Aspen Institute, Education and Society Program, and the Annenberg Institute for School Reform, Brown University. (2006). Strong foundation, evolving challenges: A case study to support leadership transition in Boston Public Schools.Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute, Education and Society Program, and Providence, RI: Brown University, the Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
2.
ChristmanJ. B., & CorcoranT. B. (2002). The limits and contradictions of systemic reform: The Philadelphia story.Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
3.
CorcoranT. B. (2007). Teaching matters: How state and local policymakers can improve the quality of teachers and teaching. (CPRE Policy Brief RB-48). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
4.
FullanM. (2011, April). Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform. (Seminar Series Paper No. 204). East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Centre for Strategic Education.
5.
HenigJ. R. (2012). The politics of data use. Teachers College Record, 114(11).
6.
HillP. T. (2011). Leadership and governance in New York City School reform. In O'DayJ. A., BitterC. S., & GomezL. M. (Eds.), Education reform in New York City: Ambitious change in the nation's most complex school system. (pp. 17–32). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
7.
HonigM., CoplandM. A., RaineyL., LortonJ. A., & NewtonM. (2010). Central office transformation for district-wide teaching and learning improvement.Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Learning at the University of Washington.
8.
JenningsJ. L. (2012). The effects of accountability system design on teachers’ use of test score data. Teachers College Record, 114(11).
LeanaC. R. (2011). The missing link in school reform. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(4), 30–35.
11.
MarshJ. A. (2012). Interventions promoting educators’ use of data: Research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record, 114(11).
12.
MartinezM., & HarveyJ. (2004). From whole school to whole system reform. Report of a Working Conference sponsored by The National Clearinghouse for Comprehensive School Reform in Partnership with the Annenberg Institute for School Reform, Consortium for Policy Research in Education, and New American Schools. Washington, DC: The National Clearinghouse for Comprehensive School Reform.
13.
MurnaneR. J., CityE. A., & SingletonK. (2008). Using data to inform decision making in urban school districts: Progress and new challenges. Voices in Urban Education, 18, 5–13.
14.
PhenixD., SiegelD., ZaltsmanA., & FruchterN. (2005). A forced march for failing schools: Lessons from the New York City Chancellor's District. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(40), 1–24.
15.
RowanB., CorrentiR., MillerR. J., & CamburnE. M. (2009). School improvement by design: Lessons from a study of comprehensive school reform programs.Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
16.
School Communities That Work: A National Task Force on the Future of Urban Districts. (2002). School Communities That Work for results and equity.Providence, RI: Brown University, Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
17.
SimmonsW. (2007). From smart districts to smart education systems: A broader agenda for educational development. In RothmanR. (Ed.), City schools: How districts and communities can create smart education systems. (pp. 191–214). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
18.
SimmonsW. (2011). What will it take to end inequities in access to effective teaching?Voices in Urban Education, 31, 2–6.
19.
SupovitzJ. (2006). The case for district-based reform.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
20.
SupovitzJ. A. (2012). Getting at student understanding—The key to teachers’ use of test data. Teachers College Record, 114(11).
21.
UcelliM., FoleyE., & MishookJ. (2007). Smart districts as the key entry point to smart education systems. In RothmanR. (Ed.), City schools: How districts and communities can create smart education systems. (pp. 41–56). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
22.
WasleyP. A., FineM., GladdenM., HollandN., KingS. P., MosakE., & PowellL. C. (2000). Small schools, great strides: A study of new small schools in Chicago.New York, NY: Bank Street College of Education.