., … AliM. (2010). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Final results from a randomized controlled study (NCEE 2010-4027). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
33.
GoldY. (1996). Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring, and induction. In SikulaJ., ButteryT. J., & GuytonE. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 548–594). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
34.
GriffinG. (1989). A state program for the initial years of teaching. Elementary School Journal, 89(4), 395–403.
35.
GrissmerD., & KirbyS. (1987). Teacher attrition: The uphill climb to staff the nation's schools. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
36.
GrissmerD., & KirbyS. (1992). Patterns of attrition among Indiana teachers, 1965–1987. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
37.
GrissmerD., & KirbyS. (1997). Teacher turnover and teacher quality. Teachers College Record, 99, 45–56.
38.
GrossmanP., LoebS., MyungJ., BoydD., LankfordH., & WyckoffJ. (2012). Learning to teach in New York City: How teachers and schools jointly determine the implementation of a districtwide mentoring program. NSSE Yearbook, 111(2), 309–341.
39.
GrossmanP., & ThompsonC. (2004). Curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teacher learning?. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching Policy.
40.
HafnerA., & OwingsJ. (1991). Careers in teaching: Following members of the high school class of 1972 in and out of teaching (NCES Report No. 91–470). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
41.
HaynesN. M. (1998). Lessons learned. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 3(1), 87–99. (EJ 564 744)
42.
HeckR. H. (1992). Principals’ instructional leadership and school performance: Implications for policy development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 21–34.
43.
HochbergE., DesimoneL., PorterA., PolikoffM., SchwartzR., & JohnsonJ. (2012, April). Comparing formal and informal mentoring for novice middle school mathematics teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
44.
HollowayJ. (2001). The benefits of mentoring. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 85–86.
45.
Huling-AustinL. (1990). Teacher induction programs and internships. In HoustonW. R. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 535–548). New York, NY: Macmillan.
46.
IngersollR. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage?Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
47.
IngersollR., & KralikJ. M. (2004). The impact of mentoring on teacher retention: What the research says. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
IngersollR. M., & StrongM. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. doi:10.3102/0034654311403323.
50.
IngersollR. M., & StrongM. (2012). What the research tells us about the impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers. NSSE Yearbook, 111(2), 466–490.
51.
JohnsonS. M., & BirkelandS. (2003). Pursuing a “sense of success”: New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 581–617.
52.
Johnson, S. M., & The Project on the Next Generation of Teachers. (2004). Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
53.
KaganD. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90.
54.
KardosS. M. (2004). Supporting and sustaining new teachers in schools: The importance of professional culture and mentoring. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
KardosS. M., JohnsonS. M., PeskeH. G., KauffmanD., & LiuE. (2001). Counting on colleagues: New teachers encounter the professional cultures of their schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 250–290.
56.
KauffmanD. (2004). Second-year teachers’ experiences with curriculum materials: A three state study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
57.
KauffmanD., JohnsonS. M., KardosS. M., LiuE., & PeskeH. G. (2002). “Lost at sea”: New teachers’ experiences with curriculum and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 273–300.
58.
KennedyM. M. (1998). Form and substance in inservice teacher education (Research Monograph No. 13). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
59.
Kentucky Teacher Internship Program. (2008). Retrieved August 30, 2008, from Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board Web site: http://www.kyepsb.net/internships/index.asp
60.
KestnerJ. L. (1994). New teacher induction: Findings of the research and implications for minority groups. Journal of Teacher Education, 45(1), 39–45.
61.
KlugB. J., & SalzmanS. A. (1991). Formal induction vs. informal mentoring: Comparative effects and outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(3), 241–251.
62.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
LuftJ., RoehrigG., & PattersonN. (2003). Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers’ practices, beliefs, and experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 77–97.
65.
McGranerK., & HenrickE. (2008, March). Effective principal leadership for teacher induction: Developing a conception of the principal's role in advancing new teacher development. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
66.
McLaughlinM. W. (1990). The RAND Change Agent study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11–16.
67.
MundryS., SpectorB., StilesK., & Loucks-HorsleyS. (1999). Working toward a continuum of professional learning experiences for teachers of science and mathematics (Research Monograph No. 17). Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Institute for Science Education.
68.
MurnaneR., SingerJ., WillettJ., KempleJ., & OlsenR. (1991). Who will teach? Policies that matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (2005). Introduction into learning communities. Retrieved July 30, 2008, from http://www.nctaf.org
70.
National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
71.
NewmannF. M., MarksH. M., & GamoranA. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104(4), 280–312.
72.
OdellS., & HulingL. (Eds.). (2000). Quality mentoring for novice teachers. Washington, DC: Association of Teacher Educators.
73.
PennellJ. R., & FirestoneW. A. (1996). Changing classroom practices through teacher networks: Matching program features with teacher characteristics and circumstances. Teachers College Record, 98(1), 46–76.
74.
PolikoffM. S., & TobinK. (2008, March). The KTIPping point: New teachers’ experiences in a statewide induction program. Paper presented at the 2008 annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
75.
PressmanJ. L., & WildavskyA. (1984). Implementation (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
RockoffJ. E. (2008). Does mentoring reduce turnover and improve skills of new employees? Evidence from teachers in New York City (NBER Working Paper No. 13868). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
79.
SchafferE., StringfieldS., & WolfeD. (1992). An innovative beginning teacher induction program: A two-year analysis of classroom interactions. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 181–192.
80.
SchwilleS., & WolfN. (1995, April). Forms of mentoring practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
81.
SlavinR. E., & MaddenN. A. (Eds.). (2001). Success for all: Research and reform in elementary school education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
82.
SmithT. M. (2007). How do state-level induction and standards-based reform policies affect induction experiences and turnover among new teachers?American Journal of Education, 113, 273–309.
83.
SmithT. M., & IngersollR. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover?American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681–714.
84.
SRI International. (2004). Review of research on the impact of beginning teacher induction on teacher quality and retention. Menlo Park, CA: Author.
85.
VanderhaarJ., & McGranerK. (2008, March). Divergent perceptions: New teacher challenges in two large urban districts. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
86.
VeenmanS. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143–178.
87.
WangJ., & OdellS. J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards-based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481–546.
88.
WayneA. J. (2012). Key lessons about induction for policy makers and researchers. NSSE Yearbook, 111(2), 491–498.
89.
WechslerM. E., CasparyK., HumphreyD. C., & MatskoK. K. (2012). Examining the effects of new teacher induction. NSSE Yearbook, 111(2), 387–416.
90.
Wollman-BonillaJ. E. (1997). Mentoring as a two-way street. Journal of Staff Development, 18(3), 50–52.
91.
WrightP. S., HornS. P., & SandersW.L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57–67.
92.
YoungsP., FrankK., ThumY. M., & LowM. (2012). The motivation of teachers to produce human capital and conform to their social contexts. NSSE Yearbook, 111(2), 248–272.
93.
YuskoB., & Feiman-NemserS. (2008). Embracing contraries: Combining assistance and assessment in new teacher induction. Teachers College Record, 110(5) 923–953.